Good, throw them all out and drag Obama out with them. He is ruining our country, and I just heard that our credit rating dropped again blame it all on him.
Great for the courts. Hopefully this is only the first of many firewalls that will stand against the subverts. Maybe we're starting to move back to the right direction for Americas prosperity.
Go Mark Go!!! You da Man!
Now, can Obama be charged with some sort of misconduct?
Can we at the least see him in the corner with a dunce cap on his head?!!
I am sick and tired of this jerk sliding around the law of this land without consequence.
It's time for the judges to throw the library at this egomaniac.
Obama is a lawless criminal who stepped over the line one too many times. But he'll do it again and again. He needs to be challenged anytime he does anything.
Is it any surprise Obama is ignoring this court order? From Levin's tweet: http://washingtonexaminer.com/nlrb-we-will-continue-to-act-despite-the-appeals-court-decision/article/2519736
mambo already whining about it...
calls it unpresidented
...also from the Great White North , your DEAR LEADER PART II O B A M A is a reflection of your low information VOTER and is also a J O K E of a leader ."
The appts were in early 2012 so to reach a Ct of Appeals decision in less than one year is actually quite quick. The case was argued early December.
I do understand why, I was venting... lol!!...but its just soo frustrating, waiting for the "Wheels of Justice" to turn on these things.
Hopefully this decision will hold up...... :)
No apology needed....really!! Carolyn wrote a great analogy, thanks for the link!!! :)
At the very least.... this court’s ruling will go toward the restoring the “constitutional separation of powers.”
What is truly aggravating, is just this week we saw Obama re-take the oath of office...and even after this ruling....they continue to mock the Constitution and the courts who do not agree with them as this was their response to the ruling!
Carney: "The White House strongly disagreed with the court’s decision, calling it “novel and unprecedented.”
Sorry, I've only seen a couple of your posts so wasn't sure of /sarc . This one actually did move quickly....I'm sure Barky will tell them to slooooooowwwwwww dddddddooooooowwwwwnnnnn their schedule....I read the entire decision, and although I am not an attorney, it is solid on Constitutional provision and long-standing case law (other court decisions). There is a nice write-up with decision quotes here http://constfreparty.blogspot.com/2013/01/obamas-appointments-to-national-labor.html
Landmark Legal Foundation has their amicus brief and press release on their home page. It was their "the Recess" position that the Court agreed with to find the appts unconstitutional! BTW, the Foundation is a 501(c)(3) corporation and accepts donations online.
Finally, a little good news. We sure could use it. Maybe this is the beginning of putting the breaks on Obama's imperial power? I sure hope it is.
I don't think so. In reading the appellate opinion, it is very, very strong in its Constitutional foundation.
There were very stong arguments made in regards to the unconstitutional nature of the affordable care act, but, that was upheld.
MN has been collecting medical information for several years. They continue to experience privacy breaches in many state departments, can only imagine how much of our medical information has been reviewed, utilized and disseminated. It is frightening. Our docs have also been asking about guns for years....It is time for it to end and WE are in the perfect position to do it.
Not only is this bill containing multiple taxes, there is also a provision in it that allows the government to change things @ will...
Once fully implemented.......the Federal government will have total control over how doctors can treat individuals...and a data base of all our personal information. (this data base is already being implemented)
I also believe in time the new system (aka Obamacare) will sink under it’s own weight..thus paving the way for Obama to save it with a single payer system, which was his plan all along.
This is a classic case of bait and switch. The gov't got everyone focused on the Commerce Clause (which we did win, Constitutional portion) and then switched the argument to a tax which is Constitutional. If you read the 2700 pages, you will find 21 taxes contained within so it's not like they were unknown.
Once we are subject to the tax, we have been harmed and have standing to sue. And there are people just waiting to sue! In my particular case, I will sue because I must pay for coverage I do not need, I will be taxed because I have too good of insurance and taxed if I cancel it. I just have to wait.
But the government argued and Obama argued that it was NOT a tax, and then argued that the supreme court should not rule on the case at all when they switched their story of it being a tax, therefore the court had no reason to bring a decision until someone actually had to pay it with the anti-injunction act. They totally pulled that ruling out of the air, Roberts being the chief culprit. I think they have something on him, personally, and they will pull that string again. If there is something they are blackmailing him with, I hope it comes out.
The only issue before the SCOTUS was the individual mandate. Until we are levied the tax, we do not have standing to sue. The SCOTUS upheld based on the gov't's ability to tax which has been found to be CONSTITUTIONAL previously. The Constitutional issues were found in our favor. There will be many, many more lawsuits yet, some are already up on the religious freedom claims.
The NLRB case is substantially different
This is one thing Mitch McConnell did RIGHT, appointed Miguel Estada to write the Senate's amicus brief in this case!
Well, let's just hope that this is Obama's Schecter Brothers moment. We could sure use some good news for the opposition party.
Many DemocRATic senators belong to Communist Party:
"It should come as no surprise that the Communist Party USA is on board with President Obama’s plan to attack Americans’ right to keep and bear arms as a means to “end gun violence.” A cardinal feature of communist regimes, like all dictatorships, is the prohibition of private ownership of arms, creating a monopoly of force in the hands of the State.
In a January 18 article, People’s World, an official publication of the Communist Party USA (CPUSA), declared that “the ability to live free from the fear or threat of gun violence is a fundamental democratic right — one that far supercedes any so-called personal gun rights allegedly contained in the Second Amendment.”
"President Barack Obama violated the Constitution"
I kinda stopped reading right there. Just sums it all up, don't it?
He will somehow get his way...Constitution be dammed. This just made him mad, and we're to weak to impeach him.