By The Right Scoop


Beck went off on a bit of a tangent this morning giving us his theory on why Olby was fired. He looks at the desperate attempts by Chris Matthews and Ed Schultz who are really after the Right with what seems like some sort of renewed passion, but he doesn’t believe it’s a coincidence. He believes that Olby was fired because he took a recent harder line against the Left and the President and now these other hosts are going the opposite way with vigor:

About 

Blogger extraordinaire since 2009 and the owner and Chief Blogging Officer of the most wonderful and super fantastic blog in the known and unknown universe: The Right Scoop

Trending Now

Comment Policy: Please read our new comment policy before making a comment. In short, please be respectful of others and do not engage in personal attacks. Otherwise we will revoke your comment privileges.


NOTE: If the comments don't load properly or they are difficult to read because they are on the blue background, please use the button below to RELOAD DISQUS.

  • Anonymous

    Glenn, you could be right!

    I only wish I had a fraction of your ability to “think out of the box” – you’re a genius!

  • http://www.theancient.us The Ancient

    I think it is much much simpler.

    Comcast is apolitical, period. They have to be in order to stay in business.

    Ogerman USED to be the ratings leader, but as has been proven many many times, GUEST host draw larger ratings that he did.

    He is also paid ALOT more money than the other hosts on the network

    so Sliding Ratings + Highest Paid Anchor = FIRED.

    Plus I look for Comcast to try and bring it back to a NEWS channel. So I bet is a Warning shot to the other anchors as well

    • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=549970585 Stacy Mack

      well the other anchors are as commie as olbie was….so don’t count on them changing..they do NOT know how to report ONLY the news…..

    • Conservative Hippie

      I hope you’re right.

    • DisturbingBehavior

      You know, if Comcast wanted to save money and get a real hard leftist/communist, I think they could just take some advice from other American companies, fire everyone and outsource all the reporting to china.
      Sure, there would be very little English spoken on the program, but you can get you got the left’s principles covered at a smidgen of the cost.
      It’s not like we wanted to hear them anyway, so I think it’d be a fantastic move.

      • Anonymous

        Just for a little more variety they could intersperce the speeches and comments from Osama Bin Laden and Al Qaida, with subtitles or translation, as they are completely indistinguishable from the commentary of the left and the Democratic party.Throw in an occasional statement by Achmadinnernut, complete with hearty endorsements by Dingy Harry and Dopey Nancy and it’s business as usual.

      • http://www.theancient.us The Ancient

        I bet you believe that the main reason companies have left the US is employee pay right???? Think Again

        • DisturbingBehavior

          whoa whoa whoa, I’m not a damn left-wing nutjob.
          There is a definite benefit to outsourcing. Stossel has covered it extensively.
          Free-trade is an important aspect to this.
          There is a cost-benefit to going overseas, and it’s more than just regulation sometimes.
          Does it mean I have to like all of it? No, but I don’t hold it against companies that do it. I understand why they do it.
          But even with this understanding of it, does it mean I can’t make a joke about it? I would hope I’d be able to, because I’d rather find the humor in things than be overly serious.

          Aside from that, it’s a jab at MSNBC, what’s wrong with a bit of humor in that direction.

        • DisturbingBehavior

          whoa whoa whoa, I’m not a damn left-wing nutjob.
          There is a definite benefit to outsourcing. Stossel has covered it extensively.
          Free-trade is an important aspect to this.
          There is a cost-benefit to going overseas, and it’s more than just regulation sometimes.
          Does it mean I have to like all of it? No, but I don’t hold it against companies that do it. I understand why they do it.
          But even with this understanding of it, does it mean I can’t make a joke about it? I would hope I’d be able to, because I’d rather find the humor in things than be overly serious.

          Aside from that, it’s a jab at MSNBC, what’s wrong with a bit of humor in that direction.

    • sadpanda

      Even simpler

    • drybackinpi

      Ancient; that must account for your thinking.

    • drybackinpi

      Ancient; that must account for your thinking.

  • Mediaaccess

    Yea, interesting enough!

  • Harvey

    as ever, glenn’s lack of self awareness is immediately amazing.

    chris matthews does a few segments on michelle bachmann and glenn says he’s obsessed, arbitrarily so.

    glenn made his tv bones using the same 60 seconds on the same 4 or 5 people for the better part of 18 months. however, that was just reasonable, rational singleminded focus as opposed to unjustifiable obsession.

    i swear, sometimes it’s like he’s not even trying to sound sensible to anyone other than him. yeesh.

    • Anonymous

      What would sound sensible to someone whose senses waived bye, bye to them already? Does anything conservative sound sensible to a lefty? From what I’ve heard from lefties, they make perfect sense, if the goal is to get to that point where full-blown Socialism reigns supreme. Don’t you agree?

      • Anonymous

        It seems they want to put individualism and our nation’s treasures on a big boat and sail pell mell into those troubled waters of individual worthlessness and collective bankruptcy.

        Conservatism is “like a Bridge Over Troubled Waters”…maybe that could “…ease your mind”.

        • Goldni007

          Rshill, I like how you reply to yourself! Are you two ppl (maybe husband and wife) using the same account? Just curious..

          your friend Goldni

          • Anonymous

            No, just me…and me. If I respond to myself I get that companion thought right next to the original thought before someone else slips in there. I tried to post a new post after a new post once and so many people squeezed in between them, my companion post made no sense.

            To those of you thinking that NONE of my posts make any sense, I have one word. Phooey.

            Happy to befriend 007.

  • http://twitter.com/PoliticalPAW PoliticalPAW

    The Real Reason…ONE “TEABAGGER” TOO MANY FOR COMCAST http://tinyurl.com/4qhvctp

    @PoliticalPAW