Oh this one is special. Listen to a guy who knows his stuff debate a twit into silence.
Comment Policy: Please read our new comment policy before making a comment. In short, please be respectful of others and do not engage in personal attacks. Otherwise we will revoke your comment privileges.
Another example that FACTS do not mean anything to these liberals! This is why Rush is right. Stop reaching across the aisle and defeat these people!
LMAO….she was shagged into silence!
Here’s my post earlier today to another similar “Green Weenie” Story….
BlueGood • 3 hours ago
If all of the Green Weenies STOPPED drinking water all over the world, that would save a lot for the rest of us, they would be doing something productive, and we of course would honour their dried up carcases by using them as fertilizer……recycling and all, as exactly they would want….
If it goes their way, there will be a lot of carcasses.
I don’t / will not waste my time anymore with these drones. Stupid is as stupid does……..
Outstanding video!Mr.Morano was obviously well armed with his facts and he left this enviro loon totally speechless.He was in a battle of wits with an unarmed opponent.Priceless.
I loved the part where he told her she was an enemy of freedom.Glad to have this man speaking to Congress on behalf of those of us that view the AGW loons.It is and always has been about control of the people,just as is everything the progressives push.
The sneering in the interviewers voice is nauseating. I admire people who can stomach being around or speaking with these slimy lefty pinko pigs.
Don’t know if I could do it.
That was not a debate by any reasonable measure or unreasonable stretch. To even refer to it as a debate seems really dumb to me.
You’re right. And it’s NOT a debate when you get right down to it. Science has NEVER been a matter of consensus. WE have entered a time where ideology is attempting to trump science. Hundreds of REAL scientists have disclaimed man made climate change. So this lady is reduced to making ridiculous comments. Some scientist, she.
Same situation, ongoing for 150 or so years with macro-evolution. It’s the politicization of science on both scores. They probably figure if the Theory Of Evolution has been accepted by so many, why not something like this? Two huge hoaxes from the same hell pit.
If evolution was a good thing that over millions and millions of years brought all of what we see, taste, smell, touch, hear into being;
Why does it all of the sudden need intelligent design input?
I should have said, what they perceive as intelligent..
It’s more a superstition trumping science than anything so glamorous as an “ideology.” Creating superstitious fears was always about tribal leaders wanting to control the populace. It’s a shame how fear can empty a follower’s head of logic and fill it with suspicion, although I doubt this reporter offered much resistance.
She was certainly up front that she wasn’t going to “engage in point to point debate”. But she sure engaged in point by point smear. As with the left, everything is on their terms.
ABC (Australian Broadcasting Corp.) is the quintessential leftist propaganda organ, right up there with Britain’s BBC, Canada’s CBC, and the US hybrids.
They are smear merchants, and ABC’s butchers have gone after Lord Christopher Moncton as well. They prove time and time again that they cannot debate because they refuse to debate. They will get smoked every time if they dare.
Morano gets tons of time on SUN in Canada. I call him Mr. Awesome Dude.
Geez, nail her with a few facts and I thought she was going to cry. “I will listen but I won’t engage in a debate” just means he’ll kick my butt in any argument. Go home honey and save some wombats.
I was waiting for her to say “but condoms save the planet…”
That’s been Obama’s saving message over the past 4 years. Throwing condoms and contraception at problems.
If only his mother was wise enough to use it as abundantly as he does…
She wasn’t there to debate Mark. She was just there to interview him by ridiculing him and telling his off.
Well, that didn’t work out well for her and I think she lost out on a promotion.
“It’s easier to fool someone than to convince them they’ve been fooled”. Mark Twain
Yearn for the days when people minded their own business
Maybe she just wanted a trip to DC….
That was good.
BONUS: Christopher Monckton of Brenchley takes us through the math to show that the cost of “the proposed Sanders/Boxer carbon dioxide tax (U.S. Senate, 2013)” will be 15 times greater than any proposed mitigation of Global Warming.
Shorter Monckton: Even assuming all the models are correct, and also that warming must be abated (which has never been proven anywhere), or that warming is somehow bad (which is counter to the evidence), the cost to the economy to reduce the warming would be fifteen times what it would cost to just adapt to the new temperature levels.
Which is another way of saying: why should we believe a body of so-called experts who have determined technology cannot allow us to adapt to climate change, when they simultaneously believe technology can be used to reverse the climate trend? Central planners have never shown more competence at anything (other than war) than private individuals who search for solutions to problems.
Bottom line: it’s none of government’s business to tell us how to deal with the weather.
The girl lambasts the man as a liar, a character assassin, and as one who tacitly, or actively, endorses violence against those who do not agree with him, all the while not giving one example to support her charges! And as a result, succeeds in the well known leftist tactic of attacking individual, rather than the argument he makes. I don’t believe for one moment the girl was left speechless. Rather, she stood there supremely smug, basking in her self proclaimed moral superiority. Someone who debates the hoax that is catastrophic man made global warming should have recognized what was going on and called her on her crap. A few quick questions as to why she engages in such despicable personal attacks at the expense of debating the issue? And how often she engages in such behavior when it comes to those who disagree with her? Would have more than done the trick.
I link to this video in my latest blog post! http://bandlerblog.wordpress.com/2013/02/18/read-this-and-weep-al-gore/
This chick, Anna Rose, has a degree in Arts and Law (not a lawyer) and is not a climate change scientist herself. Her pseudointellectual snobbery is completely ridiculous. I would debate a REAL climate scientist but Marc is not, he’s a liar, so I won’t debate him in facts. Just call him names.
She is just another person who has no ability to create value so is riding the coat tails of this money making global warming scam.
Thanks I’m debating this every month here in Hungary.
Always follow the money. The oil rich nations of the Middle East are giving money to these environmental groups to stop the US from obtaining their own resources. They flooded the market with oil months before the election to get prices down and Obama gets re-elected.
Where are the prices now? Have you noticed a 5 cent increase almost every day?
I tell my daughter that when she is asked in school to look at the ramifications of an issue, especially one perpetuated by politics, to be thorough in capturing all possible contributing factors of the issue. Given the politician’s so called meager salary (sarcasm mind you) all politicians including the President will no doubt need some extra income after leaving office.
Financially, people like Al Gore stand to become the richest people on the planet. If you include people Like Obama, who will no doubt be called the father of the Green Initiative, he too will be rolling in the dough. But if one takes a look at Gore and his life style, you would be hard pressed to defend their life style against their beliefs. Al flies around the world in several jets attending Global Warming conventions with other wealthy leaders. I’m sure these concerned people know how much their planes are polluting, and I’m sure they have heard of video conferencing. To the lay people, that being the commoners, it would be easy enough to sell tickets so the lowly spectator could join in without traveling more than they would if they were to attend this meeting at a town hall. Again, it is about the money.
Power: Politically it sounds great for a politician to stand and profess their want to protect voters by protecting the environment. This make the average individual feel warm and tingly about the good hands they have committed themselves to. When evidence magically appears casting doubt on Global Warming, an interesting tactic is employed. The, oh so honest politician, or so called expert on the subject, now becomes an angry 5 year old accusing the other of being a bully and spreading lies. All of this is never proven and the so called experts wish nothing more than to take their ball and go home. This is the second issue behind the scenes of the war on Global Warming, that being power. Obama, Al Gore, and most Green Initiative leaders want power, power over the lives of everyone. It is a simple idea that has proven itself throughout history, “If you get the money, you can obtain the power.” Make no mistake, Barack Obama, Al Gore and others want to rule others so they can be immortalized as the most powerful people on earth. Others who fit into this mad dream are Pol Pot, Jim Jones, Kim Jil Il and other would be dictators who knew that if they could be victorious, they could write history any way they want. (POWER)
Spank you very much!
According to her, facts are lies and lies are facts. SOP for leftists/globalists.
Sciences ceases to be science when the scientists get their funding from politicians/government. There is no room for objectivity when your “patron” demands that you reach a certain result, empirical evidence be damned. Science has been, unfortunately, politicized and as such cannot be relied upon for objectivity.
Global warming was just another way of liberals to try and gain more control over not only everybody’s lives, but also to get more control over our government. And if this global warming “religion,” and that’s what it is to these people, takes over the government, well then of course it has to be funded big time. So it’s just another way to grow government and suck up even more funds to finance an ever-growing bureaucracy for people who do nothing for a living.
For the progressives it’s not a matter of science – that’s what they call it, but it’s their religion – mother earth paganism mixed with marxism under the vestments of “environmentalism.”
Every religion has “offerings” – in this instance it’s taxpayer money extorted under the b.s. of “climate change.”
It seems like Mark won the argument. She didn’t rebut any of his points. She said he was “making things up,” but she didn’t bring up one thing that he made up. If he was wrong, she could have pointed it out. Maybe he wasn’t wrong.
…as in all cases of attacks on ‘ L I B E R T Y ‘ , by the indoctrinated zombies of the public school system they resort to the semantics of calling every opponent LIAR. Resulting in showing themselves out to be NO THREAT at all the TRUTH and LIBERTY which will prevail.” (period)
What a twit!
I have seen people blow debates but I don’t think I have ever seen someone shoot themselves in the knee caps so fast as her. Perhaps she should stick to Aussie politics.
Perhaps she ought to put down the Cool Aid long enough to do her own homework.
Hi. I won’t debate facts. Nice work.
Debate? No one said ANYTHING. Just a knife fight with soundbites. There is so much data, information, knowledge, and wisdom…. and this is what we get?