Arpaio to Soledad: I’m not concerned about politics, I’m concerned about doing what’s right for Arizona

Soledad O’Brien had Sheriff Arpaio on this morning to talk about the conflict between the executive order by Arizona Gov. and the new federal regulations as it relates to illegals getting drivers licenses. When she asks which law he’s going to follow, he mentions how the feds are suing him which made me laugh. But in reality, he says he swore an oath to uphold the laws of the state of AZ.

When asked how this is going to affect the GOP as it relates to politics, Arpaio said that whats more important is doing what is right and even said that he is a good example of someone who doesn’t do things based on politics. Awesome! I love the confidence.

Watch below:

Comment Policy: Please read our new comment policy before making a comment. In short, please be respectful of others and do not engage in personal attacks. Otherwise we will revoke your comment privileges.
  • poljunkie

    We love Sheriff Joe here in Arizona.

    • poljunkie

      It’s hard to believe Sheriff Joe is 80.

      He rocks.

      • 80? Wow, I would have guess around 65

        • poljunkie

          I know, I couldnt believe it either.

        • The secret is clean living. No, really. Colonel Neville.

      • Conservative_Hippie

        A crook a day keeps the doctor away.
        Catch two crooks and see me in the morning.

    • WhiteGuy2

      I am moving to Arizona in the spring of 2013, cant wait to settle in and enjoy the sun.

      • poljunkie

        Where to, if you dont mind me asking?

        • WhiteGuy2

          I’ll be house hunting in Arizona City, and the Phoenix area.

          • WordsFailMe

            Hope you bag a nice one, WG

            • WhiteGuy2

              Thanks WFM!

          • poljunkie

            Wow, you should be able to find a great house for good value on the dollar.
            We are in Northern Arizona.
            You will love the weather, although it does get a little toasty sometimes.

            • WhiteGuy2

              Yea I cant wait, been planning this move for a yr now. Gonna Retire from CT Dep Of Correction in a few months. Caint wait to live in a red state and enjoy life for a change.

              • poljunkie

                Thats great, good for you. ENJOY IT. Bring your hat and sunscreen.

              • DebbyX

                Sorry to see ya go, but good for you. CT stinks, aren’t you going to miss Gov. Dannel P. Malloy, income tax and a 6.35 sales tax?

                • WhiteGuy2

                  lol wont miss it for a second, taxes are too damn high.

      • unclesamnephew

        hey whitey, i will not leave Ohio until Az admend their constitution, stating i do not have to buy into “Obama-care”

        • Orangeone

          Will be repealed in Jan 2013 so no need to worry about AZ amending their constitution.

    • warpmine

      He never ventured into politics which isn’t that rare in law enforcement as he only concentrated on what he knew best enforcement. Had he been a sniveling snake in the grass lawyer, well, it might have been different. We know there can never be enough laws on the books or constituencies to pander to in order to fleece the public.

  • Freempg

    No questions by Ms O’Brien about Obama’s forged birth certificate? Didn’t think so.

    • toongoon

      Go figure! You’d think that as a news professiona……oh I see, IF she were a news professional she would have asked nonbiased questions. Heck, I think news professionals oughta be on the endangered species list.

      Her species are like cucarachas. Oops. Was that racist?

      • WordsFailMe


      • Soledad O’Brien is really a sad excuse for a so-called journalist. She gets talking points from leftist Websites and blogs ( see )and uses them to try to entrap and discredit her opponents (yes, I used opponents and not interviewees). She cannot think for herself and do the serious research required of a journalist before her interro…uh, interviews begin. Once upon a time I’m sure that Ms. O’Brien did practice responsible journalism. Now, she merely appears to be just another apparatchik of the DNC and the Obama WH. Quite pathetic.

        • Chris, “interviews” should be more like interrogations if you ask me. And where she gets her talking points is irrelevant. The question — AND THE ONLY QUESTION — should be are her facts correct. And I realize with both sides lots of times those facts are not correct, but just because she asks a Republican tough questions doesn’t mean she’s not practicing responsible journalism. It means the exact OPPOSITE. Asking tough question is what a journalist is SUPPOSED to do and if her guests are too ill-prepared to answer her questions then that is THEIR FAULT.

          • Then why go to journalism school and learn how to actually do research the herself, instead of getting her talking points from a blog (which can easily be Googled by anybody)? At least she could have been more discreet about where she was getting her “tough” questions from. The people who answered her questions, especially Sununu, seemed to know where she was getting her ideas from.

      • warpmine

        They are in fact extinct and have been for 8 decades as Walter Duranty saw to that. What we’ve had is a something out of Star Trek, a coelecent being that mimics the host while it consumes it. Outwardly having the same emotions and knowledge of the host. And we thought S-T was fantasy.

      • Biased questions? You mean like questions that actually put Republicans on the spot. Now, I know you guys are tired of her making you look stupid on tv but there’s no need to exaggerate.

        • toongoon

          I mean that she should be seeking the truth. She didn’t listen to Arpaio’s answers, she only reads the talking points of the obama campaign and far left web sites. She also doesn’t ask probing questions of the left and obama in similar fashion.
          That’s called bias, look it up.

          The difference between you and me is that I balance my opinion on what the facts are, while you are satisfied with the media only attacking Republicans.

          When everything is said and done I kinda hope you will learn that men who are raised to deity status through lies and false narratives are not good leaders but become dictators. It doesn’t take two minutes of free thinking to realize that but free thinking is not something the left aspires to, so it is my goal that you never have to find out what obama is like once he has no opposition.

    • Imagine that…

      Excellent point, Freempg.

      However, it’s not really necessary to imagine no questions by Soledad O’brien about Obama’s birth certificate on ANY msm program.


      For the same reason that the ORIGINAL intent of the ORIGINAL words of the ORIGINAL ‘Birther’ document of our Republic, the U.S. Constitution, specifically Article 2 Section Clause 5 is not addressed by the BIG Talkers on radio and BIG Bloggers on the web.

      What is Article 2 Section 1 Clause 5?

      The ONLY place in the founding documents,

      – Declaration of Independence
      – Articles of Confederation
      – U.S. Constitution

      where ‘natural born Citizen’ and ‘Citizen’ are contrasted in the SAME Clause 5, in the SAME sentence, separated by a comma and the word ‘or’ that is put there by the Founders with original intent.

      Sheriff Joe Arpaio’s Cold Case Posse investigation into BHObama’s fraudulent birth certificate, fraudulent SS # and fraudulent Selective Service is NOT addressed on Democrat OR Republican BIG Talker radio programs or BIG Blogger web site… or forums.


      Who knows.

      They don’t talk about Article 2 Section 1 Clause 5, right?

      That is for them to articulate.


      ‘Cause it could happen again with another OCCUPIER-in-Chief in the future

      Maybe they, BIG Talkers on radio and tv and BIG Bloggers on the web will explain to ‘we the people’ why the eligibility of BHObama is a ‘no-go-zone’ for thoughtful discussion as is evident in this short comment.

      Your thoughtful and pertinent question, Freempg, deserves an answer from the BIG Talker and BIG Blogger perpetrators of silence.


      • sjmom

        Can you tell me what would happen if it was proven Obama is not a natural born citizen? I’ve tried to find this out but to no avail and would like to know.

        • Freempg

          mom, we would be in no-man’s land. Our Supreme Court justices, with their life-long tenure and cozy (we really like each other incestousness) are too debauched and lazy to think about it. The “Roberts Court” is a disgrace, and will live in infamy for its decision on Obamacare but mostly for its “avoiding” the pentultimate constitutional threat of our time (or any other time):

          • sjmom

            Here’s my question; I’ve heard we’d be in a constitutional crisis, but what exactly does it mean? If any president was ineligible and yet had served in office would that null and void every law they signed, such as Obamacare?

            • Freempg

              Yes. Many questions would arise, like who would succeed the President, the VP or the Speaker of the House, how would the President be removed if we was ruled by the Supreme Court to be ineligible and the Congress refused to impeach? Would his appointees have to recuse themselves and all their unrelated decisions be vacated? On and on and on. But that’s no excuse that we do nothing.

              • George Payne

                He is not eligible to hold the office and doesn’t need to be impeached just removed and tried for treason.

          • There would be a national furor. Our Constitution would be seriously undermined. An unconstitutional act would have been committed and Congress would have no choice but to move forward with impeachment proceedings. Hardcore Obamatons would go into collective fecal apoplexy and clamor for Prez O to remain in office. I could only assume that there may be civil unrest, but who’s to say what would really happen?

        • If…

          What would happen if…?

          That’s a good question sjmom.

          Absolutely nothin’.

          2 Possible imprachment scenarios.

          1 –
          Impeachment by the House of Representatives?

          – Not necessary.
          Impeachment is only necessary against a legal office holder.

          – Won’t happen.
          With a weak-willed House of Representatives, controlled by weak-willed Republicans, and a strong willed in-your-face Democrat controlled Senate, impeachment proceedings agains a Democrat Usurper-in-Chief, the titular head of the ‘occupy’ movement, aka the OCCUPIER-in-Chief, is a no-go from the get-go.

          2 –
          Impeachment confirmation and conviction by Senate / Supreme Court Chief Justice?

          – Won’t happen.

          As U.S. Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas told a House subcommittee,

          >> “We are evading that one [the eligibility issue].”

          1min. 16sec. –

          Thomas –

          “And you don’t have to be born in the United States.”

          A reference to the Constitution, which requires the President to be a ‘natural-born Citizen,’ not simply a ‘Citizen,’ but has no such clause for a Supreme Court justice, a state Governor or a state or federal Senator or a state or federal Representative or a Mayor.

          Serrano –

          “Oh really?

          “So you haven’t answered the one about whether I can serve as president, but you answer this one? [about Serrano being a Supreme Court Justice]”

          Thomas –

          “We’re evading that one.”

          Followed by laughter in the chamber.

          Of course, there are legal nuances relative to laws passed and Executive Orders, but, we’re seeing illegal conduct by the highest office holder in America being minimized and laughed at by elected and appointed officals.

          So, sjmom, that’s America today.


        • Richard Laycock

          When the issue first came up Hugh Hewitt, a constitutional law attorney, pointed out that the founders did not proscribe in law any remedy for an elected President who does not meet the constitutional requirements. That means the only legal means to get the bum out is by impeachment. The odds of the GOP leading that charge? Absolutely ZERO!

        • George Payne

          He would be removed from office and all documents he signed would be null and void. That is one reason that R’s and D’s will not admit that he is not an NBC.

          • sjmom

            That’s what I thought too. It’s a national disgrace when politicians put themselves before the Constitution. The Founders are rolling over in their graves. It’s time for a huge, huge change! God help us is my prayer.

      • Freempg

        Art, we are living an episode of the Twilight Zone. I need only add one item to your excellent post:

        The scrubbing of Justia with regards to Minor v. Happersett, an 1874 decision which “contains language that appears to disqualify anyone from presidential eligibility who wasn’t born in the country to parents who were citizens.”

        • Justia and Soros…

          Thanks for the excellent American Thinker article url Freempg. I had not read it yet.

          “Public Resource Org

          “It turns out that Justia received additional help from their close counterpart in the open government information movement, Public Resource Org (PRO), founded and run by Carl Malamud.

          “Malamud was also the chief technology officer for The Center for American Progress, a progressive think-tank funded in part by none other than George Soros.”

          So, now we know that Soros is the Justia puppet master.


      • toongoon

        Art, I thought you fell off the face of the Earth. I’m glad you are back, I’ve missed reading your posts.

        • Hi toongoon…


          If I didn’t write so much in comments I could post at more forums more often.

          However, when the opportunity arises, comments about the eligibility issue relative to Article 2 Section 1 Clause 5 inspire my thinking and it just has to come out.


      • Again, asking El Presidente, Harry the Horrible, Nincompoop Nancy, et al relevant, hard-hitting questions would require Ms. O’Brien to be a responsible, objective journalist. When she interrog…oops…interviews her ideological opposites, she makes her condescension and bias evident.

      • No one addresses the birth certificate matter because THEY CONSIDER THE MATTER CLOSED. Even REPUBLICANS have said this. Obama released his SHORT and LONG form birth certificates. There is an announcement in a HAWAIIAN newspaper telling of his birth.

        Now, is it possible that this is some big conspiracy by the Obama camp to hide the fact that his not a native-born citizen. Certainly, anything’s possible. But certainly, you can see how a reasonable person would surmise that he is in fact born here in the United States given these facts.

  • 911Infidel

    Illegal aliens deserve nothing. If your so worried about their kids, the kids can go back to their home countries with their parents. Come through the legal system through the front door…otherwise, you are an illegal and should be deported. God Bless Sheriff Joe. Were it that we had someone like him sitting in the AG’s chair right now.

    • p m

      Very true – they make them out to be ‘victims’, for God’s sake.

    • librtifirst

      “Illegal aliens deserve nothing”

      Nobody does who didn’t earn it. Taking from us to give to anyone is a crime. Joe has a simple way about him, doesn’t he? “If they are here illegally, then we can solve the problem if they get legal before coming here”. (beautiful)


      That’s what he said, if they get legal that would solve it.

      Falls on deaf ears though. They want amnesty for all, disregard of our laws, more votes for O and the Dems, and general up yours!!

  • p m

    She questioned his integrity when he wouldn’t bite on her ridiculous GOP baiting!! What a tool. So the GOP might be hurt because the demographics in Arizona are trending more Latino? Duh – that may be so if she’s including all the illegal aliens. And why pre-suppose that it’s the GOP who would be hurt by that? Gee, talk about racist. Seems the dems want to keep the Latinos on the plantation same as the blacks.

    The people of Arizona – legal residents, not those who live there illegally – have already spoken and it’s to be hoped that in 2013 THEIR wishes will be heeded. Not before time.

    • WordsFailMe

      You know, nobody ever talks about the slavery that was the norm in Mexico and Central and South America. There were literally more black slaves wearing Latino iron chains than there were living in the US. When the economies collapsed as the Europeans were driven out, democracy ensued–Latin Democracy: Make every man was as dirt poor as the next. Discrimination in hiring is the law and the norm and classes are fixed by birth in Latin countries so no civil rights movement ever got off the ground. Everybody was as equally screwed as everybody else.

      These Dems would like to get the Latinos onto the liberal plantation along with the blacks, but they are going to be quite surprised. After replacing blacks in positions of power within the Party, the Latinos will be the first to break out. Debbie Wasserman Schultz and the CBC will have sandal prints all over the top of their heads.

      I worked for an Egyptian Muslim who was partial to illegals. (Strange to hear Spanish with a North African accent). Some of these people were violently anti-communist and immediately recognized the obvious communist leanings of Obama.

      Pray for a miracle.

      • WhiteGuy2

        Exactly, and the native South American tribes as well. They are all extinct, all that remains is ancient ruins and a few very impressive pyramids.

        • WordsFailMe

          WG: Think there are any Affirmative Action plans, expedited university applications and preference in hiring and promotion for the native South Americans who survived?

          The USA is such a terrible country> I’m surprised any body wants to come here…

          • WhiteGuy2

            “WG: Think there are any Affirmative Action plans, expedited university applications and preference in hiring and promotion for the native South Americans who survived?”

            Nope, and you will never hear the Liberals complain about it either.

            Strange how the hispanic countries get a pass, while Americans are constantly reminded how we stole this land from the indians.

  • WhiteGuy2

    We could put a stop to the political antics if we just adopt the very same immigration policy that Mexico has, virtually identical laws.

    • sDee

      I think our immigration laws are sufficient but we could solve most of the problem by simply enforcing our federal immigration laws. Instead we actually provide illegals all of the benefits of citizenship, tax exemption, plus immunity from most civil and criminal prosecution. Why?

      An equally dangerous situation is the 1965 immigration act. The political class in DC has been using it to establish dangerous immigration policy that for decades, n importing anti-American subversives (islamists, communists, activists). Why?

      These are ticking time bombs yet with every change of crimes bosses in DC, they all continue with both. It is intentional. The central government does not want to fix this problem. It serves them well.

      • Patriot077

        Yes, the 1965 Act also permitted “chain migration” which allowed the new naturalized citizens to invite family members to join them … this is one reason the numbers have exploded. There is no test for sponsorship, education, skills …

        As Mark Levin says, we are the only country that foregoes its own responsibility to admit immigrants who are beneficial to the US, their adopted country. We have been so stupid!

  • gothicreader

    Bad A$$ Joe – you go man!

  • Pharmacognosist

    Jan Brewer is a GREAT , GREAT American. Margret Thatcher has nothing on her. She is the best. Sheriff Joe, we love you. You are doing what is right and the majority of Americans are behind you. You are a winner.

  • Army_Pilot1967

    What does Sol-Mama not understand about the word “illegal?” Heaven’s sake, if people are here illegally they shouldn’t be given the status of a U.S. citizen…they should be considered as ILLEGAL ALIENS!!!!

  • unclesamnephew

    hey cousins! i have a question for you. have you e-mailed the govenor of your state demanding that they do the same as govenor Bewer? one state alone cannot fill the gap Obama has made.

    • sDee

      In 2010 we replaced our state house and senate with Republicans for the first time in 100years. Our pathetic excuse for a governor and a human being, vetoed their legislation.

      She is so damn scared of we the people, that she is not even running for reelection.

      • WordsFailMe

        so she’s smarter that she looks, eh?

      • MLCBLOG

        Wow! that is a success story and a half!!

    • toongoon

      Governor Quinn is determined to destroy the state of Illinois in the mold of Zero. He has no clue how to govern for the people. We’re just waiting for him to occupy the cell next to Blagojevich or Ryan.

  • Absolutely, Sheriff Joe, do what is right to protect the state of Arizona.

  • GreenBeretWay

    What a stark contrast between Sheriff Joe and Joe Blow Biden.


    • unclesamnephew

      and i thought joe’s middle name was bite me. according to mark levin it is


      Today Joe B’s friend received $20 million to start a business in — where? the Ukraine.

  • Pharmacognosist

    Soledad O’Brien is a pathetic reporter. She is not a virtuous person. There is no truth in her. What a sick, sick, sick human being.

  • WordsFailMe

    The deferment is only for 2 years. Can they make a special law for DL’s which expire in 2 years? What’s the cost to the state? What’s the point?

    Joe say we can talk about the problem We’re the greatest country in the world we can solve problem.

    But it’s pretty hard to talk when some pretend American/Closet, dog-munching Muslim is using a nation of slaves and traitors to jam laws down my throat. Doesn’t put me in the mood to “chat”, Sollydead.

    Great bumper sticker today: “LEGALIZE THE CONSTITUTION”

  • MaxineCA

    Love, love, love Sheriff Joe! He is a true Oath Keeper! I remember when there was the big controversy during the time of SB1070 and the DOJ going after Joe, a reporter asked him if he was worried about the politics. In typical straight face Joe fashion he replied “I wasn’t appointed by some political hack, I was elected by the people to uphold the law and keep them safe and that’s what I do.”

    When the O’s DOJ went after him – he was like “bring it on”. Let’s get to discovery so I can see your evidence. He would not let Holder intimidate him or determine how he would run his department.

    Then there were complaints about the food served to the inmates (it wasn’t “nutritional”) the county annexed additional land to him and he set up a huge vegetable farm that the inmates run. Whatever vegies aren’t used at the facility, are sent to a farmers market and the profits go back to the facility to offset the cost of the facility. The county wins!

    When there were complaints about his tent cities in the hot desert heat, his response was, if you don’t want to be there, don’t break the law. He got a little angry and also added, if you think they have it bad here, how do you think our troops feel in Afghanistan in full gear?

    He also implemented a dog rescue program which relieved the country animal shelters of over crowding and saved many, many dogs from being euthanized. Inmates with good behavior were given the privilege to care and train their dog so it would be adoptable. The adoption fees well offset the cost of the dog food and care. Another win for the county (as well as the furry friends).

    I wish there was a reporter who would focus on the great things he has done for his county. He may not win a personality contest, but what a great guy!

    • poljunkie

      For the male inmates: Pink Bologne, to go with their pink boxers, and pink socks.

      Did you know he also has one of the very few female chain gangs? They do work on the local highways, and around the city of Phoenix.

      Yet they all seem to like and respect him, and when he visits they reach out to shake his hand and ask for autographs.

      • MaxineCA

        I believe the inmates respect him. Aside from the fury friends he has saved, can you imagine how many lives he’s turned around to becoming productive citizens?

        He must me doing something right, considering his enemies (DOJ, ACLU, illegal advocates, MX……. etc.)

        • poljunkie

          I totally agree.

          Awhile back, there was a show on a local PHX channel highlighting the dogs/prisoners, and it really showed how they became responsible. In many cases it was the first time they had something to take care of, love, and that loved them back. It gave them purpose.

        • I agree. If you’re angering the Obama DOJ, ACLU, and other so-called equal rights and humanitarian organizations; you must be doing something right.

    • According to Obama, Sheriff Joe didn’t build that. No, he didn’t do that. He needed roads, bridges, and a fancy jail to achieve what he did. He had to have some teacher or guiding force in his life. It seems to me Sheriff Joe is a teacher, guiding force, and innovator…no thanks to the government.

  • stevenbiot

    I love Sheriff Joe! Why does Soledad have to be so hot? It would be much easier to talk smack on her if she looked like Maddow.

    • Beauty may be skin deep, but ugly is to the bone.

  • sjmom

    The sheriff is right. This is all about politics and Obama buying votes. It’s not about concern for anyone but himself, especially all of us who are citizens.

  • keninil

    Joe should offer to help Soledad go under cover as an illegal alien in Mexico. Let her find out what happens to someone who is caught without papers in old Mexico.

    • ConnieConservative

      Fantastic idea, Ken! I wish she would.

  • Nukeman60

    Does anyone find it ironic that these people are standing in lines by the thousands to get the amnesty paperwork that costs them $500 to do so and they are not complaining one bit, but the same crowd is decrying the travesty that it costs them $5-$20 to get an ID for voting? Hmmm…

    • I’m betting the States will waive the fee for ID’s for folks who are on SSI or SSDI, foodstamps, or any other of a host of other support programs that require ID’s in order to receive benefits.

      • Nukeman60

        Yep, it just shows the scam artists at work. Plus the fact that every state that has voter ID laws allows that person, who is trying to vote without an ID, the chance to vote a provisional ballot. The left never mentions that. It doesn’t fit the agenda.

      • iirc georgia was going to fully cover the costs for anyone that needed an id.
        I may be remembering wrong though.

    • kong1967

      I’m a little confused here. People standing in line that are illegal shouldn’t be able to get a driver’s liscense to vote. I know the left wants them to be able to vote via killing the crackdown on voter fraud so they won’t even need a driver’s liscense to vote, but that’s a little different. So I’m not sure what you mean.

      It’s probably not you, by the way. I’m infamous for misunderstanding people, lol.

      • Nukeman60

        I’m not talking about the people in line. I’m talking about the people that are complaining photo IDs are stopping other people from voting because they cost $5-$20, while they don’t make a squeak when it will cost ‘their people’ $500 to get amnesty. Keep in mind these people in line are their future constituents.

        And btw, it’s not necessarily a driver’s license, but a photo ID, period.

        Edit: State requirements to vote:

        • kong1967

          Ah….gotcha! See, I told you I was good at misunderstanding. I re-read your original post and now it seems so obvious what you meant. 🙂

          • Nukeman60

            No, no. I think I worded it poorly. Thank you for bringing it up. You never hear someone come out and say, “I want to vote, but I don’t have the $5 for a photo ID”. It’s always some political pundit saying, “But, but, there are 10% of the voting public that are without an ID and you’re stopping them from doing so because they just can’t afford the $5″.

            I haven’t heard a single person come out and say, “Hey, these poor illegals can’t afford the $500 to get their amnesty”. I’m assuming the illegals are better off financially than 10% of the legal voting populace. One wonders where they get the money if they actually need this amnesty to get a job.

            They must all be winning the lottery on a daily basis. Lucky them.

            • kong1967

              Yeah, that’s true. Libs say there is no evidence of voter fraud so it must be true, lol.

              Not only is what you say a contradiction in their complaints, but they don’t seem too worried about the military vote, either. They sue every election to try to get a lot of them blocked. That’s the only evidence I need to see their character for what it really is.

    • Bravo! Fantastic observation!

  • Issuing driver’s licenses is a state right not a federal duty, the Congress has no say over the matter. Also, driver’s licenses are issued by the state not a local sheriff.

    In fighting Arizona’s immigration law, the Administration argued that setting immigration policy was the job of the federal government and not the states. In fighting this illegal attempt to win over latino voters, states should look at the Constitution. Article 1, Section 8 states that “The Congress shall have Power … To establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization”. The power to set immigration policy is explicitly given to the Congress and NOT to the Executive branch. What Obama has done is an unConstitutional powergrab and should be treated as such.

  • Be nice if we had a Supreme Court Chief Justice who felt the same way as Sheriff Joe.

    • kong1967

      That’s true, but it would be nice if we could find many of anyone in a position of power that’s standing up to illegal immigration the way Brewer and Arpaio are.

    • Indeed, what a disappointment he is.

  • chatterbox365

    Interesting how Soledad O’Brien doesn’t try to f**k with Sheriff Joe like she tries to do with the other guest who appear on her lame show.

    Arizona has [email protected] and that’s the kind of leadership our country needs. Gov Brewer and Sheriff Joe rock!

    • I venture to say that some people will move to Arizona because of people like Governor Brewer and Sheriff Joe. Then again, they have John McCain. Aside from being a war hero, he is a flop as a politician. Arizona is not a bad place, if you can endure the heat.

      • poljunkie

        Summers can be extreme but the rest of the year the temp is amazing!

  • WhiteGuy2

    If this country is to survive the Democrat party must come to terms with the fact that the federal government was not founded as a charitable organisation. Providing charity was not the intent of the federal government! Charity is wonderful when given of ones free will. Remove free will and charity has no meaning. YOU CANNOT IMPOSE CHARITY! Free will as given to us by God himself is paramount!

  • white531

    You are looking at one of the last true Patriots in this country who is standing in front of those who are taking us every day toward a Socialist nation. God Bless Him.

  • BS61

    Thanks Scoop – but it’s been a bad Soledad week enough for me – she makes my blood pressure rise!

  • kong1967

    He is another great fighter against Obama, Holder and the illegals. Arizona seems to have a monopoly on the toughest fighers we have on the issue at the moment, lol.

  • The one and only Sheriff Joe.

  • Ms. O’Brien watched what she said to her guest and at least feigned some respect, for a change. That was a clever move.
    Go Sheriff Joe!

  • BM all

    Only reason Obama made this executive order to give illegals driver license and other things on election year is so he can get around the voter id laws that have been put in place.

  • ConnieConservative

    Well, she did smirk a lot less than she usually does at her conservative
    guests. That is an improvement. Good for Sheriff Arpaio. He swears to
    uphold the law and he does!

  • Overwhelm the welfare system.

  • God I detest the Communist News Network. This dolt doesn’t seem to understand the word “ILLEGAL” as in against the Law. It makes no matter who brought them here, they are committing a crime just by being in the country illegally. If it wasn’t for CNN – and their cohorts – corruption, this Alien problem would be solved….

  • The problem isn’t the fact that Sheriff Joe is going to enforce the law; the problem is that the federal government DIDN’T enforce the law, thereby allowing millions to flow into this country unchecked. How dare the liberals blame Joe for a problem that was created by so-called “compassionate” liberals. If they were so damned compassionate, they wouldn’t have let this problem fester the way it has. This problem can be stemmed and stopped, right now! Seal the border. If we had the will power to do so, we could stop the flow of illegals in a month’s time but the will to do so isn’t there.

    Obama signed that executive order for one reason; to secure illegal votes. In his hollow, little mind, he thinks that any vote should be counted, regardless of where it comes from. If he had his way, he would have entire socialist countries voting in our election. He simply doesn’t care. He’s already shown that he hates our political system, he hates our Constitution and our way of life.

  • hongryhawg

    O’Brien’s arrogance makes me puke. And that sing-song teenage voice. Please. Physically, you are an adult. Allow your brain to catch up.

  • Charm4sure

    I just love how these phoney journalists like Soledad read a quote from a newspaper editorial as though it is the word of GOD. These people are so lazy and lacking in intellectual curiosity they don’t do any investigation or make any effort to fairly consider these issues they just take turns pushing the Democrat party talking points by quoting each other regurgitating the Democrat party talking points.

  • blackyb

    Joe Arpaio is a good, decent, branve and honorable man who is standing when many are sticking their head in the sand. Joe and his investigative team are right all the way around. Obama should not be in the White House for many reasons and the main one is that he is not eligible another one is he is not fit if he was eligible. Put his phony and criminal azz in jail.

  • blackyb

    A man who has lived 8 decades or almost a century knows something. Listen to him.

  • Jay

    Como se dice “absorbed into our culture? No comprendo.

  • j


  • aZjimbo

    What a condescending witch. They will never, ever defeat Sheriff Joe.