The Right Scoop
No more Mark Levin. Lost all respect for him. Limbaugh, Hannity, Levin, the lot of them. These guys are not conservatives. They are NEO-CONS. That's what lost us the elections in 2006 and 2008. Rick Santorum is a NEO-CON fave. Rand Paul is what won in 2010. And Ron Paul started the momentum. Ron Paul or bust in 2012. Former NEO-CON, now the scales are off my eyes. I even read Levin's book! Too bad he doesn't really believe most of what he wrote.
Levin and his minions support the Patriot Act. A bunch of NeoCon racist chickenhawks. The last ditch effort now is to call Paul a Racist, which is
like throwing a Hail Mary pass.
Levin and his minions support the Patriot Act. A bunch of NeoCon chickenhawks. The last ditch effort now is to call Paul a Racist, which is
like throwing a Hail Mary pass.
Mark Levin supports the Patriot Act wholeheartedly. He supports the TSA, Carbon Taxes and NAFTA and GAT. Mark Levin is a self hating jew.
pathetic
you cannot even tolerate the marketplace of ideas and pretend to be conservative
woefully ignorant plebs
he wont protect our country but he has 70+% more donations from active duty troops?
logic fail lol
your opposition to Ron Paul stems from a world historical view fed to you through a tube
your opposition to Ron Paul stems from a world historical view fed to you through a tube
we live in an infantilized logic space now where shouting down one's opponent is considered the very height of reason and is lovingly administrated by countless experts
western civilization, we hardly knew ye
we live in an infantilized logic space now where shouting down one's opponent is considered the very height of reason and is lovingly administrated by countless experts
western civilization, we hardly knew ye
Mark Levin can't be this stupid.
It is impossible for a person to actually be this stupid and arrogant, but if he spent as much time running his mouth doing actual research, I would forgive such useful idiocy - but this isn't mere useful idiocy.
Mark Levin looks to me like an operative, no different than a FoxNews or MSNBC or CNN prestitute.
And yet I have no trouble believing that millions of Americans eat this shit up with a spoon and ask for seconds. This state of affairs was deliberately engineered and for Precisely this purpose of rendering the electorate politically neutered and continually voting for absolute scoundrels and puppets.
The worst part is, we have no choice but to somehow educate or or wake up zombies and even if Levin is simply a useful idiot whose grasp of geopolitics, history and economics is paper thin, somehow explain the world to him as well. Good luck though with such monumental arrogance.
"none are so enslaved as those who MISTAKENLY think themselves to be free" -P. Goethe
I'm looking forward to the Great Collapse, the one the Paultards know is coming. When it occurs, we'll have an opportunity to purge our culture of parasitic war mongers who cannot fathom any idea outside of their dogma. Levin & Ilk represent a vast network of criminals sucking our nation dry with debt based currency and perpetual war.
To my fellow Paultards: do not waste your breath on these monsters, they are goners. Tell it like it is, but do not let them waste your energy, their minds have been programmed to the point where the slightest acknowledgment of physical impossibilities (9-11), wealth confiscation (The Fed), and mass poisoning (environmental & mental) evokes an emotion filled response that is blind to both logic and history.
Some you win, some you lose, and some you throw away.
Mark. great video and excellent responses. Continue doing what you do - you are making a difference. Little Tboca
Levin ius a total idiot. Oh now if Ron Paul supporters call in, he doesn't want to talk to them. Wow talk about selective sensorship. Ron Paul wants to specifically define our military's mission instead of going to war in every nation on earth with no mission goal in sight.
Jewish talk show host Mark Levin believes it is unpatriotic not to fund Israel with American taxpayer dollars. Surprise. Surprise. Wah. Wah.
More money for Israel. Wave the Israeli flag.
OH LOOK... the Ronulan is attempting to appear intelligent, so we wont automatically assume he's as deluded and blank as the rest of the burn outs that make up the Ron Paul cultist movement. He's coming off as pretentious, but little more. SO... you've got 69 at the end of your name. OK... yup. Ron Paul is a cult leader. Rev. Jim Jones/David Koresh/Charlie Manson could do no better.
Ron Paul and his deluded cultist followers scare me WAY more than the specter of 4 more years of Obama.
Not true. He may think Social Security is unconstitutional but that doesn't mean he's automatically going to hang seniors out to dry. Look into his positions, stop the blanket assumptions:
. . . except in Iowa and New Hampshire, where he's behind the lead by one and two points respectively . . .
It was Reagan's militarism that he opposed, the same adventurism in Lebanon that got over 200 marines killed...
I'm going to take exception with this mischaracterization of Reagan's deployment of the Marines to Lebanon. Firstly, I served with many of those Marines, I lost many friends that day in addition to my brother Marines, four young men that I had known since boot camp and I deeply resent your implication that they died as the result of military adventurism. The Marines are our "charter force", do you know what that means? No? I'll spell it out for you. The Marine Corps is the United States' force contribution to UN Peacekeeping forces by treaty, the mission to Lebanon was a UN Peacekeeping mission sent to prevent the Lebanese Civil War from spreading to a wider conflict and engulfing the entire region, which they accomplished by the way. It was not "adventurism" that lead to this tragedy it was keeping our word by honoring the treaty that our nation signed. Many Ron Paul supporters gleefully throw the quotes from Jefferson's Inaugural and Washington's Farewell into the teeth of anyone who might question their candidate's foreign policy, well they have all been paraphrasing and misrepresenting what Washington said. This is what Washington actually said;
“The great rule of conduct for us in regard to foreign nations is, in extending our commercial relations to have with them as little political connection as possible. So far as we have already formed engagements let them be fulfilled with perfect good faith. Here let us stop.” ~Washington's Farewell Address
I would draw your attention to this particular passage, "So far as we have already formed engagements let them be fulfilled with perfect good faith.", this has to do with Honor, a concept I believe is not completely foreign to you. This is what Reagan was doing, keeping to our word that had been given, it was not adventurism. As to my own feelings about the UN, I have previously stated them in this forum before, but just for you I will reiterate them for you here and now, I firmly believe that we should fully withdraw from the organization and all relevant treaties, then present the Secretary General with an eviction notice and put those buildings to better use. I have no personal truck with you JA and I will defend to the death your right to speak your mind on issues, after all I took an Oath to that very ideal many years ago and it had no expiration date.
/Rant Off
Hahaha! A little dirty humor! Nothing personal (as long as you AREN'T a true Paulbot, always bashing everybody's candidate)! LOL!
Well, the joke is now dead, but I'll explain anyways. Your screenname is "paulbot69". "PAUL BOT"+"69"! That's as far as I can take the description, but do a quick google search for the number 69, and I GUARANTEE you you will discover the meaning of the joke in the first page of the results!
I would ask all the Mark Levin supporters here to at least take the time to look up the real history of US involvement in the Middle East instead of putting your hands over your ears and screaming when a dissenting opinion comes in like Levin does. Don't have to believe what I say, just Google it.
Want to know why Iran was radicalized and hates America? Ever hear of Operation Ajax? Look it up. In 1953 the democratically elected Iranian prime minister Mosaddegh was removed from power in a coup organised and carried out by the United States CIA at the request of the British MI6. Why did they do that? Because the British were against Mosaddegh attempting to nationalize their oil industry. Guess who they put in his place? The Shah. The Shah then had a 20 year rein of terror and brutalized the Iranian people leading to the rise of fundamentalist Islam and Ayatollah Khomeini. (Does this sound vaguely familiar? It is, because it's exactly what we did in Egypt by backing dictator Mubarrek and now the Islamic Brotherhood is taking over).
After Iran was radicalized you know how we covertly supported in a war with them? Yes, Saddam Hussein. US foreign policy has been schizophrenic in the Middle East for 50 years and it's time to stop taking one step forward and two steps backwards. Can we all agree it's never in US interests to financially back a dictator? Can we all agree there is such a thing as blowback? Can we all agree with Reagan who said his biggest mistake was putting troops in Lebanon and not realizing the insanity of Middle East politics?
Reaganite my ass.....here is what Reagan said about Ron Paul "Ron Paul is one of the outstanding leaders fighting for a stronger national defense. As a former Air Force officer, he knows well the needs of our armed forces, and he always puts them first. We need to keep him fighting for our country."
-Ronald Reagan
Ron Paul is great, this guy is a pussy...hey levin way to throw out pejoritives and interupt your guest like a angry little polemic
It is extremely unfortunate that people believe America's military caused the downfall of the Soviet Union because it fails to recognize that Communism does not work. The USSR fell because they followed unsustainable policies, not because we built 30,000 nuclear warheads. Call me a "Paultard," but I simply read into history and not gobble up the mainstream media. Also, unfortunately for Levin, I was not aware that a conservative means building up military to unprecedented levels. Reagan's militarism put us in debt (with the war on drugs). Ron Paul has mentioned again and again: He is the most conservative on stage right now. No one follows the Constitution like he does, and no one has more respect than individual liberty, the very core of our revolution, than he does. Fail, Levin.
I'm Jason in Los Angeles, the caller in this clip. I was not calling on behalf of Ron Paul, though I am supporting supporting Paul in the primary since he's the only constitutional candidate running. I called Levin's show because he claims to fight big government but continually blasts the only candidate with a record of railing against big government. I understand Levin and other neocon warmongers hate Paul's foreign policy but that doesn't change the reality that Paul's platform here is one of traditional conservative foreign policy.
Mark Levin says Ron Paul is anti-Israel...but in reality, Paul's foreign policy is BETTER for Israel. Just ask Netanyahu, who agrees with Paul that our military assistance is no longer necessary in Israel. And Paul was also the only Congressman to defend Israel's attack on Iraq in the early 80's. Ron Paul defends Israel's sovereignty all the time, Levin just fails to talk about that.
Levin also ignores the fact that Ron Paul was one of very few Republicans who supported Reagan in his first primary race. Instead he focuses on Paul's disappointment with Reagan when he failed to deliver what he campaigned on. As if criticizing your government makes you less conservative or less patriotic.
I tried to say all this on the air but Levin was to much of a coward to actually let me defend my positions. He turned the volume down on my call and talked over me. Just thought you guys should hear my side of the conversation.
Coward? He gave you plenty of time to speak and explained to you why Ron Paul is nutso.
Sorry dude, you got schooled by the Great One. And you deserved it. And it doesn't surprise me that you still don't understand his point.
No, he didn't. He cut my volume off and didn't allow 90% of my responses on air. The only people who heard my responses were my coworkers who were sitting next to me while Levin talked over me and turned my volume down.
He calls Paul a nutso on foreign policy but then misstates Paul's entire policy. Maybe if he actually KNEW Paul's policy he wouldn't think its so "nutso."
Dude get over the fact that he turned your volume down. Otherwise you sound like a WAH-baby.
Secondly, even now your premise is wrong. He wasn't defending Newt from being a RINO. He was defending Newt against attacks that he was a Socialist or Marxist.
Thirdly, he's never attacked Ron Paul for being a RINO, just a nutso because of his foreign policy.
My premise was incorrect in the first place? The minute before I called in Levin was defending Newt against accusations of being a RINO. Newt's record flies in the face of what conservative politics is all about but Levin defends him anyway? I called to discuss this and he turned my volume down, I'd hardly say that's "allowing me to make my point." Maybe in the backwards world of the neocon - where black is white and freedom is the patriot act or NDAA - that's allowing me to make a point.
But your whole premise was incorrect in the first place. And still he allowed you to make your point and you kept going and going so he silenced you so he could correct you.
Get over it. It's a radio show.
Furthermore, NO ONE is saying "its the US's falt" what the contention is, is that our foreign policy ( developed by Woodrow Wilson) of "spreading democracy around the world' is what is at issue, the manner in which we treat others via our government, is what is at question and not our country as a whole.
Mark is embelishing himself on Paul's position with respect to "national defense". Paul is for a strong national defense. What he has stated over and over is the reduction of militarism, as we are going broke trying to maintain 900 bases in 131 countries to the tune of over 1 trillion a year that we do not have.Furthermore, there is not where writen in the consitution that authorizes us to have military bases in another sovereign nation.
Mark represents the establishment and the military industrial complex, no matter how many times he denies it, his outword hatred for Paul comes through loud and clear and is a contridiction to his stance against hate speech and name calling.
Can anyone deny that Dr. Paul has the countries best interest at heart, whether you agree with him or not? Can anyone deny that he votes consistant with his rhetoric?
Can anyone deny his prediction of the financial and housing bubble or the decline of the dollar? Can anyone deny that he sites credible sources and or historical facts for his aruements?
Dr. Paul is not a perfect canddiate to be sure, however he is the only one that is not making this campaign about himself, he is the only one speaking plain truth. He is the only one who is not spending much of his time trying to defend himself or defending "flip-floping" posisitions.
We will never agree 100% on anything, but if you can agree 75% of the time, you generally call that person a friend. Dr. Paul is a friend of the constitition and of the people.
Comment Policy: Please read our new comment policy before making a comment. In short, please be respectful of others and do not engage in personal attacks. Otherwise we will revoke your comment privileges.