Walid Shoebat is giving some reason to doubt the official story being put out by German officials that the Munich killer was simply mentally disturbed and had nothing to do with Islam.
Here’s what Walid found:
Ali David Sonboly is no Iranian but pro Turkey’s Islamists from Syria. That plus he had a record with the Interpol and was being watched.
First of all. There is only one way to spell Sonboly in the Arabic (سنبلي), but in the English it can be spelled multiple ways (like Sunbulli, Sonboly), yet it is always the same spelling in Arabic: سنبلي
Unless one knows Arabic, they do not know where to look. Examining clan Sonboly and even Sonboly’s own Facebook where the Turkish flag is a main symbol.
Okay, perhaps he had a fetish for the red color and the crescent moon? But his clan also are of Turkish origin living in Syria and Turkey and this same Turkish flag as well as the Syrian flag is the pride of this clan as can be seen from Facebook.
The case for this clan’s love of Turkey’s Erdogan is ironclad. Plus he lived in the Turkish neighborhood.
Why then advertise him as an Iranian which would make him a Shiite Muslim? Is it possible that Germany wants to avoid the repercussion when Germans know that Turks or Syrian refugees who are entering Germany by the droves are the culprit?
Here’s the Facebook background he’s referring to:
Walid continues:
Now this man, we are told, is connected to “far-right terrorist Anders Breivik”? And now, the same Munich chief of police Hubertus Andrae who knew that this man had a rap sheet at the Interpol says the gunman appeared to be just a crazy man “obsessed with shooting rampages”? Was that why he was monitored? What then is an Iranian doing with a Turkish flag and why is all his clan Islamists pro-Turkey Syrians? Was he and three of his victims the sacrificial lambs to gain sympathy for the Turks and is why he swore against the Turks?
He offers a few more details that lead him to his conclusion, which you can read here.
I have my doubts about this theory however. The German government is offering up two pieces of evidence to support its contention that the Munich killer was motivated by simply mental health issues. One, he had a book on mass killings and other reading material at his home, and two, that he had a picture of Anders Breveik on his “WhatApp” message service. The killing also took place exactly 5 years to the day that Anders Breveik committed his enormous act of terror against his fellow Norwegians. They also say he was under professional care for his depression and mental health issues.
So which theory is more reasonable? It’s certainly odd that an Iranian citizen would have a Turkish flag as his background on Facebook, but I don’t see why that supplants the image of Anders he had on his “WhatsApp” social media account. And does it really make sense that this mass slaughter was concocted to stir sympathy for Turks? I’m not so sure. If that were the case then I would think the Turks would do more to deny the cover-up by the German government in the media. I know that we all want to pin every deadly attack on Islamists, but it stands to reason that Europe would have crazy nutbags that lose it every now and then too. Let me know what you think in the comments section below…