A Muslim slammed his car into that of an Afghanistan war veteran, said he did it in the name of Allah, and blamed Trump’s racism, and authorities have no clue what his motivation might be.
Watch below:
A Fresno man believes he was the victim of a terrorist attack, right here on the roadways in California.
Now, he wants the guy who he says attacked him off the streets so he doesn’t hurt anyone else.
Scott Alcala was driving to San Jose to play golf with his father, when he says he was hit by another car.
Witnesses say a car going extremely fast swerved into Alcala, causing him to fish tail and cross into oncoming traffic.
Alcala said, “I saw the suburban coming right at me about to T-bone right into the driver door and I thought that was it. A second later I turned my head and just smashed into the barrier.”
Alcala says he and the other driver were miraculously able to get out of their cars without hitting anyone else.
Alcala said, “The off-duty police officer went to talk to the other driver in his vehicle and he said, ‘Are you alright? That was way too fast,’ and (the driver) said ‘I didn’t it on purpose. It was in the name of Allah.'”
The police report says driver Ameer Abbaf Fakhraldin told police the collision was caused by Donald Trump’s improper treatment of minorities, and by Allah and other people’s lack of faith in him.
Now you might think that authorities maybe should call it an act of terror right then and there. But you would be wrong, you Islamophobic infidel!!
Ameer showed no remorse, and said that he was controlling the car through psychic/telekinetic powers. SO he’s not quite all there. But even still, the media is framing this as a “veteran SAYS there was a terror attack” and the authorities are holding off from calling it a terror attack. Even if he’s mentally impaired, this is still a terror attack, but it’s not being acknowledged as such.
And one final point – how are liberal and left-wing voices who say that Muslims will attack because of Trump not then called a cause of these kind of attacks? They’re basically saying they’re justified, and it would totally be pinned on conservatives if the shoe were on the other cankle.