British man gets away with raping 13 yr-old because he’s Muslim

The most egregious miscarriage of justice that I’ve ever heard:

Daily Mail– A muslim who raped a 13-year-old girl he groomed on Facebook has been spared a prison sentence after a judge heard he went to an Islamic faith school where he was taught that women are worthless.

Adil Rashid, 18, claimed he was not aware that it was illegal for him to have sex with the girl because his education left him ignorant of British law.

Yesterday Judge Michael Stokes handed Rashid a suspended sentence, saying: ‘Although chronologically 18, it is quite clear from the reports that you are very naive and immature when it comes to sexual matters.’

Earlier Nottingham Crown Court heard that such crimes usually result in a four to seven-year prison sentence.

But the judge said that because Rashid was ‘passive’ and ‘lacking assertiveness’, sending him to jail might cause him ‘more damage than good’.

Rashid, from Birmingham, admitted he had sex with the girl, saying he had been ‘tempted by her’ after they met online.

They initially exchanged messages on Facebook before sending texts and chatting on the phone over a two-month period.

They then met up in Nottingham, where Rashid had booked a room at a Premier Inn.

The girl told police they stayed at the hotel for two hours and had sex after Rashid went to the bathroom and emerged wearing a condom.

Rashid then returned home and went straight to a mosque to pray. He was arrested the following week after the girl confessed what had happened to a school friend, who informed one of her teachers.

He told police he knew the girl was 13 but said he was initially reluctant to have sex before relenting after being seduced.

Read more:

Comment Policy: Please read our new comment policy before making a comment. In short, please be respectful of others and do not engage in personal attacks. Otherwise we will revoke your comment privileges.
  • Un-fuggin-believeable. The same politically correct liberal establishment proudly proclaims women’s rights, but I wonder where they would stand were this to happen here. I’m pretty sure I know where.

    • tvlgds

      We can’t offend the Mooslims!

      • True… Now if the guy had been a Christian… He’d already be in jail for the max…

        If he was a jew, they’ probably try to hang him…. 🙁

        But Muzzies… Complete pass… Sickening to the pit of my stomach.

        • Orangeone

          The libs better wake up, especially those with young daughters because they are moooslim bate. And I don’t want to hear a single lib parent whine about it either. Their children deserve the best protection and with the # of single parents and the easy online access and cell phones….well I’m going to stop there

          • CBDenver

            I hate to say it, but I don’t think liberal parents would care that their daughter got seduced by a predator. After all, he did use a condom, did’t he?

        • skyemantaray

          If he was unwilling to have sex until she “seduced” him, why were they meeting at a hotel? This judge needs to be imprisoned alongside this young man.

    • BlueGood

      So much for the separation of Religion & State hunh??

      BAASTARD!…..hope the girls’ parents or brothers take him out & cut off his gonads….to make an offering to Moohamad…..

      • If she is Muslim, more likely her parents will KILL HER for allowing herself to be raped!

    • Orangeone

      I fear it is happening here

      • debw777

        Another reason we need to keep our guns.

  • stevenbiot

    Well, I cant argue that a 6th century upbringing won’t make you ignorant of civilized law.

    • I agree… Do you ever remember those days when “ignorance of the law is no defense”? I seem to have read that a long time ago in some dusty old book in the days before Political Correctness… Ah… Those were the days.

      • stevenbiot

        Standup comedy isn’t as funny as real life nowadays is it?

    • NYGino

      Ignorance of the law is no excuse, or so we’ve been told.

  • Conniption Fitz

    This ruling sets a dangerous precedent. This will become known as the ‘Naivety’ exemption and will be used by plaintiff lawyers, making it easy to defend those who lure young girls online for the purpose of sex.

    Evidently this young girl was willing, but she was too young to legally give consent. Both she and the young man knew they were committing a crime. The judge just gave them both a pass.

  • tshtsh

    Regardless, we are held accountable ignorance the law is not a legal excuse. The administration branch of government cannot wait to start collecting fines.

  • sjmom

    No wonder the Muslims are taking over Britain. This crime goes beyond religious beliefs but it is no beyond God’s law. Disgraceful!

  • deTocqueville1

    Just sick. Britain is much further down the slippery slope to Shariah.

  • If the British people don’t stand up on their hind legs like they got a pair and fight back, they will end up the second coming of the Islamic conquest into parts of Europe during the Middle Ages.

  • Apparently “ignorance of the law is no excuse” isn’t in British law.

  • JohnDoe_FormerlyLOGICandREASON

    The British judicial system is becoming a joke; I remember when there used to be “Ignorantia juris non excusat”.

    The Judge says he was “naive and immature when it comes to sexual matters”

    A Birmingham resident and user of social media and digital technology??? naive? …LOL

    I doubt that another religion would be given the same privilege.

    • mike3e4r7

      The judge also stated that because the perputrator was “passive and lacking in assertiveness, prison would do him more harm than good”. What an jackass! This dirtbag apparantly thinks the purpose of the crimminal courts is to determine what’s best for the crimminal, not what’s best for society or the victims.

  • mike3e4r7


  • toongoon

    The British justice system has just agreed that women are useless. Welcome to Sharia law.

  • M_J_S

    Two words for this POS: Death Wish. Welcome to the Charles Bronson Foundation.

  • 12grace


  • keninil

    “Eunich”-ize him and he will not need to remember.

  • Evil pos. I hope someone castrates the ba$tard… but then again, the hero who’d do such a thing would probably be locked up and the key thrown away. God please save these little girls.

    • Orangeone

      There is a man named Donald Blom in MN. The only thing left of his victim was a tooth. There are ways to rid the Earth of this disgusting slime.

      • I can’t handle stories like these.

        • Orangeone

          I know.  I hope the liberals are taking notice of what is in store for their children if this doesn’t get stopped.
          I’m looking for colliemum’s take on this case.

  • DCGere

    Just waiting for that excuse to be tried by someone in Dearborn…

  • mike3e4r7

    So let me see if I can paraphrase Judge Michael Stoke’s argument – “Because you commited a crime that no decent human being would ever commit, you must by definition have psychological problems and are therefore a victim and should not be punished”.

    Judge Michael Stokes needs to be punished for negligance and public endangerment.

    • Orangeone

      The judge held the girl responsible for luring the man (18 is a man) into the illegal act. War on Women or should I say War on Little Girls

  • Looks like the Brits gave up their brains around the same time they gave up their guns.

  • kong1967

    Ignorance of the law is not a valid defense. The judge is an idiot. He just gave Muslims the tool they need to do whatever crime against women they desire. Sorry, judge….I didn’t know.

  • Landscaper

    As the father of four in which 2 are girls, he would have not had to worry about the judge or the possibility of jail.
    Other dads know where I’m coming from.

  • syvyn11

    I would have cut his dick off and feed it to him.

    • Conniption Fitz

      Where were the girl’s father and mother? How did a 13 year old get into hotel room without their knowing it? Or did they care?

      Remember, Trayvon Martin would often stay out all night because his parents/step parent were off partying too..

  • Sober_Thinking


  • Smeethow

    I guess that judge thinks girls are “worthless” too. When did ignorance of the law become a defense?

    • NCHokie02

      agree….so as long as you act passive in court and say you didn’t know it was illegal then you should be good with anything right??

  • 3d81

    King Richard the Lionheart must be spinning in his grave. The liberals have lead the Moors right into his own house.

    What a waste of effort and lives.

  • sDee

    As Pamela Geller observed on this news:

    Meanwhile Tommy Robinson has languished in prison in inhuman conditions for a far less serious offense — and people still deny that he is a political prisoner.

    If you’ve not followed the story of our global regimes’ political prisoner in the UK, I put some links here:

  • He is NOT British! He is a muslim invader!

    STOP White GeNOcide

  • Uh, yea. Smart enough to get on the internet and troll young girls but not smart enough to understand right and wrong and control his jungle urges.

    Does anyone go to Russia and pretend not to understand Russian laws? I didn’t think so. Those that try don’t come home.

  • chatterbox365

    How about gasoline and matches???

  • Jay

    If the sheepdip needs sex education, a prison term would have been just the thing to get him up to speed. From what I’ve heard though, if he was raised Muslim he’s already been covered on that end.

  • debw777

    In a just world, the parents of the girl would get away with murder, because he’s a Muslim.

  • Too bad people cannot be put to death for being stupid! If I was that girls father I would kill the rapist and the judge.

  • ApplePie101

    I didn’t know that the purpose of prison was to do ‘good’ for criminals. At least judge Michael Stokes has given him a goal: to become more ‘mature’ about ‘sexual matters’.

  • PapaLouie

    Does this mean that everyone who doesn’t read Obamacare legislation (which includes almost everyone) doesn’t have to abide by it?