In BillO’s talking points tonight on military action against Syria, he gave, for the most part, the stated opinions of prominent Americans on whether or not they feel we should attack Syria. Some, like Bush and Cheney, were deducted from previous statements because they hadn’t made direct statements on this particular issue. He strolled through the list and then got to Nancy Pelosi and Sarah Palin and said this:
“Nancy Pelosi supports Mr. Obama in just about everything so she’s on board with attacking Assad.
Sarah Palin opposes Mr. Obama in just about everything so she’s against the military strike on Syria. Ms. Palin has written “Allah should sort it out.”“
Watch it in context:
Oh I see. So now Sarah Palin is one of those mindless conservatives BillO has been ranting about who only opposes action against Syria because they don’t like Obama? Is she now in that camp? Tell me BillO, does she oppose it because she wants to hurt Obama politically or just because she doesn’t like him? Or maybe she’s a racist? Why not trot that one out just like the left, BillO, because it’s just as mindless.
I can tell you why Sarah Palin opposes action against Syria and it’s not because she hates the president or just wants to hurt him by opposing him. No, it’s far more substantive than BillO conveyed to his audience. In fact, she laid out her reasons in a point by point post of which BillO only quoted the title (and he still got that wrong). I guess it was too much for him to read the entire post. But if he did he would have found Sarah Palin questioning the reasoning of the president, not because she always opposes him, but because his reasons don’t make any sense.
Read it for yourself and then email BillO at [email protected] and tell him he should do his research before falsely smearing someone like Palin, as he clearly did.