By The Right Scoop


I’ve heard of 3D printing before but for all intents and purposes it’s still a new concept for me as I’ve never looked into it. But apparently 3D printing has gotten so advanced that you can now print your own gun if you own one of these printers. And this creepy anarchist guy who Glenn Beck is interviewing did it.

Watch:

About 

Blogger extraordinaire since 2009 and the owner and Chief Blogging Officer of the most wonderful and super fantastic blog in the known and unknown universe: The Right Scoop


Comment Policy: Please read our new comment policy before making a comment. In short, please be respectful of others and do not engage in personal attacks. Otherwise we will revoke your comment privileges.


NOTE: If the comments don't load properly or they are difficult to read because they are on the blue background, please use the button below to RELOAD DISQUS.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_OQI5D66OXO7X2FE4NVCZC7BAMA Joe

    It is possible

    Lot’s of videos here >>>
    https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=3d+printing&oq=3d+printing&gs_l=youtube.1.0.0l10.3910.6611.0.8607.11.7.0.4.4.0.61.398.7.7.0…0.0…1ac.1.9HF3mHyVP5k

    These guns have NO lands and grooves therefore NO ballistics fingerprint

    Scary stuff !

    TSA will go crazy with this one !

    • http://www.therightscoop.com/ The Right Scoop

      Why do you write 3 words and post it?

      Just curious

      • MiketheMarine

        He wants liberal trolls to follow his thoughts and they have the attention span of a gold fish, that’s why.

        LOL

        • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_OQI5D66OXO7X2FE4NVCZC7BAMA Joe

          LOL!

          • MiketheMarine

            ;-)

            • 1endtimes2020

              What does ;) or ;-) mean? Thanks.

              • MiketheMarine

                ;-) is a winking smiley face, sideways and
                :-) is just a smiley face, sidways.

                • 1endtimes2020

                  Thanks Mike for answering a question I suspect others wanted to know, also. All those creative computer people are difficult to keep up with. Here’s a joke for you, as a reward for your efforts;
                  A glum, unhappy old lady died and when she reached the gates of heaven, St. Peter welcomed her there, and assured her that her name was written in the Book of Life. But then he said, ‘before I can let you in, you must spell a word I give you, correctly.” She said, ‘okay, what’s the word?’ He answered “love’. “Oh that’s easy, l-o-v-e.” He said ,” okay, you can come in now. Would you do me a favor, though? ” She answered she would. St. Peter said “I have to run a quick errand, so when the next person arrives, and the name is written in the Book of Life, will you give that person a word to spell correctly?” She said she would.
                  All of a sudden, her former husband appeared before her. “Well, I’m sure surprised to see you here so soon”, she said to her former husband.
                  “I just couldn’t live without you,” he answered. She said, “St Peter asked me to greet the next person while he runs an errand..I see your name is written in the Book of Life, but you have to spell a word correctly, before I can let you in” “Okay, what’s the word?” She answered,
                  “Czechoslovakia” I hope you had a ;-) out of it, Mike.

                • MiketheMarine

                  Thank you for that. Have a nice weekend.

      • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_OQI5D66OXO7X2FE4NVCZC7BAMA Joe

        FAT fingers

        • http://www.therightscoop.com/ The Right Scoop

          Uh huh. I’ve seen you do it a lot.

          I’m wondering why you just don’t type “FIRST!” and then edit that ;-)

          • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_OQI5D66OXO7X2FE4NVCZC7BAMA Joe

            As you get older – You’ll understand

            Also I keep having to buy new keyboards with all those tear jerkers you post

            I have to get used to them

    • KenInMontana

      A normal shotgun has no “ballistic fingerprint” either.

      Addendum: They can’t do this with the upper receiver or barrel with this technique.

      • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_OQI5D66OXO7X2FE4NVCZC7BAMA Joe

        Harder to conceal for “most men” – I heard exceptions live in Montana

        Baggy pants, etc.

        • KenInMontana

          I stand 6’1″, with a duster (think trench coat) on, I can (and have) fully and comfortably conceal my 12 gauge Winchester 1300 riot gun.

          For the record, I do have a CWP, and have for better than 15 years.

          • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_OQI5D66OXO7X2FE4NVCZC7BAMA Joe

            Does Montana have the same law as Louisiana

            Max of 3 shells in a shotgun mag

            • KenInMontana

              Only for Hunting, no limit on defensive shotgun mag capacity.

          • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_OQI5D66OXO7X2FE4NVCZC7BAMA Joe

            I’m thinking Virgil Earp

      • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_OQI5D66OXO7X2FE4NVCZC7BAMA Joe
        • KenInMontana

          As an “AOW” (Any Other Weapon), yes however it’s a bit more complicated that the site makes it sound, you still have to submit to the permit process through the BATFE which takes on average about 6 months and $200, in addition to the $5 stamp.

          • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_OQI5D66OXO7X2FE4NVCZC7BAMA Joe

            Yes – – Note to self

            Send a memo to HOLDER to notify all the CARTELS

            and let them know the full procedure for approval.

            Is there sales tax on the printer ??

            LOL!

      • sDee

        Is there anything to this “fingerprint” thing? I thought it was mostly TV drama. Even if each barrel really was identifiably unique in its odd grooves and nicks, a bad guy can easily change out a barrel on most pistols and long guns.

        The TV shows like to show the matching bullet marks which I guess are supposed to come from the barrel nicks and grooves, but …
        http://www.hipowersandhandguns.com/P220ammo_files/image022.jpg

      • Dukehoopsfan

        If the barrel truly has no grooves or rifling what is going to keep the round from tumbling shortly after exiting the barrel. Not sure how one could hit anything beyond a few yards. Just curious.

    • Jeff Carlson

      no gun printing at your link just 3d printing videos … what people are calling a “gun” is simply the lower reciever of an AR-15 style gun … thats what the feds consider the only part you must buy from a firearms dealer … its not a gun … its the part with a serial number on it … not a gun …

  • Sober_Thinking

    Seems like a bad idea… I’ll have to watch the video.

    • KenInMontana

      It is a bad idea, someone has tried this before, using one of these 3-D printers to make a lower receiver for their AR-15. It was a catastrophic failure, as it came apart when they fired the first round.

      • MiketheMarine

        Having been an armorer I was wondering how they would get their hands on steel strong enough to handle the pressure of a fired shot.

      • sDee

        Polymer AR-15 lower receivers work fine, but the type of polymer and forming process are designed for the stresses involved. A 3D printed one is far from that and would have all sorts of problems.

        What makes the idea interesting is that we citizens can of course make our own weapons without going through an FFL Buying an 80% AR15 lower receiver is legal and a better place to start. However it does requires access to a milling machine and a drill press (which btw would also be needed to machine one of these 3d jobs to accept the trigger assembly, saftey, and mag release anyway)

        80% reciever
        http://www.ar15-kits.com/index1.html
        DIY
        http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2010/02/22/diy-ar-15-lower-receiver-tutorial/

        • KenInMontana

          I have seen a couple of polymer lowers offered for sale, but have yet to see one match the durability of a standard metal lower and the functional longevity of these polymer lowers is still suspect. All that being said this is highly reminiscent of the “Plastic Pistol Panic” that followed the introduction of the Glock.

          • sDee

            “All that being said this is highly reminiscent of the “Plastic Pistol Panic” that followed the introduction of the Glock.”

            I was thinking the same thing. Physics are physics, and it is gonna take some precisely machined steel to project 55 grains of lead at 2000fps.

            • MiketheMarine

              A woman rattling off weapon stats is sexy as hell. Be careful. I might get all worked up……..

              ……….again.

            • sDee

              duplicate removed

          • sDee

            Damn…. you are tempting me to build a polymer AR Ken :D

            I like polymer. I’ve both an all metal Sig pistol and a polymer Sig with a modular fire control assembly. Both are excellent guns and I am impressed with the design simplicity of the polymer Sig.

            Here is a cool story

            Before we get into this, let me offer my qualification, 3 years an armorer in the 101st Airborne Division. I have seen a lot of beat to hell ARs in my time, this is pretty special.

            On Saturday while mowing a large field, I went over a terrace, hit two holes in succession and launched my AR out of its fender rack. When the butt came down it missed the butt boot, slid down the fender, missing the rear tire but not the 6 foot Bush Hog, Bush Hog being pulled behind. Thus we have an AR Modified by Bush Hog.

            The heavy blades, starting at the top, struck the scope front bell, bending the scope up 1/4 inch, shattered the front of the upper receiver, shattered the forend, struck the gas block, wrapped the gas tube around the barrel, bent the 16″ barrel in three directions, struck the QC for the suppressor DXing the lock pin, ripped the butt stock out of the lower, bent the tube key, lost the plungers and springs, sheared the rear take down pin, put the bolt carrier 1/3 out the rear, ripped the magazine out of the lower and dinged the top round.

            On Sunday I flushed and cleaned up the remains with mineral spirits. I had to cut the barrel off in front of the scope with a saws all to get it out so I could examine the upper receiver.

            Once I got the upper off the New Frontier polymer lower I was shocked, it showed little evidence of any abuse. I hammered out the key, and the butt stock screwed back on, then locked up tight. So I replaced the 5 parts (2 springs, 2 plungers and a pin) went down to the gun show and bought a new upper. Stuck it all together with a cheapo Chicom scope I had laying about and it functioned. Not even the trigger pull had changed and the mag locked up and fed ammo. Save the polymer rear pin being sheared by the upper coming open, the lower was not hurt at all.

            Sent the pictures to New Frontier, they said lifetime warranty, where do we send a replacement? No, there is nothing wrong with the lower, but could I get a new polymer pin, yep, and it is on the way.

            http://www.perfectunion.com/vb/ar-15-talk/91141-damage-testing-polymer-lower-ar.html

            • KenInMontana

              I would advise checking into the Federal Laws around manufacturing that lower, if you print it to the stage of a “blank” and subsequently drill it to finish it you are still manufacturing what is considered a “restricted” item.

      • Lives4Freedom

        Exactly. 3D printing is a process of bonding synthetic materials together. Plastics and polymers have their place, but there is a reason gun manufacturers only use polymers in certain parts of the firearm. I hesitate to explain because it seems obvious.

        I will see it as a revolutionary breakthrough when I see a 100% polymer gun rip through 50,000 rounds of ammo (of whatever size or caliber), without failure. Until then, forging, stamping, cutting and drilling metals will still be the name of the game.

  • Jeff Carlson

    to be clear he did not print a complete gun … he did not print a chamber and barrel …

    • KenInMontana

      He printed the Lower Receiver and a magazine, neither of those parts have to stand up to the stresses a barrel and Upper Receiver (where the chamber is located).

  • Conniption Fitz
  • http://profile.yahoo.com/CZSU2D67ODNZOKEZYHXONQ4F5Y John

    it is plastic, not steel…”just look, don’t use it” stuff :)

    • Watchman74

      Yea, I’m thinking it wouldn’t hold up long under battlefield conditions.

  • Army_Pilot1967

    So can weapons be mass produced using a 3-D printer? That’s a bit scary. Of course right now finding ammunition is a problem for a lot of weapons….

    • Jeff Carlson

      no …

  • sjmom

    Very intelligent but misguided young man. Thank God right now the equipment to make it is very expensive.

  • http://twitter.com/ozziecastillo Stewie

    That just reeks of radical anarchism. Would love to be a fly on the wall, but it feels like any association with that guy would end in a Breitbart.

  • WhiteGuy2

    Wow, It reminds me of the movie “Weird Science” wonder if you can make a hot chic with this machine.

    • http://twitter.com/ozziecastillo Stewie

      I’m going to sleep in an ice bath….wake me up when our technology gets there.

  • SurfinCowboy

    There are many ways to obtain a “printed” part of a rifle/gun that can be used to manufacture the whole thing.

    My worries are these stories will lead to Federal monitoring/regulation of 3D printing. 3D printing is so revolutionary (you can order parts to repair almost ANYTHING you own! Need a carb for your ’57 Ford? Print it, etc.) that the Feds would love to be involved. I am sure that crony-capitalists will want to stifle it as well.

    For the children of course.

    • Conniption Fitz

      Parts for autos and guns need to be made of materials capable of withstanding high heat and pressure… resins and plastics can’t do everything.

      • SurfinCowboy

        Of course, and those 3D printers exist. Plastic 3D printing is the cheapest and most used by the private citizen, but there are many substances that are used in 3D printing. Eventually, those industrial-level 3D printers will become more and more affordable to the common citizen. Do a search on 3D printing – it is amazing.

        But my point is more of a concern that government regulations will smother a budding industry that will save the common user money and increase their well-being, not on the functionality of plastic guns.

        You can order a barrel, you can order a blank firing stock that can then be drilled and machined to work as a fully-functional rifle – all that is true regardless of the 3D printer.

        Amazing technology.

      • http://www.theconservativevoices.com/ dmacleo

        frame repairs on many vehicles (recalls) being done with a 2 part epoxy and a plate of 1/8″ steel.
        composites make up a lot of an aircraft.
        theres a time and place for it all, ceramics been in rotors and wheels for years.

  • Sober_Thinking

    Ah… ok. He wants to be a Lady Gaga-kind of controversial guy. Nice… he’s squirrely and a bit out there. I hate these “intellects”, these smart guys who remain purposely ambiguous.

    Is he good? Is he evil? Is he a pioneer? Is he a devil? I don’t know… he’s so controversial… ooooooooo!

    This seems like a VERY bad idea. I love Star Trek science… the idea of a replicator is a lovely invention. But to mass produce potentially undetectable guns? Doesn’t sit well with me.

    He’s an anarchist… but he also seems kind of Jim Jonesish.

    Bottom line… anything that makes weapons easier for criminals to get their hands on seems to be a bad idea. It usually all comes down to money… if an evil, Muslim high-bidder bought all of this and the know-how… then boom… we have a new terrorist threat.

  • Nukeman60

    ‘Radical equality’, ‘functionalist’

    Interesting terms. One wonders if this guy doesn’t just want everybody back in caves and ‘beyond Thunderdome’. Pretty scary thoughts this guy was trying to mask.

    • http://twitter.com/ozziecastillo Stewie

      Reminded me of a Batman villain.

    • Watchman74

      I just heard a bunch of words strung together in one incoherent sentence, I have no idea what he means and I’m not sure he does either.

  • Joengima

    We’re entering an age where one can print a gun and even bullets from their homes and use it. This is both frightening and liberating.

    After watching this video, I feel like we’re at the brink of War and on the cusp of Peace.

  • Sandra123456

    Wonder if you can use a magazine/clip made in this way in a traditionally made firearm. If so all the laws mandating only so many rounds become meaningless.

    Here’s another short clip showing the inventor using a weapon. At the end he is eating lunch. Someone off camera asks him how it tastes, he replies “Tastes like Diane Feinstein’s lunch.”

    • sDee

      His magazine fits a standard AR lower so yes, it could be used in any AR.

      Our rulers will make gun laws that make owning 20 or 30 round magazines illegal, so whether we did not turn our magazines in, or if we made some ourselves, we would be still be criminals.

  • 1endtimes2020

    You can bet resins will be controlled, but in the meantime, the back and forth of one upmanship of weapons continues since the days of sticks and stones. The first priority of a human being is 1- survival 2- obtaining the means of survival and 3- improving on the means. If it means civil disobedience because of incompetence or hidden agendas being revealed, so be it. The responsibility of government is to 1- protect its citizens against military harm 2- protect citizens economically (that means don’t allow manufacturers to ship jobs to other countries, without even a debate) 3- Guard citizens from enemies within. If it is determined that the government is the enemy, use every means to impeach. If that is not acted upon by the governments’ official opposition, then it is a civil right, written into our Bill of Rights, to use every means at our disposal to defend ourselves. Period.

  • http://profile.yahoo.com/44F4AB4VSCTOCHBMBG4ZWWD5OU Laurel

    This kid has no brains. He is the last person that needs a gun.

    • sDee

      Creating CAD models for those parts and taking them to working prototypes takes brains. He is a bit over dramatic (or deceptive?) because other people have long made 80% machined AR lowers that can be completed by a citizen without going through an FFL holder. He has though, put together an ingenuous “open” play. I do not know however if he will help us or hurt us in the end. Here is why what he does could be a double edged sword……

      The AR-15 is a truly open, interchangeable rifle platform. Today, the only part of an AR-15 that the Feds regulate is the lower receiver – a single piece of metal with no moving parts that one can buy for less than 80 bucks. It has a serial number and is purchased through a FFL holder just like a complete rifle. Everything other part needed to build AR rifle can be bought from thousands of small manufactures without Fed regulation.

      He just found a way for a citizen to make a lower without the need for an expensive metal foundry or a CNC milling machine. Putting this out “in their faces” could well push the Feds into finding ways (without Congress) to end this modular open market for AR parts – i.e ending the sale of standalone AR lowers, or worse, regulating all rifle major parts like upper receivers and trigger groups.

      • http://profile.yahoo.com/44F4AB4VSCTOCHBMBG4ZWWD5OU Laurel

        Sorry but no he doesn’t have any brains. Monkeys get trained to do things that make them look smart. He was trained to do things to make him look smart…and I know lots of ignoramuses that have learned CAD.

        Real smarts comes from critical thinking skills which he has yet to display.

        Your post displayed critical thinking skills in that you saw the loophole in his thinking and you know then Feds will too.

    • h p

      He has brains, and balls to match ;)

      • http://profile.yahoo.com/44F4AB4VSCTOCHBMBG4ZWWD5OU Laurel

        In your opinion.

        Sorry but I don’t agree.

    • DebbyX

      What’s your latest invention?

      • http://profile.yahoo.com/44F4AB4VSCTOCHBMBG4ZWWD5OU Laurel

        Don’t waste my time with stupid straw man comments.

  • Bryan Ewbank

    If you can 3d print a replica, you can then create a mold from that replica, and then a final version of whatever you want. Kinda making something using the “lost wax” technique. You still need to figure out what to make the final version from, but it doesn’t have to be the same stuff you use in the printer…

  • Landscaper

    This technology is some bizarre stuff. You can “repair, invent and reproduce all sorts of mechanical items”

    • sDee

      You can do it too!

      There is an inernet site where you send your design, they send you the part back.
      http://www.shapeways.com/creator/

      • Landscaper

        sDee,
        I want one in my garage, not hire it out! :)

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_IQIGXRVWW5XRETNV25R4FATCOM ssenecal5000

    Ban Printers and Computers!!

  • http://twitter.com/ember_george Ember George #TGDN

    Did you catch that challenge thrown out at the end. “Let’s find out if we’re friends or foes.” lol Wonder what that was about?

  • RKflorida

    Folks this is real. The plastic will only last about 5 rounds but that is not the whole story. Since Beck did this advances have been made almost daily. They now have 3D printers that lay down layers of metal. Good for about 100 rounds.

    3D printed 30 round A/R magazine:
    http://www.extremetech.com/extreme/145664-3d-printed-30-round-ar-magazine-brings-us-ever-closer-to-a-fully-3d-printed-gun

    3D printing with metal:
    http://www.extremetech.com/extreme/143552-3d-printing-with-metal-the-final-frontier-of-additive-manufacturing

    This is all new within the last 4 weeks. Wait a year and then see what happens. Just the 30 round magazine is enough to shake up the powers that be. The prices of the printers is continuously falling. If you want to get caught up to date on this technology, check out the links at the bottom of the two articles above. By the way, the plans for these items are being passed around free.

  • Maxsteele

    I don’t agree. I think this young man is well read, intelligent and well spoken. He believes in liberty and freedom while also willing to debate in a controlled intellectual way. If he is what you consider “creepy” then we are all doomed.

  • ApplePie101

    Not so creepy, really. His argument comes down to the idea of individuals being able to protect themselves, rather than be at the mercy of a superstate. Print mine in neon green, please.

  • bobemakk

    Saw this on an episode of CSI-NY. They should all blow up in the printers face.

  • DebbyX

    I don’t find him creepy at all. So far, he hasn’t broken any laws, has he? But soon there will be a new law banning all copiers.