The Right Scoop
I meant to type, what are the names of the four nations Mr. Pupper Master, Soros brought down?
Prove it! Don't sling comments without backing them up. Sounds to me Glenn has done his homework!! I always knew there was a satanic force behind the ultra liberal movement just didn't know who or how. Thanks to Glenn, we now know.
While I think Beck is asking the wrong questions and is wasting his breath, I can respect the idea that Soros is not someone you want to ignore and there may be a legitimate reason to be scared of folks like him.
Thanks to Glenn Beck for risking everything to expose this evil plan!! He is a gift to America, and when the true history of this country is written, he will shine as one of our greatest heros! God bless him and keep him, his family, and his staff safe!
Is it possible that Soros really learned to admire the Nazi's having first hand expeirence in what they were doing in Hungary?
Are we playing into Soros hands and used as the anti-gov from the ground up force?
Thank Glen Beck for your courage and thank you rs for making this available.
Soros was 14 when he worked for the Nazis. Who knows what he absorbed.
As to your second question, we force Congress to cut spending, reduce the debt, and reduce pressure on the society. This will bring back investment and reduce the debt still further. If there are riots, we don't worry about them. I've been in a riot. They last about 3 or 4 days, until everything is looted and enough cars are burned. They peter out because people get tired of looting, marching, and yelling after a while. When the riot doesn't have the desired effect, it goes away.
There you go Williamm, asking a prog to ruin a good rant with facts.
You know if he even attempts to provide any, and you dare have the gall to retort, it will only end with a Reductio ad Hitlerum attack that he and his ilk are known for.
Wow, imagine that, a Soro's defender calling you Hitler, when their hero actually helped Hitler and got rich in the making.
Do you have a reading comprehension problem? Or is too subtle a point to a)agree with most of what the guy said about Soros, but b) find Beck to be a self-promoting huckster selling faux populism to the masses?
Here is an option for you, why don't you demonstrate what Beck said about Soro's isn't true. Can you do that? Or are you stuck on Alinsky's rule of just attacking the person, not their argument.
Stand up SVG123, prove Beck wrong.
Or is he just a fatty fat fat guy who cries on TV?
Nothing like a guy who makes tens of millions of dollars a year speaking like he's one of "the people". Sure, Soros is an evil megalomaniac. But Beck isn't far behind in terms of propaganda. He is using Soros as a scapegoat to gain in popularity/power, and people gobble it up. Is that so different than Soros? C'mon people - think for yourselves. All these TV personalities are full of sh*t.
Excellent glib lgical fallacy! Five stars. NOW focus on an actual point where Beck is allegedly wrong and counter with sourced empirical evidence. No? Nevermind. Rather ironic denial. You are an excellent unread incurious indoctrinated comrade. Bravo. a got nothing. No, really. Colonel Robert Neville blogspot com. zombietime com thepeoplescube com lookingattheleft com dissectleft blogspot com michellemalkin com breitbart com iowahawk typepad com PJTV com steynonline com Tim Blair blog The Daily Telegraph ANY P.J O'Rourke...
Excellent glib lgical fallacy! Five stars. NOW focus on an actual point where Beck is allegedly wrong and counter with sourced empirical evidence. No? Nevermind. Rather ironic denial. You are an excellent unread incurious indoctrinated comrade. Bravo. a got nothing. No, really. Colonel Robert Neville blogspot com. zombietime com thepeoplescube com lookingattheleft com dissectleft blogspot com michellemalkin com breitbart com iowahawk typepad com PJTV com steynonline com Tim Blair blog The Daily Telegraph ANY P.J O'Rourke...
Why don't you take Glen Beck at His Word and DO THE RESEARCH YOURSELF Before you Open Your Mouth? Just wondering.
and you know that how? and of course, you can prove it, can't you?
well, of course you can.
What's svg stand for anyway?
Soros Vast Government?
I like the message, no matter who is bringing it. It's the truth that I like hearing. I'm happy that Beck is finally telling the Soros story. I would bet that most Beck Show watchers already know about Soros.
Your tactics won't work on this board. Anyone who would defend Soros against Beck is on the wrong side.
My only issue with Glenn is that he doesn't go far enough into world gvnmt. He doesn't educate about the Fed Reserve. Soros is a big player, but not at the top of the chain concerning financial destruction. That is being done by the Fed Res system. I have to wonder if Glenn is just making Soros the focus of attention to distract from the Fed's going ons. Glenn mentions the Fed, but won't go after it. He won't have a job if he does.
I agree re: the Fed.
It's quite troubling to see how quickly you get pigeonholed (and attacked) when you say something that isn't perceived as falling in line. This happens on both the left and the right, and frankly, it is a sign of poor thinking. I remember when the Iraq War broke out and I would say something positive about Bush or the overthrow of Saddam,and immediately was branded a conservative, right-wing zealot, etc. I guess people just need the certainty of being able to label other people, and then to love or hate them. I find that pathetic.
I stand by my original comments. *ALL* these people in the media - whether on the left or right - are all about the money. And I'm sick and tired of being lectured and played to by media stars who don't have a clue how us regular folks live. How absurd it is to play a POPULIST when you are earnings tens of millions of dollars. There are NO people on TV who represent "the people". They are so far removed from normal life. We, the people, are NOT represented. Do not be fooled. These are corporations selling product - that's all. Pablum for the masses.
Sounds like your a classist. You are judging and dismissing him not because of his arguments but because he is wealthy.
Sounds like your a classist. You are judging and dismissing him not because of his arguments but because he is wealthy.
I will give you that Beck makes millions and is dramatic-seems to be his personality! But do you really think he could go on tv and say all these things if they weren't true? I mean wouldn't Soros then get Beck for defamning his character? Who else is sharing this type of info with the general public? And if information/knowledge is power then isn't it better we know these things (if they are true) so we can DO something about it? Let me know your thoughts!
First of all, I didn't say anything about whether or not what Beck said about Soros is true. But since you mention it, what's clear to me is that SOME of what Beck is saying is factual, but he has taken an awful lot OUT OF CONTEXT in order to make it seem more sinister than it really is. That is dishonest. Don't you agree? Taking a few seconds of audio clip or a few words of type, without giving the context, is a dishonest thing to do. Reminds me of what Michael Moore does.
FWIW, I absolutely LOATHE Soros, so don't get me wrong. He absolutely IS trying to control society. And so are plenty of other wealthy people - some on the right as well.
I can see what you are saying and I do agree that there are forces/people on both sides that are pulling strings to control this country and the rest of the world...powerful people with more money than I can count that feel it is their responsibility to "take care of this planet" and it is frightening if they get their way.
You do have to give Beck some credit for at least trying to warn everyone that "the house is on fire" though he may not be entirely correct about where the fire started or who started it or the outcome of it all!
I do too think Beck at times takes things out of context but he definitely states things as he believes they are from his perspective and his faith (which I believe is fundamentally flawed) therefore I am very cautious about everything he says because I know his foundation and it is already skewed so it makes me skeptical of everything else! Thanks for responding!
First you say:
"He is using Soros as a scapegoat to gain in popularity/power, and people gobble it up." "All these TV personalities are full of sh*t."
Now you say: "First of all, I didn't say anything about whether or not what Beck said about Soros is true."
we can read you know.
Hmmm Is Beck different then Soros..well Beck has not collapsed 4 countrys economys and destroyed countless lives nor has he betrayed his culture and sold his people into bondage then made off with their posessions, nor have I caught him in lies and hes not a communist soooooo duh guess what im going with Beck and am thinking for myself, have checked it all out and Becks right
yeah like William says, tell us one thing that Beck says about Soros that isn't true. And I'll consider not banning you.
He failed to mention that all the reigmes Soros helped overthrow were Communist or authoritarian.I'd think that's a lie.
What about the Malaysian currency? Seems he lied there
"Soros denied that his hedge fund, the $9.1-billion Quantum Fund, had a role in devaluing the ringgit; in his own speech, he said that ironically the buying of Malaysian currency during the crash helped buffer the impact. Mahathir, he claimed, was using him "as a scapegoat for his own mistakes."
But Soros admitted to zeroing in on the Thai baht and other currencies, sending regional stock markets spiraling downward. He dismissed Mahathir's desire to ban currency trading, calling it "a recipe for disaster." After the prime minister's speech, Malaysian finance officials hastily reassured bankers that policies would not change.
"Dr. Mahathir," Soros added, "is a menace to his own country."
http://articles.latimes.com/1997/sep/22/business/fi-34969
"Hedge funds have acquired notoriety because of their aggressive investment practices and the relative secrecy of their activities. However, despite often-cited anecdotal reports, there is little concrete evidence that hedge funds as a group were heavily involved in triggering or even intensifying the series of South-East Asian currency depreciations. In the absence of publicly available figures on hedge fund positions, Graph V.8 presents statistical estimates of aggregate portfolio exposures for a group of funds specialising in global investments, including currencies, to Asia and Latin America during the period 1994-97. The exposures have been derived from the estimated sensitivity of the hedge funds' reported returns to the underlying markets and the funds' size. The graph shows that, while there was considerable exposure to Asia at the beginning of 1997, these long positions were substantially reduced a few months before the crisis. At the same time, positions were built up in Latin American countries. Moreover, on the basis of this analysis there appears to be no statistical evidence that these funds as a group had extensive short positions against Asian currencies at any time during or after the summer of 1997."
Strange that the Bank for International Settlements says Soros didn't bring down the Malaysian currency.
http://www.bis.org/publ/ar98c05.pdf#page=18
"Hedge fund managers like George Soros did not conspire to sell Asian currencies last year and touch off the capital flight that set off the economic slowdown that now grips the region, the Bank for International Settlements said today in its annual report.
The central bankers' bank said that hedge funds, which are typically aggressively managed private pools of money, began cutting back their Asian exposure at the beginning of 1997 and had ''substantially reduced'' their Asian holdings before the crisis broke out last July.
''There is little concrete evidence that hedge funds as a group were heavily involved in triggering, or even intensifying, the series of Southeast Asian currency depreciations,'' the bank said in its 1998 report."
But since it's from the New York Times no one on the far right will believe this article.
Curious that the Malaysian Prime Minister Mahathir Mohamad retracted his statements about Soros.
"Malaysia's former premier Mahathir Mohamad today met his old foe George Soros and said he accepted the billionaire financier was not responsible for the 1997-98 Asian financial crisis.
Mr Mahathir has long blamed Mr Soros for undermining South East Asian economies by destabilising their currencies, and famously called him a "moron".
"Mr Soros said he was not involved in the devaluation of the Malaysian currency and that other people were involved. And I have accepted that," Mr Mahathir said at a joint press conference."
http://www.abc.net.au/news/newsitems/200612/s1812946.htm
And we all know Glenn flat out lied about Soros' youth in Hungry or do we need to revisit that?
Well he lied did about the Jan Kozak strategy paper never being intended to see the light of day.Though I guess this isn't a lie about Soros.But still it's a lie.It is right here on Amazon
There's an article about it here
http://www.tysknews.com/Depts/gov_philosophy/pt1_shot.htm
Heck the Birchers already beat Glenn on this one
http://www.jbs.org/component/content/article/1009-commentary/6422-and-not-a-shot-is-fired
Even the far far far right beat Glenn on this
http://www.libertygunrights.com/AndShotFired2.pdf
You can read the book here
http://www.scribd.com/doc/6922376/Kozak-And-Not-a-Shot-Is-Fired
So when Glenn says "“He wrote this essay and it was never intended to go public. But it accidentally did. We found it in a very old copy of the congressional records",he is either lying or his "research" staff doesn't know how to do research.I'd almost pick the latter.
So will he be on the air tomorrow?He did say if he was ever caught lying he'd be off the air.
Happy Birthday US Marine Corps
You would ban me for saying something you may not agree with? Please tell me you aren't serious.
How about an attempt at a REAL exchange of ideas! Your baseless rants and character assaination is usless drivol! Go somewhere else for that! This board is for mature adults conducting debate and the exchange of ideas!
First he starts with agitation. Pressed for facts, he changes the subject.
svg, you've been asked more than once to prove you allegations.
the facts sir, bring on the facts, or leave
how about banning him because he just likes flinging poo with no facts, no substantiation, no figures. Reminds me of a monkey in a cage, screaming at the visitors.
What a ridiculous and ignorant comment to make. "rife with innuendo, accusation and petty name-calling"??? WTF??? I have never done ANY of that.
You could not be more wrong about me. Obviously, you didn't take the time to read my posts.
You don't know me. You don't know what my views are on a myriad of issues. Maybe you should take the time to understand someone or something before threatening to "ban" them. I find that to be a very ugly, knee-jerk reaction. We'd probably agree on a lot more than we'd disagree, but that shouldn't be the criterion for being accepted or allowed to post.
I guess I'm starting to see why LGF (Charles) gave up on the right.
Here...I'll make you all happy:
Beck is brilliant! Everything he says is so true. He is THE man! Thank God we have him to expose that puppet master Soros. I agree with everything Mr. Beck says, fully and completely. It was if I wrote the show myself. I'm so glad we all agree on this. :)
Relieved?
Evenin' Marie,
The following is not a matter of speaking "for" Scoop. It is a clear statement of MY reason (and thought process) behind any action I take, as a volunteer moderator ~
People are not banned for thinking 'differently' (there are several long-sharing posters that are testimony to that). Professional (or at least deliberately determined) agitators, instigators and drive-by leg-lifters... are.
When a poster's first few posts are rife with innuendo, accusation and petty name-calling, and completely void of any reasoned discourse attempt ~ they aren't here to discuss ideas or exchange honest point-counterpoint.
The people who DO deserve better than drive-by trash dumps.
CM Sackett
...Scoop may have a completely different take on the matter.
CM Sackett
I am thinking for myself, and as I am thinking for myself, I,m thinking that your reasoning is stupid, but that's what happens when I think for myself.
Comment Policy: Please read our new comment policy before making a comment. In short, please be respectful of others and do not engage in personal attacks. Otherwise we will revoke your comment privileges.