The Clinton machine is on Defcon 1 as they see her lead collapsing in the polls like a weak elderly pneumonia-stricken lady, and so they’re unleashing all the attacks on Trumpworld that they’ve been holding back.
This is one they’ve launched tonight:
A server that Trump owns that is in direct communication with a Russian bank owned by friends of Putin. Yes, nothing to see here. Move on. https://t.co/w7nnteWuDW
— John Scotus (@John_Scotus) November 1, 2016
This Slate story on the Russian server is incredibly explosive, damning evidence of collusion between Russian interests and Trump. Amazing.
— Kevin Phelan (@KPhed) November 1, 2016
Occam's Britva:
A Trump org server in direct comms to a Russian bank is a sign of a financial relationships Trump denies regularly.
— Rick Wilson (@TheRickWilson) October 31, 2016
It’s from Slate and describes how a bunch of computer nerds discovered Trump had a server set up to receive secret messages from a Russian bank:
In late July, one of these scientists—who asked to be referred to as Tea Leaves, a pseudonym that would protect his relationship with the networks and banks that employ him to sift their data—found what looked like malware emanating from Russia. The destination domain had Trump in its name, which of course attracted Tea Leaves’ attention. But his discovery of the data was pure happenstance—a surprising needle in a large haystack of DNS lookups on his screen. “I have an outlier here that connects to Russia in a strange way,” he wrote in his notes. He couldn’t quite figure it out at first. But what he saw was a bank in Moscow that kept irregularly pinging a server registered to the Trump Organization on Fifth Avenue.
More data was needed, so he began carefully keeping logs of the Trump server’s DNS activity. As he collected the logs, he would circulate them in periodic batches to colleagues in the cybersecurity world. Six of them began scrutinizing them for clues.
…The researchers quickly dismissed their initial fear that the logs represented a malware attack. The communication wasn’t the work of bots. The irregular pattern of server lookups actually resembled the pattern of human conversation—conversations that began during office hours in New York and continued during office hours in Moscow. It dawned on the researchers that this wasn’t an attack, but a sustained relationship between a server registered to the Trump Organization and two servers registered to an entity called Alfa Bank.
The piece goes into agonizing detail about what the internet nerds discovered, but admits it’s not a smoking gun, just another mysterious piece of the Trump-Putin puzzle. During times when the election ramped up, they notice that the server had more interactions with the Russian bank, but they have no idea what those interactions are or mean.
This is the conclusion they reached:
What the scientists amassed wasn’t a smoking gun. It’s a suggestive body of evidence that doesn’t absolutely preclude alternative explanations. But this evidence arrives in the broader context of the campaign and everything else that has come to light: The efforts of Donald Trump’s former campaign manager to bring Ukraine into Vladimir Putin’s orbit; the other Trump adviser whose communications with senior Russian officials have worried intelligence officials; the Russian hacking of the DNC and John Podesta’s email.
I honestly can’t tell if this is a real concern or ginned up by liberals to heighten the already frightening relationship between Trump and his BFF Putin (which you can read more about here). Just today the FBI admitted that they were investigating ties between former Trump campaign manager Paul Manafort and the Russians. So who knows? What an incredible irony that Trump would be damaged by his own secret server scandal…
Feel free to debate the issue in the comments!!
UPDATE – Some experts are expressing skepticism in the over-broad conclusion of the Slate story:
The Trump<->Russia story going around is based on the abuse of benevolent private sharing of DNS traffic for malware investigation. https://t.co/2Yf9QKQnZy
— SwiftOnSecurity (@SwiftOnSecurity) October 31, 2016
These private DNS data sharing and search arrangements are insanely valuable for the safety of the web, I was hoping people wouldn't do this
— SwiftOnSecurity (@SwiftOnSecurity) October 31, 2016
NOTE ON SLATE DNS TRUMP STORY: One of the experts quoted in the Slate article disagrees with its conclusions, feels misquoted, more tomorrow
— SwiftOnSecurity (@SwiftOnSecurity) November 1, 2016
My interest is purely on a technical, public service level, I'm sure Trump does tons of scuzzy terrible shit, just concerned on the details.
— SwiftOnSecurity (@SwiftOnSecurity) November 1, 2016
So take it with a grain of salt…