By The Right Scoop


In her response to question about GOProud and CPAC, Coulter says that the only reason liberals want to be the gay-friendly party is that it helps them destroy the family. She says that it makes much more sense that gays are apart of the Republican Party:

About 

Blogger extraordinaire since 2009 and the owner and Chief Blogging Officer of the most wonderful and super fantastic blog in the known and unknown universe: The Right Scoop

Trending Now

Comment Policy: Please read our new comment policy before making a comment. In short, please be respectful of others and do not engage in personal attacks. Otherwise we will revoke your comment privileges.


NOTE: If the comments don't load properly or they are difficult to read because they are on the blue background, please use the button below to RELOAD DISQUS.

  • Impertinent

    Ann…I doubt that sodomy will ever be universally accepted..Period.

    • Anonymous

      Yes, I’m sure there are still a few die hard holdouts who still hate oral sex or any other sexual interaction that isn’t strict coitus (aka Sodomy). Be sure and tell your husband or wife to skip all foreplay and commence rutting like a dog.

      • http://www.theancient.us The Ancient

        Missionary only, and the women better not enjoy it…..

        RIGHT!!!!!!

        In many ways Social Cons are a bigger threat to freedom than Liberals and Progressives

        • Anonymous

          Didn’t you realize that the female orgasm is a sign of demonic possession?

          Truth.

          • Tyler

            That would explain why in the Middle East, they cut their clitorises off.

      • Anonymous

        what a refreshing conversation…

    • http://twitter.com/DannyFromWI DJ DeMent

      Shared beliefs does not equal acceptance of sodomy. I still say being gay is a sin, I still work with gay folks, I even get along with them seeing as they don’t feel the need to constantly throw their sexual orientation in my face.

    • http://twitter.com/DannyFromWI DJ DeMent

      Shared beliefs does not equal acceptance of sodomy. I still say being gay is a sin, I still work with gay folks, I even get along with them seeing as they don’t feel the need to constantly throw their sexual orientation in my face.

    • Ira Thurby-Wright

      “I doubt that sodomy will ever be universally accepted”

      I don’t know have such a distinct position on landscaping and lawn care, nor do I believe it has much relevance in politics, but Ms. Colter does have a good point with Liberals using every and any minority under the sun to divide society. The point of removing family and religion so that the government can solicit exclusive loyalty of the masses is poignant and resonant. Just another ends-justifies-the-means tactic in the liberal arsenal.

    • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100000220027383 Troy La Mana

      Why? Because the act doesn’t produce children?

      • Ira Thurby-Wright

        Or because it produces a wide array of pathologies, the least of which is hemorrhoids and colitis.

    • Alex

      Don’t you have a family of dead soldiers to protest? People are moving past homophobia, and Fred Phelps would be dead 5 years from now.

  • http://www.planettron.com NickDeringer

    Every now and then Coulter hits the target like laser guided munitions. This was one of those times. While the Left is content to cohabit with their significant other, they insist that Gays get married. Why? Because same sex marriage is just a tool to beat Christians into silence and destroy the traditional family.

  • http://www.planettron.com NickDeringer

    Every now and then Coulter hits the target like laser guided munitions. This was one of those times. While the Left is content to cohabit with their significant other, they insist that Gays get married. Why? Because same sex marriage is just a tool to beat Christians into silence and destroy the traditional family.

    • Zaza69

      Exactly! And the other tool they use to destroy traditional family is abortion!

      • http://www.planettron.com NickDeringer

        The Left doesn’t mind torture and murder as long as it takes place inside an abortion clinic.

        • Tyler

          Apparently, they don’t mind it in Gitmo or the other secret military prisons worldwide as long as Obama’s the president doing it either.

    • Nonayabusness

      dumbass

  • Virusx2k1

    I lost all respect and regard for Ann Coulter, quite a while ago, when she spoke at a gay event. When there was controversy generated by this, she explained that she’ll, basically, speak at any event. When that monkey called Michelle Malkin a “…political prostitue…”, he obviously thought he was talking to Ann Coulter.

    As for liberals co-opting gays, Coulter is so far off the mark, she’s shooting at other planets. The liberals [democrats] are gay friendly because they have much in common with the gays: liberality. The gays have absolutely NO PLACE in the Republican Party, and people need to wake up and realize this. Again, I fully agree with Mark Levin: if you’re a fiscal, political and social Conservative, you’re a Conservative (or a Tru-Con/True Conservative, as I say). Anything less, even two out of three, and as one of his callers called it (accurately), you’re nothing but a “…hyphenated liberal…”. True Republicans are Conservatives, and they believe in the family, working to protect the sanctity of that very basic building block of successful societies the world over, throughout all history. The best honor Jesus Christ, though, as the great Conservative Buckley pointed out you don’t have to love God, but you can’t hate God, either, and call yourself a Conservative (hence his intense disdain for Ayn Rand). Homosexuality is an outright rebellion against God through abomination. It is a destructive attack on society, aimed at destructively recalibrating the dynamics of the healthy, functional familial unit. It is a repudiation of evne the ‘laws of nature’, leading, inevitably, to extinction. You link your page, RightScoop, to Tammy Bruce, but I have no interest in anything she has to say, and would not recommend her as a source of reliable, clear Conservatism to anyone. She may call herself Conservative, but she isn’t; she’s nothing but another social liberal. By their very definition, practicing homosexual political organizations cannot be Conservative, as they push destructive, un-Godly, decadent, evil, family-destroying policies and lifestyles of social liberality.

    It makes absolutely no sense to accept a gay that supports the gay agenda (sham marriage, intrusion into the armed forces, recognition for insurance purposes, adoption, etc.) into the GOP. Quite frankly, I am thoroughly and utterly disappointed in LTC/Rep. Al West for attending, giving his past stance on gays in the Army (http://www.bilerico.com/2010/10/allen_west_on_gays_in_the_military_unfortunately_t.php), but I would not expect any better of a social liberal, PseudoCon (Pseudo-Conservative) like Ann Coulter.

    I don’t think gays should be exterminated, or anything like that, but they should not be permitted to marry, raise children into their perversion-dominated lifestyle, have their gay sex partners receive medical benefits while heteorsexuals cannot in unmarried relationships, or join the armed forces. Hate crime legislation granting them protected status need to be immediately revoked and nullified. Giving them the power to censure Christians for denouncing their un-Godly lifestyle, via their pet bureaucrats, needs to be halted. All the rights homosexuals, blacks or anyone else needs are contained right here:

    http://www.usconstitution.net/const.html

    Should homosexuals not be protected from assaults? No, they’re still Human Beings and God’s Children. Should they lose all respect? No, not all, but homosexuality is certainly not something to be proud of, nor considered a desirable trait in any person. I have friends that are gay, but I don’t mince words, bulls*it or beat around the bush with them, when they want a straight, honest assessment of why I oppose their unhealthy sexual practices. It doesn’t mean, thuogh, I value them any less as friends or people. I just put God’s opinion on the matter above mine, their own, and everybody elses’.

    • http://twitter.com/Rushlimbang Brian Skinner

      Plain stupidity. You want all gays to be liberals? I sure don’t. I agree with you about gay marriage but to say we can’t join with them in common cause is very short sighted. I grew up not liking gays at all because every one that I saw on t.v was an anarchist or hedonist liberal. If gay people join with use in embracing the civil society (and many of them do) we will advance the ball further down the field than if they are all pushed to the democrat party. The thing you forget is that being gay is often times if not at all times a product of your biology. I know people want to deny it but it is true. I do not say this to endorse gay acts or lifestyle but it is a fact of life. I am a mormon and the beliefs of my church regarding homosexuality are well known. This does not mean we can’t acknowledge the fact that some people have different inclinations than we do. Nor does it mean that we have to champion them either.

      • http://community.livejournal.com/black_avenger_1/profile Virus-X

        Plain lack of “reading is fundamental”. It’s not a matter of what Virus-X wants. It’s a matter of truth. The homosexual agenda is social liberality. If you think it’s Conservative, then maybe you should be looking in the mirror, before calling someone stupid. If I “wanted” something, it would be for them to not be practicing homosexuals, and more interested in the fact that it’s not a lifestyle or path Jesus Christ wants them to pursue, and that it will only lead to a bad end. If we join the homosexuals and accept their idea of what your “civil society” is, we’ll be no better than any of these other 2nd and 3rd world countries that have normalized homosexual sodomy. Obviously, mormonism isn’t making you strong, but a weakling. In my faith (Christianity), I don’t accept moral relativism (your “…fact of life…”), but the Will of God in Christ and an unwillingness to accept anything other than what He wants and approves as being good. God has conquered the world. He did so, over 2 millennia ago. Maybe you should read up on that. You are more than free to surrender. I will not.

        • http://twitter.com/Rushlimbang Brian Skinner

          you cannot say Homosexuals believe in social liberality after saying you could care less about what Tammy Bruce says. You might want to read her book “The death of right and wrong” it might open your eyes. There are some gays that stand up for the traditional family and you are throwing them under the bus.

        • http://twitter.com/Rushlimbang Brian Skinner

          you cannot say Homosexuals believe in social liberality after saying you could care less about what Tammy Bruce says. You might want to read her book “The death of right and wrong” it might open your eyes. There are some gays that stand up for the traditional family and you are throwing them under the bus.

        • http://twitter.com/Rushlimbang Brian Skinner

          you cannot say Homosexuals believe in social liberality after saying you could care less about what Tammy Bruce says. You might want to read her book “The death of right and wrong” it might open your eyes. There are some gays that stand up for the traditional family and you are throwing them under the bus.

      • Alex

        As a gay libertarian, I wouldn’t want to join a movement that has people thinking I’m wild-eyed and perverse. People like the former poster who hate my guts.

    • http://www.greenvilledragnet.com/ RobTaylor

      Islamism is eating the world, our economy is collapsing and we’re on the verge of a world wide famine and you can write all this about gays? Who gives a crap about gays – OUR COUNTRY IS BANKRUPT.

      • http://community.livejournal.com/black_avenger_1/profile Virus-X

        Dude, you need to grow a brain capable of running something more complex than a Commodore 64. Maybe unlike you, I can work on several things, simultaneously, try solving multiple issues during the same time period, and walk and chew bubblegum at the same time. The topic is homosexuality being a ‘logical’ part of the GOP. If you haven’t noticed, I’ve written here pretty extensively about muslims and my thoughts on restarting the economy. Maybe if you weren’t incapable of looking at more than one thing, you’d realize that.

        • http://www.greenvilledragnet.com/ RobTaylor

          No the topic is whether or not in a Republic a person’s sex life determines their politics. We’ve all, as Ann Coulter said, had premarital sex, been to strip clubs, looked at porn etc and all those things are – to Christians – sins. Does that disqualify you from wanting a strong national defense or a free market economy?

          I am a Republican, a Tea Party member and a Conservative and I’m not a Christian. Does the fact that I am not a Christian invalidate the rest of my political life?

          I don’t look around at people’s comments to respond to one, but your thoughts on one thing aren’t related to another. That’s the point Coulter makes about gays as well – their thoughts on their own sex lives have little to do with their thoughts on how a Republic should be run.

          I find it interesting that everyone who screams about gays always yells about “sodomy” etc usually meaning man-on man anal sex. But men only make up 50% or so of gays so women who are gay don’t commit this sodomy. Are they OK to be Republicans?

          My point here is that your distaste for other people’s sex lives is foolishness. And losing elections by driving away every person who doesn’t live up to the Christian morals you don’t even really follow (a Christian should minster to sinners) will only lead to the right losing power. Our basic American values work for everyone because they include people’s freedom.

          I suspect you do several things that are “sinful” during the day. I find it highly dubious that your sex life, alone that it might be, meets Christian standards of conduct. Yet I would no more allow people to drive you from the GOP than anyone else. I’m a Reaganite -I believe in the big tent making a strong America. You believe that the Republican party and Conservatism in general is a club where adults with childish internet handles gather to complain all day. There’s room for you and there is room for gays.

        • http://www.greenvilledragnet.com/ RobTaylor

          No the topic is whether or not in a Republic a person’s sex life determines their politics. We’ve all, as Ann Coulter said, had premarital sex, been to strip clubs, looked at porn etc and all those things are – to Christians – sins. Does that disqualify you from wanting a strong national defense or a free market economy?

          I am a Republican, a Tea Party member and a Conservative and I’m not a Christian. Does the fact that I am not a Christian invalidate the rest of my political life?

          I don’t look around at people’s comments to respond to one, but your thoughts on one thing aren’t related to another. That’s the point Coulter makes about gays as well – their thoughts on their own sex lives have little to do with their thoughts on how a Republic should be run.

          I find it interesting that everyone who screams about gays always yells about “sodomy” etc usually meaning man-on man anal sex. But men only make up 50% or so of gays so women who are gay don’t commit this sodomy. Are they OK to be Republicans?

          My point here is that your distaste for other people’s sex lives is foolishness. And losing elections by driving away every person who doesn’t live up to the Christian morals you don’t even really follow (a Christian should minster to sinners) will only lead to the right losing power. Our basic American values work for everyone because they include people’s freedom.

          I suspect you do several things that are “sinful” during the day. I find it highly dubious that your sex life, alone that it might be, meets Christian standards of conduct. Yet I would no more allow people to drive you from the GOP than anyone else. I’m a Reaganite -I believe in the big tent making a strong America. You believe that the Republican party and Conservatism in general is a club where adults with childish internet handles gather to complain all day. There’s room for you and there is room for gays.

    • http://www.theancient.us The Ancient

      So wrong on so many levels, First off, the constitution is no way shape of form gives anyone any rights, PERIOD, the constitution was written to form the bases and limitations of a federal union of independent states.

      It limits what congress and the president are allowed to do to the people of this nation.

      No where in this document does is speak to Marriage, or gays, thus this is 100% a State issue and should be handled by the states, and under the State constitutions, PERIOD.

      Further, Conservatives Support the constitution, Social “Conservative” have hijack the conservative label, not different than Liberals HiJacked the liberal label years ago.

      Social Cons are Statists, just like progressives, the only difference is in what they want the State to control. Progressives want the State to control economic activity (with behavior as side product) Social Cons skip the middle man and want a Big Government state that directly controls all behavior to their moral authority. I.E, your free do what you want, as long as the Social Con agrees that is a “moral” activity. They are arrogant enough to think they speak of Gods Will by violating Gods most natural Law, FREE WILL OF MAN!!!!!.

      • http://community.livejournal.com/black_avenger_1/profile Virus-X

        I don’t know if you’re agreeing with me, or not. I never stated that the Constitution was the source of rights. However, it does outline the rights that we do have, ranging from the rights of the People, the rights of the States and the Rights of the federal government. And, yes, I’ve stated multiple times, to multiple people that marriage is not a federal issue, hence one of my reasons for going to the Constitution, in the first place.

        As for Social Conservatives, you have no idea what you’re talking about. Social Conservatives are not into state control, of anything. They are about government having it’s proper place, in respect to social matters, and believe that social engineering is not the place of the government. Social Conservatives refer to the Constitution (and in many instances, the Bible or Torah) for State authority in social issues, finding that social issues are really not the purview of the Congress, the Executive, nor the Judiciary, aside from such socially constructive laws as outlawing homicide. They believe the Constitution does not grant the federal government marriage authority, nor does it grant the federal government the power to mandate if children can live, or not. They believe that we have the rights to Life, Liberty, the Pursuit of Happiness and responsibility to overthrow tyranny, if it comes to our shores. Life means you are not to be murdered as a fetus, for instance. Liberty means you’re not to be forced into contracts you want no part of. The Pursuit of Happiness means you’re free to run your state through your own elections, and through your Representatives and Senators, and governors and state legislatures, pass the laws you see fit to pass, as long as they do not attempt to trump or nullify the Laws of the Land, as laid out in the United States Constitution. I’m speaking as a Social Conservative, and you’re obviously not. Maybe if you actually spoke to one, you’d know what you’re talking about, but I certainly can’t guarantee that, and really don’t think it very likely.

        • http://www.theancient.us The Ancient

          From Virusx2k1:However, it does outline the rights that we do have, ranging from the rights of the People, the rights of the States and the Rights of the federal government.

          Again, the Constitutions single purpose is to lay out what the federal government can do and what is has the exclusive authority over, PERIOD. Anything not delegated to the federal government is left to the people and the States. So again, the Constitution IN NO WAY outlines the rights of people or of States, the “rights” you refer to, are only statements of prohibitions against federal government actions. Nothing more. The courts have vastly over interpreted this as they have most of the Constitution, applying it to the States and the People where it should not be.

          From Virusx2k1:
          Social Conservatives refer to the Constitution (and in many instances, the Bible or Torah) for State

          Right there is the problem, Looking to anything other than the Constitution, is Unconstitutional, I do not care what the Bible or Tarah say, if we go down that path then we have to allow honor killings and other aspects of Islam….

          We do not base our government on any religion, period.

          Now on the Rest of your statements, how do you square all of the tenants you claim to uphold while at the same time supporting Gay Marriage Bans?

        • http://www.theancient.us The Ancient

          Ohh and Other Common Social Con Support Statist Positions

          1> War On Drugs — The Biggest Assault on Personal Liberty since the creation of this nation
          2> Patriot Act — Slap in the face to everyone that supports the US Constitution
          3> FCC Control of Cable TV for “Decency”

          Shale I go on..

          • Anonymous

            Don’t forget antiquated gems like Prohibition!

    • Alex

      So libertarians aren’t true conservatives to you? Wanting less government in people’s lives is a liberal value?

  • Anonymous

    Congratulations liberals, you have almost completely destroyed the Black family. Absolutely right Ann, that should be the lefts’ slogan “We Destroy Lives”, and if we haven’t destroyed yours yet, just wait awhile, we are focusing like a laser on it. Like the president of the Black Chamber of Commerce told ” call me senator” Boxer, “yeah you love Blacks, you love to keep them in their place”. The libs and the Democrats have systematically destroyed blacks through their policies of promoting one parent homes and offering bribes in the form of entitlement handouts.There is a big difference between a helping hand and a handout, a hand involves some time and effort and if done right is a long term solution, while a handout just involves giving away somebody elses money, and just kicks the can down the road. Nice work libs, time to get that slogan for 2012 out there “Vote Democrat, We Destroy Lives”, always something to be said for truth in advertising.

    • Anonymous

      I want a leader who believes in the American Dream for one reason…they’ve lived it! Democrats want that dream to be as difficult as possible. I don’t get that. It’s a WTF thing for me. They want to to be able to say that America failed. No, their liberal ideas are what has failed. The further they’ve gotten from the original ideals, the more we have gone into debt, dependency and near despondency. Those days are done! The pendulum is swinging back and when it hits that rightward zenith, we need to hold it there at a minimum and have a meeting or two with Dan Tumser :-)

      I am quickly becoming a Huskerbob fan. I like how you speak from your gut with the brain, the heart and the soul mixed in there. Excellent.

      • Anonymous

        Well, meet away, lol. Planning to give me the Ludovico Technique for Libertarianism, huh? =P

        Depending on what that rightward zenith looks like I might be duct taping the pendulum to the ceiling or trying to rip it down. Either way we’ll for once be able to not remain fixated on it’s clockwork swinging and live life for what else there is around us. We’ll just have to wait and see, won’t we?

        • Anonymous

          “Depending on what that rightward zenith looks like I might be duct taping the pendulum to the ceiling or trying to rip it down.” (Dan)

          By the way, I really liked this :-)

  • Anonymous

    She was funny.

  • Anonymous

    She was funny.

  • CavVet

    This is a side of Ann Coulter I have not seen before, and I do not like it. I thougt her to be conservative, not a libertarian. Extremely disappointed.

    • Anonymous

      Ann Coulter uses shock sarcasm to make a point. She also never minces her words. Sometimes she makes me cringe and other times, I laugh out loud. It’s just who she is. She is a conservative. No way she is a libertarian. If the tent is supposed to be big enough for gays, then it must also be big enough for Ann Coulter.

  • Goldni007

    Ann did well there…although she is one of those women who have Sheryl Crow disease. She looked horrible there! Sometimes she looks WOW..HOT! Sometimes she looks..well awful!! Sheryl Crow disease.

  • Annie

    I admire the way she used ‘gays’ and sin in the same sentence. Homosexuality is a named sin in the Bible, and she was right, too, that there are PLENTY of other sins for us to trip over. Conservatives need to keep marriage defined as between men/women, but gays ARE out there, and if they want to vote conservative, come on along – so long as they don’t insist that we pander to them. (Which does seem to be thier method of operating, but I’ll give them the benefit of the doubt, since I’m in a good mood listening to all the great speakers this weekend)

  • Anonymous

    That is one of the most insane things I’ve ever heard.

    We love the family. We have no plans to destroy it. We want gays to be able to have families too.

  • help

    Greedy Woman.. follow the money.. just think

  • Brifry

    No fault divorce, abortion, now homosexual-ism. We know what divorce and abortion has wrought in our nation, only God knows what grief awaits our normalization of homosexuality. As in the former I suspect it will be the children that will suffer.

  • Anonymous

    a part of the Repub party? not apart of it…right?

  • Deb

    Is anybody else have trouble with this stream?

  • http://www.facebook.com/AMrSmith Robert Smith

    I don’t normally just state my opinion without Bible reference to back it up so in Luke 17:28 Jesus tells his disciples that as it was in the days of Lot, (who was residing in sodom), they did eat, they drank, they bought, they sold, they planted, they builded. Are you all familiar with Sodom and why the God of Abraham destroyed it. Not because so much sin, but because there was not a righteous man to be found in the whole city. They were living like we do in America, just going about everyday lives thinking they were all alone in the desert to do what they wanted. Well the rain of fire and brimstone, could have been a volcano I suppose or a meteor shower that just happened to fall in that very location and Gommorah as well. So to that, my Bible based opinion is that when no righteousness is found, the city is doomed. One day the truth, THE GOSPEL OF JESUS CHRIST, will be gone from this planet. Oh, there will be watered down versions and preachers saying to live good and don’t be judgemental; you know, TOLERATE THEM, it’s in YOUR best interest, live and let live. Well to them a lie will be sold as the truth, so deceptively, so as even to fool the very elect. That is when the “father of all lies” will send his emmissary to bring all left on this planet under his protection, of that day and time I want no part of. Want to know how this all ends: READ THE BIBLE.

  • Anonymous

    The interesting part of Ann’s remarks about gay culture is that she’s been paying attention and has turned the last vestige of defense of gay rights on its head.

    I’ve been arguing against gays rights for going on 15 years now and my objection to gay rights is not based on religion at all. I’m an atheist. My objection is based solely on the “ick factor”. This drives liberals crazy. They can’t attack me for being a religious bigot although that’s always their first assumption. When they discover my objection has nothing to do with religion or sin and is based on disgust at people who have a need to flaunt their private sexual habits in public, habits that I find disgusting and don’t want to hear about no matter what species they do it with, they always fall back on their last defense: being gay has nothing to do with sex.

    It’s a culture, you see. It’s not about sex at all. I’m the one with the dirty mind for associating gays with sex. Right.

    So Ann’s comments about sodomy make perfect sense in that context. Right? Of course they do. She’s got them by the balls. So to speak.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Raymond-Dillard/100000031929357 Raymond Dillard

    Ann is right. The Marxists are geniuses at manipulating special interest groups to do their bidding to destroy family and religious values wich are antithema to their goal. Here are links to Marxist Theory on Homosexuality Past Present and Future, albeit these articles are from 1993

    http://web.archive.org/web/20071210142404/http://www.etext.org/Politics/AlternativeOrange/2/v2n2_mth1.html

    http://web.archive.org/web/20070929090408/http://www.etext.org/Politics/AlternativeOrange/2/v2n4_mth.html

    http://web.archive.org/web/20071220194938/http://www.etext.org/Politics/AlternativeOrange/2/v2n6_mth.html

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=647186311 Thomas Parker

    I’ve said this before and I’ll say it again:

    Jesus did not say “Love your neighbor as you love yourself… unless they’re gay.” The point of 1 Corinthians 6 was to illustrate that we’re basically ALL going to hell… without Jesus. Why do people focus on homosexuality? Read 1 Corinthians 6… we’re ALL in that list. All of us. No one is righteous. Not one.

    • Anybetts

      Thomas Parker, you missed the point. If anyone continues in blatant unrepentant sin, going against the laws of God, he or she cannot rely on Jesus Christ to save them in the end. Christ died for sinners who repent and follow God’s laws, changing their hearts and lives completely. Sinners who intend to keep on sinning – who are outright proud of their sins – are never instructed to use Jesus’ death/resurrection in a cynical way. I wouldn’t bet my life on “working” that ploy.

  • Samkrevich21

    I almost posted this on my facebook for everyone to see what a egotistical psychopath this woman is. Then I decided she doesn’t deserve that.

    How about this…liberals think gays should have the right to marry because they are humans like everyone else and should have the rights everyone else has.

    NEWSFLASH: Not everyone in America is a judgemental God fearing Jesus freak. Some of us live life, treat others well, and gain success not by using religion to guide our choices, but our morals and sense of human rights and fairness.

    WHAT A CONCEPT! HUH!?!?!

    • VinceP1974

      There is no “right to marry whoever you want”. Marriage is a union of a man to a woman.

      What you want is to change that. Without thikning two seconds as to the consequences.

      Now I’m gay and I am against gay marriage. I’m against every pillar-destroying agenda item of the Left

      I’m also not a victim. And that’s where a lot of this gay-marriage-desiring is coming from.. the victimization mentality.

      • Samkrevich21

        Yeah, there IS the right to marry whomever you want. So as long as you are one gender and they are the other. Why is it that homosexuals marrying will result in consequences, but couple of 19 year old mormons who barely know each other can get hitched without a question? Seriously, its 2011.