Obama supporters gone wild and the devastation they leave behind

From the YouTube description:

WARNING: graphic content! Watch Obama supporters “gone wild” with attempts to silence speech; to steal, vandalize, deface and destroy conservative political signs; and to intimidate through violent, aggressive behavior. The party of bumper sticker “tolerance” and “co-exist” mantras, reveals its true nature in this shocking expose.


(via The Shilling Show)

Consider this an open thread.

Comment Policy: Please read our new comment policy before making a comment. In short, please be respectful of others and do not engage in personal attacks. Otherwise we will revoke your comment privileges.
  • garygramscom

    Vote for Romnoid…well that settles it…. I am!

    • Pyrran

      Yeah, I wasn’t going to vote for Romney, but this Romnoid guy seems like just the candidate for me! I’m in!

  • These “people” wouldn’t behave this way if they KNEW their lives were in danger by doing so…I’ve never seen any of these things happening in the more gun-friendly states. But then again, I live in Los Angeles, and I’m pretty sure North Korea is more gun-friendly than we are! LOL!

  • Susitna

    Like the OWS the Obama supporters have an attraction to feces, maybe because they are full of it.

    • BlueGood

      Not only full of it Susitna…they enjoy the scent and try to make like EVERYBODY does as well…

      That is the level of their depravity….is there any lower space on the planet they will dive in to???

    • toongoon

      It oozes from their ears. Ewww.

    • It’s who and what they vote for

      • Galatiansch2vs20

        Like a dog that returns to its vomit Is a fool who repeats his folly. Proverbs 26:11 NAS

  • Army_Pilot1967

    What can you say about liberals beside: disgusting, violent, disturbed, demented.

    • Don

      What else can you expect, Army_Pilot1967, when all the left has is racial hatred, class envy and now a make believe war on women? They can’t use the truth, only hate. Its all they and all they are.

      • Army_Pilot1967

        This country has changed dramatically over the last several decades. It wasn’t always this way. Conservatives and liberals always had their differences, but there wasn’t all the hate and violence of today. It’s sad that things have turned out this way.

        • NoToTyrants

          Conservatives and liberals always had their differences, but there wasn’t all the hate and violence of today. It’s sad that things have turned out this way.

          I think you can trace this current trend toward hate and violence in our politicals to the presidential election of 2000. That is when the left, incited by their candidate and the Democrat party leadership, went completely off the rails and became thoroughly unhinged.

          They pulled out every vile dirty underhanded hate-filled trick to try and overturn that election. They have since not only sustained the hate, deceit, and vitriol, but have amped it up.

          • Army_Pilot1967

            You might be correct about 2000 being a turning point. That was a nasty election for sure. There was a time when politicians disagreed with each other, but there was no rancor or a public display of bitterness or back-stabbing. Politicians were doing things for the good of the country, not for certain groups. Things are just too out-of-hand nowadays.

            • warpmine

              BTW, this is exactly how tyrants came to power during history. Unfortunately, they’re simply to ignorant to understand this.

          • warpmine

            I agree except the when it began to happen and that was decades earlier in Chicago during the Dem Convention. They were and are simply nuts wishing for a war and by God they’re going to get what they’ve been asking for. They may terrify the elderly but this conservative constitutionalist will enjoy putting an end to their charades.

    • Pyrran

      A lot more, pilot, but this is a family website.

    • keyesforpres

      Dumba$$ also comes to mind…

    • Galatiansch2vs20

      II Timothy 3:1-5 NAS

      But realize this, that in the last days difficult times will come.

      For men will be lovers of self, lovers of money, boastful, arrogant, revilers, disobedient to parents,

      ungrateful, unholy, unloving, irreconcilable, malicious gossips, without self-control,

      brutal, haters of good, treacherous, reckless, conceited,

      lovers of pleasure rather than lovers of God, holding to a form of godliness, although they have denied its power;

      Avoid such men as these.

  • 911Infidel

    Panic time for the bed-wetters. Romney is up in all the swing states and a few he wasn’t expected to take. Oopsies. Looks like that UC voter model is looking rather prescient at this point in the election cycle. Ah, so sad too bad.

  • GreenBeretWay


    This is funny and probably true. WARNING : Bad language

  • “This is what democracy looks like” Libtard style!

    • marketcomp

      This is what it looks like when child doesn’t get thier way. They throw temper tantrums! And we see this in dear leader and almost every dictator. For example, when it was beleived that Hugo Chavez was on the verge of losing he started rolling out the tanks. Now I ask you what was he going to do with tanks, when he already rigged the vote? Childish but very dangerous and another reason why we should never allow another dictator to come to power in the United States or any where if we can influence it.

      • Teach the children history and how to vet a candidate. This will prevent the next Carter/Obama that comes our way.

        • meyou

          Those lessons have to come from home; schools won’t do it anymore (they used to during the 50s & 60s).

  • johnos2112

    I wonder what will happen election day? Stay tuned!

    • Orangeone

      The Demorats are already threatening violence. The NBPP was released by Holder. I wonder about our safety at the polls in swing states.

      • Absentee is your friend!

        Our home is on the same block as our polling station. We’ve not been there in a decade.

        • Stephanie T

          This is very sad that citizens of the United States of America have anything to fear on Election Day. But be smart and use absentee ballotting if necessary to get your vote in.

          • proudhispanicconservative

            By sending your vote, you are empowering them, I am going to go cast my vote personally, let them come to me they will see what the second amendment is all about.

            • Stephanie T

              I completely agree. However, Celeste’s situation may be different as are others’. For example, I would hope that a woman with young children in fear of visiting her polling place in person would take advantage of using an absentee ballot.

        • Orangeone

          If you vote absentee in MN and someone goes to the poll and votes in your name (no voter ID here yet), your absentee is not counted.  I go in person but I go at an odd hour.

  • p m

    These are the Koolaid drinkers the demoncommies have created.
    Time for a cultural revolution, no?

  • CalCoolidge

    Hey look, the Obama Nazi’s are even using the Swastika now.

  • Brought to you by the people that preach “tolerance.”

    “Why can’t we all just get a bong”? – NObama (probably)

  • That speech NObama made about civility is really working isn’t it?

    • Rshill7

      He wasn’t talking to his side, only ours.

      To Obama supporters: If Big Bird is an issue for you, you’re probably a child.

  • Landscaper

    Think they are ticked off now……. WAIT until they LOSE.

    • Betsey_Ross

      They must know that Romney is going to take VA. They are pretty hyped up in these film clips. This is what loser Democrats do. I wonder what Nov. 7th is going to look like?

      • p m

        Looks like some riots have been and are still being organized in advance, courtesy of Rent-A-Mob. Just hope the cops, wherever riots may erupt if they do, God forbid, will NOT pussyfoot around with the losers as they did with OWS.

        • Pyrran

          I will exercise my constitutional right to vote for the candidate of my choice and woe to those who try to stop me.

      • Orangeone

        Independents should be convinced that they don’t want to be associated with these criminals.

    • wodiej

      That’s why I won’t put bumper stickers on my car.

      • Landscaper

        Have a USMC decal on my truck, Romney sign in my yard. Screw em’

        • Orangeone

          I have a Romney sign in my yard too. If they try it they will be introduced to my Glock.

          • TexasEnforcer

            And my Sig, my FN, my Ruger, my Mossberg and my Stag Arms.

  • my personal favorite was the call to the GOP hq on 9/11…stay classy Albemarle County!

  • marketcomp

    These peope are as delusional as their dear leader. This is so such childish and immature behavior that is being displayed every where.

  • jdbaird

    I would absolutely love to pepper spray those two guys at the end of the clip… “Oops the camera just turned off for a second now these guys are on the ground writhing in pain, don’t know what happened!”

    • Or stun gun their a$$es!

      • Orangeone

        And then flip them over to cook the other side of the pancake

      • jdbaird

        Oh yeah! “Don’t taze me bro”

  • Prepare for the 7th of Nov… Things could get real UGLY real FAST!

    • We’re preparing for the 5th through the 11th. The night before may be used to terrorize. The days after and throughout the weekend may be used for mayhem. We’ve already arranged vacation days and made sure we don’t need to leave the property for those 7 days, just in case we can’t.

  • froggy19510

    “If you call it a riot, it sounds like it was just a bunch of crazy people who went out and did bad things for no reason. I maintain it was somewhat understandable, if not acceptable. So I call it a rebellion.”

    Maxine Waters.

  • So, chuckle if you will, but the fear of Nov 7 (and beyond) is why hubby and I are stocking up on arms and ammo.

    Not. Joking.

  • RosiesSeeingRed

    The intolerance is in their soul — in their being. I don’t know if I’ve told this story here before, but a few years ago when O’Reilly and Beck did their tour together, they had ads running in the local movie theater. I was there waiting for a movie to begin with my two friends who are liberals, and they nearly had a cow when the O’Reilly/Beck ad came on. One said she was going to speak to the manager. The other said “this shouldn’t be allowed.” I leaned toward them and said “What is this? Communist China?” and they both shut up. But seriously, neither thought it was OK for O’Reilly/Beck to be advertising their show — in other words, for O’Reilly/Beck to be able to SPEAK.

    No problem though with a Michael Moore movie being shown in the theater, let alone merely advertised.

    The liberal mantra: Free speech for me but not for thee. And if you dare try to exercise your right to free speech, we will suppress you.

  • sjmom

    This is Satanic behavior if I ever saw it; vulgarity, vandalism and violence and vitriol. It’s the hallmark of the Left and their leader. Remember, Alinsky dedicated his book to Lucifer; now, there’s a calling card. Praise the Lord, God is on His Throne and His arm is not shortened. The victory is ours; the battle is the Lord’s (2Chron. 20)

    104 days until Romney/Ryan are inaugurated. Yes, I am counting the days!

    • This behavior of the Satanic Left is predictable. Remember, these people are Godless.

  • wodiej

    Good grief, they act like a bunch of gangster hoodlums. Oh, they are.

  • 12grace

    If they act like this before the election, think what they will be like, if obama gets in again?

    Future, Brown Shirts.

    • p m

      He won’t, 12grace – but there will be more like this, I fear.

  • denbren52

    I have been saying for some time now that the post-election period will be violent no better who wins. If Obama wins, he will not hesitate to proceed with his Communist agenda, thereby inflaming the people who thought they were voting for an American. If he loses, all Hell will break loose very quickly.

    • TexasEnforcer

      Stay vigilant and armed.

    • PJRodman

      My husband said the same thing today. The violence just may be inevitable. The left – where opposing views are absolutely not tolerated. The liberal elites stay safe and snug in their gated communities and watch the useful idiots burn their own houses down. What a plan.

  • SKL53

    What can you expect from loosers who are totally uncivilized! They are like the Occupy Wallstreeters who dirty up the place! They leave a trail of disease wherever they go!

  • ArizonaPaul

    Yeah….They’re the “open-minded one’s. Right. And all the hate comes from the right. Just read about where the real hate comes from-“Unhinged” by Michelle Malkin, and “Demonic” by Ann Coulter.

  • Life is hard -its even harder when your Stupid !! I believe Ronald Reagan said that !! And these people are Stupid.We are talking low I.Q. here. You can’t debat stupid.These people are stuck on stupid. Their parents were stupid,its in their genes !! Romney will vote for Gene therapy ,so they may be helped. OBama loves stupid people ,nothing is better for a politician than a stupid person !!

    • iaintlyin

      an uneducated voter is their best customer

  • TexasEnforcer

    Typical obama base. The 47% at its best. Romney wasn’t lying. These people want to be “subjects” dependent on the gov’t. A sad, but true existenece for the diehard libtard base.

    • Galatiansch2vs20

      Was he speaking only of Democrats, or just of the 47 percent who don’t pay federal income taxes? Because if it was the latter category, he was wrong just as he stated he was. There are many who don’t pay federal income taxes who plan to vote Romney/Ryan.

  • Sober_Thinking

    Ignorance and intolerance on parade.


  • Shoot those two punks and go get a burger. No biggie. Did I mention that I love Texas?

  • iaintlyin

    Seems like a small thing but I’ve learned to pay attention closely to the words 0 reads at his speeches. The first day after his infamous debate debacle, 0 said somewhere in that mornings campaign stop “i will not allow that to happen”, referring to a Romney victory saying it would be going backwards. What did that mean? I thought it was the American voters that determined the winner. I can’t find a link to the speech but distinctly remember those words. After seeing this video, witnessing the OWs crowds and knowing the left in general, we are going to be in for hard times following a Romney win, the left (especially the MSM, msnbc and ilk) will cause massive disturbances and chaos for the duration of Romneys reign. Be Aware

  • p m

    O/T Courtesy of the Cato Institute, here’s their2012 Fiscal Policy Report Card On America’s Governors.

    Connecticut and Illinois are rock bottom. Kansas, Florida, Maine and Pennsylvania get an ‘A’. A few of the Bs should move up provided they can expand on what they are already doing. Very interesting and educational!


    • nibblesyble

      Thanks p m…hope you had a great thanksgiving!

      • p m

        Yes, thanks nibbles – you too I hope. Did your little ones enjoy some turkey, or are they too small? In the UK we call it the Harvest Festival. We went to a C of E church school and had the best hymns that time of year. Wish it could be a formal holiday there as it is in N. America – an ancient tradition worth honouring with a proper holiday. Take care:)

        • nibblesyble

          They did enjoy turkey. Mostly I wanted them to know that it is a day about being grateful for family, friends, and especially God and His goodness. I didn’t know the UK had a Thanksgiving type holiday….more wonderful tid bits to fill my obsession..lol. You are the best p m.

          • p m

            Back at you, nibbles! 🙂

  • :46 second mark…..DEMON EYES!!!!

  • drphibes

    The Left are rabble to the core. Even the ones in suits and ties.

  • Welcome to the Left’s New Civility… otherwise known as fascism.

  • I had a Bush/Cheney ’04 sticker on the back window of my nice Ford E350 van…

    That window got busted out. My teacher sister said I “deserved” it. Then kinda laughed like it was just a joke.

    The only thing you can do is stand up for what you believe and make your life a positive example…

  • Of all the places in America the Founding Father I admire most and who wrote the Declaration of Independence. Thomas Jefferson 3rd president of the United States and who was born in Albemarle county Virgina. Is probably Turning over in his grave to see the free speech he stood for, get trample on in his place of birth.
    Shame on all those Democrats who have resorted to tyranny and gestapo tactics to silence free speech.

  • stage9

    This is why we have second amendment rights, to keep liberal radicals from committing crimes on our property.

    • James1754

      Can’t shoot people over property. Unless you want to spend a long time behind bars.
      So please do not give this advice.

      • MiketheMarine

        If they are carrying a weapon and you are in your yard, you could argue that you feared for your life. Knowing those intollerant asshats, I don’t think that would be far off the mark.

        • James1754

          First of all, you can argue anything. If you want to spend a fortune to an attorney and possibly lose your home and even your life, go out in your yard, armed, and confront the fool defacing the political sign.
          Then plan on spending the next few nights in jail and the next few years in court, to the cost of hundreds of thousands of dollars.
          All so you can protect a $1.98 cardboard sign. And by the way, be prepared for the nightmares that will accompany the taking of a human life in defense of a cardboard sign that was free.
          Yea, real smart.
          Or you could get the license plate number off the car and call the police and let them deal with the fool. Then the fool can explain it to the judge.

          The signs are free, just go get another one and save your family the heart ache.

          Personally I would chose option 2.

          • You typically have a right to inform people they are trespassing, and must leave. If they refuse, you typically have the right to take them into custody until a law enforcement officer arrives to take custody.

            I would be defending my property, not some piece of cardboard.

            You don’t have the right to simply shoot at trespassers, but you do have the right to defend your property. All day, every day.

            • James1754

              With all due respect, you have the right to tell people to leave your property, when they do not you do not have the right to escalate the situation. You then become the aggressor and are opening the door to all sorts of legal problems.
              Simply call the police and let them do their job, it will save you and yours a world of hurt, anguish and money.

              Lastly, unless you are a sworn law enforcement officer, you do not have the right to take anyone into custody in most states. So called “citizen arrest” is not legal in all states and I would suggest you check your local laws. To put it mildly, it is not worth the problems you can cause yourself.

              • Taking someone into custody is NOT escalation. Moving from trespass to OCCUPY is most definitely escalation.

                And gun owners are always more familiar with these laws in their states than non gun owners, I assure you. The hell we go through to obtain and preserve out second amendment rights, combined with the regular training a responsible gun owner goes through is one reason why we are so familiar with these laws.

                Anyone initiating aggression is the problem, not the law-abiding citizen.

                • James1754

                  You are completely missing the point. The entire point is to let the police do their job, so you do not cause yourself problems.
                  Now how do you intend to “take someone into custody”? Please understand that a person spray painting or decorating a sign is not considered an aggressor under the law. Do you even understand what escalation means as a legal term?

                  Pick your fights, this one is simply not worth the problems you can cause yourself and family.

                • Obviously you do not take anyone into custody without the threat of force. If they decide to occupy your land after being informed they must leave, most states give you the right to do something other than “wait for the cops.” The is what the second amendment is for.

                  If someone has chosen to do something on my land with my property against my wishes, it’s already gotten past the “pick your fight” stage. That is what you are missing here.

                • James1754

                  I am not now nor have I been talking about people “occupying your land”. We are talking about people spray painting and using feces to decorate political signs.
                  Now someone can trespass simply by putting their dirty feet upon your property and you have the right to ask them to leave. You do not have the right to escalate the amount of force used. You do not have the right to use a firearm, which is considered lethal force in every state, to get them to leave.

                  The Second Amendment is about self-defense. What you are talking about is not self-defense. You pay the police to do a job. Let them and avoid all the problems you will be facing if you do not.

                • Yes you damn well are referring to people occupying your land. If they leave when you tell them to leave, none of this discussion exists (other than to maybe press charges if the damage warrants it, which has nothing to do with firearms or confrontation we are going on about here).

                  Once you inform them they must leave, and they refuse, *they* have escalated into illegally occupying/trespassing on your land. This is simple logic.

                  And you most definitely have a right to use a firearm in any legally prescribed manner. One of which is to protect your property (some states provide for this particular right, others claim you may not use deadly force to stop theft, but may to prevent major damage, like burning your barn, so each person needs to know their state’s laws).

                  So far, nobody here has mentioned a drawn weapon have they? No, they haven’t. No one advocated shooting them outright, did they? No, they did not.

                  I shouldn’t have to spell out the way this works, but you seem to demand it.

                  1)You walk up to them, taking full advantage of open carry, observing all the usual safety and courtesy rules of firearms, and you tell them to leave.
                  2) If they refuse you then tell them you are calling the cops.
                  3) If they still refuse, you may stand there and by your very presence hold them in custody until the cops arrive.
                  4) If they are stupid enough to try and use force on you, you have a right to defend yourself.

                  You have never spent much time in the country, I can tell. A sheriff has little sympathy for a trespasser complaining of rock salt in his behind out here.

                  You just do not f*ck with landowners and expect them to sit in the kitchen waiting on the law.

                • James1754

                  When you lower yourself to using foul language tie discussion ends!

                • I like to think I’ve elevated the art of using foul language.

                • James1754

                  That is an oxymoron.

                • Not when it’s done properly.

  • This is VA….this is tolerance…the usual Left Wing Haters…they ever pull this on my property GOD HELP THEM….I will be waiting!!! It is time Conservatives, who vastly outnumber these scum, need to fight back. I am sick of these PINKOS who did this in the cover of night afraid of the real men and women that protect them. So they pull their 5 yr old stunts…rejects of society that want to play the victim…..BOO HOO!!

    Romney will get even more support from me with each and every one of these stunts!

  • Landscaper

    Levin had another great line tonight…. “take their iphone and they will cut your throat, take their liberty and they will still vote for you.”

    • Galatiansch2vs20

      “They who would give up an essential liberty for temporary security, deserve neither liberty or security.”

      Benjamin Franklin

      (quote source: http://www.cancertutor.com/Quotes/Quotes_Presidents.html)

      • James1754

        Actually the quoit is as follows:
        A person who would give up essential liberty for a little temporary safety, deserves neither liberty nor safety.

        Franklin never used the word security.

        • Galatiansch2vs20

          Please provide the source you base your assertion on. I found numerous websites besides the one I source above that say it the same way they quoted it. Here’s one that gives the date as well:
          “They who would give up an essential liberty for temporary security, deserve neither liberty or security.”

          — Benjamin Franklin (1759)

          • James1754

            Get off the web and go to a library. Franklin never used the word security, he said safety.
            They were quoting this back when I was in school and that was before computers.
            In fact check Poor Richard’s Almanac

            • Galatiansch2vs20

              Wow- my parents, both senior citizens- neither of them recall quoting Benjamin Franklin in school!

              Quoting something in school without having seen Benjamin Franklin’s work directly naturally could be just as incorrect as quotes on the internet.

              Did you see the saying in a work of his at the library or in a book in school?

              I just checked the Almanac’s pages available on here for the year listed on that one website (1759):

              and did not see the quote.

              Could it have been from something other than the 1759 Poor Richard’s Almanac? If I don’t know which work it was from, I can’t very well look it up at the library- anything more to go on?

              • James1754

                Sorry about your parents. What do you want me to do about the lack of knowledge being spread by their school system?
                Again, get off the web site and go look at a book.

                The word is “safety” not security.

                • Galatiansch2vs20

                  The public school system back then was far from perfect, but not nearly as bad as now. I went to a combination of public, private, and home school myself. There were a number of things I had to memorize in school and I read the Constitution as part of my schooling. But I never had that particular quote quoted in school. What school did you have the privelege to go to where they had you quoting that?

                  I recognize the word safety is not security sir, but I also would like to verify what you are saying is the correct quote. I guess you didn’t read it at the library from Franklin’s own work or read it in a book at school since you did not answer that? Or do you not remember the title?

                  You are asserting something quoted by many websites is incorrect. Just telling me to go look at a book without telling me the particular work of Franklin’s the actual quote is from is not helpful.

                • James1754

                  The word is “safety”, the term security did not mean what it does in our time. You can find both on the web.
                  If you go back into books the correct quote is safety.

                • Galatiansch2vs20

                  There’s someone who is running for Congress in Missouri who gives the low down on this.

                  He says there are a number of variants (though in his list, he is not listing specifically the one I found on those other sites) incorrectly attributed to Franklin. Here’s what he says on this site: http://kevincraig.us/tempsec.htm

                  ‘..1759 document, which uses an archaic form of “s”:

                  “Thoſe who would give up Essential Liberty to purchaſe a little Temporary Safety, deſerve neither Liberty nor Safety.”

                  Researchers now believe that a fellow diplomat by the name of Richard Jackson is the primary author of the book. With the information thus far available the issue of authorship of the statement is not yet definitely resolved, but the evidence indicates it was very likely Franklin, who in the Poor Richard’s Almanack of 1738 is known to have written a similar proverb:

                  “Sell not virtue to purchase wealth, nor Liberty to purchase power.”‘

                  So, it’s possible that site I used was incorrect, but the above proverb attributed to him indicates to me Benjamin Franklin would have been against selling virtue (if they were willing, as Levin reportedly so graphically put it, to cut your throat) if you take away their government issued, tax payer paid for cell phone. Also, being willing to vote for Obama for a freebie. Would you agree?

                • James1754

                  The way we use security today is entirely different from It use 250 years ago. It was not interchangeable with safety as it is today.

                  “A democracy cannot exist as a permanent form of government. It can only exist until the voters discover that they can vote themselves largesse from the public treasury. From that moment on, the majority always votes for the candidates promising the most benefits from the public treasury with the result that a democracy always collapses over loose fiscal policy, always followed by a dictatorship. The average age of the world’s greatest civilizations has been 200 years.”
                  Alexis de Tocqueville

                  Now de Tocqueville was writing in the early part of the 19th century. It appears that not much has changed, except now we have a political class that maintains it’s power by buying votes(all in the name of helping those in need).
                  Yes I do agree with you. Of course it is amazing how people will sell themselves for so little.

                • Galatiansch2vs20

                  Additionally, the Democrat’s platform is an adoption of what God speaks about in Romans 1- it is a platform of utter rejection of their Creator.

                  “If we ever forget that we are One Nation Under God, then we will be a Nation gone under.” – Ronald Reagan

                  (source of above quote: http://www.thelandofthefree.net/quotationchristian.html)

                  John Witherspoon, Signer of Declaration of Independence, Clergyman & President of Princeton University

                  “Whoever is an avowed enemy of God, I scruple not to call him an enemy of his country.”

                  –Sermon at Princeton University, “The Dominion of Providence over the Passions of Men,” May 17, 1776.
                  (source: http://christianity.about.com/od/independenceday/a/foundingfathers_3.htm)

                  “Bad men cannot make good citizens. A vitiated state of morals, a corrupted public conscience are incompatible with freedom.”

                  Patrick Henry
                  (quote source: http://www.cancertutor.com/Quotes/Quotes_Presidents.html)

      • ” I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending too much liberty than those attending too small a degree of it.”-Thomas Jefferson

        • Galatiansch2vs20

          “God who gave us life gave us liberty. And can the liberties of a nation be thought secure when we have removed their only firm basis, a conviction in the minds of the people that these liberties are of the Gift of God? That they are not to be violated but with His wrath?”
          -Thomas Jefferson –Notes on the State of Virginia, Query XVIII, p. 237.

          (source: http://christianity.about.com/od/independenceday/a/foundingfathers.htm)

  • No surprise. They’re taking cues from their Islamic Masters.

    Romnoid 2012!!!

  • Leftists are soooooooooooooooooo tolerant, ain’t they, bro?
    FuBar Ack is practically already gone ———-> it is new NORMAL. 😉
    Liberalism is a mental disease.


    Where are the police when people are vandalizing en flagrante?? I hope I don’t hear mealy mouthed Repubs trying to reason with violent out-of-control people, saying It’s all free speech….call the cops!! this is at least disturbing the peace and destroying private property. Property of Repub HQ. Advertising signs are property, not OK to trash.

  • “NOBAMA 2012 – Truth” video. Please pass it on. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iLmNiXIsg2c

  • The Nazi brown shirts projected and attacked using the very same hatred, intolerance, bigotry onto Jews in the 1920’s and 30’s.. They, these radical Obama liberals, are truly a product of 21st century form of Nazism-ie; anti-semitic hate embodied fascist liberalism.. Along with allied partnership with arab islaimic muslim fundamentalist extremism, aka radical islam.

  • kong1967

    Pathetic. The party of tolerance is anything but tolerant.

    This is why I didn’t put my anti-Obama sticker on my truck. I didn’t want to come out to a vandalized truck. I can get my message out elsewhere.

    I cannot wait until we get to see their reaction when Obama loses.

  • notebene

    I not only have anti-Obama stickers on my van, I have a concealed weapons license in order to defend it! Bring it, Liberal loons…I’m ready with my weapons and my faith!

  • bongobear

    This behavior is reminiscent of the Brown Shirts in Nazi Germany.

  • bobemakk

    This is the only ammunition they have against the republican conservatives. They have no clue and are not politically educated so they destroy our support signs for republicans.

  • guppymanster

    The democratic supporters of Barack Hussein Obama, in many places, are filthy degenerates who would be more at home in Cuba or Venezulea. It’s a shame they can’t go there and leave us alone. Vote them out, America!