By The Right Scoop


Levin took to the airwaves today to expose Sandra Fluke and defend Rush Limbaugh over these attacks from Democrats and the leftist media. One thing among many, that I loved about this monologue is that when talking about Obama calling Sandra Fluke, Levin wonders if Brian Terry’s parents ever got a call from Obama. Awesome. He goes on to tell Brian Terry’s story.

But the end is where he really takes to calling the media out and defending Rush:

I want the leftists at MSNBC, CNN, and the other so-called news outlets who are dressed up as journalists but are nothing of the sort, I want you to understand something. You don’t get to decide who the rest of us listen to. You don’t get to decide who the rest of us admire. You’re not going to succeed in driving Rush Limbaugh from the airwaves. I don’t care how many cowardly Republicans you speak to. I don’t care how many inside-the-beltway pseudo-conservatives you speak to and so forth.

Our nation is teetering. Everything we believe in is being undermined. The future for our children and grandchildren is perilous. And you in the media do the bidding of the very politicians who have brought us to this dire state. You don’t get to dictate to us. You don’t even get to influence us, try as you might.

Rush isn’t going anywhere because there’s tens of millions of us standing by his side. And we’re not going anywhere either.

You say nothing about the unconstitutional acts of this president. You say nothing of the policies that are bankrupting our nation. You do nothing to expose the lies and deceit of this administration. In fact, if you’re not covering it up, you’re cheering it on. This is why we have no respect for you, why your audience and readership are plummeting and will continue to.

No we will not let you take down Rush or anyone else. In fact, I think I speak for tens of millions of Americans when I say you can go to hell.

Here’s the full segment:


Comment Policy: Please read our new comment policy before making a comment. In short, please be respectful of others and do not engage in personal attacks. Otherwise we will revoke your comment privileges.


NOTE: If the comments don't load properly or they are difficult to read because they are on the blue background, please use the button below to RELOAD DISQUS.

  • Nukeman60

    It’s the saddest of days because Andrew Breitbart is gone.

    But the rest of us are finally starting to stand together. The left is not going to know what hit them when they see that being PC has just gone out the window along with their smears and their ratings. They can all just go to hell.

    Yeah, I said Hell.

    • destroyer_of_moonbats

      finally…

    • Trust1TG

      I pray they repent. A human life and mind is a terrible thing to waste.

    • GRITSMama

      Not “can” but will all just go to hell!

      • http://twitter.com/reagansucked ronald reagansucked

        Matthew 7:1

        “Judge not, that ye be not judged. Unless you’re a Republican, in which case it’s all good.”

    • bobemakk

      I agree 100%

    • http://twitter.com/reagansucked ronald reagansucked

      If you think that’s an effective threat then by all means please be as publicly open about your hatred of women as possible. People like me know that Rush is saying what you all really think, but there’s still plenty of room for others to come around. Thanks for offering to help.

      • Nukeman60

        No problem. Yes, Rush is saying what we all, men and women alike, are really thinking. Just the fact that you took the time for the driveby tells me how worried you are that your world is crumbling around you.

        Thanks for letting me know that and verifying what most of America is coming to realize about you and your ilk. Love ya, man.

      • http://twitter.com/PoeAllen Allen Poe

        Your logo is offensive. may you get what you deserve.

      • http://www.facebook.com/julicornwall Juliann F. Cornwall

        They don’t hate women they just hate ignorant people who refuse to think for themselves and follow the party line of BS at all cost of credibility. I listen to him and I was not upset at all at his retorical question. They do not hate women got it?

  • ApplePie101

    Same here!

  • Trust1TG
  • PAWatcher

    Sandra Fluke is a flake, fake and a slut to boot who should pay for her own contraceptives, get fixed, or get mommy and daddy to pay to play.

    • Spartan4Palin

      Does it not strike anyone that this woman is also a prime example of the failures of our educational system? She’s a 30 year old that is STILL a ‘law student’?

      I’m just thinking the hours she has widdled away on sex, that she could’ve been earning a lot of money as a partner at a law firm. Instead she is advocating to be a ‘partner’ to thousands of individuals who will become rich with youtubes of her?

      Just wanted to work this ‘puzzle’ out a bit?

      • http://twitter.com/reagansucked ronald reagansucked

        I’m thinking the actual failure of education is among people like you: so lazy and credulous that you won’t spend 5 minutes reading an article and learning that she was actually there testifying on behalf of a friend who lost an ovary because she couldn’t afford hormonal birth control pills, aka ‘prevent golfball-sized ovarian cysts pills’ to people with certain conditions. You’ll lap up whatever swill Limbaugh pukes in your direction before rubbing your belly and asking for more, but heaven forbid you actually take the effort to think for yourself.

        Rush is playing you all like a fiddle.

        • sandyfromchesterfield

          She can still get pregnant with one ovary.

          • http://madaboutmahound.blogspot.com/ Gary Rumain

            Damn!

        • http://twitter.com/PoeAllen Allen Poe

          Sorry, you lost your girlfriend. Maybe you should call Monika. As to education, it has passed you by, no person left behind. Sometimes, I think compusary education should be an option. Then, you might actually appreciate great people, so far above you.

        • Spartan4Palin

          Was she representing herself as the other woman’s lawyer? She’s a 30 year old woman’s advocate. It was a LIE when she was reported as a 23 year old law student. Of which she didn’t deny the claim!!!

          I’m thinking very clearly on my own. I don’t need someone to go up before Congress and argue on behalf of whatever issue I may have. I’m perfectly able to do that on my own. And I certainly won’t lie before Congress as to who I am. She, on the other hand, felt just fine lying about it. As well as those who tripped over themselves to have a photo op with her. If that’s the kind of mentality you have, you are certainly welcome to it.

          I won’t betray who I am or the principles I live by.

        • Slappyxxx

          The “swill” Ronnie, is another leftist moonbat trying to get the producers of our society to pay for something else. take f#ckin responsibility for your own actions Ms. Fluke. If you want to take contraceptives then fine, we have no business in others bedroom, but PAY FOR IT YOURSELF and quit suckling @ the governments (our) teat!!!!

      • jaimo

        Plus she’s homely and is probably playing for the same team. What exactly does she need contraceptives for?

    • http://twitter.com/shelbeau80 Shel

      Absolutely. She is Democrat plant. She must be prostituting herself to the liberal democrats. Why else does some random student end up in front of congress? And is immediately coddled by Pelosi.

      • BS61

        I read that she was a women’s rights activist before attending college – that is just typical!

        • las1

          Yeah… and it’s worse than that… she’s the past president of Students for Reproductive Justice. She’s a prop of the Dems… a female cardboard cut-out designed to make real women everywhere shudder in disbelief, and put on display to embarrass the hell out of every sound thinking individual… woman and man.

          And just like libs… they’ve got a committee for EVERYTHING… a grievance mongering, screaming panel and spring board factory from which to launch endless demands and fake outrage.

          Levin is right. There really are two Americas.

          • kringlebertfistyebuns

            “a female cardboard cut-out designed to make real women everywhere shudder in disbelief”

            So…women have to hold a particular political or religious viewpoint to be considered “real?”

            “And just like libs… they’ve got a committee for EVERYTHING…”

            Is there some alternate Earth where conservatives don’t organize to support or oppose their pet causes?

            • las1

              On the contrary your comments show you hold the utopian view of the “world”. I assume you are a leftist… so correct me if I am wrong. I’ll address you as one.

              As a leftist you view the universe as something to hate… to transform… to change. And to do this you need other people’s money to do so. Conservatives understand the world as it is and attempt to ameliorate as best as possible the negative influences and nature of man. America’s founders understood that and instituted limited government to allow moral citizens to conduct their affairs. (Look up John Adams on a moral and religious people).

              Marxists, Socialists, and other assorted leftists seek to recreate man in a utopian image. This project has deadly consequences. Soviet Union and Communist China as exhibit A. That’s the world you inhabit… a false one which seeks to dominate and impose upon everyone else through taxes and fiat and regulation… all in the name of making society a better place.

              Now to miss Fluke and her left wing activist project. She was falsely presented as just another young student innocent and concerned. But Fluke was a blatant activist, former head of the Students for Repro Justice. She was dragged in as willing prop. No body anywhere in the US is being denied birth control. That’s a canard. And you know it. Responsible people pay for their on BC. It’s not about women. It was truly pathetic and embarrassing (and Fluke embarrassed herself) to see someone advocate for such a phony cause. I’m sure her parents are really proud.

              You pretend to support and represent “women”. You support and represent statism and the control the leftist Democrats seek to impose upon everyone else. So yes… Fluke is not real… she’s fake. She represents not women, but leftist ideology.

              Because you are a cultural Marxist (and look it up so you can get a handle on the term) you pump out cliches like “women’s rights, gay rights, equal distribution etc. ad-nauseum hiding behind the fake sanctimony of the left with the pretense that you are doing your leftist god’s work on earth.

              If the right can be accused for being activist for limited government and personal responsibility and individual rights according to the Constitution and Declaration, and are activist against the statist slavery which the left wants to impose… then the label fits.

              • kringlebertfistyebuns

                It’s hard to know where to begin with a jeremiad like this, full of mind-reading and strawman-erecting, but I’ll try to address some of your comments:

                The short answer is yes… conservatives are organizing… finally.

                Conservatives have been organizing in the modern era for the past 60 years, dating back to “God and Man at Yale” (the author of whom, incidentally, would be largely appalled at what his movement has become). Of course, actual conservatism is moribund within the movement, having been largely supplanted by regressive laissez-faire authoritarianism.

                She was falsely presented as just another young student innocent and concerned. But Fluke was a blatant activist, former head of the Students for Repro Justice, no mention of her position on this was given, and she was presented as something else.

                This is a lie. From the very beginning of her testimony:

                “My name is Sandra Fluke, and I’m a third-year student at Georgetown Law School. I’m also a past-president of Georgetown Law Students for Reproductive Justice or LSRJ.

                I don’t know how much clearer she could’ve been.

                The crux of Ms. Fluke’s testimony, BTW, was that the no-birth-control-pills-ever policy has direct, deleterious effects on women’s health. The Pill does have uses other than the one for which it’s most commonly prescribed, you know.

                I personally know women who’ve used The Pill to regulate excessively heavy/painful/irregular periods, or to stave off endometriosis (present in 5-10% of women of childbearing age) or to stop polycystic ovarian syndrome (also 5-10%), for three examples.

                Those are entirely “legitimate” medical uses for birth control, which aren’t requiring people to subsidize anybody’s icky dirty sex life. (Preventing pregnancy is also an entirely legitimate use of birth control as well, BTW.)

                It’s strange, though, that although some don’t want to putatively subsidize people’s sex lives via paying for birth control, almost everyone is content to subsidize other reproductive choices through, say, child tax credits.

                Speaking of subsidies… you know the insurance plan offered at Georgetown? The one that doesn’t cover birth control for female students? Turns out the university doesn’t actually pay for any of the coverage. Kinda clouds the issue a bit IMO.

                You claim that this isn’t a women’s issue. It most certainly is about women in that it affects their health and well-being far out of proportion to men’s. I certainly don’t know any men who have a need for hormonal birth control.

                You purport to support and represent “women”.

                I have not claimed to represent women, or any other group of people for that matter. I “represent” no one other than myself, though I’m pretty sure I share a lot of my views with a lot of people.

                If your concern is that your liberty will be infringed, that might be correct, for values of “liberty” that include “treating other people like crap.” Your freedom of religion ends – or should end – where other people’s rights begin.

                If you make the argument that people shouldn’t be forced to pay for things they find morally objectionable, then I presume that you’d support anyone who’s opposed to, say, our bloated defense budget getting their portion back? How about people who oppose…oh, I dunno…public libraries? Should they still have to pay for them nonetheless?

                Finally:
                And I am not being hyperbolic when I say that the end result of leftist ideas produce places like Cuba, Cambodia, North Vietnam, China and Russia.

                I would counter with two observations:

                1) What you term “leftist” is only so on the parochial, revisionist spectrum of politics advanced by too many American “conservatives” these days. Virtually anywhere else in the world, most American “liberals” would be center-right or maybe barely center-left, myself included. If I were to see Stalin or Lenin or Mao or Kim on the street I’d kick them in the junk.

                2) The notion that the “end result” of liberal ideas is necessarily totalitarianism or statism is a logical fallacy, just as it would be if I stated that the endpoint of conservatism is a nationalistic autocracy (Italy/Germany), or an authoritarian dictatorship (e.g. Chile under Pinochet, Dominican Republic under Trujillo, or Indonesia under Suharto), or an austrofascist regime like Spain or Portugal used to have.

                • las1

                  You are correct…the 5 minute truncated version of her testimony in the MSM omitted the intro. Mea Culpa. I suppose I could be forgiven that slip considering I too fell for the image the MSM constructed around this poor, financially strapped activist elitist, lovingly speaking on others’ behalf with selective anecdotes, and yet so egregiously abused by Limbaugh. They deliberately left out her activist credentials.

                  For this remainder… I’m addressing your criticisms but putting them in a broader more comprehensive frame.

                  Fluke IS an extremist “feminist activist with an agenda who targets catholic institutions” Activism is one thing… but it’s predictable and non-stop with the left… and is in no way in the same league with the right. Just compare campus activism… it’s a contrast. The left outnumber conservatives twenty to one. And even Fluke herself managed to shut down a pro-life speech at Cornel when she was there. But this is typical and is multiplied on every campus in North America. We have wonderful examples of how this works in Canada… and the leftist hate is frightening on campus. You see… these people value free speech when it’s just for them. The right have learned that this is just the way it is. When the left are confronted… they hiss back.

                  No one is against medically necessary coverage. But Fluke’s whole testimony screams agenda while hiding behind extreme feminist tropes. She’s broad brushes all insurance companies; but not all insurance packages are the same and they cover different things including the “medically necessary” interventions with the birth control she demands.

                  But Georgetown’s insurance doesn’t cover what Fluke wants it to cover… so she marches arm in arm with Pelosi to a hearing. She selectively uses extreme examples… heart wrenching scenarios as a mask for the real purpose of her wind baggery: regular contraception. If she was so compromising and was so concerned about the Catholic institution, she would enjoin her intended audience to cover the “medically necessary” contraceptives (and many already do) and leave the rest alone. But that’s not her purpose. Her purpose is political and she demands Catholic institutions to abandon their First Amendment rights… in the name of “women’s health” of course. She just doesn’t say that… liberals front their agenda with extraneous arguments.

                  But she’s liberal, and she appears sincere, and she’s supported by Pelosi… and she’s an “expert” activist with moral support, so it all must be true. (none of which we can prove of course, or at least investigate easily). But extreme cases always drive the liberal policy agenda. It’s all feminist critical theory admitted as testimony. Not even Canada’s state run health insurance covers contraception… and here America wants to run ahead of lefty Canada!

                  Now to your other critiques… Strawman? It’s not strawman to lay out what progressives believe and how they act. Mindreading? I alerted you from the beginning that I “assumed” you as a leftist and asked you to disavow to me if I was incorrect. I agree… sort of… with your analysis of the left/centrist/right continuum. But you are centre/left defending a leftist position. Look up “overton window”. The reference lines have shifted dramatically. What was once considered left, even extreme.. is now considered centre. But that’s too much work now for our purposes.

                  But it matters little that a continuum exists on which liberals or conservatives fit. We are human and we can all fit along somewhere. But the trajectory of post-modern liberalism, as a pseudo-ideology in America, is degenerative and is always on a down hill trajectory and with the moving of the “overton window” will lead ultimately to tyranny. Post-modern liberalism’s a pseudo-ideology in the sense that, as practiced, it resembles a fashion statement … a flavour of the day. Whatever victim group it picks up one day… it relegates to lesser status the next.

                  Now… regressive laissez-faire authoritarianism? Anything the left hates, of course, is naturally “regressive”. Laissez-faire and authoritarianism… mutually exclusive and contradictory terms… but of course you are intelligent enough to see that. But again only the leftist mind can see in laissez-fair something authoritarian. And the fact that you referenced this cliché indicates you are more left than you self definition of centre/left.

                  Now let’s go deeper…The history of communists and socialists and leftists and liberals is never to take ownership of their past. (The Democrat Party IS the party of slavery, secession, segregation and now socialism).They are always trying to rework the unworkable and trying to recast their ideology into some new mold by calling it new names… modifying it, softening it, making it acceptable. Whether it was Progressives’ love for Woodrow Wilson (who segregated the military btw) or Progressive admiration for Mussolini’ fascism in the 1920’s, these are all indicators of the inherent rot of the movement. (David Horowitz, one of the New-Left’s activist leaders in the 1960’s claims that pure communists in 1950’s America always called themselves “progressives”)

                  So progressives then recast themselves in the forties and fifties as liberals because of the negative connotations. But they were forced to change names back again to Progressives after the 1980’s, because Reagan exposed them as socialists trying to make socialism acceptable by calling themselves liberal. Hilary Clinton then admitted to preferring the name Progressive. In any case the liberal trajectory is always downward and destructive. You see this in public policy, social norms, and political extremism of the left. The Democrat Party no longer exists… it’s been taken over by progressives and it’s shock troops… the hard left.

                  America is heading is the direction Europe has already taken. The anti-liberty stance leftwing Europe is taking is becoming increasingly serious and betraying fascistic tendencies, or at least totalitarian. Learn how voices of dissent against the leftist norms are being silenced and demonized by its media and censured in law through human rights complaints, hate speech laws, upholding of shariah, and most reprehensible, the left’s support and protection of Islamists. This paradigm exists in America under Obama and is steadily coming to fore.

                  I’ll reference you these: Elizabeth Sabatich-Wolf of Austria; Geert Wilders of the Netherlands; Tommy Robinson of the UK; egregious abuse of laws against dissenting voices of conservatism in Europe and the current meltdown going on in Sweden where the media and institutions are totally controlled by the left and use every tactic to silence conservatives; Norway, where conservatives are being demonized, intimidated and threatened, fascist style, in the wake of Utoya; Canada, Mark Steyn and Ezra Levant and Human Rights Commissions silencing their work; France is feebly trying to turn things around… too late IMO. The list is endless… and the list exists in America as well. A recent judge ruled against an atheist for wearing a Mohammed costume. The hierarchy of protected groups exists. On top are Muslims, then gays, then blacks, then Latinos, then other visible minorities, then atheists… on and on. You see the mess liberalism and relativism gets us into?

                  This liberal/left nexus with Islam is the seminal issue in the world today.
                  Few understand this, and absolutely most liberals are clueless to this. The left is also marching hand in hand with Islam. A match made in (ahem) heaven, of course. Imagine… the very leftist feminists who pretend and who use women so shamelessly for their agendas are totally silent about women in Islam. Where are they on female genital mutilation? Where are they on honor killings in America. Crickets! They are nowhere… they are hypocrites. But if it’s conservatives or Christians they hate… their venom spews. (Newt Gingrich is driving them crazy with him exposing the anti-religious bigotry now so widespread.) Where are these caring and concerned feminists speaking out when their leftist hero, Bill Maher, spews his venom about another Sarah Palin. I won’t repeat what he said… you can google it; or where were they condemning Letterman about his comments about Palin’s daughter… google it. Hypocrisy in full display in all it’s peacockery.

                  All these issues can be broadly lumped under Cultural Marxism which has almost completed its job.

                  So you go ahead and characterize what I say as jeremiad and parochial revisionist and live in the ever critical and demanding land of post modern liberalism. But today’s liberals would confine JFK to a right-wing-extremism purgatory. Modern liberalism, which you evidently accept, bears no resemblance to classical liberalism… which is really conservatism.

                  Statism, identity politics, and abortion rights are the ONLY supports for post-modern liberalism. And in America the liberal in chief, Obama, represents this three legged table. But of course most people know little of Obama’s radical leftist past because liberal media fashion themselves our gatekeeper. Obama still has not been vetted in media.

                  This could go on and on… but here’s my central point in saying this… when liberals speak, there is a whole whacky and horribly sinister world of cultural Marxism behind it… and most liberals have no clue… and the ones who do know this are duplicitous, they are hypocrites and they are engaged in the deliberate and admitted destruction of Western Civilization.

        • kringlebertfistyebuns

          Can you explain why having activist conservatives testify before Congress is okay, but having a woman testify who’s similarly activist for the opposite view is wrong?

        • http://twitter.com/shelbeau80 Shel

          The writing was on the wall. Now it is in writing. She is a ‘nazi’ feminist.

  • Alborn

    Amen. I am one of those Americans for whom you speak. Thank you so much for speaking out and tell the truth.

  • Ranger1325

    Mark Levin, like Rush, is a master at taking all of the liberal BS and putting it into words that the majority of us are thinking.

    Epic monologue, once again.

  • scottgilbert

    Ditto !!! thank you Mark :)

  • Jim_McCarty

    Rush and Levin have been taking elocution lessons from Andrew Breitbart!

  • http://twitter.com/Ramparts360 Ramparts360

    Yeah, the institutional left can GO TO HELL.

  • http://twitter.com/bullyonsmom Anna B

    Amen Mark!

  • jackl92

    Thank you brother. Mark I am very upset to hear about the death of Andrew.
    Never the less, I knew in my hart that you will continue to take this fight to the MSM. Thank you, bless you and be safe.

    • PVG

      Mark too, has a serious heart condition. I pray he heeds Bill Whittles’ advice!

      • http://no-apologies-round2.blogspot.com/ AmericanborninCanada

        My thoughts exactly! I worry about him!!

      • http://madaboutmahound.blogspot.com/ Gary Rumain

        I hope he doesn’t eat anything cooked by Bill Ayers.

  • Rick2340

    Awesome, as usual

  • LIBERTYUSA

    …and from 1 NEO CON Canadian who also saids to the LAME STREAM MEDIA , “You can all go to HELL.”

  • LIBERTYUSA

    …Good Night America and may God Bless you .”

  • c4pfan

    I love Mark!

    • PVG

      DITTO!

  • Sandra123456

    It would be interesting if someone did a poll about the MSM and what their favorability rating is now. Ask if the MSM is trusted. Ask where people go for their news now, TV, radio or the internet.

    Rush has more listeners than any of the TV news programs have viewers, far more, and he has more listeners than many “hit” prime time TV show have viewers.

    I think Mark Levin does speak for tens of millions of Americans when he says the MSM can go to hell.

    • kringlebertfistyebuns

      If anyone’s getting their news from an “entertainment” talk show of any stripe, they should have their head examined.

  • Sober_Thinking

    Another brilliant rant. Nobody says it better.

    This is typical for the wretched left because they screwed the pooch badly by elevating their pagan god into office. And since they arrogantly won’t admit their horrendous mistake… they have to nibble at the small things. Contraceptives… really?

    And Miss Fluke is indeed a floozy… she deserves the condemnation when she testifies that she spends around $3000 a year on contraceptives. And to have princess pelosi lead this congressional witch hunt is pathetic. She is a true hero for the harlots.

    And Brian Terry’s family deserves so much more honor. The traitor-and-chief ought to be ashamed. Dirtbag… arrogant Ahole.

    • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_FVCCOA6LM6QSFR2GKZCRL2SCMM BikerHoop

      Let’s put the math to this $3000 a year on contraceptives. At walgreens-dot-com condoms are about .72 each which means with that $3000 she can buy 4166 condoms. Now, you divide that by 365 and the result shows she has sex about 11.4 times per day. Any wonder why she’s still a student?

      • GiantM

        Any wonder how she still walks! Lol…kidding.

        • kringlebertfistyebuns

          The condom argument is a strawman, is not what Fluke was addressing, and calling her a slut is a transparently desperate, dishonest attempt to derail the conversation.

      • Sober_Thinking

        Any wonder she was rightfully called a slut?

        • http://profile.yahoo.com/Z5MRLHPSWN2PYXHDGZG5JK7IUE Gary

          Biggest difference between her and a 747 is not everyone has been on a 747……

      • kringlebertfistyebuns

        I believe the discussion was in reference to other methods of birth control, and that $3000 figure was spread out over three years, not one.

        I could see how the price of the pills, combined with doctor visits and lab tests necessary to obtain said pills, might make it close to that figure, though I’m skeptical it’d be quite that high for most women.

        Pills: $30-50/month for 3 years (non-generic): $1080-1800
        Gyno exams/lab work/pap smears: $200-400/year x 3= $600-1200.
        Total: $1680-3000 for a broke-ass college student.

        Most people have no idea what their medical care actually costs due to insurance.

        I don’t know where the condom argument comes from, but it’s idiotic, dishonest handwaving.

  • Constance

    I wonder if Mark Levin realizes he is also very much like Andrew Breitbart. Levin also defends people, quite regularly. He sticks up for his friends, and he doesn’t care who he offends. I have always been amazed at people like Rush, Breitbart, Levin… they are at their very best when faced with incredible opposition. They shine. They rally people, and by doing so, they bring comfort to all of us who so often feel overwhelmed by all the leftist nonsense going on in our country. When I hear people like Levin speak, I so often hear my own thoughts being expressed in a way I could never express them to others. I had a lump in my throat listening to him speak of border agent Terry. The absolute disgust of it – the anger we should all be feeling about it. Obama calls a silly, self-serving wench going to law school to ask how she is holding up? It’s a wonder most of us haven’t jumped off a bridge by now.

    • Asian_chic

      I couldn’t have said it any better!!!!

  • http://twitter.com/Nopropaganda TruthDriver

    Oh the “Righteous Indignation” coming from the left, is both predictable and entertaining. Surely they jest while their political correctness comes back to bite them in the arse! Thank you, Mark, for always standing for Truth. Breitbart is smiling…

  • http://profile.yahoo.com/EPNKCLUJ4F2PBVGOB7MU7O56ZA W.

    Mark Levin is so right – and Bill Whittle and Breitbart said it too – it’s the Soros-big money – manipulated media that is the enemy.

    They are not doing their job, not telling the truth….because of malevolent liars who have bought the media.

  • http://profile.yahoo.com/B2TGU6U2HFFSZUXHIPTQX36R3E Ana

    I am a woman and Sandra Fluke is an insult to sluts – she isn’t smart enough to get the guys getting free sex to pay for their orgasm or leave some change on the night-stand.

  • 911Infidel

    The dinasour media still doesn’t get it. I heard something like 17% of Americans have turned off their TV’s and cancelled their cable subscriptions. With the new media on the Internet, thanks to Breitbart and others, along with Talk Radio, and of course RR, doing away with the Dhimi monopoly on the news back in the 80’s, there is no need of the leftist media anymore. They have lived out their usefulness. Long live the new media.

  • carmtom13

    Thank you Mark. You said it all!

    • PVG

      As usual!

  • sara holy land

    I’m speechless – GREAT !

  • DocBarry1

    thank you Mr. Levin – now please set the record straight on this false narrative being promoted by the left and the Republican establishment to destroy the historical record re Gov Palin

  • greatj

    Mark,
    Don’t waste you time watching M.S.N.B.C.They take their orders from Obama and the Democratic party.

  • texasgirl46

    Excelent…

  • http://no-apologies-round2.blogspot.com/ AmericanborninCanada

    OH AMEN Mark!!! So well said and I know you said what millions of us have been thinking or trying to say!! And if they try and take Rush, or Levin or anyone else off the air- they’ll have to pry the radio out of my cold dead hands.

  • aZjimbo

    As usual, the thunder on the right speaks again from the heart.

  • Luker410

    You are speaking for me Mark. I’ve got Rush’s back. Now we find out how weak the Libs are.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_CKFGTNEKQQCXQZHLQ7EM72Q37E Michael Bittner

    God, I love that man!

  • http://www.facebook.com/bruce.a.hedrick Bruce Allen Hedrick

    And now- if Levin will start explaining how the left is empowered by the 17th Amendment we just might find our way back to liberty …

  • http://www.thechristianmessage.org/ Pastor emeritus Nathan Bickel

    I’m not a great fan of Levin as I am a Constitutionalist who believes that Obama is a fraudulent White House occupier by virtue of his non natural born citizen status, thus disqualifying him to be legitimate president.

    But, be that as it may – I applaud Mark Levin for his spot on words and his support for Rush. I think that Rush explained things very well. Based upon Rush’s commentary I was assisted in understanding the following:

    “Prostitute:”

    A woman or man who solicits money in exchange for sex with another man or woman

    “Political Correctness Heroes”:

    College women who solicit monies from US taxpayers so that they can exercise [contraceptive] sex with men or women

  • lostdutchman

    “DITTOS” Mark ! ! (to paraphrase Rushes’ callers)

  • GiantM

    With Ms. Fluke it’s just another example of the Left throwing mud on the wall and knowing it won’t stick……BUT! The stain remains. That’s their goal. Continue to stain the minds of the unformed, uneducated, and oblivious Americans. The media continues to coerce those minds with lies.

    Thank G_D for the internet, because I believe the amount of “informed” individuals will surpass the uninformed come November!

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Chris-Dias/1680711668 Chris Dias

    You speak for me! It’s only sad that you even have to argue such things.

  • taxa22620

    miss fluke is the kind of lawyer you want……it would be good to screw a lawyer instead of getting screwed by one

    • NHConservative0221

      She’s kind of ugly…. looks like she’s not really interested in guys..

      • taxa22620

        you could be right……. but the things you have described is pretty much what you learn in law school

  • GeorgiaPeachie

    You speak for me!! Go Levin!

  • anneinarkansas

    Mark Levin is called the Great One for good reason!
    Boehner and Co. should be listening.

    • NHConservative0221

      Boehner and Scott Brown can go to hell !!

    • NHConservative0221

      Boehner and Scott Brown can go to hell !!

  • http://profile.yahoo.com/FT77BT2TTVUY72EFEYBEUSX7VA white eagle

    Bravo ! Bravo ! COUNT me in !! … I want this Corrupt & Perverted Administration Brought DOWN !

  • NYGino

    She may not be, by definition, a sexual prostitute but she definitely is a political prostitute and that can’t be argued by anybody.

    • LeonidasOfSparta1957

      Amen– and the truth will out. I hope she tries to sue Rush. Her whole life of political prostitution will come out during the legal investigation aspect. Her whole sexlife will be on display. She started this pissing contest. But he will finish it. Bring it on, Fluke. Your name is appropriate, madame, to the hopes you carry in your heart of harming our liberties and harming Rush– they are a FLUKE.

  • capelady

    Isn’t it fascinating that the liberals are all upset by what Rush said about this woman, but have never had a problem with what Bill Maher and others have said about Sarah Palin and Michelle Bachmann?

    They are selectively offended.

    • cathmom

      As Rush would say: right on right on right on.

      Too bad Santorum did not say this when questioned by Wolf Blitzer on this subject!

  • sjmom

    Mark is so good at expressing what the rest of us are feeling. This morning my husband and I emailed Rush with a note of support because we must stand with him, Mark and the others who are speaking out on our behalf. If we are silent then their voices will become muted.

    As a side note. I wonder if Ms. Fluke and her ilk realize if the govt pays for their birth control they also have the right to dictate who they sleep with as well as other facets of their personal life. Fools never understand what they do to themselves until it is too late.

  • bobemakk

    Levin has already taken up a small part of Andrew Breitbarts job. My prayers are with Andrew and his family.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Beale-Bauguess/100003289525911 Beale Bauguess

    If it wasn’t for Mark Levin, Limbaugh and Hannity and the like–I’d be a very depressed individual. They help me see that the libs don’t literally own all of us yet.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/David-Hips/568018297 David Hips

    Mark,
    Go Man Go…. Tell it like it is….. I am so sick of these whiners it is unreal.

    She is going to Georgetown University and needs the Government to pay for her elective medical services.

    She needs some cosmetic surgery. I cannot in my life imagine why she needs contraceptives.

    • http://madaboutmahound.blogspot.com/ Gary Rumain

      I’d rearrange her face free of charge. 😉

  • NHConservative0221

    Rush was very kind to that ______________ compared to what I would like to call her !!

  • http://twitter.com/Buckeyemom1776 Therese

    I wish I could call Mark Levin, President. Levin. He’d. make a damn good president.

  • publius1969

    I am glad Mr.Levin is on our side. Stay safe,sir and keep fighting the fight. We need more people like him…

  • big4bluz

    Levin doubles down on the Limbaugh crazy talk.

    • Pimpernel_Gammidge

      Leftists can’t talk about the real issues because it highlights the awful record the current regime has done at Downgrading the country.

      Who brought up this stupid topic in the first place?

      Who keeps of trying to use it to distract from President Downgrade’s appalling record in the White House?

  • stinkprogress

    Awsome,
    Lets not forget how the Dummycrats in congress came out last week reeling against proposed cuts to federal employees benifits claiming these people shouldnt have to bear such burdens yet the very same week it is revealed our COMMANDER IN CHIEF proposes to cut the militarys health benifits increasing costs up to 300%,
    So the average pay for a soldier is around 21 grand while federal employees average around a 100 grand not including the ridiculous bemifits.
    Where are the unions on this…

    This adminstration and its tools on the left has given a big F%^K You to our troops and they should all know and understand this!

    Oh and another thing, I remember in 2008 many troops overseas were denied ther rights to vote, with the absentee ballots not getting out in time, I wanna know what is being done to make sure this doesnt happen again?
    I do know our criminal AG is running around suing states who dare try enact voter ID laws all but assuring rampant voter fraud.

    I am sick and tired of this POS prez getting a pass for is maltreatment of our military and our allies and whoever our candidate is better take it right to him!

  • damitajo1

    who is levin?

    • stinkprogress

      you wouldnt understand, your teeny little mind couldnt comprehend

    • http://www.facebook.com/julicornwall Juliann F. Cornwall

      Mr L is the best. I love his straight forward approach. He was in The Undefeated and has a radio show that Sarah Palin announced that she would not be running. That is who Levin is a true patriot a voice of the truth.

  • LeonidasOfSparta1957

    Thank you Professor! Spot on. Stated as it was needed. Bravo! In honor of the Great One and Rush– two much revered and respected men who have NEVER ONCE SWERVED from truth-telling, “theirs but to do or die”–

    “Cannon to right of them,
    Cannon to left of them,
    Cannon in front of them
    Volley’d and thunder’d;
    Storm’d at with shot and shell,
    Boldly they rode and well,
    Into the jaws of Death,
    Into the mouth of Hell
    Rode the six hundred.

    Flash’d all their sabres bare,
    Flash’d as they turn’d in air,
    Sabring the gunners there,
    Charging an army, while
    All the world wonder’d:”

  • LeonidasOfSparta1957

    “a political partisan and advocate,” age 30, demanding the I PAY FOR HER sex-decisions and free contraception? Go to hell?– she’s already LIVING IN HELL. Right on, right on, right on, Professor Levin. God Bless you and Rush. True heroes you two are.

  • detectivedick

    Thank you Mark, I am one of those millions you speak for! Thanks again and Please keep up your great work!

  • gunfire7778

    CNN, MSNBC, and other leftist media: rachel maddow chris matthews george stephanopoulos You can go to hell

  • dk_in_tn

    Amen to that.

  • http://twitter.com/AshleyAnnThomas Ashley Ann Thomas

    I agree with Mark Levin. Great speech!

  • http://twitter.com/AshleyAnnThomas Ashley Ann Thomas

    I totally agree with Mark Levin…great speech Mark! I miss Andrew Breitbart. He would have been all over this.

  • Rmic

    Sandra Fluke is really a provocateur and obviously she didn’t engineer this thing by herself. Her story of victimization staring herself and other poor women who are embarrassed when they find out they can’t afford their birth control pills or have suffered because they couldn’t afford disease testing after a rape is standard Marxist Democrat Subversive Boilerplate material. In my book makes her worse than what Rush rightfully referred to her as based on her phony little bio. Referring the this woman as a whore is really an insult to women of loose morals everywhere.

    Since this woman is seeking to further the Soros/Alinsky agenda of The Subversive and Chief and the host of Secular Humanist Marxists who have infested academia, the “news media” and our government which is parasitic in it’s very nature rather than calling her a Ho just call her Sandra Flukeworm !

    • http://madaboutmahound.blogspot.com/ Gary Rumain

      Or any sort of parasite that kills its host.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Jane-Giavelli-Lauhon/100000150602922 Jane Giavelli Lauhon

    Mark Levin speaks for me, loud and clear!

    • http://madaboutmahound.blogspot.com/ Gary Rumain

      I hear you! 😉

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Denis-Ian/100003224950643 Denis Ian

    The Left is about to get slammed over this … because only a horse’s ass would think that contraceptives are a right.

    • http://madaboutmahound.blogspot.com/ Gary Rumain

      But don’t forget that parasites have a sense of entitlement. They want what’s yours to be theirs, irrespective of what anyone else thinks.

  • lsamsa

    I truly believe that people like Rush Limbaugh should be allowed to speak. The U.S. prides itself on freedom of speech. I respect that.
    I think Rush should be heard far & wide, so that everyone can make up their own minds about what he says.
    The free market is also something that the U.S. seems to place high value on.
    If advertisers feel that their product/services will be hurt indirectly because of sponsoring a show that many people have told them they find offensive…then they have every right to end that sponsorship.
    Apparently seven advertisers of Limbaugh’s show have pulled their ads recently, due to many people contacting them to voice their displeasure and/or because the advertisers themselves were offended.
    This is not a ‘plot’. This is the free market working.

  • http://profiles.google.com/gtomkins1 Glen Tomkins

    Stand with Rush. Stand with the goats.

    Far be it from me to urge you to do anything else. I’m certainly not going to tell you to go to Hell.

    You’re already there.

  • melissatx

    Amen.

  • southheaven

    Only a female is responsible for their body.  Why should ” we the people ” pay for your actions.  Why should “We the people “pay for your abortions?  If you get pregnaunt, the boy isn’t responsible for it, you are!  Only you can let this happen unless you are rapped, It is your decision to take the chance and you and only you are responsible for the consequences.  Not “We the people” to take care and suport your recless actions. I kept my knees together before marrage, stayed away from temtation instead of looking for it.  I am proud to say that I am a mature woman who knows what I want and can wate for the right person or as in shopping, the right item instead of settling of something or someone less.    Rush, Mark and the rest are right on.

 
 
Follow Us!
Get all of our posts delivered directly to your inbox every day!

Join other followers

Powered By WPFruits.com