Huma Abedin‘s extremist ties are finally hitting the mainstream after being reported in right-wing blogs for a long time. She is, of course, Hillary’s top aide and ostensibly married to lecher and scoundrel Anthony Weiner. The New York Post is reporting how Huma Abedin herself published articles that spoke against Hillary’s feminist proclamations while at the State Department!
One of Clinton’s biggest accomplishments listed on her campaign Web site is her support for the UN women’s conference in Bejing in 1995, when she famously declaHillary’s top aide Abedin worked for Muslim journal that BLAMED U.S. for 9/11, opposed women rightsred, “Women’s rights are human rights.”….
However, soon after that “historic and transformational” 1995 event, as Clinton recently described it, her top aide Huma Abedin published articles in a Saudi journal taking Clinton’s feminist platform apart, piece by piece. At the time, Abedin was assistant editor of the Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs working under her mother, who remains editor-in-chief. She was also working in the White House as an intern for then-First Lady Clinton.
Shouldn’t this be a huge deal? If her top aide doesn’t believe in one of the major reasons she puts out for being “qualified” for the presidency, then why is she her top aide?
Then there’s this about 9/11:
Sperry reported that Abedin’s mother also had an article from 2002 in which she basically said the US was destined to be attacked by terrorists on 9/11 because of “sanctions” it imposed against Iraq and other “injustices” on the Muslim World. Abedin has played a key role in Hillary Clinton’s campaign. The campaign denied The Post‘s repeated requests for an interview.
This is WAY worse than the unsubstantiated claim Trump made about seeing “thousands” of Muslims celebrating on rooftops on 9/11.
All of this comes from her time working at the “Journal of Minority Muslim Affairs” until 2008. Her mother serves as editor-in-chief of the controversial publication and yet no one seems to care. Pretty convenient for the Clintons, isn’t it?