By The Right Scoop


Tonight’s debate was a fiery debate with candidates going back and forth attacking each other. Quite frankly it was awesome and there were some excellent exchanges that certainly got past the talking points.

So vote in the poll and tell us who you think won the debate!


***

UPDATE: Newt Gingrich is winning this poll. The Paulbots put up a post at Daily Paul to run up the votes for their messiah, so I disabled him in the poll. Sorry Daily Paul, but that won’t be tolerated here. And just remember that next time that Ron Paul is left off a poll. You only have yourselves to blame.

About 

Blogger extraordinaire since 2009 and the owner and Chief Blogging Officer of the most wonderful and super fantastic blog in the known and unknown universe: The Right Scoop


Comment Policy: Please read our new comment policy before making a comment. In short, please be respectful of others and do not engage in personal attacks. Otherwise we will revoke your comment privileges.


NOTE: If the comments don't load properly or they are difficult to read because they are on the blue background, please use the button below to RELOAD DISQUS.

  • http://twitter.com/NickKarels Nick Karels

    Obama won… it was a circus

    • Anonymous

      ATTN: everyone who would have voted for Ron Paul, TRS has censored and removed him from the poll. vote for Jon Huntsman instead! Huntsman now equals RP on this poll.

      • http://www.facebook.com/messerone Matt Messer

        Or how about no? They need to put RP back up… This never happens to any other candidate other than RP and it’s complete and utter BS!!

        • Anonymous

          that’s clearly not going to happen since the owner of this site blows.

          • Anonymous

            Aww , then move on to another site .

            By the way , I used to think Ron Paul had some good ideas , but after hearing his rant on Iran last night I think he’s out of his mind .
            As for the good ideas , well even a broken clock is right twice a day !

            • C. Kelly Hurst

              Watch his speeches from 2003 predicting the collapse of 2008.

              • Anonymous

                Yeah I know . My grandma made a few predictions that came true too . That doesn’t mean she should become president . I refer you back to my comment “well even a broken clock is right twice a day”

            • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_KTNNZGJK6NA5YY3IFREHM2UF34 steve

              Yeah, because there’s no way our military could ever handle a missile coming from Iran. I mean, yeah, they shot a satellite out of the sky on the first shot, traveling at 40k mph. But that doesn’t mean they could shoot a poorly made, non existent missile traveling at 3k mph. (that was sarcastic). People really need to stop underestimating what our air force is capable of.

              • Anonymous

                If there was a man standing in the street screaming he was going to kill me and everyone in my home then he was going to kill all the people in the next house I wouldn’t want the police to wait until the bullets were flying to do something .
                THAT is what Paul is asking us to do , wait until Iran starts sending their nukes before we do something about their threats of war .

                • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_DVHT6FUMHPQ6FMYIUJFSKJZSRQ Matthew

                  We get it, you don’t like Ron. Now STFU.

              • Anonymous

                If there was a man standing in the street screaming he was going to kill me and everyone in my home then he was going to kill all the people in the next house I wouldn’t want the police to wait until the bullets were flying to do something .
                THAT is what Paul is asking us to do , wait until Iran starts sending their nukes before we do something about their threats of war .

        • Anonymous

          that’s clearly not going to happen since the owner of this site blows.

        • http://www.facebook.com/people/Milo-Fivers/100002722300007 Milo Fivers

          They should put Ron Paul back up. Let all the Ron Paul supporters vote
          for him. And everyone else can focus on the results for #2 thru #8.

        • http://www.facebook.com/people/Milo-Fivers/100002722300007 Milo Fivers

          They should put Ron Paul back up. Let all the Ron Paul supporters vote
          for him. And everyone else can focus on the results for #2 thru #8.

      • http://www.facebook.com/wizardquen Donalea Gordon

        THIS IS BULL!

      • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=596576389 Bruce Larson

        BULLSHIT!

  • http://no-apologies-round2.blogspot.com/ AmericanborninCanada

    I think Newt won with his common sense answers, but Romney won by not having to answer for anything!

    • Anonymous

      Yes, but Romney has to do more than sit there and look good.

      Perhaps in any other election, but not now.

    • CampusView Administrator

      I liked Newt too. (Vancouver here)

    • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=596576389 Bruce Larson

      NO MORE STATUS QUO!

  • http://twitter.com/NickKarels Nick Karels

    Obama won… it was a circus

    • mark Prucha

      Stop worrying about the fighting. All of them will be better candidates for it. That’s the point. We weed out the weak hands and the survivors advance as better, sharper candidates.

      It’s a good part of the process. People will not remember this debate a few months from now.

    • mark Prucha

      Stop worrying about the fighting. All of them will be better candidates for it. That’s the point. We weed out the weak hands and the survivors advance as better, sharper candidates.

      It’s a good part of the process. People will not remember this debate a few months from now.

  • http://www.therightscoop.com/ therightscoop

    I’ve already noticed Paulbots trying to rig the vote for him in my poll. But I can delete repeat votes so it will be fair in the end (or as fair as it can be).

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Michael-Kelly/776080400 Michael Kelly

      lol since when does getting the word out about a poll all of a sudden become rigging? The Paul camp circulates polls. If there’s a poll with Ron Pauls name on it, we know about it and we make sure our fellow “Paulbots” vote for him. There’s a reason he’s running third nationwide. Unless you want to tell me and everyone else that Paulbots rigged those national polls as well.

    • http://www.facebook.com/Madgunchemist David Williamson

      Yeah, tweak it for Newt too, as a matter of fact take this bull poll down, if you can vote multiple times you can’t trust the results. It will only obscure who the true winner was. Good luck with that tweaking.

    • Anonymous

      Scoop,

      I tried voting twice just to check if it would take my vote. Unfortunately, it did! As a result, I voted twice for the same person!

      • Anonymous

        Hi Cindy,
        I did the same test and the poll said “we’ve already counted your vote” How were you able to rig the vote?

      • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_AYDR3E6WJA3IZOJCA2YQ2IZCIU Joe

        this post proves my point

      • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=596576389 Bruce Larson

        THE BIAS OF THE PERSON THAT CREATED THIS POLL IS OBVIOUS…

        WHAT A BUNCH OF MORONS. THERIGHTSCOOP.COM HAS NO CREDIBILITY.

        IF SO CALLED “PAULBOTS” CAN CAST MULTIPLE VOTES FOR RON PAUL… THE SAME THING CAN BE DONE FOR EVERY CANDIDATE…

        THE WHOLE POLL IS NONSENSE!

    • Anonymous

      Scoop,

      I tried voting twice just to check if it would take my vote. Unfortunately, it did! As a result, I voted twice for the same person!

    • Anonymous

      So… you edit the results of polls on your website? Isn’t that the definition of poll rigging? The results of your poll should speak for itself regardless of who is the winner.

      • http://www.facebook.com/people/Michael-Kelly/776080400 Michael Kelly

        Be objective everyone. No one should be voting twice for anyone, if it does happen, TRS SHOULD take down duplicate votes. Those who are macro-ing and manipulating their browsers are hindering the process we’re trying to protect. Couch activism is cowardly and quite frankly frustrating to me.

        • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=596576389 Bruce Larson

          STOP BEING A BLIND COW… THE WHOLE POLL IS NONSENSE! IT IS POLL RIGGING!

          THE BIAS OF THE PERSON THAT CREATED THIS POLL IS OBVIOUS…

          WHAT A BUNCH OF MORONS. THERIGHTSCOOP.COM HAS NO CREDIBILITY.

          IF SO CALLED “PAULBOTS” CAN CAST MULTIPLE VOTES FOR RON PAUL… THE SAME THING CAN BE DONE FOR EVERY CANDIDATE…

        • http://www.facebook.com/people/Lillian-Bradley/1344384531 Lillian Bradley

          TRS is doing exactly what it wants to condemns. They say they fear that Dr. Paul’s supporters will robotically support him and dilute or make this poll void. What they really fear is Dr. Paul’s victory. So here’s what I think I’ll do in retaliation. I’m gonna sit here and vote over and over for all the candidates. I’m gonna do my part to show this poll for the laughingstock it is.

          • Anonymous

            Unless you have many computers, you can only vote once. YOur IP address is read and you can’t vote more that once. But go ahead and try.

          • Anonymous

            Unless you have many computers, you can only vote once. YOur IP address is read and you can’t vote more that once. But go ahead and try.

          • Anonymous

            Unless you have many computers, you can only vote once. YOur IP address is read and you can’t vote more that once. But go ahead and try.

      • http://www.theancient.us The Ancient

        Not to conservatives…

        Just like Progressives, the ends justify the means…. Ron Paul is not Conservative thus he can not be allowed to win.

        • http://www.facebook.com/people/Michael-Kelly/776080400 Michael Kelly

          He’s not conservative because the mainstream has twisted the definition. 50 years ago he would have won the party’s nomination no problem. In the days of Robert Taft, he would have thrived. In today’s political landscape, the term conservative has adopted this false paradigm of smaller yet more centralized government despite no attempt from proclaimed conservatives to tighten the reins of the system. People shouldn’t work for the government, their government should work for them. These are the conservative ideals I subscribe to, and Ron Paul subscribes to. I’ll vote for him now. If no one in 2016 sticks out or can match his convictions, I’ll write him in whether he’s running or not.

          • http://www.theancient.us The Ancient

            Conservatism was born as Anti-Communism, and has always been a statist ideology, from Prohibition to McCarthism, from the War on Drugs to the War on Terror, Conservatism is the flip side of the Totalitarian Coin that the reverse of that coin in Progressivism.

            • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=596576389 Bruce Larson

              YOU ARE SO FULL OF SHIT YOUR EYES MUST BE BROWN. DID YOU JUST MAKE THAT UP?

              Sir go peddle that nonsense somewhere else. Political Conservatism is older then this country you idiot. Americans DID NOT INVENT IT, though it has been a part of politics in this country since DAY ONE!

              Dr. Paul, is a Jeffersonian Republican – look it up ‘Ancient’ That is where Traditional American Conservatism started. With Thomas Jefferson and James Madison Creating the original Republican party. That is documented historical fact.

              For your education Conservative means exactly the same thing in politics as it does any other time it is used… It about conservation of something… As in “not wasting it.”

              It’s about having a small (conservative) government.
              It’s about giving the federal government limited (conservative) power and control.
              It’s about limiting (conserving) the amount of taxes the government needs from the people in order to operate effectively.
              It’s about conserving as well as preserving our Constitution, and the individual liberty of the people.
              It is also about Interposition and Nullification… (if you don’t know the conversation is over)

              • http://www.theancient.us The Ancient

                Angry Much……

                Jefferson started the Democratic-Republican Party, Which Evolved (or devolved) in to the Whig Party (John Adams) and the “original” Democratic Party (Andrew Jackson) . It has NOTHING todo with the Modern Republican Party which is started as an Anti-Slavery Party after the Kansas-Nebraska Act.

                Jefferson’s Democratic-Republican Party is a closer analog to the modern Libertarian Party than to Republicans

                As to your List, Those are LIBERTARIAN not conservative idea, Conservative (modern Conservatives) are about conserving traditional social norms and Judeo-Christian values rooted in religion, and imposing their morality upon the population.

        • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=68138706 Austin Battenberg

          He favors limited government. Barry Goldwater would be proud.

        • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=596576389 Bruce Larson

          How ancient can you be because Ron Paul is a TEXTBOOK Traditional Conservative with regard to AMERICAN politics. Besides –

          THE WHOLE POLL IS NONSENSE! IT IS POLL RIGGING!

          THE BIAS OF THE PERSON THAT CREATED THIS POLL IS OBVIOUS…

          WHAT A BUNCH OF MORONS. THERIGHTSCOOP.COM HAS NO CREDIBILITY.

          IF SO CALLED “PAULBOTS” CAN CAST MULTIPLE VOTES FOR RON PAUL… THE SAME THING CAN BE DONE FOR EVERY CANDIDATE…

    • Anonymous

      So… you edit the results of polls on your website? Isn’t that the definition of poll rigging? The results of your poll should speak for itself regardless of who is the winner.

    • Anonymous

      How do they “rig the vote”?
      I was wondering if your voting system limited voting to one time – it appeared not to – but I can’t tell for sure.
      BTW – Ron tore them up tonight. The only one that comes close to having his intelligence is Newt – but he’s such a big government hack. At least he wants to audit the Fed. Paul is the only one that’s willing to get rid of it. If he can only educate the voters enough to help them realize just what a scourge it is – there’s some hope for the country.

      • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=596576389 Bruce Larson

        THE WHOLE POLL IS NONSENSE! IT IS POLL RIGGING!

        THE BIAS OF THE PERSON THAT CREATED THIS POLL IS OBVIOUS…

        WHAT A BUNCH OF MORONS. THERIGHTSCOOP.COM HAS NO CREDIBILITY.

        IF SO CALLED “PAULBOTS” CAN CAST MULTIPLE VOTES FOR RON PAUL… THE SAME THING CAN BE DONE FOR EVERY CANDIDATE…

      • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=546582610 Alberto Morel

        I wouldn’t trust Newt’s comment on auditing the fed. He’s just trying to gain votes by saying the right thing.

    • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=652349681 Marcus Johnson

      Like any thought nazi, there is evident discomfort that other people don’t agree with his candidates that push the exact same ideas.

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Kenny-Clark/1705976129 Kenny Clark

      Do it a$$hole! we have screen shots before and after you took Ron Paul off,you have been exposed as a fraud,and rigging polls!!…sucks to be you dick head!

      • KenInMontana

        Good bye child.

    • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=652349681 Marcus Johnson

      also.. it makes total sense that you would protest Ron Paul’s supporters and accuse them of tweaking polls by TWEAKING your own. wtf

      • http://www.therightscoop.com/ therightscoop

        Sorry, but I had to put a stop to it.

        • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_AYDR3E6WJA3IZOJCA2YQ2IZCIU Joe

          BS show your proof what your doing is the worst wrong it dammages our republic

        • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=596576389 Bruce Larson

          How can you not realize this compromises the integrity of the whole poll?

          If these so-called “Paulbots” can manipulate votes for Ron Paul then the same can be done for every candidate.

          Face it the whole thing is complete bullshit nonsense.

        • http://www.theancient.us The Ancient

          Ofcourse you did, cant have Ron Paul seen as anything other than a nut job right…. That would be terrible if he actually became popular….

          • http://www.therightscoop.com/ therightscoop

            That’s not why i did it.

            • http://www.theancient.us The Ancient

              The fact the Newt, the biggest statist of the bunch won the poll tells me there is something wrong anyway.

              • Anonymous

                It tells me people still believe what politicians tell them instead of questioning everything and looking at their deeds.

              • http://www.therightscoop.com/ therightscoop

                It tells me just the opposite, that people loved the way he performed. I’m sure most still wouldn’t vote for him, but he has some great moments in that debate.

            • http://www.theancient.us The Ancient
              • http://www.therightscoop.com/ therightscoop

                So you are proving to me that they can skew more than one poll?

                • Christian Herold

                  Are you trying to say that RP followers somehow rigged the Topix poll?
                  That, with all due respect, is laughable. Look at the map, read the comments across the country, and think about it. This is the smoking gun – and you taking out RP as an option in your poll are a hypocrite.

    • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_AYDR3E6WJA3IZOJCA2YQ2IZCIU Joe

      have you checked all other canadates for dupes then? I bet not

    • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_I4SYS3IZH2XMB6AA44X6NCX6ZU Romeo d

      you stupid lying biased ASS! RON PAUL WON AND YOU DONT LIKE IT! HE TOLD THEM ALL TO BRING THE TROOPS HOME AND ALL OUR VETERANS SAY THE SAME THING ANDTHIS POLL DOESNT MEAN SQUAT NOW!

    • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=596576389 Bruce Larson

      THEN YOUR WHOLE POLL IS COMPROMISED! Look your bias is OBVIOUS to EVERYONE reading, You are not fooling anyone but yourself!

    • Anonymous

      I have never seen so many comments on your site, must be the Paulbots you speak of. I am a fan of Paul, but I am glad that you are keeping the poll honest and true for the repeat visitors of your site. I am not interested in the votes of people whom I don’t consider part of the right scoop community.

    • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=546582610 Alberto Morel

      Paulbots? I would understand if there were automated scripts running trying to boost Paul’s numbers. But no, these are actually people voting for their candidate. Why fault the people for being far more organized and passionate about their candidate then all others? That is censoring free speech and it should not be tolerated.

    • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1550597528 Tom Voss Jr

      i’ve been told that there are VERY simple codes that can be used to eliminate double voting. Just saying.

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Conrad-Schweizerhof/722928651 Conrad Schweizerhof

      you realize this is up on mitt romneys site to right???

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Conrad-Schweizerhof/722928651 Conrad Schweizerhof

      you realize this is up on mitt romneys site to right???

    • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_ZSKBH7TG7PZE2HKYKQXURPXAYY Anonymous

      the “paulbots” are actually people voting, sorry you don’t like our choice, he will get the nomination chump

  • http://twitter.com/nochera67 Mary Nochera

    As far as who won the debate… Newt, however I do not feel we had the next POTUS on that stage tonight. It helped me rule out several candidates… So it was effective in thinning the herd.

  • poljunkie

    Although he wouldn’t be my vote in the primary, I felt ( as did the people I watched with tonight) that Newt won, by coming across polished and well spoken.

    Romney was much better tonight than in the last election cycle.

    Bachman came across as a fighter.
    We still like Cain- just because!
    Pawlenty became annoying, and the rest, well they in our opinion are going to start dropping out!

    Can’t wait for the weekend!

    • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=596576389 Bruce Larson

      End the Status Quo and return the honor of Thomas Jefferson style Republican Conservatism into the Whitehouse again.

      Ron Paul 2012 – The ONLY Candidate for Veterans, Soldiers, and real hardworking Americans.

  • Anonymous

    Herman Cain did well tonight. Good answers and calm in a pinch. America needs a non-politician in the White House. Somebody that knows how to run a company, make the decisions that are good for the company (America), and has the stones to back up what he says. Records are good. He has one. A good one.
    Gingrich might have done well because of his rebuttal of Chris Wallace, everybody wants someone to stand up to the media, even Fox media.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_ZM2XJEWHT7NXOHZTZWBFVKALNI DetroitS

    After that debate, it’s definitely still “RUN Sarah RUN.”

  • Anonymous

    Newt was our Donald Trump tonight. I say, let him stay in, just to say what others wont. Otherwise, I think Cain and Bachmann did very well.

    • Anonymous

      Cain apologized to the jihadys.
      He has no comeback after that methinks

  • Anonymous

    While I have many misgivings regarding Newt as a candidate, I think he blew the doors off the rest of them. He spoke straight to America, knew his stuff better than anyone else, was completely comfortable, and more or less stood above and outside the debate, and kinda took charge.

    The big loser in the room was Fox. My disdain for that “news” organization grows daily.

    Personally, I think Fox went after Bachmann. I thought the questions to her were particularly idiotic and unfair (which is saying something, given the questions to the other candidates) and sometimes quite sexist. I think they purposely kindled that interchange with Pawlenty (who is done for; as is Huntsman); and they seemed to let Ron Paul go on and on (again to his detriment)

    • Anonymous

      Other than Hannity,
      all the men and a few women of FOX belong to the
      ‘He Man Woman Haters Club”
      when it comes to Palin and Bachmann.

    • Anonymous

      To his detriment? He’s the only one presenting real solutions. EVERYONE ELSE UP THERE IS A BIG GOVERNMENT NEOCON! Endless wars, more fiat monetary system and loss of individual liberty.
      What is wrong with everyone here? No one can see the 800lb gorilla through it’s legs.

      • Anonymous

        Paul is a Pacifist and an appeaser. He is the type of guy who sticks his head in the sand and ignores the world around him because it is “their business”. This is a dangerous world and the U.S. must stand for freedom for all who seek it. The Muslim world is intent on destroying us and Iran is the leader of that pack. Give them an edge, you give them a mile and the next thing you know they are coming through doors and windows. We cannot have a bunker mentality. You have to take the fight to where they are if we are to survive! Semper Fi!

        • http://www.facebook.com/jeffery.daniel Jeff Daniel

          you’re an idiot….

        • Kevin Hilde

          Pacifist and appeaser? That sure explains why he’s so willing to take unfashionable positions and stand for them when the entire establishment is against him.

          Muslim world intent on destroying us? They wish …. they have no such ability and you’re being a paranoid chicken little worrying about them so much. No one, not one single country has the power to genuinely threaten our borders.

          Our dangers come from within. Our danger is from our own government spending and regulating us into poverty.

        • http://twitter.com/Vets4RonPaul LibertydeFined

          It’s fine, once upon a time I had your views, until I wised up and started listening to the legitimate arguments. This mentality of going over there to attack them before they attack us is political warmongering to keep the giant defense contractors in business. Hooah.

        • http://twitter.com/Vets4RonPaul LibertydeFined

          It’s fine, once upon a time I had your views, until I wised up and started listening to the legitimate arguments. This mentality of going over there to attack them before they attack us is political warmongering to keep the giant defense contractors in business. Hooah.

        • http://www.facebook.com/jboles6467 Jeremy Boles

          Somebody needs to watch the BBC documentary, “The Power of Nightmares” lol.

        • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=596576389 Bruce Larson

          Hey Jeff I concur… what a maroon. By definition Neoconservative Warmongers are IRREFUTABLY sociopaths.
          Airborne All The Way

    • Anonymous

      To his detriment? He’s the only one presenting real solutions. EVERYONE ELSE UP THERE IS A BIG GOVERNMENT NEOCON! Endless wars, more fiat monetary system and loss of individual liberty.
      What is wrong with everyone here? No one can see the 800lb gorilla through it’s legs.

  • Anonymous

    They all won.
    The d-bags of FOX lost

  • Anonymous

    We have some good candidates!! Didn’t really help me decide, tho – the ones I liked, I think did well. The ones I don’t care for….well, one did REALLY good, and I appreciated his comments – the others, either silent or no thanks. Can’t wait for Perry and Palin to get in and mix it up!!

  • Anonymous

    man newt was awesome a conservative who takes on the media is a winner in my book and what is with the lame questions from fox news…pathetic, you said this you said that… gotcha questions don’t they debate policy solutions…lame

  • http://twitter.com/Nightlifeafdrk Nightlifeafterdark

    Newt won, he has the best ideas and he is a proven winner, anybody remember contract america., but Romney did do very well and helped himself as the front runner.

  • Anonymous

    Sarah Palin is playing this very smart by staying out. These dumb – dumbs are only lowering their status. Rick Perry will be no different. John Bolton will be no different. Only Sarah Palin can mop up this mess and win the nomination. The general election will be hers as well despite everyone’s apprehension about her ability to beat BHO. The ’12 election will be a referendum on the president and the economy will be the main focus. I wouldn’t rule out another foreign crisis, though.

    BS

    • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=596576389 Bruce Larson

      Sarah Palin is a joke as a presidential candidate. She is NOT smart enough.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_KWR3UAFHYEJET2U2G37S4FLYBY Tim O

    The fact that you said Paulbots lets me know this poll is biased from the start. I will not be visiting this site ever again. What should we call you, the wrong scoop? Ron Paul 2012, the rest have establishment more of the same written all over them.

  • andy rhodes

    Dumb ass moderator…you cant vote more than once in this poll…I tried after reading your trash and it says “Thank you, we have already counted your vote.” That means no more votes count. You are trash trying to cover the fact that Ron Paul will win this poll like every other one.

    • KenInMontana

      And you dimwits wonder why you get banned, good bye sh!t for brains.

      • Nick Estorga

        therightscoop.com.. where “dimwits” are banned for common sense and logic.

        ..Where legitimate grassroots supporters are CENSORED to further your biased ends.

        We all see through your veil, and there’s no way I will ever take this site seriously, in my mind it has lost all credibility.

        You are not true fiscal conservatives.. You are warmongers and neocons. Go read up on the history of the Republican party.

  • andy rhodes

    Dumb ass moderator…you cant vote more than once in this poll…I tried after reading your trash and it says “Thank you, we have already counted your vote.” That means no more votes count. You are trash trying to cover the fact that Ron Paul will win this poll like every other one.

  • Anonymous

    I agree with Candidate Paul’s liberty oriented positions

  • http://profiles.google.com/michael.andrew.alaniz Michael Alaniz

    Did Gary Johnson drop out? And as always Newt performed well in the debate. But to be honest there was no clear winner tonight.

    • http://twitter.com/factsfirst Yeah its me

      Gary was excluded because having him on stage would lend more credibility to Paul’s stances than the establishment hacks want.

      • http://profiles.google.com/michael.andrew.alaniz Michael Alaniz

        How can you not consider Paul part of the establishment? The man has been in congress for 35 years and has ran for president a number of times. He will never be elected President!!!

        • http://twitter.com/factsfirst Yeah its me

          Yeah 35 years fighting against the establishment not working with them. That I think quite obviously makes him not one of them.

          • KenInMontana

            35 years of lining up at the pork trough like every one else makes him no different than anyone else. If he was so principled he could have refused it. Just another career politician.

            • Orange Shaman

              Besides your argument about the “pork trough,” what other candidate HAS been principled EVERYWHERE ELSE the way HE has?

            • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=596576389 Bruce Larson

              Shut up – Your so ignorant of the facts… Especially when they are publicly available. Ignorant asshole like you just cast dispersions because you are to damn lazy to get off your fat ass and do something. You’d rather suck on the Status Quo teat.

        • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=596576389 Bruce Larson

          BULLSHIT – he already has the vote of almost all the active duty military and their families. Ron Paul will be the next president, and you will still be clueless

      • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=596576389 Bruce Larson

        If you watched idiot you would know why Governor Johnson was not there.
        BECAUSE HE HAS A STATE FUNCTION TO ATTEND THAT COULD NOT BE CHANGED. iF YOU DIDN’T WATCH Wtf ARE YOU HERE?

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_KWR3UAFHYEJET2U2G37S4FLYBY Tim O

    Wow the owner of this site ripped my comment off because I did not agree with him calling us Paulbots. No I am not a Paulbot, I am a former Marine who wore a uniform and swore an oath to uphold The Constitution of The United States of America, so of course I will uphold the only candidate on that stage who has stood fast on upholding that piece of paper that thousands of my brothers and sisters died defending. Don’t you dare call me a Paulbot, call me an American.

    • http://twitter.com/jasonus_habilis SovereignHominin

      Likewise. As a former Navy Vet who swore an oath to uphold and defend the Constitution against all enemies foreign and domestic, I agree. Ron Paul is our nation’s last best hope. We need someone who will actually tackle the tough problems we face. We need to address the fundamentals of our monetary system and the Fed’s ability to print money out of thin air. We need someone who is willing to trim the federal government down to a manageable size, who is able to make cuts across the board killing all the sacred cows of big government. We need to restore our bill of rights and the freedoms we pay lip service to whenever we thank a veteran. We need to stop being the world’s police. We can still have the greatest military in the world while shifting our focus strictly to DEFENSE. End the unconstitutional wars! Support the Troops, Bring Them Home!

      • http://www.facebook.com/jeffery.daniel Jeff Daniel

        I am an Army Vet myself. Ron Paul has my vote. want to support the troops? stop killing us for nothing….

    • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=596576389 Bruce Larson

      Hes’ just a chicken shit

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_KWR3UAFHYEJET2U2G37S4FLYBY Tim O

    Wow the owner of this site ripped my comment off because I did not agree with him calling us Paulbots. No I am not a Paulbot, I am a former Marine who wore a uniform and swore an oath to uphold The Constitution of The United States of America, so of course I will uphold the only candidate on that stage who has stood fast on upholding that piece of paper that thousands of my brothers and sisters died defending. Don’t you dare call me a Paulbot, call me an American.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_KWR3UAFHYEJET2U2G37S4FLYBY Tim O

    Wow the owner of this site ripped my comment off because I did not agree with him calling us Paulbots. No I am not a Paulbot, I am a former Marine who wore a uniform and swore an oath to uphold The Constitution of The United States of America, so of course I will uphold the only candidate on that stage who has stood fast on upholding that piece of paper that thousands of my brothers and sisters died defending. Don’t you dare call me a Paulbot, call me an American.

  • Anonymous

    wow the Paulbots are all fired up tonight. did they shoot up on herion or something?

    • http://www.facebook.com/jeffery.daniel Jeff Daniel

      you are an Idiot….

      • Anonymous

        What an argument! This is what distinguishes Paul supporters.

        • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=596576389 Bruce Larson

          Hey lanahi – Look up the word Laconic… Then look up it’s origin. Then maybe you wont look like such an intellectual ignoramus, when you go around insulting veterans.

          Why is it Ron Paul voters are the only ones getting singled out here?

          THE WHOLE POLL IS NONSENSE! IT IS POLL RIGGING!

          THE BIAS OF THE PERSON THAT CREATED THIS POLL IS OBVIOUS…

          WHAT A BUNCH OF MORONS. THERIGHTSCOOP.COM HAS NO CREDIBILITY.

          IF SO CALLED “PAULBOTS” CAN CAST MULTIPLE VOTES FOR RON PAUL… THE SAME THING CAN BE DONE FOR EVERY CANDIDATE…

          • Anonymous

            The only ones who would WANT to stuff ballots and rig votes are Ron Paul and Obama supporters. There are a lot of similarities between the followers of both. The same thing happens with all the straw polls at the GOP conventions and in the past with Iowa: Bus loads of supporters are trucked in to skew the polls so they become useless as to how Iowans actually feel about a candidate. Unfortunately for you, these are the only kind of polls you win.

            Hey, I understand what it’s like to have your candidate left out of polls. It happens to Palin all the time because she wins too often, so they say she isn’t running as an excuse to leave her name off, even though they’ve included Perry in the same polls. But I always see Ron Paul’s name on the national polls (where he usually runs in low single digit numbers), so why are you griping about not being on one little online poll?

            You have hundreds of other online polls to flock to and overwhelm, so grow up, okay? It would just once be nice if the online polls could be an accurate reflection of genuine national mood. Maybe the mistake was in allowing nonmembers to the site to vote at all.

            The only thing it would prove by leaving RonPaul’s name on the poll is that he has a central site that supporters go to get their news instead of several sites for each of some of the other candidates. I
            doubt if that was the aim of the poll, though.

    • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=596576389 Bruce Larson

      Hey unseen ya li’l prick, You just demonstrate your absolute ignorance of what is going on.

      Li’l chicken shit coward

    • Anonymous

      unseen1, Your statement is highly offensive to me for a number of reasons. While I personally do not shoot up heroin, I respect the ability and rightful authority of others to choose for themselves what they want to do with their own PRIVATE PROPERTY (i.e. their bodies) so long as they don’t use violence, force or coercion against others in the process of their use. Grow up on an intellectual level and don’t be so morally smug, it’s sad and pathetic. Now, if you’ll excuse me, I need to figure out how to increase my mid six-figure bank account I’ve worked very hard for. Good day.

  • Anonymous

    wow the Paulbots are all fired up tonight. did they shoot up on herion or something?

  • Anonymous

    Newt was on fire tonight. Once again, nobody laid a glove on Romney. Why does he constantly get a pass? Bachmann was okay under pressure a few times. Lots of Paulbots cheering everything he said (very annoying). Iran is not a threat? Give me a break!

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Michael-Kelly/776080400 Michael Kelly

      Iran isn’t a threat. We already did this once people. We got all fired up over a third world country with literally zero resources. Its hypocritical to say that this war was a waste of time yet jump into another conflict under the same premises with the same amount of intel, which is virtually non existent. If you’ve ever read the 9/11 commission report, the CIA acknowledges that the motives of radical extremists is to push back American influence. They don’t hate us because we’re “free” they hate us because we push our lifestyle down their throats. They just want us to leave them alone. What if the Chinese military invaded and started kicking down our doors searching our homes for domestic terrorists? You’d hate it and want to fight back. Think people, really. If we left the Middle East and treated them like human beings instead of dogs, we wouldn’t be losing sleep over imaginary threats.

      • Anonymous

        If we left the Middle East and treated them like human beings instead of dogs, we wouldn’t be losing sleep over imaginary threats.
        _
        I agree 100%.We should get out of the Middle East.
        But only when simultaneously EACH AND EVERY muslim and muslim lobbyist+symapathizer GETS THE HE11 OUT of USA. ALL of them.
        Not one of them here. Not one of us there.
        And ofcourse we start digging for our own oil first.
        BTW I resent the statement that Middle Easterners are being treated like dogs, because dogs are loyal loving animals and we love dogs . Dogs don’t kill their own daughters and wives for a religious kick .

        • http://doorwaybuck.com CM Sackett

          …damn, that’ll do!

          • http://www.facebook.com/people/Michael-Kelly/776080400 Michael Kelly

            This is typical ignorance. We as a christian nation have our extremists but we don’t demonize the whole group because of a few obviously insane individuals. They have different customs, but they are a faith. I remember the United States being a place that tolerates and respects other faiths. You either respect all religions across the board or you don’t. There is no in between. I refuse to be a hypocrite.

            • Anonymous

              So muslims should islamize our country in the name of your tolerance of a
              death-cult why exactly ?
              Non-interference works both ways. It doesn’t matter if all muslims do not blow themselves up or crash airplanes, but by the time we find out what they are capable of, its always toooooo late.
              Sometimes in life, you gotta make the right decision .
              We don’t need islam and muslims to get a certification of ‘ tolerance’ from some kingdoms which are run by a 7th century cult of blood and mayhem. We can be plenty ” diverse” and ” tolerant” with Christians, Hindus, Sikhs, Buddhists , Jews etc., you know people who DON’T KILL in the name of their ” religion “

              • http://twitter.com/jakejwest Jake West

                Christians don’t kill people in the name of religion?

                Crusades?

                Witch Hunts?

                Spanish Inquisition?

                Christianity has killed more people than Stalin, Hitler and Mao all combined.

                • KenInMontana

                  You might want to check your math on those numbers there genius.
                  Mao~78 Million
                  Stalin~23 Million
                  Hitler~17 Million

                  Crusades (all of them)~ estimates range from 58,000 to 133,000 (total people killed)
                  Witch Hunts~more than 30,000
                  Spanish Inquisition (1480-1808)~31,912

                  As we say Jake old boy, EPIC FAIL! Get a new meme son, because the one you brought is broken.

                • Anonymous

                  When did the Crusades happen ?
                  When did the Witch Hunts happen ?
                  When did the Spanish Inquisition happen ?
                  Are they still happening ? Are we still in danger from those Crusaders ? Did those Witch Hunters kill kids at Beslan ? Did the Spanish Inquisition cause a handicapped American on a wheelchair to be thrown overboard a ship in the middle of the ocean ?
                  When did the islamic jihad start ?
                  Is it still going on ?
                  Do you think { :P } that killing in the name of jihad should be encouraged just because once upon a time in history , the Crusades happened ?

              • Anonymous

                Did you hear any protests of these acts of terrorism from the Muslim world? Their silence was quite loud.

                • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=596576389 Bruce Larson

                  Is that supposed to make sense?

                • Anonymous

                  If they were such compassionate and peace loving people, you would think they would protest loudly about indiscriminate killing of innocent people in the name of their religion.

              • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=596576389 Bruce Larson

                Hate Break it to you CheezWhizz. You a very poorly informed…
                http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democratic_Karen_Buddhist_Army

                To say Judeo-Christians do not kill in the name of religion is complete nonsense. Have you been meditating in a cave?

            • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=596576389 Bruce Larson

              Talk about ignorance WE ARE NOT CHRISTIAN NATION! No matter how much you love Jesus get is straight – If you have a problem go read the US Constitution, IT IS ABSOLUTELY CLEAR ON THIS ISSUE.

              Americans that don’t KNOW the Constitution are shameful and lazy unless they are other wise in capable.

  • Anonymous

    Newt was on fire tonight. What did he have to lose? Once again, no one laid a hand on Romney. Why does he seem to get a pass? Bachmann did all right while under some pressure as an Iowa front runner. Lots of Paulbots in the audience yelling after his every answer (very annoying).

  • Anonymous

    If you don’t think Iran is a direct threat to Israel, you’re nuts. Iran is also the power behind Syria, Hezbollah, Hamas, and other organizations. They are threatening to become the hegemony in the Middle East.

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Michael-Kelly/776080400 Michael Kelly

      Violence only begets more violence. We’ve been far too intrusive in their internal affairs for the past fifty years. Seeing how you think Iran is such a threat, it would be because of failed foreign policy. We’ve tried it your way for long enough with no positive results. Just more bloodshed, more loss of US life, an increasing debt and an unsustainable military influence in the middle east that does nothing but antagonize people who otherwise wouldn’t have issue with us. We can’t afford to tell others how to live. We can’t afford to run our own country let alone run the countries of every enemy of Iran. Be realistic. What we need is a change in policy, not a change of strategy.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Michael-Kelly/776080400 Michael Kelly

    OMG please fix Pawlenty’s name, he did terrible in the debate, but the typo is so irksome. He is a candidate, his name should at least be spelled correctly.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Joel-S-Miller/20711381 Joel S. Miller

    Ron Paul? Was never a fan of his but anyone who says just leave Iran alone because they have a right to do whatever sounds a little too much like Chamberlain saying Hitler can do what he wants over there! Get real!! Isolationism does not work and any of hundreds of failed countries, governments and their economies is proof of that! Get a grip!!

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Michael-Kelly/776080400 Michael Kelly

      It’s not isolationism, he believes in free trade and commerce with all nations. He doesn’t think we have the right or authority to tell others how to live. Our country was founded on the principle of freedom, so its ironic that we now go into other countries telling them how to live and using military installments to disrupt their political processes for our own benefit. Am I the only sane one in thinking the best foreign policy is a policy of trade and growth? Don’t misunderstand, he’s very strong on a national defense. People nowadays think the only defense is a pre-emptive offense. They fail to realize that if we facilitate a healthy trade environment and quit meddling in business where we don’t belong, we’d be much better off and we’d be a more prosperous nation and would be much more safe.

      • Anonymous

        So do you agree with Ron Paul’s positions on legalizing marijuana, cocaine, heroin, prostitution, etc?

        • http://www.theancient.us The Ancient

          Yes

        • http://www.facebook.com/people/Michael-Kelly/776080400 Michael Kelly

          I agree that I don’t need a law telling me that heroin is bad. I grew up in a home full of drug use and violence. I know the horrors that come with drug use and addiction, but I don’t think drug users should be treated as criminals, they should be treated like patients with a serious problem. Portugal deregulated their drug policies and since they did their crime rate has dropped and drug use has dropped.

        • http://www.facebook.com/people/Michael-Kelly/776080400 Michael Kelly

          I agree that I don’t need a law telling me that heroin is bad. I grew up in a home full of drug use and violence. I know the horrors that come with drug use and addiction, but I don’t think drug users should be treated as criminals, they should be treated like patients with a serious problem. Portugal deregulated their drug policies and since they did their crime rate has dropped and drug use has dropped.

      • Anonymous

        few flaws in the argument.. America has not gone into north korea or iran and yet they are terrorist states…our policy of free trade and growth has not stopped north korea or iran…how would ron paul stop northe korea or iran?, iran with a nuclear weapon may not effect american but it would destroy neighbouring states in the hand of terrorists, it is too volatile a region not to intervene..

        • http://www.theancient.us The Ancient

          And who gave us the right to intervene?

          Why do we feel we must be the world police force, and do so at no charge?

          The US Military should only be concerned with US Security and NO ONE ELSE.

          • Anonymous

            who gave us the right…we dont have a right..usa have never intervened without due process…you go to the UN then UN fails as usual then you have to intervene because if you dont things get worse i guess…iraq invaded kuwait but i guess we should not intervene…folks in north korea have no lives but i guess we should not intervene…iran can have nuclear weapons but i guess we should not intervene becasue israel can take care of iran and start a third world war…who wants to intervene let us all just be weasels taking care of our business while the world collapses…great idea

            • http://www.theancient.us The Ancient

              Unless they want to pay for our assistance, and explicitly ask for that assistance and that assistance is approved by congress then no we should not have.

              I am tried of paying for the worlds protection only to be ridiculed for it. Let the world fend for themselves and let it be known that anyone that attacks The USA or its citizen will die a swift death. If the world wants our protection they can pay us for it.

              • Anonymous

                a more reasonable position….unlike other ron paul fans…

        • http://www.facebook.com/people/Michael-Kelly/776080400 Michael Kelly

          The region is volatile because we made it that way. Reagan contracted radical islamists and offered them equipment and training to cause trouble along the soviet unions borders. In the 50’s we overthrew the Iranian government and placed the Shah in power. That coup was the catalyst that destroyed the region politically. Our involvement is exactly the reason why the area is so unstable to begin with. History books exist for a reason. So we can stop making the same mistakes as our predecessors.

          • Anonymous

            the region was volatile way before reagan…the region has always been volatile since the creation of israel, terrorism is about fundamentalism has nothing to do with reagan this goes way back to the crusades…what about north korea, America is the only superpower now, if there were other superpowers then usa need not intervene on its own, but there are no other superpowers atleast for now

            • Anonymous

              Who will take our place when our currency collapses? Won’t be long now.

            • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=596576389 Bruce Larson

              Terrorism has NOTHING to do with FUNDAMENTALISM, and EVERYTHING to do with IDEALISM.

              This is a problem in America. Not enough MANDATORY political education. Its like that on purpose, to keep the populace ignorant.

          • Anonymous

            The region is volatile because:

            – The Middle East is the crucible in an ideological war;

            – The rest of the world is dependent upon Middle Eastern oil, so we pay exorbitant rents to countries ruled by absolute tyrants, feudal monarchs, or religious theocrats, except for Iraq.

            In turn, these countries use this ideological struggle to maintain power.

            The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (Saudi Arabia) is a feudal monarchy. Some of the monies realized from the sale of crude is used as a matter of state policy to fund the export of Wahhabism. Wahhabi schools in areas such as Pakistan are prime recruiting ground for terrorists. Some of the members of the Royal family provide significant support to the Muslim Brotherhood (which has declared war against America) and Hams (which wants to destroy Israel).

            The Islamic Republic of Iran (Iran) is a corrupt religious theocracy. As a matter of state policy, funds are used to support various terrorist groups, including Hezbollah and Hamas (which want to destroy Israel), the Muslim Brotherhood (which has declared war against America) and elements of Al Qaeda (who are at war with the United States).

            Let’s say that the United States adopted the policies recommended by Representative Paul and withdrew all of its armed forces from the Middle East, a number of things would happen:

            – The region would fall under the sway of Iran, thus recreating the Persian Empire. Israel would be destroyed. The hope that the people in the region would have of gaining some semblance of freedom would be snuffed out.

            – To protect its position, Iran would continue with its military buildup, including building nuclear armed inter-continental ballistic missiles that could reach America.

            But then Representative Paul would be happy with this result, because we would no longer have the problem of Israel, right?

            • http://twitter.com/factsfirst Yeah its me

              Your Daft if you think Israel would be destroyed. Israel would turn the middle east to glass if it even thought it was in any real Danger.

              Just as daft to think that warring tribes that have hated each other for thousands of years would suddenly come together if America left. If anything America being there killing all sides gives them a reason to make temporary alliances.

              • Anonymous

                Right, let’s go for the ad hominem attacks.

                The Supreme Ayatollah who rules Iran does not believe the Holocaust happened, refuses to recognize Israel and wants the “end of the world,” so that Allah returns.

                We are not dealing with rational people, but rather religious fundamentalists who believe that killing infidels is the quickest way to paradise, and so are prepared to martyr themselves.

                Now, if Representative Paul were to say, we need to end the reign of oil as a strategic commodity, thus cutting off the revenue stream, so that we can withdraw our forces, but in the interim, those nations in the Middle East that rely on our armed forces for protection should either pay, or sell us crude oil at a reduced rate, then I would say, okay, I am prepared to listen.

                However, to say let’s just to walk away, while saying, no worry there just a bunch of primitive warring tribes, so let them stew in their own juices … hmm, you are ignoring the long and proud history of the Persian people.

            • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=596576389 Bruce Larson

              And what happens when the Middle East runs out of oil? Go do some research on what all these countries were like before oil.

          • KenInMontana

            Carter started the CIA program to arm the Afghan Mujahideen and it was continued under Reagan. Throughout the operation the CIA took great pains to avoid arming the “Foreign” groups, who were armed by Arab states, more than a few CIA operatives were in fact killed by those groups. You may want to take a closer look at those “History books” that you’ve been reading. BTW, the Afghan Mujahideen were not “Radical Islamists” nor were/are they the Taliban.

          • KenInMontana

            Carter started the CIA program to arm the Afghan Mujahideen and it was continued under Reagan. Throughout the operation the CIA took great pains to avoid arming the “Foreign” groups, who were armed by Arab states, more than a few CIA operatives were in fact killed by those groups. You may want to take a closer look at those “History books” that you’ve been reading. BTW, the Afghan Mujahideen were not “Radical Islamists” nor were/are they the Taliban.

        • Anonymous

          Israel would probably be glad to take care of Iran, but the UN won’t let them. They like their rogue terrorist States.

          Why exactly is it volatile? Why hasn’t our violence stopped theirs? If we spend two trillion a year, rather than one, would that help?

        • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=596576389 Bruce Larson

          Odin… You need some serious debriefing. You can’t even see the utter ridiculousness of what you are saying.

          I spent many, many days and nights in the DMZ on the Korean peninsula. I am very familiar with both sides.

          Please quantify “terrorist states” Don’t be a Neoconservative, it’s impossible to hide your sociopathy. Neoconservatives are State sanctioned American Terrorists.

          The problem with ‘your argument’ is it is based on the ASSUMPTION we as a country – the USA, have some ‘innate right’ to police the world and WE DON’T.

          Is your brain really so small that it cannot see that America has no more business blowing up innocent folks homes and killing families in Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, or Iran & North Korea than any of those countries do blowing up innocent folks and their homes in the good ol’ U.S of A. That is what is called a “No Brainer”

          Seriously if you don’t see that then by definition you are a sociopath. Look it up for yourself –
          http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/sociopathy

          • Anonymous

            i dont need debriefing you certainly need a sanity check..if you have a bully picking on a weaker kid what does the teacher do, stand and enjoy the fight or intervene and give the bully a beating…?

          • Anonymous

            i guess we should not have intervened in the world wars either

    • http://twitter.com/factsfirst Yeah its me

      LOL – How do you equate a small country sitting in on the sidelines doing basically nothing to Nazi Germany that had a massive military and conquered the majority of Europe and killed millions? Your Insane, Iran could not even pose a sizable threat to Israel much less us.

      and get you facts straight Non-interventionism does not = Isolationism, your just spewing media propaganda, so much drivel.

      • http://www.facebook.com/people/Joel-S-Miller/20711381 Joel S. Miller

        No Britain was not a “small country”. On paper they had the largest navy and a sizable army in many colonies all over the world. But they were convinced that by reprimanding the dictator and issuing rules and consequences but repeatedly did nothing, and whose leaders tried to convince the people that a strong Germany was a good thing and they posed no threat to western Europe. And they were still feeling the sting of millions lost in the first war. So sitting out and watching would be a better philosophy. Sound familiar?? It’s Ron Paul’s stance. The one that says IF WE KNEW ABOUT POSSIBLE 9-11 PLOT WE COULD DO NOTHING SINCE IT WAS HAPPENING IN ANOTHER COUNTRY! Please! This philosophy is not reasonable or practical in today’s world. Even Obama and his black only voters would be Paul head up. Now if he wants to be Sec. of the Treasury then by all means. Know your history son!! No propaganda coming from this mouth!!

        • http://twitter.com/factsfirst Yeah its me

          Britain? who said anything about Britain? Iran is the small country being referenced.

    • Anonymous

      Paul isn’t advocating for isolationism. That statement in itself is extremism, which puts you in the same mindset as Islamic Jihadists. The only difference is that you are an American militant extremist.

    • http://www.facebook.com/jeffery.daniel Jeff Daniel

      if you are so gung ho, grab a rifle and get some…. I bet it’s easy for you to kill me and my brothers…. I know a recruiter that will sign you up…

    • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_DGEHFDURZ465SXVQGXIJ7KZSLE malalingua

      so go enlist and use your own money and buy all the guns, ammo you need.

  • Mike Roberson

    I like Ron Paul for sure,but being realistic,I don’t think he can win. I wish Rick Perry had shown up,im here in Texas and I think he could had done well.

    • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=742087888 Ralyn Sue Speerly Schraceo

      If all of you people that keep saying that would vote for Ron Paul, he’ll win in a landslide. Wise up – he is the only one that can beat Obama.

      • Orange Shaman

        It’s all primaries here. Almost ANY R can beat Obama at this point, so you MIGHT AS WELL make it the ONE WHO’S TRUE.

      • Orange Shaman

        It’s all primaries here. Almost ANY R can beat Obama at this point, so you MIGHT AS WELL make it the ONE WHO’S TRUE.

      • Orange Shaman

        It’s all primaries here. Almost ANY R can beat Obama at this point, so you MIGHT AS WELL make it the ONE WHO’S TRUE.

  • http://twitter.com/factsfirst Yeah its me

    I am in Texas as well and I have seen what Perry has done here, he is Scum, a filthy thief, stealing farmers lands. Selling out Tollways to foreign companies, the list goes on. Perry is PURE Neocon.

  • http://twitter.com/factsfirst Yeah its me

    I am in Texas as well and I have seen what Perry has done here, he is Scum, a filthy thief, stealing farmers lands. Selling out Tollways to foreign companies, the list goes on. Perry is PURE Neocon.

    • Anonymous

      Well if Perry is PURE Neocon then that settles it! Perry will be the new GOP nominee which sounds pretty good to me!

      • Anonymous

        Right, so you want George W. Bush, I mean Rick Perry as the GOP nominee. No thanks.

      • http://twitter.com/factsfirst Yeah its me

        Your insane and Obvious care nothing about this country if you think any Neocon is ok even a little. The Neocons are just as responsible for the state of our country as Obama, in fact they are batting for the same team. So basically you think its ok to keep Obama in office cause that is exactly what Perry and all the other Neocons would be.

        • Anonymous

          We might get a few months of feel good conservatism out of Perry. You never know.

          • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=757693178 Clayton Hunt

            I’m a Native Texan, you do not want Perry, he is a fraud and a grade a ass

            • http://twitter.com/factsfirst Yeah its me

              Same here, Born and Raised in Dallas. Perry is Trash and should be in prison along with some of the council members on his team.

              • Mike Roberson

                Guys its politics,no one candidate is the holy grail for the GOP. Every candidate has issues with something or other. Its about which candidate has the best chance of beating BHO,just as many people would say no way im voting for Ron Paul. Regardless of how much I may like Ron Paul,I don’t think he can win the GOP primary or win against BHO. No Perry isn’t perfect,but he’s a dam sight better than our current administration. One more thing,im tired of the word neocon being thrown around like a four letter word at whom ever you think os doing Ron Paul wrong. You do nothing for your cause and more and more make yourselves sound like a fringe kook conspiracy theorist group along with those that believe 9/11 was an inside job.

                • Orange Shaman

                  If Paul doesn’t win the primary…then so be it…but to suggest just because the conservatives don’t agree with his foreign policy or whatever other ridiculous reason they can find for not realizing he’s what the others ONLY CLAIM to be that he CAN’T beat Obama? Wow. At this point, a BAG OF FRITOS can probably beat Obama. The PRIMARY actually IS Paul’s GREATEST CHALLENGE.

                • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=596576389 Bruce Larson

                  Mike… Do you even know what a Neoconservative is? It has nothing to do with Ron Paul. Neoconservative are obvious they are voting for Neoconservative candidates. It’s not like the Neocons are hiding… Sociopathy is obvious.

      • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=596576389 Bruce Larson

        You have no REAL idea what a Neoconservative is do you? Sociopath.

  • Anonymous

    Newt Gingrich? Yes, he is very bright and educated, fluent in the dialectic, somewhat charismatic and definitely, DEFINITELY, a consumate politician, and I don’t mean that in a nice way, so don’t kid yourselves. A Gingrich presidency will just further entrench us in the Middle East and raise the cost of living here at home in the U.S. He is a master of rhetoric. Remember the quote attributed to P.T. Barnum: “There’s a sucker born every minute”. Don’t be a sucker.

    Peace, freedom and prosperity. Ron Paul in 2012!

    Note: For all of you paranoiacs, this “Paulian” only voted in the poll once. Go, Ron, go!

    • Anonymous

      LOL … based on the answers that L. Ron Paul gave this evening, Representative Paul should be running to be the President of Iran, not the President of the United States of America.

      • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=596576389 Bruce Larson

        Your ignorance is quite entertaining.

      • Anonymous

        Really? Why do you say that? Because Ron Paul actually has the fortitude, integrity, guts and intellect to recognize that the U.S. gunvernments foreign “policy” is to murder and kill in the name of empire building and that the U.S. gunvernment is what has actually agitated some Iranians to respond to what they see as offensive to THEIR soveriegnty and freedom? Is this what you REALLY mean?

  • Anonymous

    Newt Gingrich? Yes, he is very bright and educated, fluent in the dialectic, somewhat charismatic and definitely, DEFINITELY, a consumate politician, and I don’t mean that in a nice way, so don’t kid yourselves. A Gingrich presidency will just further entrench us in the Middle East and raise the cost of living here at home in the U.S. He is a master of rhetoric. Remember the quote attributed to P.T. Barnum: “There’s a sucker born every minute”. Don’t be a sucker.

    Peace, freedom and prosperity. Ron Paul in 2012!

    Note: For all of you paranoiacs, this “Paulian” only voted in the poll once. Go, Ron, go!

  • http://twitter.com/factsfirst Yeah its me

    100% It is my body I can do with it what ever I choose so long as it hurts no one else. If it does hurt someone there are laws already in place for that.

  • http://twitter.com/factsfirst Yeah its me

    100% It is my body I can do with it what ever I choose so long as it hurts no one else. If it does hurt someone there are laws already in place for that.

  • Anonymous

    The winner tonight were the American People. We know that all of these people cannot be the President, but I was impressed with how they would not be manipulated by the media.

    Newt not for President, but I truly would consider him as VP. I know that is not popular, but he is the highway that any president would want to get the job done in 2012. Please no 6th grade comments from the haters.

  • Anonymous

    The winner tonight were the American People. We know that all of these people cannot be the President, but I was impressed with how they would not be manipulated by the media.

    Newt not for President, but I truly would consider him as VP. I know that is not popular, but he is the highway that any president would want to get the job done in 2012. Please no 6th grade comments from the haters.

  • http://twitter.com/DejaView DejaView

    Ron Paul is winning this pole and every other pole…and he CAN win the presidency!

    • http://www.therightscoop.com/ therightscoop

      Don’t fool yourself. He wasn’t winning the poll. His paulbots were running up his vote. And now he’s gone.

      • http://www.facebook.com/people/Michael-Kelly/776080400 Michael Kelly

        Regardless whether Paul is on the poll or not, can you please fix Pawlenty’s name, its irritating.

      • http://twitter.com/factsfirst Yeah its me

        No he was winning that is why you removed him, be honest.

        • http://www.therightscoop.com/ therightscoop

          If you call having the poll skewed by a site full of paulbots…

          • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=4905714 Brian Parsons

            I didn’t get to your site from the dailypaul. I found it listed on Facebook. I’m not a Paulbot… I have feelings too! LOL…

            • http://www.facebook.com/InspireReality Lori-ann Kellett

              Same here – I found this on Facebook. Rename this site: TheWrongScewedInvalidScoop.com

          • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=596576389 Bruce Larson

            YOU SIR ARE AN IDIOT. I am an Engineer, with 21 years experience. You have no idea what a BOT is and it is your ignorance that betrays your obvious bias and lack of integrity.

          • http://www.facebook.com/djkapitalkev Kapital Kev

            Romney has links to your poll along with many other polls as well why isnt his name being removed from the poll? Are they not Romneybots?

          • http://www.facebook.com/people/Larry-Cumiskey/658152231 Larry Cumiskey

            Your a loser, I will spread this message of your censorship everywhere I can.

      • George Weilenmann

        I resent Being called a Bot, Just because I support him doesn’t mean I am a bot. He appeals to old and young alike.

        • KenInMontana

          He appealed to a whopping, what was it 8% of the electorate last time around? Yeah sure, he could whip Obama. Not.

          • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=596576389 Bruce Larson

            Your just a perfect example of the bliss of ignorance, like all the idiots that voted for Obama, and all the idiots that voted for Bush, and Clinton before him, then Bush Sr., oh yes, and lets not forget my Commander in Chief President Ronald Reagan. Yeah I have been following this shit as close as American-ly possible that long. It turns my stomach how shortsighted the average American is. These presidents have been passing the same shit stinking baton since day one.

            I Guess that the news don’t get out there in Montana, but Dr. Ron Paul already has the Military vote, active duty, veterans, and their families. Oh you didn’t know?

            That is a primary reason we are so ‘vociferous’ in a literary sense on this poll. Because WE ARE TIRED OF GETTING SCREWED BY EVERYONE.
            We fought YOUR war, because YOU the PEOPLE wanted it. You better GOD DAMN well VOTE FOR OUR PRESIDENT!

            IF you don’t well, what does your conscience tell you… yep that’s right you’re a D-bag.

            • Anonymous

              Blaspheming does not make your comment any stronger. Paul does not “Have” any monopoly on any votes.

              If the Paul voters wouldn’t pull tricks like trying to flood the poll, then get caught at it because it was so sophomoric, then they would be taken seriously, as would their candidate.

              I can’t imagine anyone finding your candidate attractive if you are an example of those who propose to have this man as president. Would you yell at people once he got into power? Would you bully them?

            • Anonymous

              PS. What does your conscience tell you?…..

              How do you know what another person’s conscience says? That is a ridiculous statement.

      • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_DGEHFDURZ465SXVQGXIJ7KZSLE malalingua

        why do you hate the message of liberty so much?

      • Anonymous

        you’re not very intellectually honest .. if you can’t take the answer don’t ask the question.. or in a pinch close one eye and pretend to see what you want.

      • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=596576389 Bruce Larson

        You are a despicable HUMAN BEING…

        EPIC FAIL! therightscoop.com demonstrates absolute absence of integrity

  • http://twitter.com/DejaView DejaView

    Ron Paul is winning this pole and every other pole…and he CAN win the presidency!

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Ryan-Caley/620286656 Ryan Caley

    Ron Paul, Michele Bachmann, and Newt Gingrich won it for me tonight.
    The big losers were Tim Pawlenty and Rick Santorum. They were awful and mean and wrong on many things.
    Good job Michele boy do you know the issues and hold your own especially when low blow sexist questions were asked. GREAT JOB TONIGHT

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1761025540 Marissa Ladyliberty Cantrell

    How disrespectful and biased. The whole point of running for President is to have supporters. If Ron Paul has more supporters, that means he is winning. If your poll counts multiple votes then it is your poll, not the supporters, that are flawed.

    • http://www.therightscoop.com/ therightscoop

      Those supporters can vote for him for President. The problem is most of his supporters are online so all they can do is make him win online polls. It never translates into real votes.

      • http://www.facebook.com/people/Michael-Kelly/776080400 Michael Kelly

        Which is why he’s only 3% behind Perry in many national polls?

      • http://twitter.com/factsfirst Yeah its me

        Most of the nation is online, whats your point? Oh and his votes do translate, more so than any other candidate, that is called inspired or dedicated. You want to claim dishonesty of an entire group based on a few who do no different than other supporters of other candidates then remove him entirely even after you claim to remove the votes of those who do cheat your flawed voting system. Makes you more dishonest because you are cheating an entire group based on a few miscreants. That is even if its possible to vote more than once. I am about to find out.

        • KenInMontana

          Your done, next time you visit someone’s site try a bit more respect in airing your perceived grievance.

          • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=596576389 Bruce Larson

            Do you eat paint?

      • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=596576389 Bruce Larson

        You sir are a FULL OF BULLSHIT PHONY.

        Do you have something against the members of our military, veterans, and their families? In countless public polls Ron Paul has been far and away the clear candidate for president among this VERY IMPORTANT demographic. I am a part of it as are MANY of YOU’RE so-called Bots voting here.

        I have worked as an IT engineer for over twenty years… longer then the damn Internet has even existed. A bot sir as a software application that does something automatically. It DOES NOT INTERACT ON MESSAGE BOARDS.

        Not only that what preventions are you taking to ensure you scrutinize all votes in the same manner… What you can’t? Look dude this is a SCIENCE discipline, Politicians like you are too stupid.

    • Anonymous

      What’s disrespectful is 1. to come here and try to vote multiple times in order to skew results; and 2. to come here and bash the site/mod for calling out the Paulbots on this.

      • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=596576389 Bruce Larson

        Will you Technology IGNORANT MORONS stop CALLING Dr. Ron Paul’s Supporters BOTS! Goddamn that is SOOOOOOOOO frustrating Google ‘BOT’ A ‘BOT’ is a software application that does something automatically, like repeating a process over and over again inside an application…

        For a a BOT to work on this poll it would require access to the application, as it CAN’T PRESS THE KEYS OR CLICK THE MOUSE.

        What is DISRESPECTFUL IS YOU CALLING names when you don’t even know what they mean. It also makes all of you look like FOOLS!

        • Anonymous

          “a software application that does something automatically”

          Sounds very much like the Paul supporters on this thread.

          Now what is it that you don’t understand about a metaphor?

    • http://www.therightscoop.com/ therightscoop

      And I would never put up a post to try and run up someone else’s poll. That defeats the purpose for having a poll.

      • http://twitter.com/factsfirst Yeah its me

        It does no such thing, how do people vote if they do not know about the poll?

        Polls are advertised to get the largest segment possible to vote.

        Transparent excuse.

      • http://twitter.com/factsfirst Yeah its me

        It does no such thing, how do people vote if they do not know about the poll?

        Polls are advertised to get the largest segment possible to vote.

        Transparent excuse.

      • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=596576389 Bruce Larson

        Dooooooooooooh… Doooooooooooohhhnuts! Way to go Homer.

        • Anonymous

          Bruce,

          Stop. You make Paul look bad. If you are representing him, act like an adult.

    • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=596576389 Bruce Larson

      You are absolutely right!… we can all read this obvious LIARS rationale below.

      EPIC FAIL FUCKTARD!

      • Anonymous

        If you and your fellow Paul folks will NOT flood the poll, like the left would do, then get caught, then yell and scream, then perhaps you would be taken seriously.

        You tarnish your candidate with this nonsense. Paul is a straightforward guy, and though I would never vote for him, he seems that he would be appalled by your childish tantrums and games here.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Tim-Hefton/55011729 Tim Hefton

    Your petty attempt to try and discredit Ron based upon his strong support is just that; PETTY.

    • http://www.therightscoop.com/ therightscoop

      Good. Then run along and skew the vote somewhere else.

      • http://www.facebook.com/people/Tim-Hefton/55011729 Tim Hefton

        Skew!? You’re skewing the vote single-handedly by purposely leaving out a viable candidate. Scared much? Either way, if either you or I retort and say “oh it’s just an online poll” we’ll both just look remedial and childish. But regardless, I think we all know who is the childish one here, therightscoop.

        • http://www.therightscoop.com/ therightscoop

          Yeah I did it because I was scared. You nailed it.

          • http://www.facebook.com/people/Tim-Hefton/55011729 Tim Hefton

            Clearly

      • http://www.facebook.com/jeffery.daniel Jeff Daniel

        scoop of shit?

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1068833855 Hank Xavier

    so everyone else is allowed to promote a poll but not Paul’s people. pathetic. you have no credibility

    • http://www.therightscoop.com/ therightscoop

      whatever dude. Daily Paul’s intention was to skew the poll like they always do.

      • http://www.facebook.com/people/Michael-Kelly/776080400 Michael Kelly

        The fact you’re using the word dude in regards to an issue of national importance lends you no credibility.

        • KenInMontana

          Actually, your previous skewing of history destroyed any credibility you thought you had. Good bye.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Steven-Thomas/100000168043233 Steven Thomas

    RON PAUL! what is wrong when a poll removes one of the leading candidates? what a joke this site is.

    • http://www.therightscoop.com/ therightscoop

      Good. Then run along and vote somewhere else.

  • http://www.facebook.com/InspireReality Lori-ann Kellett

    By removing Ron Paul, that negates this stupid worthless poll of yours then. Because Ron Paul supporters got the word out to vote in the poll and the other candidates don’t have nearly as passionate supporters, that means remove him? Cya, worthless poll and worthless “therightscoop” website!

    • http://www.therightscoop.com/ therightscoop

      Bye now.

      • http://www.facebook.com/InspireReality Lori-ann Kellett

        Better re-register your domain name and website to: TheWrongBiasedScoop! That would be more accurate…just sayin

    • http://www.therightscoop.com/ therightscoop

      Bye now.

  • Anonymous

    Wow, the sense of entitlement that Paulbots seem to have is rather ironic.

  • http://twitter.com/Ron2012Paul Ron Paul 2012

    8 people on stage, and only 7 choices to choose from. You guys lose credibility when you can’t count to 8.

    • http://www.therightscoop.com/ therightscoop

      You guys loose credibility when you skew polls.

      • http://www.facebook.com/people/Michael-Kelly/776080400 Michael Kelly

        It’s not skewing when it’s one person, one vote. When a guy has a 15% base and has a good ground game, how is it so hard to believe that he won?

        • http://www.therightscoop.com/ therightscoop

          It’s always this way. Always has been with paulbots. Why do you think CPAC has removed Paul from their straw poll?

          • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=757693178 Clayton Hunt

            Because CPAC is a bunch of self righteous Neocons. They also Removed Go Proud cause they’re gay and John Birch cause they’re not lockstep neocon.

          • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=757693178 Clayton Hunt

            Because CPAC is a bunch of self righteous Neocons. They also Removed Go Proud cause they’re gay and John Birch cause they’re not lockstep neocon.

      • http://www.facebook.com/people/Tim-Hefton/55011729 Tim Hefton

        Case in point: You’ve lost ALL credibility.

      • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_KTUA42MXXZGGO4OCQ6OCVPWLNQ Peyton Manning

        Loose? You truly are a moron. I guess I won’t link to your site anymore. Wouldn’t want to give you any traffic.

        And BTW, it’s spelled PAWLENTY.

        This site is ridiculous. It’s scary that you are actually able to vote.

        • http://www.therightscoop.com/ therightscoop

          That was a typo. Thanks for the correction. Fixed.

          • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=596576389 Bruce Larson

            You are pathetic and I hope you enjoy your EPIC FAIL ALL OVER the INTERNET

      • http://twitter.com/Ron2012Paul Ron Paul 2012

        Loose? or Lose? First you can’t count. Now you can’t spell! Your credibility = 0.

      • http://www.facebook.com/jeffery.daniel Jeff Daniel

        pathetic lies….

    • Anonymous

      Ron Paul was a re-run of the Ron Paul show. He said nothing of value. Newt was the only one that did well.

      • http://twitter.com/Ron2012Paul Ron Paul 2012

        Newt wasn’t using his own talking points. He was using Ron Paul’s.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=757693178 Clayton Hunt

    Hey who’s the doofus who removed Ron Paul? I was coming to vote in a valid poll (that I have never voted in prior), and I come across this POS poll.

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Phillip-Hawk/653937464 Phillip Hawk

      Ron Paul 2012

    • KenInMontana

      Bye doofus

      • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=596576389 Bruce Larson

        Ken stop reaching in there so far when you’re picking your nose. It’s causing brain damage.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=4905714 Brian Parsons

    I’m failing to see how linking to your website and garnering web traffic to your shitty site isn’t to be tolerated. You truly are a moron Right Stupe!

    Ron Paul 2012

    • http://www.therightscoop.com/ therightscoop

      Skewing polls isn’t a valid effort.

      • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=4905714 Brian Parsons

        Hey… if any of those other candidates had anybody who cared about them enough to link to your crappy site… we’d all be shouting in the streets that someone actually cares. If you’re going to put up a poll, and expect people not to vote in it, what’s the point? And it’s only skewing the poll if people vote more than once. I would hope you disabled that feature. A real piece of work!

        • http://www.therightscoop.com/ therightscoop

          Sorry but I would never put up a post just to go tell my people to go vote in a poll. I have more respect for online polls and the people who are using them.

          • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=4905714 Brian Parsons

            Clearly. You respect honesty… so you take out a viable candidate from your poll. Ever thought maybe people really like the guy?

            • http://www.therightscoop.com/ therightscoop

              Sure people like the guy. And i didn’t want to remove him. But when other blogs put up posts dedicated to running up the vote for their guy just so they can make it look like he’s winning everything, I don’t appreciate that.

              • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=757693178 Clayton Hunt

                If a site links to yours and they cause you to gain more traffic, don’t you win in the end because of advertising?

                • http://www.therightscoop.com/ therightscoop

                  This poll isn’t about me making money.

                • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=757693178 Clayton Hunt

                  Were there any doubles?

                • http://www.facebook.com/jeffery.daniel Jeff Daniel

                  more lies…

              • http://www.facebook.com/jeffery.daniel Jeff Daniel

                Lies….

              • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_DGEHFDURZ465SXVQGXIJ7KZSLE malalingua

                you run you’re site like thinkprogressive, when they don’t get the results they want they just exclude or make up their own stuff. I know progressives are about stifling dissent and censorship I just didn’t realize the ‘right’ is also doing this too. No wonder I get my news from Russia today or from Radio France.

              • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_DGEHFDURZ465SXVQGXIJ7KZSLE malalingua

                you run you’re site like thinkprogressive, when they don’t get the results they want they just exclude or make up their own stuff. I know progressives are about stifling dissent and censorship I just didn’t realize the ‘right’ is also doing this too. No wonder I get my news from Russia today or from Radio France.

            • http://www.therightscoop.com/ therightscoop

              Sure people like the guy. And i didn’t want to remove him. But when other blogs put up posts dedicated to running up the vote for their guy just so they can make it look like he’s winning everything, I don’t appreciate that.

          • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=596576389 Bruce Larson

            You sir are a Moron, and you have NO Business running anything online.
            You’re far too stupid. You don’t know Jack-shit about online polls or the people that use them. I do though – By profession I am a Cisco Certified Network Architect.

      • http://www.facebook.com/jeffery.daniel Jeff Daniel

        lies…

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Jill-Stone-Pyeatt/1287545085 Jill Stone Pyeatt

    This poll is completely invalid because you left off Ron Paul.

    • http://www.therightscoop.com/ therightscoop

      No he was on there until Daily Paul started skewing the poll.

      • http://www.facebook.com/jeffery.daniel Jeff Daniel

        lies…

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Phillip-Hawk/653937464 Phillip Hawk

      Why did Ron Paul get cut from the poll?

      • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=757693178 Clayton Hunt

        RS’ giant bias

      • http://www.therightscoop.com/ therightscoop

        Read the update below the poll. And then blame Daily Paul.

  • Anonymous

    haha wow, way to disclude ron paul from the poll you idiots.

    • http://www.therightscoop.com/ therightscoop

      Blame Daily Paul for skewing the poll.

      • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=757693178 Clayton Hunt

        How did they skew?

      • http://twitter.com/factsfirst Yeah its me

        Yes explain how one vote per person skews a poll.

        You can not vote more than once on this poll I tried voting for other candidates after voting for Paul.

        • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=757693178 Clayton Hunt

          Because, because, because, daily paul, skewing.
          That’s all you’ll get from RS

          • http://www.therightscoop.com/ therightscoop

            What’s true is true.

            • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=742087888 Ralyn Sue Speerly Schraceo

              What’s true is your poll is a fraud – your site just lost all credibility. And if you think we won’t be spreading it all over to make sure people know you’re a bunch of phonies – you have another thing coming.

            • http://www.facebook.com/jeffery.daniel Jeff Daniel

              and lies are….LIES!

      • Anonymous

        I understand how easy it is to skew a pole, all it takes is a bit of php and curl, but are you seriously bad enough that you cant write some simple scripts to prevent that? there are literally a million ways it could be done. either do it right, or don’t even bother doing it at all, but the way your going about doing it is going to make you look biased and bad in the long run.

      • Anonymous

        Deleting my comments? i’ll say it again. in fact, i’ll go ahead and make a template so i can say it again incase it gets deleted. And again, and again, and again.

        There are a million ways you could prevent the poles from being skewed as you claim. Im aware with a bit of php and curl its easy to skew the results. the fact that you removed ron paul from the votes instead of fixing the problem shows that your being biased. you may not mean it that way, but it does. Deleting my comments also does not help your case. I cant believe you have the audacity to delete my comment. It is not hard to fix the poles where they cannot be skewed. if you need help, i’ll be more than happy to help you.

        However, choosing to ignore what i say, deleting my comments, its clear you do not want any help, its clear what your agenda is. I wouldn’t bother taking much action to supress what i have to say. to say the absolute least, it will be useless.

        The choice is yours.

      • http://www.facebook.com/InspireReality Lori-ann Kellett

        Again – blame yourself. YOU are responsible for YOUR decision and no one else. Take some responsibility for your own bias. Not blaming supporters that may have seen this poll on the DailyPaul site. I did not – I found it on Facebook, along with many others. But in your warped mind it is right to ban all of us from voting by removing him due to YOUR lame excuse. That is all it is – an excuse to be biased, nothing more.

      • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=596576389 Bruce Larson

        Now you are telling people who to blame about something that didn’t happen? Are you on drugs?

  • http://profiles.google.com/hjhemin Jake Hemingway

    This site is biased and rude, Ron Paul is dominating most polls and polling around 3rd nationally. Just because his supporters are active and vote in polls doesnt mean anything bad..it just means he has motivated supporters. I am positive you wouldnt remove Romney or Bachmann if there supporters posted the poll on one of their forums…….this site is a liar and biased against Ron Paul….end of story

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Phillip-Hawk/653937464 Phillip Hawk

      Ron Paul 2012

    • http://www.facebook.com/jeffery.daniel Jeff Daniel

      TRUTH!

    • http://www.facebook.com/jeffery.daniel Jeff Daniel

      TRUTH!

  • http://profiles.google.com/hjhemin Jake Hemingway

    This site is biased and rude, Ron Paul is dominating most polls and polling around 3rd nationally. Just because his supporters are active and vote in polls doesnt mean anything bad..it just means he has motivated supporters. I am positive you wouldnt remove Romney or Bachmann if there supporters posted the poll on one of their forums…….this site is a liar and biased against Ron Paul….end of story

  • http://www.facebook.com/shelly.sands1 Shelly Sands

    Scoop, This is hilarious. You really did stir up the hornets nest. They’re becoming unhinged. So very funny LMAO

    • Anonymous

      Not sure if it’s funny or scary or just f-ing unbelievable.

      • http://www.facebook.com/shelly.sands1 Shelly Sands

        I think it’s hilarious the Paulbots are totally freaking out.

        • http://www.facebook.com/jeffery.daniel Jeff Daniel

          freaking out? I think you mean pointing out a sad, pathetic attempt to hide the truth….

        • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=596576389 Bruce Larson

          I think it’s hilarious how you act all smug, and high and mighty – YOU DO REALIZE YOU ARE BEING CRITICIZED BY NOT ONLY RON PAUL SUPPORTERS BUT OTHERS AS WELL?
          You’re blind ignorance of this is what is truly funny.

        • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=596576389 Bruce Larson

          I think it’s hilarious how you act all smug, and high and mighty – YOU DO REALIZE YOU ARE BEING CRITICIZED BY NOT ONLY RON PAUL SUPPORTERS BUT OTHERS AS WELL?
          You’re blind ignorance of this is what is truly funny.

    • http://twitter.com/ozziecastillo The Wizard of Oz

      The Ron Paul people are always unhinged. In all fairness, there are some Palin supporters that approach the same level. The Ron Paul people just feel it’s necessary to point out how much of a winner their candidate is even though he can’t seem to gain that support on his own, while Palin can actually demonstrate real political influence.

      They would cheer no matter what Ron Paul said no matter the circumstance. If during the debates he spent the whole time speaking like Macho Man Randy Savage, they would cheer- If he wore clown make-up during the debates, they would cheer…..they’re supporters regardless of the actual likely chance that he wins and many would rather take 10 steps backwards then elect someone that can move the country 1 step in the right direction.

      They are the Nader of our side of the political spectrum.

      • http://www.facebook.com/shelly.sands1 Shelly Sands

        I’m a Palin supporter and yes I agree that there are some that can be a bit aggressive. I also understand where that comes from. The Paul supporters get downright nasty. I will admit I’ve seen a few (very few) that get like that, but not as ugly as the Paulbots get. I agree with the Nader comparison.

        • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=596576389 Bruce Larson

          Please you people are so blatantly rude you pompous children! These are Hard working Americans many of them VETERAN’s You should be ashamed of yourselves. Calling them names and being rude snotty and smug. And to top it off you openly admit to compromising the integrity of the whole poll.

          What is a BOT?

      • http://www.facebook.com/jeffery.daniel Jeff Daniel

        and to think our guy will be president! I bet that gets them panties all in a wad!

      • Orange Shaman

        Really? You really think they would just cheer no matter what? You really think it has nothing to do with them just genuinely finding someone who stands for the same things they do as opposed to the same old crap? C’mon now.

        • http://twitter.com/ozziecastillo The Wizard of Oz

          Yep….I’ve seen Paul give rambling answers that would challenge Al Sharpton for the most incoherent, and still his ‘fans’ go wild- “and we shouldn’t be in other countries….and we should pay our own bills….and we should end the fed….and we have to stop corporate welfare”

          All of those are made-up for the purpose of illustrating how stupid he sounds to everyone else. He’s less electable than Sarah Palin by a huge factor……and he sounds worse than she does as far as presentation.

          • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=596576389 Bruce Larson

            You are an amateur… Go to school you ridiculous fool. SARAH PALIN WILL NEVER BE PRESIDENT. She is too STOOOOOOOOOOPPPPPIIIIIIIDDDDDDDD, are you kidding me no more idiots in the Whitehouse.

            You are just ignorant. Have you even read the Constitution, so even know how the American Political process works? How about a wheel? Do you know how to operate one of those?

      • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=596576389 Bruce Larson

        Get is straight Mr. Wizard of Oz. Do your homework and stop spouting rhetoric and your high opinions. Ron Paul IS the ONLY Candidate the Knows the damn Constitution. When is that last time you read it.

        In case you haven’t heard, Ron Paul already has the military, veterans, and their families. What in the hell do all you smug assholes have against us? We fought your goddamn wars because you wanted us too but were to cowardly to do yourself

        The reality is you don’t like the truth or facts. That is why everything you say above is unsubstantiated personal opinion and nothing more. That is why the status quo has never worked in my 50 years on the planet, but yet you purport it as the ONLY solution. How about you stop being an armchair critic and offer something to the topic at least…

        • Anonymous

          Bruce,

          This is the same comment you made to me 2 hours ago, along with the blaspheme and the swearing.

          Do you think you advance your ideas in anyway by doing this? Do you think if you swear at someone that they will all of a sudden see any wisdom in your comments?

    • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=596576389 Bruce Larson

      What is funny is you clowns committing public suicide with your credibility.

  • http://www.facebook.com/jay.roveda Jay Roveda

    Dear RETARDS who made this pole,
    You forgot one of the candidates? But who? RON PAUL !
    Shows how worthless your poll is…
    Sincerely,
    Jay Roveda

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Phillip-Hawk/653937464 Phillip Hawk

      Where is Ron Paul?

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Phillip-Hawk/653937464 Phillip Hawk

      Where is Ron Paul?

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Jill-Stone-Pyeatt/1287545085 Jill Stone Pyeatt

    How can we be skewing the results when his name isn’t even there? How ridiculous is that? Everyone knows he was in the debate tonight. You’re destroying all credibility for this poll.

    • http://www.therightscoop.com/ therightscoop

      No Daily Paul did that.

      • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=596576389 Bruce Larson

        You’re a liar!

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Jill-Stone-Pyeatt/1287545085 Jill Stone Pyeatt

    What the heck is everyone so afraid of?

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Phillip-Hawk/653937464 Phillip Hawk

    Where is Ron Paul?

    • Anonymous

      LOL!!! Nice one!

  • Anonymous

    baha, your site is pathetic! Ron Paul clearly won and your establishment site can’t admit defeat. sad excuse… pathetic.

  • Anonymous

    baha, your site is pathetic! Ron Paul clearly won and your establishment site can’t admit defeat. sad excuse… pathetic.

  • http://www.facebook.com/JamesCBabb James Babb Ⓐ

    Thanks for keeping this limited to status-quo candidates only. More of the same please!

    • Anonymous

      hahaha, awesome.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_KTUA42MXXZGGO4OCQ6OCVPWLNQ Peyton Manning

    Everyone vote for Santorum!

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100000462408165 Lisa Pedraza

    how can you hold a poll and then remove members. all the votes for ron paul were real. check the ip addresses. DUPES

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_HJ6SL7RPGGGTMTGD6FCSYKKD5U A.

    Way to go jack wagon. All you do by removing Ron from the poll is give him more notoriety. Oh wait, I guess I should be thanking you.

    PS – he’s going to be in the top 2 in Ames. He won’t be dismissed anymore.

    PEACE!

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_JQA6G3X6K2TGWYKZA4BDI3CCGE Rob

    Let me get this straight, I am not allowed to vote for Ron Paul in this poll because I may have been made aware of this poll by someone who supports Ron Paul? Interesting Choice of Logic. Why didn’t you omit Romney since: 1. Romney was already in the debate & 2. This is a poll about the debate?

  • Orange Shaman

    I still don’t see how people voting for Ron Paul in your’s or any other poll is “skewed.” If anything…you leaving him OUT of your poll is “skewing.”

    Technically…fans of the other candidates are perfectly able to do the same thing…by which I mean call people from other places to come vote on this one (which in real world definition is not “skewing”) to even the odds. I would call it the free market working its way to make people realize that there is a better option.

    Or did you already forget the old saying “Fight bad speech with MORE speech.” Maybe if you encouraged the fans of other candidates to do the same thing instead of STOPPING it…you MIGHT get EVEN MORE traffic on your site. Plus…you’ll get a MORE REALISTIC idea of who’s truly the better candidate for the job. Just saying…

    No matter. Come time to vote in the primaries…it’s not like people are suddenly going to be swayed another direction. Everything that can be said will be said and in the end…just ask yourselves if you can trust ANY of them. If so…WHO?

    All any candidate can do is do their best to spread their message and drive it home that THEY are the one that people need to choose. I’m going to just remain hopeful that the right choice will finally be made instead of the same ol’ R/D mantra we’ve had for well over a century now.

    • http://www.therightscoop.com/ therightscoop

      I didn’t want to remove him. And until they created a blog post at Daily Paul, he wasn’t doing that bad. But that’s my problem. They created a blog post for the whole purpose of running up his votes.

      Sorry, I just don’t appreciate that.

      • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=757693178 Clayton Hunt

        Who do you think wins elections? The guys that sit back and do nothing or the guys that campaign and have people that support them get the message out? Jesus, Mary, and Joseph you cite one post as skewing. Yet I did not find this from the Daily Paul.

      • Orange Shaman

        So what? It’s an online poll. The primaries are where the votes truly count. I really hope my word spreads and Huntsman racks up the votes just to prove my point.

        • http://www.therightscoop.com/ therightscoop

          But I’m not measuring just to see paulbots run up the poll. I want a real indication of what my viewers think. And it seems clear to me that they think Newt won the debate. And many thought Paul did. And now we’ll never know where he would have really landed.

          • Orange Shaman

            If you’re solely trying to get those who visit your site regularly…you’ll have to regulate your poll somehow to INCLUDE ONLY THOSE PEOPLE to vote. Right now…people can sign on as a random name and therefore become a “viewer,” even though they may have never been to this site before. As far as your poll…I don’t know much about the coding for it…but I don’t think you even have to sign up for Disqus to have it.

            Better yet…instead of having something that just anyone and their dog can click on…just ask the question, show the peoples’ names, and let those who use this site regularly just SPIT IT OUT…as you can see many have ANYWAY.

          • http://www.facebook.com/jeffery.daniel Jeff Daniel

            that is easy… we think you are a fraud…. No poll needed.

          • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=596576389 Bruce Larson

            Because YOU screwed it up no one else did.

      • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=742087888 Ralyn Sue Speerly Schraceo

        Oh, so you say it’s rigged because we are let people know where the polls are that you all like to hide? We can only vote one time, how is that rigged? I watched the debate tonight and the very clear winner by applause was Dr. Paul. The rest of them were all too busy cat fighting.

        • Orange Shaman

          Even the debates are like verbal pro-wrestling with Paul and Johnson being the only two guys who want no part of their nonsense. I found an old saying the other day which I found interesting.

          “Liberals want the government to be their mommy. Conservatives want the government to be their daddy. Libertarians want to be treated like adults.”

      • http://twitter.com/factsfirst Yeah its me

        So your saying you do no appreciate a group knowing about your poll because then they can vote for their guy, but it is ok for all other groups to do the same because their groups are smaller.

        • Orange Shaman

          I call it “free market” voting. The idea that he should be taken off the poll because more people come from outside the site to vote is like raising tariffs on exported goods to the point that outside countries don’t want to trade with you.

      • http://www.facebook.com/jeffery.daniel Jeff Daniel

        I call bull shit.

      • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=596576389 Bruce Larson

        It doesn’t matter what you appreciate. I see this was really just all about YOUR EGO. You have zero credibility.

    • http://twitter.com/ozziecastillo The Wizard of Oz

      Lets say that Mark Levin had a poll on his site for the best candidate- and a bunch of Dems posted the poll on their sites to support Huntsman…..well now it’s not really a good representation of conservative candidates or Mark Levin’s audience.

      Polls are meant to sample the exposure, but when the exposure is ignored, and instead, it is circulated to groups with certain political leanings, then the poll is useless.

      Ron Paul winning is not an accurate representation of this site, or those that watched the debate (conservative or liberal) on this site. It’s actually a courtesy that TRS gave RP a chance on his site because the way things normally turn out he should have just avoided the hassle. RP supporters contaminate the sample, and it would not be tolerated by any legitimate pollster with credibility….TRS isn’t claiming anything but being a conservative blogger.

      • Orange Shaman

        Here’s the problem though. By taking a very viable candidate (whether you believe he is or not)…your poll is just as useless as a “contaminated” sample.

        • http://twitter.com/ozziecastillo The Wizard of Oz

          I don’t think Paul is viable at all— you have to consider what the deciding factor thinks of him. My guess is that independents are likely to vote for establishment types before voting for someone that is far outside the norm.

          Therein is the problem….if he is likely to lose, then he should not be the candidate to fight off the push towards marxism. We should band together to get someone that can win and move the bar slightly to the right. However, RP supporters are usually the my way or the highway people…..they’d rather see the U.S. in anarchy so that they could get their shot. They don’t care to preserve the nation, they care to make a point rather than work within the constraints of the constitution…..sure our current POTUS has ignored it, but the way to better things is not to burn it—which if you ask many RP supporters, is a reasonable alternative to RP.

          I’m not trying to argue ideals….just reality- and the reality RP supporters are willing to accept is not the same as the reality I am willing to give up on.

          • Orange Shaman

            Independents are exactly that for a very specific reason. They don’t go with the grain of establishment. Many independents voted for Obama last time because they didn’t know better and actually believed his rhetoric of hope and change as well as like many others…loved the idea of having a black president.

            That’s GONE now. Who do the independents have left who’s NOT an establishment type? RON PAUL!

            Just about ANYBODY with an R in their description can win against Obama at this point…but who else is ACTUALLY DIFFERENT and NOT JUST ANOTHER LYING SACK OF CRAP? RON PAUL!

            • http://twitter.com/ozziecastillo The Wizard of Oz

              I believe independents are only self-labeled because they are uninformed and want to appear to be above the fray because they are clueless about issues…..it’s a way of saying I’m not sure without appearing to be a dummy that is clueless about issues……riding the fence just because choosing a side may leave them looking dumb amongst their peers.

              Although I like a lot of Ron Paul (personally I think Rand Paul stands a chance and should be a contender in 8 years or so), but the American people are too hooked on entitlements……that and Ron Paul is an awful awful person to push any message….he can barely articulate a sentence let alone a message. Get a libertarian that can effectively sell his message and I’m in- otherwise, face reality. Ron Paul is a no-go and the best way to reach RP ends is through conservative means…at least for now. Any type of loss or lack of conservative support will only enable a gain in the globalist movement which runs against RP ideals.

              • Orange Shaman

                I’m very well-informed and I am still refusing to be labeled as anything though the closest one would be “Libertarian Anarchist.” Just regularly Locke-style Libertarianism IS a compromise for people like ME. I was actually registered as an I because there was no Rs in any elections which appealed to me EVER, so it was pointless to bother with them. I only recently changed to R registry-wise because I personally know a guy who’s an honest and good man who’s a Republican. I still refuse to call myself one despite that being what I’m registered as since those who are R in IDEALS piss me off too.

                I honestly don’t believe EVEN WITH Paul as president that our country can be saved…but I still believe above and beyond all else that he’s the guy. My state always overwhelmingly votes R for all electoral colleges during general elections, so the primaries are very important to me because if Paul loses again…it’ll once again be pointless for ME PERSONALLY to bother voting on general election day.

                • http://twitter.com/ozziecastillo The Wizard of Oz

                  exactly my point– damn everything else, I want my way- btw…..the average independent does not share your views so you basically represent a voting bloc that has no impact on real elections, which is why RP people are guilty of skewing votes.

                • Orange Shaman

                  I know the average independent doesn’t share my view. My point though is that the average independent still obviously didn’t decide to tow a party line, but would rather actually decide whether any candidate is worth their time regardless of party instead of just hopping on-board. I represent just as much of a vote as any other human being.

                  Ron Paul isn’t even my way anyhow. Even if the primary voters WAKE UP and realize that he IS what the other Rs ONLY CLAIM…and he beats out Obama (which will actually be easier in my opinion)…I would STILL wish for people to evolve BEYOND governments and instead form free non-state communities.

                • Orange Shaman

                  I know the average independent doesn’t share my view. My point though is that the average independent still obviously didn’t decide to tow a party line, but would rather actually decide whether any candidate is worth their time regardless of party instead of just hopping on-board. I represent just as much of a vote as any other human being.

                  Ron Paul isn’t even my way anyhow. Even if the primary voters WAKE UP and realize that he IS what the other Rs ONLY CLAIM…and he beats out Obama (which will actually be easier in my opinion)…I would STILL wish for people to evolve BEYOND governments and instead form free non-state communities.

                • http://www.facebook.com/jeffery.daniel Jeff Daniel

                  who are you to speak for “the average independent”? you are going to see just how large of a block we really are….soon.

              • http://www.facebook.com/jeffery.daniel Jeff Daniel

                where do you get this crap? Glenn beck have a summer camp now? you say Ron Paul can’t push a message? that is incorrect… it is just over your head and you don’t understand what he is saying….

                • http://twitter.com/ozziecastillo The Wizard of Oz

                  I’m fully capable of forming my own opinions—- Ron Paul is as effective a communicator as GWB….yes, that’s an insult. It’s not over my head, although it may be over yours- if you quit riding RP’s nuts, you might be able to see that. RP is the GOP Nader.

                • Orange Shaman

                  Really? Bush? Bush was probably the worst speaker I’ve ever heard in my life…yet he actually got the vote…TWICE. Maybe it’s that he’s TOO effective. People tend to shove words into his mouth all the time, so maybe he really IS over most peoples’ heads.

                • http://twitter.com/ozziecastillo The Wizard of Oz

                  I originally typed that he was worse, but I tried to be diplomatic……GWB on a bad day doesn’t sound as loony as Ron Paul…..

                  I’m not talking about content, I’m talking about presentation- I could vote for Rand Paul in an instant—-but it matters whether or not the person can win over enough people to get elected POTUS.

                • Orange Shaman

                  Paul spits it out coherently. Bush…just…kind of…looked like he was…um…lost most of the time. It’s why he was so easy to make fun of. Where’s the looney in Paul other than content (according to those who think he’s looney)? I don’t see how any of the others can possibly win over as many people on the fence as Paul. It boggles me that anyone thinks that another Bush (basically any of the other R candidates) could possibly appeal to others who aren’t party-towers…which would be the majority of voters in our country.

                • http://twitter.com/ozziecastillo The Wizard of Oz

                  Wrong- The majority of people are stupid, and on one side or the other ideologically.

                  Only the wingnuts are on the socialist side and on the full libertarian side. Unlike my fellow “libertarians”, I realize that a ‘progressive’ approach is necessary to reach that goal because if I present my case all at once, they will recoil in fear.

                  Ron Paul supporters are childish in their temperament….much like Obama- it’s not all about you guys and what you want…it’s about how to get there and bring everyone else with you in agreement as opposed to having them claw and fight their way out.

                • Orange Shaman

                  It’s sad that you have so little faith in humanity…but I battle with that lack of faith at times myself, so I can’t pick on you too much for that. Fear is the only thing that’s holding ANYBODY back. Fear is the only reason we even HAVE a government still. If people were able to live without fear (correction: most…I and a select few others do not), then anarchy could actually work and do so in an orderly manner without chaos. Full-libertarian? Try full anarchy. That’s where I am. Libertarianism is the compromise.

                • http://twitter.com/ozziecastillo The Wizard of Oz

                  With your stated position of full anarchy, do you not see how you can’t be taken seriously (as far as your opinion) regarding an election for the constitutionally governed U.S.?

                  Why should your opinion matter when your stated goal is not preservation of this government, but a new transformation of the U.S.? It would be like giving Obama’s political opinion credit when he does not want what America is.

                • Orange Shaman

                  On the contrary…anyone who is willing to accept a limited Constitutional government (being ME) can and should be taken seriously. Anarchy is just IDEAL…not something I would go out of my way to make happen. Otherwise, I’d already be off-the-grid so-to-speak in the woods instead of getting on this website to talk to yall.

                • http://twitter.com/ozziecastillo The Wizard of Oz

                  I’m so tired, and I’m beginning to act like a prick- I do enjoy the conversations with you so I’ll go to bed rather than allowing myself to become too much of a jerk. I will say, however, that Ron Paul lunatics do more to damage the libertarian idea than they help. Think of all the Gore people, Nader people, Palin people, and how much their fanatical supporters, and, sometimes, confrontational approach does to help the actual ideas.

              • http://www.facebook.com/jeffery.daniel Jeff Daniel

                where do you get this crap? Glenn beck have a summer camp now? you say Ron Paul can’t push a message? that is incorrect… it is just over your head and you don’t understand what he is saying….

          • http://www.facebook.com/jeffery.daniel Jeff Daniel

            you mean the free handouts or the or any/all of the wars? what “reality” are you speaking of? Ron Paul supporters just want the country to go back to what the founding fathers intended…. It’s quite clear. what American wouldn’t want America to go back to being America? read a history book for God’s sake.

            • http://twitter.com/ozziecastillo The Wizard of Oz

              You guys have a great strategy for getting there…..

              Tell me, which is closer to your final goal…..assuming you’re not stupid enough to think you can get there with one election-

              Helping an election proceed to the point where a candidate can be elected that pushes the standard closer to the founder’s POV….or going kamikazee on a candidate just because s/he is not Ron Paul?

              • Orange Shaman

                The others are just like the Bushes. They’ve already been flying head-first into our country and everything it stands for from day one. That’s why the legs on the table are about to give. If society hasn’t evolved yet, then so be it. It’ll just be a shame to see our country do what Britain’s doing. I’ll be surprised if we even make it to the 2012 elections.

                • http://twitter.com/ozziecastillo The Wizard of Oz

                  To try to argue that there is no difference between the other candidates is ridiculous and completely reinforces the claim that RP supporters are fanatically blinded.

                  Is Obama the same as McCain would have been…would we have the same results in legislation and leadership?

                  What about if Palin is nominated rather than Romney, or Cain vs Perry, or Bachmann vs Huntsman?

                  As much as I think that there are some do or die situations, facilitating the “die” part doesn’t make you any better—-it makes you an obstacle to the “do” part of the movement.

                  I’d be an a-hole if I were running around claiming that it’s Rand Paul or no one, just like Ron Paul supporters are a-holes for refusing to see that there are ways to accomplish the goal without setting fire to society.

                • Orange Shaman

                  Bush basically opened all the power grab doors for Obama. McCain was basically another Bush which is why so many people hated him from the get-go.

                  I say “another Bush” a bit broadly, but virtually all of them are still conservative as opposed to libertarian. They want limited government intervention in comparison to liberals, but still support corporatism and war as well as civil liberty encroachments via police state.

                  There is no “do” with anyone but Ron Paul. I just don’t see it. As I said before, I’m going to vote for him in the primaries because he is truly the only guy who I can A) trust and B) believe will actually do what’s right if he’s elected. If he loses…then it really doesn’t matter for me because as I’ve said plenty of times before…Oklahoma’s gonna vote for whoever the R is regardless. I could seriously say “(bleep) it. I’m voting for Obama” and the R would still win all 5 electoral college votes here, so I truly believe in these primaries and will continue to support and hope that the one guy who I am willing to vote for actually gets the nomination.

                  Society is setting fire to itself by being so blind. I think Ron Paul’s not necessarily a “messiah” who can fix everything, but I do believe that he is the only one who is actually willing (all the candidates are capable, but none willing) to do what’s right and actually reverse the statism, so I just believe that it’s going to burn regardless if anyone else is elected. I said it on someone else’s deal. Ron Paul might not necessarily be able to keep our country from going up into flames, but any of the other candidates will guarantee that it will.

                • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=596576389 Bruce Larson

                  Wow like that’s really trippy dude… WTF messiah? This is Politics you silly tripped out space cadets, come back to earth.

                  This poll is just ridiculous!

                • Orange Shaman

                  Politics is based on philosophy and my philosophy is that people whether they even realize it or not are starting to evolve beyond the need for a government or politics at all.

                • Orange Shaman

                  Politics is based on philosophy and my philosophy is that people whether they even realize it or not are starting to evolve beyond the need for a government or politics at all.

                • Orange Shaman

                  Politics is based on philosophy and my philosophy is that people whether they even realize it or not are starting to evolve beyond the need for a government or politics at all.

                • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=596576389 Bruce Larson

                  Read a real poll you rude asshole. Ron Paul’s is Far and away the run awy candidate for the military, veterans, and their families. It’s like you are having this conversation from some other reality. Ron Paul is not fringe and he id NOT independent he is a Republican candidate… You do know how our government works don’t you? Because all you are doing is saying words over and over and over again that are all just your very OBVIOUSLY uninformed opinion.

                  What do you mean “set fire to society” did you take your medication today?

                • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=596576389 Bruce Larson

                  Read a real poll you rude asshole. Ron Paul’s is Far and away the run awy candidate for the military, veterans, and their families. It’s like you are having this conversation from some other reality. Ron Paul is not fringe and he id NOT independent he is a Republican candidate… You do know how our government works don’t you? Because all you are doing is saying words over and over and over again that are all just your very OBVIOUSLY uninformed opinion.

                  What do you mean “set fire to society” did you take your medication today?

                • Anonymous

                  Bruce,

                  Why do you insist on making your people look bad with your comments?

                  We are here to talk with each other. No one wants to talk to someone like you.

          • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=596576389 Bruce Larson

            Are you calling all active duty military, veterans and their families stupid? Because I am calling you stupid, you have been sleeping in that poppy field in Oz too much, because your having trouble making sense.

            Ron Paul will be the next President.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Kenny-Clark/1705976129 Kenny Clark

    THIS POLL IS A JOKE AND IS GOING TO BE REPORTED AS FRAUD,NO RP…LOL

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Kenny-Clark/1705976129 Kenny Clark

    RON PAUL IS MISSING,ALEX JONES IS GOING TO HAVE FUN WITH THIS ONE!

  • http://twitter.com/Ron2012Paul Ron Paul 2012

    You penalize people for being better organized and more certain for their support of a candidate. Shame on you. You have the same mentality of the Chinese government when you have to filter what is really out there versus what you want your viewers to believe.

  • http://profiles.google.com/tantocomo Derek Hanusch

    Hey one candidate was left off! Sarah Palin! She won without even being there b/c everyone one else sucked so bad! Haha, I mean that kinda tongue in cheek, so don’t pretend like thats my serious political analysis of the debate, but my god trscoop has brought on the ron paul wrath!

    I’ve only managed to see half the debate so far b/c trscoop still hasn’t posted the rest of it, but Ron Paul was in serious kook mode… in particular on Iran… “I’m Ron Paul and our problem with Iran is we don’t mind our own business!”… and he’s supposed to be the serious, lives in the real-world candidate? I don’t think so!

    Hang in there trscoop! And post the whole debate like you usually do so I can watch the rest of it!

    • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=742087888 Ralyn Sue Speerly Schraceo

      Sarah Palin is not running, nor was she there.

      • http://profiles.google.com/tantocomo Derek Hanusch

        I’ll go ahead & wait for her to tell me whether or not she is running.

    • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_I4SYS3IZH2XMB6AA44X6NCX6ZU Romeo d

      you suck dick and just like sarah palin i dont have to see you lol

    • http://www.facebook.com/jeffery.daniel Jeff Daniel

      As a soldier I agree with Ron Paul. If you want to go to war with Iran then sign up buddy…. lets see you get your ass shot off for a year at the time for TEN plus years…… It’s easy to be pro war when its not your blood or sweat or tears…..

      • Orange Shaman

        Amen, brotha!

      • http://profiles.google.com/tantocomo Derek Hanusch

        From what I understand we’re already @ war with Iran via Afghanistan & Iraq…

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=547660281 Diane Lapinski

    RON PAUL WON, WHY ARE YOU TAKING HIS NAME OUT? YOU TOTAL SCHMUCKS. FAIR AND BALANCED MY ASS!

  • bradley

    You can rig as many polls as you want. It doesn’t change the FACT that Ron Paul won.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Ava-Indiana/100000079126783 Ava Indiana

    This is a joke poll right ? fake lol lol very funny

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=652349681 Marcus Johnson

    WELL I WOULD HAVE VOTED FOR RON IF YOU HADN’T INTENTIONALLY LEFT HIM OFF. SO I VOTE FOR NONE OF THE OTHER TURDS.

    • http://www.facebook.com/jeffery.daniel Jeff Daniel

      if he put “none of the above”, you know it would be ahead in the poll…..

  • http://twitter.com/factsfirst Yeah its me

    You need to remove all the candidates from the poll fans of each have told members of their network that this poll is here.

    You can only vote once, no way to skew the poll.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=742087888 Ralyn Sue Speerly Schraceo

    What a crock poll – You didn’t list the real winner, and that was Ron Paul. And to the dummy that said they didn’t list Palin, she wasn’t there nor is she running.

  • http://twitter.com/phinerose Jo

    Well weather you like it or not, Dr.Paul is clearly more supported than any other candidate on your poll!

    RON PAUL 2012!!!!

  • bradley

    You can rig as many polls as you want. It doesn’t change the FACT that Ron Paul won.

    • http://www.therightscoop.com/ therightscoop

      actually he might have won. or he might have pulled a strong second.

      But now he gets zero thanks to the paulbots

      • http://twitter.com/factsfirst Yeah its me

        Thx to a network of voters who can only vote once you mean. Same as any other candidate.

      • bradley

        Well, the Paulbots that actually vote are going to get Ron Paul the nomination.

      • bradley

        http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5rXPrfnU3G0 By the way I got some porn for you.

      • http://www.facebook.com/InspireReality Lori-ann Kellett

        No – thanks to YOU and ONLY YOU. You are the one that decided to remove him and no one else. Point the finger at yourself, not someone else. Just a tip.

      • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_DGEHFDURZ465SXVQGXIJ7KZSLE malalingua

        Antiquis temporibus, nati tibi similes in rupibus vntosissimis exponebantur ad necem

      • http://www.facebook.com/jeffery.daniel Jeff Daniel

        I dare you to put up “none of the above” in place of Ron paul……

  • Anonymous

    What a shame that Ron Paul was not included, this takes away from the credibility of the poll.

    It is not Ron Paul’s fault that his supporters are more organized on-line, the other candidates should have sites encouraging their fans to vote on polls as well.

    At least Paul got to talk about the Fed, The Founder’s view on foreign policy, small government, liberty, etc.

  • Anonymous

    Way to disregard a single candidate. Sorry that Ron Paul supporters are more organized than these establishment candidates.

  • http://www.facebook.com/hugh.w.robinson Hugh Wesley Robinson

    You removed Ron Paul because he was winning? This is a biased poll and unworthy of anyone giving it credibility. If you dont like the votes then dont ask the poll. You are showing how non credible you and your organization is. This is a pathetic display of biased media. You should be ashamed to call yourself american.

  • annajanek

    Ron Paul………..you took Ron Paul off because he was winning!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    this is nor fair!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1820502003 Grace O’Connor

    Ron Paul is my choice for president though he has been omitted from your poll.

  • http://www.facebook.com/justin.roffey Justin Roffey

    Taking away Ron Paul? I think your fear is showing…..

  • Anonymous

    Ron Paul won!! but you “accidently” left him out! try being a little more honest, please

    • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=757693178 Clayton Hunt

      It was no accident, it was on bias.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_2CGKE3YOOPC2CFTHXMOOADTE5Q Hl M

    Ron Paul.

  • http://profiles.google.com/tantocomo Derek Hanusch

    Lol all the ron paul bullies lamenting the lost of the poll’s credibility! This is a voluntary response poll on a conservative blog! Thats a pretty casual forum for a poll. I don’t see any sort of assumed lofty air of credibility.

    & like I said earlier I haven’t seen the whole debate, but Ron Paul only made his boneheaded foreign policy positions sound more boneheaded & not any more convincing.

    • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=742087888 Ralyn Sue Speerly Schraceo

      Oh, so you are telling us you come vote but didn’t even watch it all? And you guys say we rig it? Well, I did watch the entire thing – and Ron Paul won hands down. The rest of the phonies were too busy attacking each other instead of really answering the questions.

      • http://profiles.google.com/tantocomo Derek Hanusch

        Actually I haven’t voted in the poll yet :p

        & I couldn’t agree that ron paul won b/c he made clear that he is a foreign policy nut. I think we know what issues Ron Paul is at odds with traditional reagan conservatives on, so I’m not gonna get into that right here right now… but he basically just confirmed that he is who he is, and if you’re into that then… well you’re into that…

        • http://www.facebook.com/jeffery.daniel Jeff Daniel

          I am betting you are no soldier or have any close to you….

          BTW Reagan SUPPORTED RON PAUL! Read a frickin’ book already.

          • http://profiles.google.com/tantocomo Derek Hanusch

            Lets see… reagan endorsed ron paul for his candidacy like one time? I read about that a couple weeks ago. If you’re trying to say that Reagan supported Ron Paul’s foreign policy, that is not gonna fly b/c that was not the case. Reagan, as I’m sure a soldier such as yourself isn’t learning for the first time, advocated one of the largest military buildups of all time which led to the fall of the soviet union… which seems to me to be at odds with what I’ve been learning about Ron Paul today :P

            • Orange Shaman

              The Soviet Union didn’t fall because of our military build-up. They fell because their economy was going to (bleep)…just as Europe’s doing now and we’re starting to do. Paul’s the closest thing to a Founding Father that we have, yet people dismiss him because they’d rather we continue our imperialist foreign policy instead of concentrating on our own defense. Paul’s the closest thing we have to Ronald Reagan, but people dismiss him because he “sounds crazy.” How absurd that people are honestly looking at the race for president the same as you would American Idol. Enjoy another big government conservative having the big government torch passed on from Obama like Bush did for him. When your country falls, the anarchists will gladly form their own small communities where people actually share resources instead of trying to control one another and be able to properly protect themselves against outside threats because it won’t be about spreading security, but concentrating on actually protecting the people and property.

              • http://profiles.google.com/tantocomo Derek Hanusch

                Lol history according to a free market anarchist. There economy going to “(bleep)” is not exclusive from a military buildup & there is plenty of reason to believe the arms race contributed to it…

                Let’s see… how much more do I wanna debate the nature of government with a ron paul free market anarchist…

  • http://www.facebook.com/messerone Matt Messer

    PUT RON PAUL BACK ON THE POLL YOU SLIMEY F****!

  • http://www.facebook.com/wizardquen Donalea Gordon

    WHERE IS RON PAUL HE CLEARLY WON THE DEBATE? WAS THIS AN INTENTIONAL OVERSIGHT?

    • http://www.facebook.com/InspireReality Lori-ann Kellett

      Not an oversight, Donalea – it was done on purpose because Ron Paul was getting too much support from this poll being mentioned on the DailyPaul. So, this Nazi-tactics supporter of this site, which should really be named TheWRONGCensoredScewedScoop.com, decided to remove Ron from this poll.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100000045369027 Derek Roman

    Bring the troops home, stop all foreign aid, allow gold/silver usage, stop bailing out banks, allow states to regulate themselves, end the Private Federal Reserve, fights for civil liberties…Ron Paul…

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100000045369027 Derek Roman

    Bring the troops home, stop all foreign aid, allow gold/silver usage, stop bailing out banks, allow states to regulate themselves, end the Private Federal Reserve, fights for civil liberties…Ron Paul…

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=742087888 Ralyn Sue Speerly Schraceo

    News Flash: The person skewing and rigging the polls appears to be you. If you can’t run a fair poll then don’t run one at all – how pathetic can you get.

  • http://twitter.com/jakejwest Jake West

    Hey “Paulbots,” stop telling people about this poll, you are rigging it!

    Oh hey, I’ve got a better idea! I’ll just remove Dr. Paul from the list to not rig the poll.

    Yeah man, great idea! Your logic is sound!

    • Orange Shaman

      So sound…

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_2CGKE3YOOPC2CFTHXMOOADTE5Q Hl M

    Ron Paul.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100000079377650 Stuart Grant

    That’s right. Can’t have them niggers voting. Next thing you know, they’ll want to get on the bus with yer ma. Nice move. I seem to remember this kind of voting fraud from history. Hint (it wasn’t the good guys who limited access to the ballot box).

  • http://twitter.com/phinerose Jo

    WOW! Taking my “Likes” off now! Show’s your hatred for Dr.Paul and his supporters, is strong. By calling us “Paulbots” and saying he’s our “messiah”, clearly shows you really dislike him.

  • CampusView Administrator

    Not sure what a Paulbot is or Daily Paul, but it doesn’t bode well for the fairness of this website if people communicating about and supporting their favorite candidate is basis for excluding that candidate from a vote. Isn’t that called democracy?

    • http://twitter.com/myronfalwell Nathan Obral

      Stuffing the ballot isn’t democracy. More like fraud. Or Chicago-style politics. But it’s ain’t honest in any way.

      • CampusView Administrator

        So that’s how Rahm became mayor!

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Amy-Nichole-Stantz/1429155090 Amy Nichole Stantz

    Where is Ron Paul in this poll??? Seriously? <–is following frettsey and voting for Huntsman instead….Cheaters…how can we be expected to take you seriously??

  • http://twitter.com/Ron2012Paul Ron Paul 2012

    You’re getting so much traffic from DailyPaul because no other candidate out there has the support to have such a successful grassroots created forum dedicated them and their beliefs. DailyGingrich? DailyRomney? DailyBachmann? They don’t exist because these are all typical politicans smeared by dirt (hypocritical voting records, questionable personal lives, etc.). Ron Paul is legit and has a chance this weekend to win in Iowa. This site has no credibility.

    • http://www.therightscoop.com/ therightscoop

      I explained that I did it and why I did it. That’s transparency my friend.

      • http://www.facebook.com/InspireReality Lori-ann Kellett

        Pretty lame – it is wrong to just up and decide to censor results because you don’t like the increased traffic coming to this poll by supporters of Ron that watched the debate? How many watched the debate BECAUSE Ron Paul was in it? I know I am not the only one that wouldn’t even bother listening to the other candidates dribble drabble and waste my time! But – according to you, censorship is OK by you. Again you are the TheWRONGScoop, “my friend” (sarcastically)

      • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1310338120 Samantha Kirby

        I hit like on accident, you and your poll are as currupt as our current government. Look at all these people who are angry at your decision, i hope anonymous hacks your site and defaces it. You snide pathetic piece of vile excrement

        • Orange Shaman

          I don’t think Anonymous would waste their time. I’m really anxious to see them hack Facebook though.

          • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1310338120 Samantha Kirby

            Indeed indeed!!

        • Anonymous

          Typical Ron Paul supporter comments.

        • Anonymous

          Typical Ron Paul supporter comments.

      • http://www.facebook.com/jeffery.daniel Jeff Daniel

        And we are telling you that you are a fraud for doing so….

    • Anonymous

      Sarah Palin has. Her supporters are very fervent, like Ron Paul supporters. The difference is that MOST of her supporters don’t call people names and talk stupid.
      Anyway, the poll was about who WON the debate, not about who you want for president. Ron Paul did not win the debate. I can’t stand Gingrich, but I think he won the debate. You can’t handle that someone else might have won this particular debate, apparently.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1310338120 Samantha Kirby

    How can you take ron paul off, he smashed the compitition, he can be the only one to save this country from a tyranical government. You are supposed to be media, you are supposed to be for the people! I guess you must be breast fed by the government to!

  • http://www.facebook.com/justin.blough Justin Blough

    Wow so apparently polls are only supposed to be taken by people who are for establishment candidates or…. I am confused. Because someone lets people know there is a poll and directs people to the poll, that poll candidate now becomes irrelevant because the only way to get polling data is for people not to know about the poll. Makes perfect sense.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=676900247 Jon Klingler

    you suck taking RP off the poll. scared huh?

  • Jason .

    Oh I get it this poll is for second place right?

    • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=757693178 Clayton Hunt

      yeah just about

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=626507541 Chris Nichols

    so the mod here pisses on the group with the largest web presence, seriously guys maybe we should blacklist the sites that pull this crap so as to never ever contribute to their web traffic again, kinda like voting with your feet, hmmmm someone should start a Facebook group for this

    • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=757693178 Clayton Hunt

      I’m doing it now Called Ron Paul Blacklist

      • http://twitter.com/jasonus_habilis SovereignHominin

        Send it my way. I’ll promote it.

      • http://www.facebook.com/InspireReality Lori-ann Kellett

        THANK YOU! I just joined! Make sure to post this site on there multiple times! ;-)

  • Anonymous

    OK this is the reason America is going down the hill because people like you who do not want honest person as a president real American, who love this country and who loves people and want Peace, Freedom , Prosperity for every individual, you want Tyrrany? War?Tyrranical Federal Resrve who is robbing people for 100 years? What is the reason you took Ron Paul of the Poll?

  • livefree1200cc

    Cool – censorship at it’s best – you people ought to be ashamed of yourselves – you should be proud to remove the guy who would win your poll if you played fair – of course they posted for people to vote – how else would people know about the poll you morons !

  • http://www.facebook.com/ilikepieguy23 Skyler McCreary

    Your poll is a JOKE!

  • http://www.facebook.com/ilikepieguy23 Skyler McCreary

    Your poll is a JOKE!

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_AYDR3E6WJA3IZOJCA2YQ2IZCIU Joe

    so let me get this straight you disabled ron paul voters because they told there supporters to get the word out about the poll and vote? you have lost your credibility if the vote could be rigged then it is invalid because all voters could do the same for their canidate.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_I4SYS3IZH2XMB6AA44X6NCX6ZU Romeo d

    YOUR JUST A STUPID MUTHER FUCKER, SCREW YOU AND YOUR BIASED POLL, EVERYBODY KNOWS RON PAUL WON THE DEBATE AND TOLD THOSE WAR-MONGERING HIGH GOVT. SPENDING PRICKS CANDIDATES TO STOP SPREADING FALSE PROPAGANDA WE NEED TO GET OUR TROOPS HOME NOW! and balance the budget!

    • Anonymous

      Typical Ron Paul supporter comment. I would not vote for the man just because his supporters are foul-mouthed thugs.

    • Anonymous

      Typical Ron Paul supporter comment. I would not vote for the man just because his supporters are foul-mouthed thugs.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_AYDR3E6WJA3IZOJCA2YQ2IZCIU Joe

    btw I didn’t even get to cast my vote is for RON PAUL

  • http://www.facebook.com/will.adkins Will Adkins

    Looks like the only way to ensure Ron Paul won’t beat your preferred candidate is to remove him from the poll…

  • http://twitter.com/factsfirst Yeah its me

    This is what a real poll looks like.

    http://onlineiowastrawpoll.com/

    They advertise and ask everyone to tweet to the poll to get the largest segment possible. Your poll flies in the face of this simple logic.

  • Orange Shaman

    Hey, Scoop. Feel free to take one of Jon Huntsman’s votes off if you’d like. I just did it again from a different computer to further prove my point that the goal you stated can’t possibly happen no matter what steps you attempt to take in this sort of poll.

    • KenInMontana

      A different computer at the same location?

      • Orange Shaman

        Yep.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100002162987406 Missy Oldpage

    Where’s Ron Paul 2012!!!!!

    • Anonymous

      He’s already won. We’re just voting for the person that gets to shine his shoes.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100001665798317 Padactor Roger

    what happened to Ron Paul? I’m not voting for anyone else. Just because you took his name off of your poll doesn’t mean he wasn’t there. Quite awesome you guys being part of a status quo ;] ;] ;]

    Ron Paul 2012 !

  • Anonymous

    You are nothing more than a poser. Preach free market, individualism, and liberty yet always come up short. This is the second poll I can remember on this site that has not included Ron Paul.

    I really don’t know what people like you are afraid of? You want an accurate representation of your lame ass website? If you ask me anyone who comes to your website and votes should be considered representation no matter how they heard about it. I guarantee had Romney or even your wet dream candidate Perry put something on their site you would not have removed their name!

    I found your website through YouTube, so maybe you should block anybody who receives advertising from YouTube.

    I actually am surprised you didn’t throw Palin in there since this website has an obvious obsession with her along with all other middle aged republican men who can’t see a female George W. Bush when it’s right in front of them.

    You, my friend are truly pathetic and should take a long hard look at yourself. I feel you and Bill O’Reilly would get along just perfectly.

    Loser.

  • Anonymous

    You are nothing more than a poser. Preach free market, individualism, and liberty yet always come up short. This is the second poll I can remember on this site that has not included Ron Paul.

    I really don’t know what people like you are afraid of? You want an accurate representation of your lame ass website? If you ask me anyone who comes to your website and votes should be considered representation no matter how they heard about it. I guarantee had Romney or even your wet dream candidate Perry put something on their site you would not have removed their name!

    I found your website through YouTube, so maybe you should block anybody who receives advertising from YouTube.

    I actually am surprised you didn’t throw Palin in there since this website has an obvious obsession with her along with all other middle aged republican men who can’t see a female George W. Bush when it’s right in front of them.

    You, my friend are truly pathetic and should take a long hard look at yourself. I feel you and Bill O’Reilly would get along just perfectly.

    Loser.

  • Anonymous

    You are nothing more than a poser. Preach free market, individualism, and liberty yet always come up short. This is the second poll I can remember on this site that has not included Ron Paul.

    I really don’t know what people like you are afraid of? You want an accurate representation of your lame ass website? If you ask me anyone who comes to your website and votes should be considered representation no matter how they heard about it. I guarantee had Romney or even your wet dream candidate Perry put something on their site you would not have removed their name!

    I found your website through YouTube, so maybe you should block anybody who receives advertising from YouTube.

    I actually am surprised you didn’t throw Palin in there since this website has an obvious obsession with her along with all other middle aged republican men who can’t see a female George W. Bush when it’s right in front of them.

    You, my friend are truly pathetic and should take a long hard look at yourself. I feel you and Bill O’Reilly would get along just perfectly.

    Loser.

  • Kevin Hilde

    Are you assuming that there are no pointers from other the candidates’ supporters toward blog polls such as this? Are you really that stupid or is this a special prejudice?

    You can spout your dishonest explainations all you wish …. the truth remains. For whatever reason you simply can’t allow Paul to win the poll.

  • http://twitter.com/tikerbell85 Misa Hirasawa

    Where is ron paul? I vote for him

  • Anonymous

    Resistance is futile! We should all just SURRENDER to Ron Paul and his cult of followers!

    • Anonymous

      yes you should !

    • Anonymous

      If by surrender, you mean actually follow the constitution.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_YFFEGQG4TFOAWVJZRYVE7XDMLI tclwrap

    It is a sad day in America you have totally discredited Ron Paul from the poll. It fundamentally says, you have your biases, and the results from this poll or anything else for that matter need to be treated with a grain of salt. Shame on you!

  • Anonymous

    Why are you not letting people to see my comments? about the unfair treatment of Ron Paul?

  • http://www.facebook.com/vardkinzon.navthrfez Vardkinzon Navthrfez

    Ron PAUL 2012…..I know there are several issues that come and go each election year, and these issues are reflective of the times and the social needs and wants, but the point I wish to make right now is that regardless of your opinions or views on any issue, whether it be economic or social, etc. is this…. We are a Nation founded on the ideals and principles of FREEDOM. I understand we all have concerns dealing with welfare, employment, immigration, marriage, education, and so on, but these are issues best resolved by state and local gov’t. We as a People, a Nation, should never lose sight of our Nation’s Foundation and Legacy to the History of Mankind and the World, that we are the ICON of FREEDOM. Regardless of personal ideals on other issues, I ask all of you to look first and foremost at any Candidates plans for the FREEDOM of OUR NATION and OUR CITIZENS. Please Vote for FREEDOM. It’s unfortunate that hidden agenda exist at all levels and in all societies around the world, but if we maintain FOCUS on what makes us a GREAT NATION, we will ALWAYS be FREE!!

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Robert-Kalland/724534807 Robert Kalland

    Ron Paul anyone?

  • Anonymous

    Sieg Heil, Right Scoop!!

  • http://twitter.com/Movement4Truth Founder

    I bet if one of the status quo candidate’s that RightScoop likes to touch himself to the thought of night had the support following Ron Paul does and posted a poll, you would be very quiet. Unless you can post proof the the poll has been hacked or tampered in any way and prove that not every RP vote were not individuals, you should not ever remove someone from a poll just because someone posted about your poll. Isn’t that the whole point of you having a poll? Visitors?

    Just because the supporters of these fake conservative candidates enjoy sitting there and jerking each other off without taking real action and Ron Paul’s supporters are all about taking action knowing that’ll be the only way to get people to understand what the hell is really going on, doesn’t mean you punish the voters.

    I tell you what, since so many Ron Paul supporters are actively getting masses of people together and preparing for a trip to the ballot box, let’s remove him from the race all together. Apparently, actively supporting someone with morals and an understanding that the government is out of it’s mind and outside the very limited jurisdiction granted to them by the Constitution, is not a practice of a democratic society. It’s “unfair” to the other voters to be taking this sort of action. Shame on all of us.

    P.S.
    “Government is established to protect and maintain individual rights…” THAT’S the limit of government! That’s it! Stay the hell out of my health, my food, my car, my job, my home, my education, MY LIFE!

    The rest of you, go buy a GMO burger with you Federal Reserve note, stuff your government owned face, get in your government regulated car and drive through a few government checkpoints so they can check your government ID and make sure you purchase some government insurance until you find a cliff and fucking floor it for the good of humanity.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Stefan-Krizan/544978816 Stefan Krizan

    Ron Paul won the debate hands down

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_DGEHFDURZ465SXVQGXIJ7KZSLE malalingua

    This is what Ron Paul is fighting for the first amendment. I take this as a civil matter too since I am black and you are discriminating against me. This is disgusting, just goes to show you there is more free speech and expression in China than there is here is amerika. Way to stifle dissent, you should be proud of yourselves.

    • Anonymous

      A privately owned web site has nothing to do with the first amendment. It is GOVERNMENT that cannot abridge our first amendment rights…supposedly. A web site owner can do whatever he wants.

  • Anonymous

    Ron Paul was winning here at this Poll and you took his name off! Sad, sad, sad you can not stand honest future president, you like Tyrrans, Dictators, who is ruing this country to the grownd!

  • http://profiles.google.com/tantocomo Derek Hanusch

    This is how it goes: I might have some sympathy for all you Ron Paul guys if he didn’t SUCK SO BAD! I don’t know what fantasy world he lives in but ours is a world governed by the aggressive use of force.

    • Orange Shaman

      You’re saying the greatest military on Earth can’t defend itself against the other countries who are basically using our leftovers? C’mon, now. Now THAT’S a “fantasy world.”

      • http://profiles.google.com/tantocomo Derek Hanusch

        I didn’t notice that I said that. I heard Ron Paul call for not defending ourselves today because our biggest problem is we don’t mind our own business.

        • Orange Shaman

          If you actually paid closer attention to his words or read his books, you’ll realize that he COMPLETELY supports DEFENSE…but what WE’VE been doing…with this “pre-emptive war” crap is called MILITARISM. THAT’S what he means when he says we should mind our own business.

          • http://profiles.google.com/tantocomo Derek Hanusch

            I support “pre-empting” iran getting nukes. Maybe I haven’t read his books, but I know enough to know he is not for defense the way I am, and the way I feel needs to be promoted in order to ensure our safety. Just because a country doesn’t have an air force to fly over here and attack us doesn’t mean its none of our business.

            • Orange Shaman

              That’s exactly what it means…especially when we’re BROKE and CAN’T AFFORD it. You know what caused ROME to fall? Spreading their military too far and thin as well as going broke from not being able to afford paying for it all. Sound familiar?

              • http://profiles.google.com/tantocomo Derek Hanusch

                lets see… in 2006 the deficit was under $300 billion (ballparking off the top of my memory) & today its over $1.5 trillion & defense spending hasn’t increased significantly in that time…

                I’m not convinced that defense spending is bankrupting our country. Its the spending on welfare, & crap thats just flushed down the toilet. You wanna reform the military? that’s fine. You wanna reevaluate the strategies, & where we have our troops throughout the world? that’s fine too. You wanna charge other countries for our military services? That’s fine. But Ron Paul just wants to live & let live on a global scale & I’m not cool with that.

                I know that the failing economy is our greatest threat to security, but give me a break over defense spending causing that. It isn’t so.

                • Orange Shaman

                  I didn’t say it was…but the point is that it’s not our job to police the world and we’re NOT EVEN PROTECTING OURSELVES properly anyway. Do you feel ANY safer with the troops in the Middle East? I don’t. As a matter of fact, I’m MORE SCARED THAN EVER…but NOT OF TERRORISM. I’m scared of BIG GOVERNMENT trying to CONTROL MY LIFE and claiming that it’s FOR MY OWN SAFETY. There’s still plenty of false flag terrorist attacks here…only now there’s no need for thousands to die like in 2001. Now, they’re being “thwarted” by Homeland Security and these “threats” are being used to CURTAIL OUR CIVIL LIBERTIES EVEN MORE. Wake up and smell the coffee. Welfare and entitlements and corporatism ALL need to go…but let’s PRIORITIZE. Let’s END MILITARISM before we STICK IT TO THE POOR AND SICK. Just saying.

                • http://profiles.google.com/tantocomo Derek Hanusch

                  Well excuse me if I judge from history that the atlantic & the pacific oceans are not enough to keep us safe. I’m plenty with you w/ regards to the threat of big government violating our rights in the name of protecting us, but that does not mean that our country is not vulnerable to external threats.

                  I’m not so arrogant though as to believe I’m actually gonna convince a Ron Paul guy involved in a raid on one of my favorite conservative blogs. Of course you have a response for everything b/c otherwise you wouldn’t be so pretentious. Why don’t you just admit you hate the military so we can get on w/ our lives? Its pretty sick to try and make the case that we are such a large powerful country that, “Oh no big deal the other countries are basically using our leftovers!”

                • Orange Shaman

                  I used to be in the military and I don’t hate those who put their lives on the line for something greater than themselves. Been to Iraq for 2 years of my life, so I would never hate my fellow brothers in arms. What I do hate though is the way that politicians just wage pre-emptive wars which put our troops into jeopardy with NO INTENTION ON WINNING. If you’re GOING to wage war…then do it RIGHT. Go in, get the bad guy and be done with it. Don’t nation-build and create a global empire. If it’s just a militaristic empire like it’s been for the past decade now…then it DOES need to ALL END and we need to REGROUP to DEFEND OURSELVES for a change.

                • http://profiles.google.com/tantocomo Derek Hanusch

                  lol, now you’re sounding less like Ron Paul. Hell yeah, I’m sick of politians waging wars they don’t intend to win, but I don’t think Ron Paul would ever say “if you’re going to wage war…then do it right.” …particularly w/ the talk today about rights for terrorists (aka the wrong way to wage war)…

                  also, I appreciate you served, something I didn’t do, and I don’t mean to say that you hate individual members of the military, but surely someone having served in the military doesn’t preclude them from hating the military in general. I’m not sure that America’s military action the last ten years qualifies as “imperial” by historical standards. “Boneheaded”, perhaps, “without a clear mission or goal for victory” surely, but to call it a “global empire” is pretty pessimistic.

                  Maybe I’m naive, but I think that several of our candidates are ready to shake up defense… particularly along the “no intention of winning” lines, if only b/c the public is demanding it, and it is my hope that the public (by which i basically mean the tea party) gets to reset plenty of things via the 2012 elections…

                • Orange Shaman

                  Here’s where Ron Paul speaks when he talks about rights for those who are captured. Not everyone we capture actually is a terrorist, but many are just suspects…yet we still detain them indefinitely without trial. That’s what Ron Paul talks about when he speaks about rights. You really should either listen to other things he’s said on his foreign policy and pay close attention or even check out a book or two of his at the library. He’s a very brilliant mind, but you can’t spew an entire book worth of Libertarian philosophy during a debate or television interview.

                  If America’s past decade of militarism doesn’t also qualify as imperial, then it sure is imperial-like the way we’re building roads for them, training their forces, and providing them with weapons…all the meanwhile like I said before…we’re broke and stretching our military even thinner. At this rate, I wouldn’t be surprised if they didn’t bring the draft back.

                  You’re definitely naive if you think anyone but Paul’s going to actually do defense as opposed to the same old wasteful militarism. Most of them seem to want EVEN MORE of the same…and it sounds like you and I both agree with that being a terrible idea if nothing else.

                • http://profiles.google.com/tantocomo Derek Hanusch

                  When one of these people is captured, the purpose is not to punish them for being a terrorist. The purpose is to keep them off the battlefield. This is a standard part of fighting wars for thousands of years, but today we are so brilliant that we are gonna prosecute them according to the same laws as if the are a criminal?

                  Let me sum it up: the military, while it may be wasteful (I’d be curious to see a comparison to other gov agencies) & while it may be in need of reform, is not what’s bankrupting this country, and it is not what is destroying this country.

                  I don’t have my faith in individual politicians, my faith is that the tea party can actually change enough politicians to the point that they deal with the government in actual real world terms, rather than according to the hoax that they’ve created & live to perpetuate. If you wanna include the military as part of the hoax or the scam that is the federal government… I don’t think I’m there with you & I don’t think that most people are b/c I don’t think that is the reality of the situation.

                  If the tea party can’t live up to that within the decade, then I’ll have to pick where I want to live in a world that is significantly different from ours today…

                  …but Ron Paul has never left me with any impression other than being vulnerable in an increasingly aggressive world, excuse me if I take him at his words, which I hear him repeat in interview after interview after interview

                  also, ps, on a personal note, you get your replies out way fast! way to go :P lol I’ve been debating a real Ron Paul guy tonight! A first for me so thx its been fun!

                • Orange Shaman

                  Just because that’s been the way of war doesn’t make it right. If you’re not going to charge the person with a crime, then they should not be held against their will. If they WANT to stay for their own safety…that’s a different story…and some of them MIGHT.

                  The Pentagon said that the Department of Defense was “too big to audit.” That’s not just wasteful, but downright arrogant. Those are fighting words as far as I’m concerned. Just because you’re responsible for our country’s safety (which you’re not even doing well), you shouldn’t be held accountable like every other government entity?

                  The military isn’t a part of the hoax. They may very well be the only part of government which is NOT corrupt. Ya know…they’re just following orders like they’re supposed to. I’m probably about to go off the charts completely with you here, but I think that there’s NO NEED for ANY government…even including a nation, or borders, which brings us to the military. It’s ALSO NOT NECESSARY. People are capable of forming communities where they share the resources and protection of those resources. That’s an entirely different conversation altogether though.

                  I’m not so much as “Ron Paul guy” as much as I am a free-market anarchist (if I must be labeled as anything) who would prefer NO government…but a small and very limited Constitutional Libertarian government which is what Ron Paul touts is a COMPROMISE that I’m WILLING to support.

                  I’m always glad to have real debates even if we both completely disagree with one another.

                • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100000924130996 Fara Wheld

                  Dontcha hate it when the comments get pencil thin?

                • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100000924130996 Fara Wheld

                  Dontcha hate it when the comments get pencil thin?

                • Orange Shaman

                  Yeah. It’s one of the fatal flaws to Disqus.

                • http://profiles.google.com/tantocomo Derek Hanusch

                  lol, now you’re sounding less like Ron Paul. Hell yeah, I’m sick of politians waging wars they don’t intend to win, but I don’t think Ron Paul would ever say “if you’re going to wage war…then do it right.” …particularly w/ the talk today about rights for terrorists (aka the wrong way to wage war)…

                  also, I appreciate you served, something I didn’t do, and I don’t mean to say that you hate individual members of the military, but surely someone having served in the military doesn’t preclude them from hating the military in general. I’m not sure that America’s military action the last ten years qualifies as “imperial” by historical standards. “Boneheaded”, perhaps, “without a clear mission or goal for victory” surely, but to call it a “global empire” is pretty pessimistic.

                  Maybe I’m naive, but I think that several of our candidates are ready to shake up defense… particularly along the “no intention of winning” lines, if only b/c the public is demanding it, and it is my hope that the public (by which i basically mean the tea party) gets to reset plenty of things via the 2012 elections…

                • Orange Shaman

                  I used to be in the military and I don’t hate those who put their lives on the line for something greater than themselves. Been to Iraq for 2 years of my life, so I would never hate my fellow brothers in arms. What I do hate though is the way that politicians just wage pre-emptive wars which put our troops into jeopardy with NO INTENTION ON WINNING. If you’re GOING to wage war…then do it RIGHT. Go in, get the bad guy and be done with it. Don’t nation-build and create a global empire. If it’s just a militaristic empire like it’s been for the past decade now…then it DOES need to ALL END and we need to REGROUP to DEFEND OURSELVES for a change.

            • http://www.facebook.com/justin.blough Justin Blough

              dont forget to close your closet before bed, scary things are out to get you

              • http://profiles.google.com/tantocomo Derek Hanusch

                Haha! You Ron Paul guys sure are scary!

    • Anonymous

      Wow, do you work for the UN or something?

  • http://profiles.google.com/jason.burns.mobile Jason Burns

    Ron Paul won. You guys suck! Where is Ron Paul in your stupid list?

  • http://profiles.google.com/jason.burns.mobile Jason Burns

    Fake poll!

  • http://www.facebook.com/matthew.hensman Matthew Hensman

    That’s right you fear Ron Paul cowards!!!

  • livefree1200cc

    Vote Huntsman in place of Paul and DESTROY this poll. Ron Paul 2012 !

  • G M

    You’re a feckin retard. Newt? Get Ron up there you blind cont.

    • Orange Shaman

      Just vote Huntsman. If we’re voting to lose anyway…

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_J3WJVPD7BO7UZFFVR4IWESTAKQ Mystery Man

    Approve that ASS HOLE!

  • Orange Shaman

    I love how Huntsman’s votes are going up now. I don’t know if that’s my friends or if anybody else took cue from me and spread the word too. Haha.

  • Orange Shaman

    I love how Huntsman’s votes are going up now. I don’t know if that’s my friends or if anybody else took cue from me and spread the word too. Haha.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1537776596 Nick Mcdonald

    I don’t know what to think, to believe the maker of this poll is actually scared of Ron Paul gives me some hope for the 2012 presidential election.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1537776596 Nick Mcdonald

    I don’t know what to think, to believe the maker of this poll is actually scared of Ron Paul gives me some hope for the 2012 presidential election.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_WD2QGSLL7KDO5MJ6JIQX3BTCUU Willy Will

    Where is Ron Paul at? He isn’t on the poll!

    • Orange Shaman

      Oh well. Since it’s not a real poll…you might as well vote Huntsman.

  • Anonymous

    Vote Huntsman in place of Paul to teach these commies a lesson about unfair censorship

    • Orange Shaman

      Haha. That’s what I did…with two computers at that. Don’t forget to spread your word elsewhere and link them here to do the same.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Tom-Smith/615325820 Tom Smith

    Where is Ron Paul?

    • Orange Shaman

      Just vote Huntsman for grins since that’s all this poll is now.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Mike-Palko/726793270 Mike Palko

    yes, this poll is actually to see who is the biggest loser

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1149283611 Kristopher Seibel

    Wow, why have a poll then? Im a normal person with no biased to any of them, but Ron Paul sounded the most like he had his stuff together. Lemme guess the people running this poll will be voting for the Pizza man CEO. You lost all credibility the right scoop. You are a joke and ill never return to your bogus site ever again!!!

  • Stephen Bauer

    Ron Paul gets my vote here and he seems to be the #1 choice out here in Hawaii among Republicans.

    • Orange Shaman

      Just vote Huntsman, since your guy isn’t on there. I didn’t realize we were voting to lose, but apparently we are. Go Huntsman! Haha.

  • http://twitter.com/meyeb G. E.

    Where’s Ron Paul?

    • Orange Shaman

      Screw it. Just vote Huntsman. That’s how useful this poll is without all the candidates anyway.

  • http://twitter.com/meyeb G. E.

    Where’s Ron Paul?

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Trevor-Benson-V/100000375978257 Trevor Benson Ⓥ

    And how is this poll fair?

    Ron Paul 2012 – Restore America NOW!

    http://www.ronpaul2012.com

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Bill-Redder/100000544267578 Bill Redder

    wow. take a breath and look at yourselves, paul supporters. you’re acting like obama worshipers or a seiu mob. a rational person may just stop visiting this site if it bothered them this much. instead you message all your fellow sheep and encourage them to harass trs.

    truly, by reading this mass hissy fit one can only conclude you all are deranged. or 30 years old and still living with mom and dad in their basement. btw: it’s only censorship if the government blocks paul from this poll so knock off the hyperbole. if you don’t like the polling structure, you guessed it… leave! and if you’re so sure your messiah won the debate why are you getting your panties in a twist about this poll?

    and you wonder why nobody takes “dr. paul” (not too pretentious!) seriously? it’s largely because of the people he inspires. that, and his foreign policy stances… but i digress.

    grow up ladies. nobody cares about your sad temper tantrum.

    • Orange Shaman

      I agree that some of the Paul supporters take it too far. It is a shame…but the message still stands and this country will surely crumble if any other path is followed. I will hope for the best…but prepare for the worst.

      • http://www.facebook.com/people/Bill-Redder/100000544267578 Bill Redder

        you may want to not confuse passion for saving the republic with adolescent railing, and misplaces rage and energy, towards a political website.

        my concerns about paul aside i am glad so many people are engaged with the process. it’s dearly needed. and libertarianism has some good ideas.

        but a reasonable person can only conclude there is little difference between the obama fanatics and the sentiment expressed by an overwhelming number of paul supporters (filtering in part from the daily paul) on this page.

        idol worship is largely what got us into this mess.

        • Orange Shaman

          True. As one who never has or ever will worship idols…I still can’t help but think that Ron Paul is the only one who will actually ATTEMPT (keep in mind, I don’t say even CAN because I don’t know if he can) to restore our country to its founding principles of limited government.

          I hate some of the “Paulbots” too, but I personally think that a lot of them are not TRUE supporters, but saboteurs. It’s the only reason I can think of why they would act in such a manner.

      • http://www.facebook.com/people/Bill-Redder/100000544267578 Bill Redder

        you may want to not confuse passion for saving the republic with adolescent railing, and misplaces rage and energy, towards a political website.

        my concerns about paul aside i am glad so many people are engaged with the process. it’s dearly needed. and libertarianism has some good ideas.

        but a reasonable person can only conclude there is little difference between the obama fanatics and the sentiment expressed by an overwhelming number of paul supporters (filtering in part from the daily paul) on this page.

        idol worship is largely what got us into this mess.

    • Anonymous

      go to hell Bill – you neo-con loving droid

      • http://www.facebook.com/people/Bill-Redder/100000544267578 Bill Redder

        that’s it. the voice of a rational, and mature, person NOT living in mommy’s basement.

        or is that, attic?

        throwing ad hominems makes you sound like a progressive, btw.

        • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100000924130996 Fara Wheld

          Bill — I debate with guys like you all the time. I’m beginning to think it’s a form of foreplay. Words are hot. Seriously..

          But your logic isn’t lining up with your Thesaurus. You’re being hypocritical and you’re sullying those precious beautiful words you are using. Please stop that.

      • http://www.facebook.com/people/Bill-Redder/100000544267578 Bill Redder

        that’s it. the voice of a rational, and mature, person NOT living in mommy’s basement.

        or is that, attic?

        throwing ad hominems makes you sound like a progressive, btw.

    • http://www.facebook.com/InspireReality Lori-ann Kellett

      Censorship happens all the time by the BigCorp owned media all the time, where have you been? So, we support him and think it is flat out wrong for this douche to remove him for some stupid excuse? Okay – lets say a company doesn’t disclose there is poison in the food they make, just don’t say anything because those that are outraged are nothing more than lunatics in our logic? Ummm – okay then. Ron hasn’t been in Congress this long, for no reason. He’s the only one that ever tries to talk sense against the others that support the Patriot Act and further destruction of this country by the BigBanks, Federal Reserve, and BigGovernment all manipulating everything to line their own pockets. If you believe in our Constitution, then Ron is the only one that votes constantly following it. Too bad that you equate “passion” with “tantrums”. Very sad.

      • http://www.facebook.com/people/Bill-Redder/100000544267578 Bill Redder

        “censorship” is what governments do, not corporations or people to other people. but, assuming you’re right.

        WHO F#CKING CARES if trs rigged the poll? you just went on a big rant, regurgitating paul’s policies, yet miss the real point that all of you are taking this waaay too seriously. and making your selves look infrigginsane in the process.

        time for you all to walk away from the computer, go outside, breathe some fresh air. and get a life.

        (yes, i hate that cliche too. but it’s apt.)

        • http://www.facebook.com/InspireReality Lori-ann Kellett

          Maybe our passionate “temper tantrums” is exactly because people aren’t taking things seriously ENOUGH. None of the other candidates are really for any change at all – slight deviations from the same old BS. BTW – I’m not the only one that went on a rant, you did too! Just like the other candidates up there tonight, all hypocrites.

        • http://www.facebook.com/InspireReality Lori-ann Kellett

          Maybe our passionate “temper tantrums” is exactly because people aren’t taking things seriously ENOUGH. None of the other candidates are really for any change at all – slight deviations from the same old BS. BTW – I’m not the only one that went on a rant, you did too! Just like the other candidates up there tonight, all hypocrites.

          • http://www.facebook.com/people/Bill-Redder/100000544267578 Bill Redder

            i agree passion is necessary in these times. but what’s going on here is fanaticism usually reserved for the comment section of you tube videos.

            while i tend to be wordy (you should hear me talk) there is a difference between being verbose and emotionally driven tirades.

            not everyone here is guilty but most paul protesters here have been.

    • Kevin Hilde

      So Bill, dishonesty doesn’t bother you in the least?

      • http://www.facebook.com/people/Bill-Redder/100000544267578 Bill Redder

        assuming your charge of dishonesty: who the f#ck cares if this site is dishonest about a poll they put up? friggin leave if it bothers you… it’s just a political site, not the ACTUAL election.

        get a grip.

        • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100000924130996 Fara Wheld

          Oh my good God in heaven…

          Bill Redder: “again, sinking to profanity is also very “progressive” of you.”

          **followed by**

          Bill Redder: “assuming your charge of dishonesty: who the f#ck cares if this site…”

    • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1149283611 Kristopher Seibel

      No youre totally right bill-doe, I think we should always ask what the people think and not include all options…Pretty Nazi regimist, just the way you like it, schmuck. Get real pal. Maybe we should hold all polls without your vote, obviously you like to talk out of your ass… Wipe that thing.

      • http://www.facebook.com/people/Bill-Redder/100000544267578 Bill Redder

        just looking for an opportunity to use “nazi” in a sentence i bet. very clever… and adding “doe” to the end of my name? a masterstroke! with such genius intellect like you the little doctor needs all the help he can get.

        again, sinking to profanity is also very “progressive” of you.

        but please continue. the more you talk the more kooky “dr. paul” (messiah to you) looks.

        kid, it’s just a political web site. save you virgin rage for the REAL election.

    • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1149283611 Kristopher Seibel

      No youre totally right bill-doe, I think we should always ask what the people think and not include all options…Pretty Nazi regimist, just the way you like it, schmuck. Get real pal. Maybe we should hold all polls without your vote, obviously you like to talk out of your ass… Wipe that thing.

    • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1149283611 Kristopher Seibel

      No youre totally right bill-doe, I think we should always ask what the people think and not include all options…Pretty Nazi regimist, just the way you like it, schmuck. Get real pal. Maybe we should hold all polls without your vote, obviously you like to talk out of your ass… Wipe that thing.

  • http://www.facebook.com/dudanation Brian Duda

    Try and remove Paul from the real ballot during election. he is going to win. Real people are going to vote for him a total of 3 times.
    1. Republican nomination.
    2. Presidential election
    3. Presidential re-election

    No more free easy money for you scumbag scam artists that try to control the population. Leave it to the hard workers for once!

  • http://www.facebook.com/dmarkham28 Dan Markham

    Seems like the moderator of this poll just can’t accept that Paul actually did win the debate by that much…check every other poll on the web

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_O2IGUQJMTQ7BO5ZIQIXVCJB4QA Greg Fisher

    Perfect example of corruption in news reporting. I’m submitting this along with quite a few other examples to my local news stations. It’s sad how when Ron Paul wins polls, it’s organized fraud… Curious how he always wins the voluntary response polls. Anyway, the person who put up this poll is clearly not a professional, calling Ron Paul supporters “Paulbots,” so I wouldn’t worry about this too much, but it still is regrettable.

  • Anonymous

    The PaulBots are morons. Anyone that is being halfway objective knows he will never be president and DID NOT come close to winning the debate.

    • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_DGEHFDURZ465SXVQGXIJ7KZSLE malalingua

      well livefreeordie2012 you might as well die because you sure aren’t living free. The illusion of freedom is not freedom.

    • Orange Shaman

      Halfway objective? How? I thought the whole purpose of debates was for the candidates to sell themselves. He sold me back in 2008, but unfortunately he lost and since Oklahoma votes R for all 5 electoral colleges anyway…it didn’t matter whether I voted or not after that. He is still the same guy and I am happy about that since everyone else is just now morphing into a “small government” COSTUME to appease those who are finally waking up, but unfortunately too stupid to realize they’re being deceived. If Paul gets it…he may STILL not be able to save your country…but any other R will SURELY destroy it.

  • http://www.facebook.com/hoswald Heather Oswald Bucaram

    Ron Paul should be on that list!

  • http://www.facebook.com/hoswald Heather Oswald Bucaram

    Ron Paul should be on that list!

  • Orange Shaman

    Huntsman might get more votes than Romney? Haha!

  • Orange Shaman

    Huntsman might get more votes than Romney? Haha!

    • Orange Shaman

      Oops. I accidentally liked my own comment with the intention of editing it. Oh well. Just for grins after all…

    • Orange Shaman

      Oops. I accidentally liked my own comment with the intention of editing it. Oh well. Just for grins after all…

  • http://profiles.google.com/hjhemin Jake Hemingway

    I demand you remove Romney as his supporters have posted your poll on his MittRomneyCentral fan site…..seems fair since you removed Paul because the polls was posted on dailypaul…….oh yeah I forgot…you’re biased

  • http://profiles.google.com/hjhemin Jake Hemingway

    I demand you remove Romney as his supporters have posted your poll on his MittRomneyCentral fan site…..seems fair since you removed Paul because the polls was posted on dailypaul…….oh yeah I forgot…you’re biased

  • http://profiles.google.com/hjhemin Jake Hemingway

    Romney supports posted your poll on his mittromneycentral fan site….remove Romney now!!!!!!!!!

    • Orange Shaman

      Wouldn’t want Romney voters to “skew” the poll.

    • http://www.facebook.com/jennifer.m.yoder Jennifer LadyLiberty Roberts

      That’d be too logical and fair though…

  • http://profiles.google.com/seijeff Jeff Seiffert

    Now isn’t this nice. You can’t reconcile yourself to the fact that Paul might have enough individual supporters to actually get the numbers he had before you deleted him and you don’t even bother to look at other candidate’s websites or supporter websites to see if they’ve directed people to vote here also. You simply make accusations which cannot be proven and remove a candidate from the poll entirely while simultaneously insulting his supporters with a derogatory moniker simply because you don’t like the results you are getting. Just a tad intellectually dishonest are we?

  • Orange Shaman

    Romney and Huntsman are neck and neck now as Huntsman continues to climb this silly online poll. Heck…might as well have a Mormon running the country.

  • http://www.facebook.com/jennifer.m.yoder Jennifer LadyLiberty Roberts

    I am appalled that you think you are conducting a fair poll. There is no way in gods green earth that you as a pot, can call the kettle black. What does it matter if someone votes twice? It isn’t like it is going to decide the actual presidency. This entire poll should be removed as it is not accurate.

  • http://www.facebook.com/jennifer.m.yoder Jennifer LadyLiberty Roberts

    I am appalled that you think you are conducting a fair poll. There is no way in gods green earth that you as a pot, can call the kettle black. What does it matter if someone votes twice? It isn’t like it is going to decide the actual presidency. This entire poll should be removed as it is not accurate.

  • http://www.facebook.com/jennifer.m.yoder Jennifer LadyLiberty Roberts

    Oh, and just so you know, I was not allowed to vote more than once.. so I have no idea how anyone could’ve rigged it to cheat the vote…

  • http://www.facebook.com/jennifer.m.yoder Jennifer LadyLiberty Roberts

    Oh, and just so you know, I was not allowed to vote more than once.. so I have no idea how anyone could’ve rigged it to cheat the vote…

  • Anonymous

    Ron Paul is naive when it comes to foreign policy. In the age of nuclear weapons you can’t put your head and the sand and pretend someone isn’t a threat.

    • http://www.facebook.com/jennifer.m.yoder Jennifer LadyLiberty Roberts

      You cannot create sanctions for some countries for having them, and just allow the other countries to have them..

      • Anonymous

        Not everyone can be trusted with nukes.

        • http://www.facebook.com/jennifer.m.yoder Jennifer LadyLiberty Roberts

          Well, we are not their Parents… Why do we continue to drain our pockets and risk our troops to punish them?

          • Anonymous

            Who are you talking about?

            • Anonymous

              Who gave us the authority to decide who can and cannot own weapons? The USSR was a MAJOR threat to us, but we allowed them to have nuclear weapons. Pakistan has nuclear weapons, and isn’t that where we found Osama? Why don’t we just invade them too? China’s got them. So does North Korea. We should start preemptively bombing them right now.

              We have them too! Other countries should start bombing us right now.

            • http://www.facebook.com/jennifer.m.yoder Jennifer LadyLiberty Roberts

              The rest of the damn world man. We got border issues here, we got schools falling apart, and people starving, the highest unemployment rates since the depression, so where should our priorities lay? Overseas, which is taking money from our people, and endangering our troops?
              They know it is bullshit being over there. Everyone does, yet somehow us being there is what is best for us?? HOW??

              • http://twitter.com/SupremeLaw John Washington

                The wars don’t benefit Americans, they only benefit the heads of the corrupt corporations that fund the politicians and benefit from stealing money and lives from Americans to wage their wars.

                This organization is called the military industrial complex.

                • http://www.facebook.com/jennifer.m.yoder Jennifer LadyLiberty Roberts

                  They need to rethink foreign policy and remove the business aspect of war and really lay back and analyze the costs. I saw an article that said they spend 2 billion a month on air conditioning alone!!

        • http://www.facebook.com/jennifer.m.yoder Jennifer LadyLiberty Roberts

          Well, we are not their Parents… Why do we continue to drain our pockets and risk our troops to punish them?

    • Orange Shaman

      I’m sorry…is this more of the same kind of putting words in his mouth that I always notice conservatives doing? Answer: Yes.

      There’s a difference between defense and imperial militarism. He’s always said it, written about it in his books and still stands by defense AS OPPOSED to militarism which is what WE’RE DOING NOW. Big difference.

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Bill-Redder/100000544267578 Bill Redder

      exactly. and paul’s assertion “they” are terrorists because “we” are occupiers does not flatter a man so supposedly intelligent. he is either naive or indigenous about the issue of islamic history. at least where the fundamentalists are concerned. (hat tip to political correctness)

      • Jester2069

        Think so? Hop onto the web and look around for the politically-neutral historians talking about the “greater” Middle East. Juan Cole comes to mind, but there are others.

        “Blowback” is not some joking premise for our actions out there, and studies have literally PROVEN that 90+% of suicide bombings in Afghanistan come from our presence there. A great majority of Afghans don’t even know 9/11 happened.

        If you can find one, go meet some retired CIA guys. I know two, and they both LOVE Ron Paul. gg liberty.

    • http://www.facebook.com/jennifer.m.yoder Jennifer LadyLiberty Roberts

      I would think that every other moron in Washington is just as naive, I mean look at the crap we keep involving ourselves in..

    • http://www.facebook.com/jennifer.m.yoder Jennifer LadyLiberty Roberts

      I would think that every other moron in Washington is just as naive, I mean look at the crap we keep involving ourselves in..

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Thomas-R-Weiss/675994178 Thomas R. Weiss

    “The Paulbots put up a post at Daily Paul to run up the votes for their messiah, so I disabled him in the poll. Sorry Daily Paul, but that won’t be tolerated here. And just remember that next time that Ron Paul is left off a poll. You only have yourselves to blame.”

    You have to be kidding me! Your polling software can’t limit voting to one vote per one IP address & network adapter MAC address combination? REALLY? Come on, even most of the FREE polling web-page widgets are at least THAT smart, these days – it is 2011, after all.

    Pull the other leg – this explanation is seriously lame – I would call it a lie that relies on the average person’t ignorance of basic software, but hey – maybe these guys are so ignorant they had no clue about what to look for in polling software.

    Problem is, you would really have to look HARD for polling software incapable of limiting responses to a single vote per machine – or you would have to write your own brain-dead version.

    Frankly, I think it is more likely that Ron Paul was legitimately kicking some serious butt in this poll, so they chose to sweep it under the rug.

    Y’all should have seen the live real-time chat during the debate on Fox’s live debate coverage internet site. Serious number of Ron Paul supporters. Gave me a lot of hope.

    • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100000924130996 Fara Wheld

      I was on FB the entire time, there was on friend who was giving updates on the Fox Live Chat and said it was heavily Ron Paul. Seriously, folks. We won’t let ourselves be ignored and swept under the rug. Can you imagine… all of these Ron Paul supporters out there making a showing… all of the ones at HOME that support him?? It’s really encouraging!!

  • http://twitter.com/waynewillems Wayne Willems

    WHERE THE HELL IS RON PAUL’S NAME IN THIS POLL?????

  • http://www.facebook.com/jeffery.daniel Jeff Daniel

    John Huntsman= Ron Paul So if you would cast a vote for Dr. Paul then lets show this fraud that his “Poll” still belongs to us…. not us “Paulites” but us AMERICANS! a real scoop of Bullshit is what this pathetic excuse of a site SHOULD be named…

  • http://twitter.com/waynewillems Wayne Willems

    OMG, our country is totally doomed with this kind of BS going on!

    • Orange Shaman

      Hope for the best…but prepare for the worst. That’s what I’m doing.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Thomas-R-Weiss/675994178 Thomas R. Weiss

    Well, I see from your page source code that you are using Polldaddy – here are the features of this software: http://polldaddy.com/features/#polls

    I see this little gem: “Anti-fraud, IP address, and location reports”

    So, it looks like this turkey allows more than one vote per machine – and then you have to pour over a report and pick out the duplicates! L A M E !

    You people need to get better software – should be REALLY easy to find, in this day and age. Sheesh!

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Claudia-Infinger/100002274993604 Claudia Infinger

    Hey nitwit, it is the first and last time I will come to this site so go stuff a sock in your mouth. You are nothing but a paid hack who has no integrity.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Claudia-Infinger/100002274993604 Claudia Infinger

    Hey nitwit, it is the first and last time I will come to this site so go stuff a sock in your mouth. You are nothing but a paid hack who has no integrity.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Thomas-R-Weiss/675994178 Thomas R. Weiss

    So, you are really telling us, given your hideously inadequate polling software
    ( http://polldaddy.com/features/#polls ), Ron Paul was the ONLY candidate getting duplicate votes?

  • Anonymous

    What I just understand for the life of me is why people out there even want to consider voting for a 76 year old man to run this country.

    It just baffles me.

    • Orange Shaman

      If that 76 year old man wasn’t the only one who makes sense…then I might vote for someone else. If that 76 year old man wasn’t the only one who is actually making points instead of just talking points…then I might vote for someone else. If that 76 year old man wasn’t the only one who has actually consistently BEEN a small-government candidate…then I might vote for someone else.

    • http://www.facebook.com/jennifer.m.yoder Jennifer LadyLiberty Roberts

      Because with age comes experience and knowledge.. and he certainly has the knowledge and record to show that he knows what he is doing, and his plan would set us on the right path as a nation.. We should not discriminate based on age.. what the hell..

    • http://www.facebook.com/dannyboy1980 Daniel Salazar

      and what baffles me is people like you who vote for the guy who makes bad decisions, cheats on his wife, but hey he can sure play a good game of basketball and run in a marathon. That will save the country!

      • Anonymous

        Daniel,

        It baffles me that peoople would vote for a man with zero experience except for being a community organizer.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=596576389 Bruce Larson

    Your poll is BULLSHIT and it means nothing without everyone who participated!- Put Ron Paul back on you chicken shits HE WON!

    YOU ARE DISGUSTING!

    • http://www.facebook.com/jennifer.m.yoder Jennifer LadyLiberty Roberts

      That’s right Bruce, no one can handle the truth.. they are all brainwashed neo-con lovers who need the Government to tell them how to live.. I am disgusted at this site.

    • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100000924130996 Fara Wheld

      They’ll put him back on here. I guarantee it. In about 6 weeks, his name will be added to this poll. The poll long since forgotten, it will show Ron Paul with 0 votes. Zero! And the author of this poll will rejoice in his propaganda machinations.

  • Dan

    tell you what guys and gals.only watched about 1/2 of debate(DVRed the rest and will watch the rest tonight) but from what i saw so far, anyone (except huntsman) could run the bamster into the ground(also i much** confess if Sarah gets in,this is just an exercise in futility because i am a big BIG Sarah fan and will fight for her when she announces she is running) but i digress…back to the debate …i liked Gingrich and his answers were great…the guy is just brilliant and Santorum i like a lot too Mittens is Mittens and had some good points but i just don’t trust him…loved Cane…but can’t vote for him(make a good Treasury sec.) M.Bachmann i like but a few times she looked like a woodchuck in the middle of the road when a car is barreling down on it..if you know what i mean…Pawlenty i don’t know, good but not that good…but like i said the Bamster HAS to GO he is a danger to the future of this Republic….well off to work Later all…

  • Orange Shaman

    Oh snap! Huntsman’s in 3rd now. No offense Scoop…but you might as well scrap this thing. Between the fraudulent Gingrich and now for sure Huntsman votes…it means nothing anymore. Seriously though. Instead of actually putting up a poll…try just asking the question next time…tally the answers from those who are regulars…then you’ll actually be able to properly measure what you wanted to measure.

    • http://twitter.com/ozziecastillo The Wizard of Oz

      Huntsman is a joke— Gingrich, I can believe because he performed this debate…….it wasn’t about who the favored candidate was….the poll was about who won the debate- Gingrich did IMO, and I didn’t have to vote more than once or pass this along to Gingrich supporters to figure it out…..right after I voted, I checked the poll results and Gingrich was up by a huge amount even though I don’t want him as a candidate, I was still honest in answering the poll….I didn’t just try to play up the candidate I wanted.

      • Orange Shaman

        I purposefully went out of my way to spread the word to have my friends vote for Huntsman because I thought it was disingenuous to take Ron Paul’s name off the poll just because you have a perception of it being “unfair” that people are calling on from other sources whenever every other candidate’s supporters are capable of doing the same thing. It’s called free-market voting…but not when you take out a candidate.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=68138706 Austin Battenberg

    Why should it matter where the voters come from? The Daily Paul is bringing traffic to your site. Ron Paul is gaining attention. Why can’t the other candidates have supporters as enthusiastic about their candidacies and go on websites with polls to vote for who they thought was best? I watched the debate. I liked what Ron Paul had to say, so I go to a site to vote for him, but he gets taken down because the moderators don’t like that we came from a website that promotes him. Seems like a poor loser.

  • http://www.facebook.com/k3n.king Ken Poirier

    Why is Ron Paul not on the list? Do you fear him that much?

  • http://www.facebook.com/chad.claflin Chad Claflin

    what happen to ron paul… it wont let me vote for him

  • http://www.facebook.com/E.Nordy Eric Nordstrom

    Let me get this straight… supporters of a candidate are not allowed to tell other supporters about a poll? The Wrong Scoop is surely suffering from political down syndrome. Wow. I am left bewildered at the sheer stupidity.

    • http://twitter.com/phinerose Jo

      The guy of this site is a Sarah Palin fanatic!

      • http://www.facebook.com/jennifer.m.yoder Jennifer LadyLiberty Roberts

        Kinda apparent LOL

  • http://www.facebook.com/E.Nordy Eric Nordstrom

    Ron Paul must be doing something right, banker butt buddies hate him and his supporters. Here is a link to an article and a screenshot showing a Ron Paul Poll vote (of FOX News) whereby a Paul supporter votes for Paul, but the vote is given to Gingrich. http://www.indyinasia.com/2011/08/screenshot-proof-fox-news-post-debate-online-poll-is-bogus/

  • Anonymous

    Foolish poll. you left a name off.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Levon-Avakian/1216304475 Levon Avakian

    what is this? the second place poll? lol, what are you so afraid of? have your readers turned on you? Has your fear that maybe americans actually have brains come true? U MAD? keep hating, HATERS MAKE S LOOK GOOD> bitch

  • joe kregorian

    pretend I this is that “Contact or send us a tip!” button. CLICK. Here is your tip. Be a man. Ron Paul earned our support he didn’t pay us (matter of fact we paid RP), “paulbot” cute term, how does it feel to be in the minority DICKBOT. Newt rips off everthing RP says anyway he’s just ugly so of course YOU’D be attracted to him more when he says it. grow a pair and spice up the site a little bit will it looks like SHIT

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Rick-Grootveld/100000567535599 Rick Grootveld

    The only choice for informed, free thinking Americans. RON PAUL.

  • herman munster

    pretend I this is that “Contact or send us a tip!” button. CLICK. Here is your tip. Be a man. Ron Paul earned our support he didn’t pay us (matter of fact we paid RP), “paulbot” cute term, how does it feel to be in the minority DICKBOT. Newt rips off everthing RP says anyway he’s just ugly so of course YOU’D be attracted to him more when he says it. grow a pair and spice up the site a little bit will it looks like SHIT

  • herman munster

    pretend I this is that “Contact or send us a tip!” button. CLICK. Here is your tip. Be a man. Ron Paul earned our support he didn’t pay us (matter of fact we paid RP), “paulbot” cute term, how does it feel to be in the minority DICKBOT. Newt rips off everthing RP says anyway he’s just ugly so of course YOU’D be attracted to him more when he says it. grow a pair and spice up the site a little bit will it looks like SHIT

  • http://www.facebook.com/jennifer.m.yoder Jennifer LadyLiberty Roberts

    The Bullshit scoop

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1508512398 Daniel Cobarrubias

    ron paul won…..especially when you forget to add his name to the poll!….he makes more sense then anyone he’s running against, that’s kinda what telling the truth does!
    sorry you couldnt see that rightscoop…i mean wrongscoop.

  • http://twitter.com/SupremeLaw John Washington

    Is there something stopping other supporters from promoting their candidates?

    No, only a lack of enthusiasm.

    The author of this poll is wearing no clothes.

  • Douglas Berube

    Your poll is missing a candidate… Are you leaving this candidate out because you’re afraid that maybe too many people don’t actually buy into the media’s idea of a front runner? Are you leaving this candidate out because the only way for the people who love this candidate to express their views is by fair and open questions to the public? Either way, you’re serving up the wrong scoop. Now get your tail out from between your legs and put Ron Paul up on the poll.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_AR2PFDK5GJWWRTZ6QRQQPASKMM Andrew

    NO RON PAUL YOU IDIOTS, THIS SITE IS FOR THE STATUS QUO IN WASHINGTON

    • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100000924130996 Fara Wheld

      “THIS SITE IS FOR THE STATUS QUO IN WASHINGTON”

      OBViously…

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100000924130996 Fara Wheld

    Well.. “TheRightScoop” is officially illegitimate. Removing someone from a poll, for any reason, personal or impersonal, gives a perceived bias against that person. Not to mention eliminates freedom of speech in support of said candidate. Typical Neo-con control. LET FREEDOM RING! RON PAUL 2012!!

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100000924130996 Fara Wheld

    Oh, Nevermind.

    “UPDATE: Newt Gingrich is winning this poll. The Paulbots put up a post at Daily Paul to run up the votes for their messiah, so I disabled him in the poll. Sorry Daily Paul, but that won’t be tolerated here. And just remember that next time that Ron Paul is left off a poll. You only have yourselves to blame.”

    They never *were* a legitimate political resource/blog/etc. Some people seem to forget.. the truth is hardly popular. You don’t like Ron Paul taking the debate in a landslide? Then don’t have a political blog. You have to deal with reality, even when you don’t like it.

  • http://www.facebook.com/VitaMixLady Lea Ann Anderson Savage

    And you don’t think that other campaigns organize their followers and ask them to vote in polls? Every vote for Ron Paul that came from the “Paulbots” was a real person who would have voted for Ron Paul. So in essence, you are penalizing him for having a passionate, intelligent, articulate, organized and LARGE following!

  • http://twitter.com/nickmarschel straw man

    489 comments and growing… Are there really that many angry Ron Paul supporters out there?

    • http://www.facebook.com/jennifer.m.yoder Jennifer LadyLiberty Roberts

      yeah, and many more, although I speculate most are asleep right now..

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_DZYJWV7XZMNU55UUWB3NN7LVMA Mike

    You’re so full of shit. I just tried voting multiple times and it doesn’t even count the excess votes.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_DZYJWV7XZMNU55UUWB3NN7LVMA Mike

    You are so full of crap. I just tried voting more than once and it doesn’t even count the excess votes. Ron Paul was winning your stupid poll fair and square. You’re just burnt whichever candidate you prefer was losing to Ron Paul. Are us “paulbots” (real mature btw) running up tens of thousands of searches on Google, getting him to #4 on the Google Trends list? Romney #8 (only because of him getting heckled turning into a big story) and no one else even in the top 20. https://lh6.googleusercontent.com/–srRMwPgO7Y/TkS4vVAcONI/AAAAAAAAAEc/v68TnFefXAE/rptrend4.jpg

  • http://www.facebook.com/dannyboy1980 Daniel Salazar

    none of the above, Ron Paul. Im not a Paul Bot, im an American

  • http://twitter.com/nickmarschel straw man

    You Ron Paul supporters should realize that if he gets the nomination, conservative voters will be forced to choose between the foreign policy of Obama or the domestic policy of Ron Paul. Paul is squarely in the Cindy Sheehan wing of the Republican party. Instead of ‘Peace through strength’, he preaches ‘Peace through weakness, wishful thinking and mind our own business’.

    • http://www.facebook.com/dannyboy1980 Daniel Salazar

      since when is not starting wars a sign of weakness? if you love war so much, why dont you go show your sign of strength and fight for god knows what, cause it sure isnt for freedom

      • Anonymous

        Tell that to the slaves before the civil war and the Europeans before WW2.

        • http://www.facebook.com/dannyboy1980 Daniel Salazar

          what does a civil war have anything to do with foreign policy and bombing other countries, or having bases all over the world. We police the world but cant even pay for it, look at the mess we’re in. Im sure it doesnt matter to you mikey, because your cartoons still come on at 4 oclock everyday, and life is fun. What business is it of ours to save the europeans? we started out not wanting to even get involved in that mess, we didnt enter ww2 until years after it began. grow up mikey

          • Anonymous

            Daniel,

            It took a war to free the slaves. This is relevant because there were folks in the north who wanted to live and let live leaving the slaves in bondage. Same mentality that there was before WW2. There were whose who wanted to let Hitler have his way.

            The terrorists only understand one thing. Strength. Like any bully, you let them know that they will be hurt if they act, they will not act. If you give a bully your lunch money, he will come back for more.

            We won the cold war because we build Boomers and bombers and the reds couldn’t afford to match us and they collapsed because they bankrupted the country. Reagan DID talk to Gorby, but only to tell him that we would cut back on our nuclear arsenal but he could never match us and we would never step back and let him win.

            Bullies and sites for terrorists like Iran only understand one thing. That is strength. They laugh at weakness. They use the naive for their own purposes.

            If they get the nukes, they will sell them to the terrorists who will turn them on us. If you think that being nice to them will change them from their goal then it is naive and plays right into their hands.

            • Anonymous

              You do forget the fact that terrorism is a result of the war in Iraq. Yes, it existed in a smaller scale before the war, but it motivated the people to fight America and thus the rest of the western civilization. I believe Ron Paul has a point when he says that trade can be much more effective some times, just look at Vietnam. At least it’s something that the rest of the republican candidates should consider.

            • http://www.facebook.com/dannyboy1980 Daniel Salazar

              you need to get a history lesson, because those same terrorists were funded by us as they fought the soviets, who bankrupted themselves. We put the weapons in their hands, funded guys like bin laden, and saddam hussein. Do you really think these fools in caves training with monkey bars in the desert can stop the USA? the soviets had more nukes than we did. Do you think we cant go bankrupt too? oh wait, we kinda already are. tell me when the last time Iran started a war? let them have their own revolution, they obviously didnt like our puppet leader we placed there, and are growing tired of the current regime. stop getting your news from guys like bill o’reilly, cause we’re the bullies and you dont even realize it.

          • Anonymous

            Daniel,

            It took a war to free the slaves. This is relevant because there were folks in the north who wanted to live and let live leaving the slaves in bondage. Same mentality that there was before WW2. There were whose who wanted to let Hitler have his way.

            The terrorists only understand one thing. Strength. Like any bully, you let them know that they will be hurt if they act, they will not act. If you give a bully your lunch money, he will come back for more.

            We won the cold war because we build Boomers and bombers and the reds couldn’t afford to match us and they collapsed because they bankrupted the country. Reagan DID talk to Gorby, but only to tell him that we would cut back on our nuclear arsenal but he could never match us and we would never step back and let him win.

            Bullies and sites for terrorists like Iran only understand one thing. That is strength. They laugh at weakness. They use the naive for their own purposes.

            If they get the nukes, they will sell them to the terrorists who will turn them on us. If you think that being nice to them will change them from their goal then it is naive and plays right into their hands.

        • herman munster

          hey mikey the civil war expert, if the federal government wanted to free the slaves so badly, why didnt they just buy them from the south and then release them? how come all of the euro countries who had slaves didnt need a civil war to free their slaves. your knowlege of history is at the 6th grade level if you seriously think the civil war was about slavery. AND WHAT ABOUT US!? WHOSE GOING TO SAVE US WHEN ALL THIS SHIT CRUMBLES TO THE FLOOR! ILL TELL YOU WHO MR. SUPERHERO WE HAVE TO SAVE EVERYONE. NOBODY THATS WHO

  • Johnny Spinoso

    Leaving any candidate out just makes you look bad. What point are you trying to make? Yes the active participation of Ron paul supporters will make all of these other candidates look bad. Its not like these other candidates supporters don’t know how to use the internet or navigate a web page. So whose fault is it? Oh and only 277 votes for the frontrunner of this poll! Either this poll sucks or there are just not enough Newties out there that know how to turn on a computer.

  • Anonymous

    What is it about poor sampling that Paulbots don’t understand?

    The fact that Newt won is a testament to the poll actually; I’m betting that most people who voted for him here aren’t exactly Newt-fans. But he won the night and people gave credit where credit is due.

    • Johnny Spinoso

      If you want to give credit were credit is due lets put Pauls name back up there!

      • Anonymous

        Okay, I’ll ask you: what is it about poor sampling you don’t understand?

        • Johnny Spinoso

          So your collecting data for a scientific study? whatever you need to say to justify it. The votes for the other candidates wouldn’t change with Paul up there.

          • Anonymous

            Somehow I knew you wouldn’t understand the question.

            • Johnny Spinoso

              frank luntz is this you? oh frank.

              • Anonymous

                So now you’re delusional? Better get some meds.

                • herman munster

                  micawber shut up you sound like mitt romney trying to explain how hes not a liberal

        • Johnny Spinoso

          So your collecting data for a scientific study? whatever you need to say to justify it. The votes for the other candidates wouldn’t change with Paul up there.

    • http://twitter.com/nickmarschel straw man

      Agreed… I voted for Newt because I thought he performed well but I can’t see myself voting for him in the primaries.

      • Anonymous

        I agree, glibness does not make a ghood president. I think that it will be Romney/Rubio or Perry/Rubio. They are the only ones who can really beat the heack out of the maggot in the WH.

        As to Ron Paul. If he were in charge in WW2 we would be speaking German and Japanese. Make friends with Iran? Leave them alone? What nonsense.

  • http://twitter.com/nickmarschel straw man

    If Ron Paul had been President of the U.S. in WW2, Great Britain, France and Spain would all be part of a greater Germany.

  • Anonymous

    LOL the Ron Paul drones are miffed, they can’t flood the poll with repeat votes!!!!

    Go home you jokers!

    • Johnny Spinoso

      once your ip address is recorded you cant vote more than once.

    • Johnny Spinoso

      once your ip address is recorded you cant vote more than once.

    • Anonymous

      The Paul folks are very intense, but they have the right to see their guy’s name on the ballot. AS I said, I would never vote for Paul, but he deserves to have his name on the poll that means nothing.

      So what if they flood the poll? This is NOT a scientific poll anyway and a huge win for Paul would be seen for what it is.

      If the Paul folks want to skew a poll, it is to their own detriment because people do not take badly skewed polls seriously.

      People are NOT stupid. When a poll is ridiculously in favor of one candidate and this is not Cuba or China or Iran, we know that the poll has been played. That is sad since it really diminishes Paul and his followers. But then that is their choice.

    • Anonymous

      The Paul folks are very intense, but they have the right to see their guy’s name on the ballot. AS I said, I would never vote for Paul, but he deserves to have his name on the poll that means nothing.

      So what if they flood the poll? This is NOT a scientific poll anyway and a huge win for Paul would be seen for what it is.

      If the Paul folks want to skew a poll, it is to their own detriment because people do not take badly skewed polls seriously.

      People are NOT stupid. When a poll is ridiculously in favor of one candidate and this is not Cuba or China or Iran, we know that the poll has been played. That is sad since it really diminishes Paul and his followers. But then that is their choice.

    • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100000924130996 Fara Wheld

      You all are liars. You can’t “Skew” a poll that is set for one vote per IP address. These polls don’t get won by hacking or cheating. We’re passionate for Ron Paul, not only because he’s right, but because he’s obviously ignored by the media. The more you ignore him, the louder and stronger we get to support him, to have our voices heard over the din. You want us to simmer down? Then listen to what we have to say.

      • Anonymous

        ROFL…You are all so fierce! It’s a stupid poll that means nothing and you paulbots get your panties in a bunch over it.
        Lighten up!

        • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100000924130996 Fara Wheld

          Who gives a flying crap about a podunk poll that MAYBE 1000 people would see on a good day? It’s censorship. Plain and simple. It pisses people off.

  • Anonymous

    I think That Paul should have his name on the ballot. I would never vote for the guy, but he should be here.

    This poll is just for fun anyway. It means nothing because it isn’t scientific. Let all names be put on the poll.

    Paul was there and should be reperesnted on the poll.

  • http://www.facebook.com/david.brashear2 David Brashear

    Where is ron paul? No seriously, why all the conservative media whores keep pulling shit like this?

    • Anonymous

      We were just discussing this. Perhaps if you “talked” to the people who put the poll together, they might redo it with Pauls’ name on it.

      • http://www.facebook.com/david.brashear2 David Brashear

        If it didn’t happen everywhere, I think people could care less if it happened here. But both of the debates I’ve watched have cut him off, asked him stupid questions, or both. Or the headlines read “that crazy guy had the best idea” or “surprisingly good advice from Ron Paul”..Really? Like he hasnt been saying the same thing for the better part of the past 15 years?!

        • Anonymous

          David,

          it is frustrating to watch, but he and the others had 1 minute to respond and he wanted to go on and on. The moderator had to keep to the rules.

          I wish they ahd asked Rommey more questions but they had 8 people there and had to get as much as they could done.

          I predict that the next debate will have fewer people since some will have dropped out (Pawlenty, Huntsman, Santorum) and they will have more time for each candidate.

          • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100000924130996 Fara Wheld

            Wow.. Ron wanted to go On and On… you’re truly amazing… They let Santorum and Paul ramble on b/c they knew the Bachmann-Pawlenty show had gone on *far* too long and it was obvious the other candidates were suffering for their home-town bickering.

            • Anonymous

              Perhaps you are right there. I had to go pee at the time and left the room. :)

        • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100000924130996 Fara Wheld

          They went..what.. almost 2 full rounds before coming back to Ron Paul. But they did the same thing to Santorum. Santorum spoke up about it though. That was nice. It brought attention not only to him but to RP.

      • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100000924130996 Fara Wheld

        They’ve already used degrading language in regards to Ron Paul supporters. They lost their credibility in the first place when they removed him. And worsened it with name-calling.

        • Anonymous

          Please clean your own house before you come over to ours and tell us how bad we are. Read the comments of your fellow Paul followers.

          You guys sound like those people we have to read from HuffHO and DailyKOS. Don’t you see how similar you are? Don’t you see how you hurt the good things that Paul may have to say with your comments?

          You can’t recruit even one level-headed person with your rants and silliness. You need more support, not less and you drive away the very folks you would need.

          • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100000924130996 Fara Wheld

            That is no excuse. NONE at all. You cannot blame your own actions on the actions of others. It doesn’t work that way. 2 rights don’t make a wrong and all that crap. So what what Ron Paul supporters say. Every candidate has extremists that support them. ALL of them! That doesn’t excuse this site from doing the same thing.

            • Anonymous

              Minus the cliches, did you read the update? He was removed because Pauls folks would have made it worthless with their flooding.

              I don’t understand why you don’t get that and why you can’t disicpline your own folks. We don’t want another 4 years of cheating and yelling ande extremism.

              You want your guy taken seriously, you have to stop floks like Bruce Larsen from ranting on and on. He makes more noise than the more rational people in your group. NO one will listen to you or the other more rathional folks as long as people like Bruce make your group sound like the far left.

              You need to clean your house up if you want to be taken seriously. This is not president of the class we are talking about.

            • Anonymous

              Minus the cliches, did you read the update? He was removed because Pauls folks would have made it worthless with their flooding.

              I don’t understand why you don’t get that and why you can’t disicpline your own folks. We don’t want another 4 years of cheating and yelling ande extremism.

              You want your guy taken seriously, you have to stop floks like Bruce Larsen from ranting on and on. He makes more noise than the more rational people in your group. NO one will listen to you or the other more rathional folks as long as people like Bruce make your group sound like the far left.

              You need to clean your house up if you want to be taken seriously. This is not president of the class we are talking about.

              • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100000924130996 Fara Wheld

                I don’t have to stop anyone from anything. That’s the glory of the first amendment. It is *your* folks who disregard the Constitution and do whatever you can, when the glaringly obvious prevents you from censoring. You simply make up lies and manipulate to make yourselves look like the poor underdogs.

                You’ve obviously taken your cues from the Neo-cons and liberals in government. Victimize yourself so others will come to your defense so you won’t have to defend yourself.

        • Anonymous

          Fara,

          I have not once degraded your candidate. I have tried to carry on a dialogue with you. That is all. If you are passionate about him and want him to win, you will need to start debating points as well as passion.

          When you threaten to shoot someone because they disagree with you, you have already lost the debate because no one can talk to someone who threatens and does not want to listen.

          You cannot convince anyone to your side by coercion. Rational debate in this republic is what wins converts, not left-wing like bullying and threats to shoot people.

          • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100000924130996 Fara Wheld

            “When you threaten to shoot someone because they disagree with you, you have already lost the debate because no one can talk to someone who threatens and does not want to listen.”

            You. are. a. liar.

  • http://www.facebook.com/david.brashear2 David Brashear

    Where is ron paul? No seriously, why all the conservative media whores keep pulling shit like this?

  • http://twitter.com/cjsovereign C. J. Sovereign

    so evidently, therightscoop.com has rendered itself another irrelevant MSM shill not worthy of the title “journalist” …. what a joke!!! RON PAUL IS GOING TO BE THE NEXT PRESIDENT!! LIKE IT OR NOT, ESTABLISHMENT!! If your job depends on the old failing economic system, then start thinking about a new career, because things are about to change, DRASTICALLY.

    • Anonymous

      No he isn’t. Sorry, he is a fringe candidate and will not attract the middle and the independents.

      Yelling does not make it so. He does not represent the vasts majority of Americans, no matter how intense you feel about him. If you believe in him, then vote for him, but making pronouncements like you did only makes you sound foolish.

      • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100000924130996 Fara Wheld

        Er… the middle and independents make up a large portion of his base. Far-right conservatives and libertarian democrats also.. That’s a lot of people. These polls don’t get won by Ron Paul for nothing…

        • Anonymous

          Er…. that is what Obama does.
          It is smug and smarmy, but if you admire him, keep copying him.
          As to your comment.

          If the Paul followers would vote honestly, rather than sending out “flash Mob” alerts from their web site to flood a poll, the poll would be taken seriously.

          When you get caught you act just like the far left and attack those who caught you.

          If you are an example of the people who would be a part of governing with Paul, I am glad that he has zero chance of winning. We have been bullied and cheated enough already with Obama. We don’t need another person like him with followers like him.

          • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100000924130996 Fara Wheld

            I’m beginning to think Mikey *IS* therightscoop… Or their sibling.

            • Anonymous

              I am a first time writer here. But go ahead and attack if it pleases you, if you have run out of arguments. Wonder if Paul would find that a good tactic, to act just like the far left.

              • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100000924130996 Fara Wheld

                I haven’t run out of arguments. I’ve barely scratched the surface will all these simpletons and their name-calling. We haven’t even GOTTEN to the issues here.

                And I wouldn’t trust your terminology if you had WEBSTER’s tattooed on your forehead. You’re obviously a manipulator.. so, you’ve lost any credibility as a debate opponent. I wouldn’t trust a word you said. You done wasted your “benefit of the doubt” with your exaggerations and victim-role play.

      • http://www.facebook.com/dannyboy1980 Daniel Salazar

        oh shut up mikey, you just repeat what you hear the talking heads on tv say. what are you, 12 years old? He has the most financial support from military personnel than any candidate, he has the 2nd most GOP donations total and thats without support from corporations like front runner romney. its because of people like you that we get idiots in office, because you say “ah this guy cant win” and you vote as if its a popularity contest. the country is falling apart and you repeat the same bullshit we’ve heard for decades. Fringe candidate my ass, you should watch this clip and see why people like you need to stop making elections popularity contests

        • Anonymous

          Well, Daniel,

          Go ahead and support this guy. We will see what happens in November.

          Attacking me is a really good way to support him. Makes me want to learn more and more about him since you represent him in such a calm and literate fashion.

          • http://www.facebook.com/dannyboy1980 Daniel Salazar

            we dont need your support, yo go support the war mongers since you make such a strong case for them. The only way people like you will earn is when your friends die in war, or you serve and realize its all bs. You go vote for the guy who will keep us in the middle east, as the deficit gets bigger, at least they have a nice tan and a nice set of hair right? you dont know half of whats going on, keep watching your Fox news or wherever you get your information from.

            • Anonymous

              Daniel,

              How do you know what I know and what I don’t know? You don’t even know me at all.

              But if you want to rant and rave, go ahead.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Pio-Kolby/100001752491345 Pio Kolby

    This poll has zero creditability because Ron Paul has been removed from the choices. That is ridiculous! Ron Paul 2012! Ron Paul loves America more than any other nation on earth. Israel is not the 51st state. End the wars! End the fed! Ron Paul handed Rick Sanitarium his head on Iran and World war 3 for the Military Industrial complex: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ogseq-xh9ks&feature=channel_video_title Ron Paul won the debate!

    • Anonymous

      Shouting? Is that how it works? You sound like the demoncrats. Does this make anyone with both feet on the ground want to become a part of your team?

      We are tired of the yelling and shouting and all of the c r a p that the left is throwing and you sound just like them. Why would anyone find you or your canididate attractive?

      • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100000924130996 Fara Wheld

        Then stop ignoring us and trying to shut us up. What do you think a trapped animal will do? Screech and fight to get out. This is the same idea. You trap anyone, you muzzle anyone, you ignore anyone and they will get louder and more persistent until they are acknowledged. Freedom of Speech 101. America EXISTS for that *very* reason.

        • Anonymous

          How can you be ignored when you are in our faces? I don’t control what the sites put up or not. I am a commentor just like the rest of you. I have nothing to do with the content.

          If you want people to take you seriously and look at your candidate seriously, you will have to stop shouting and jumping up and down. Bullying will not win recruits. You dilute Paul’s position with your conduct.

          Why should I or other independents even want to look at what Paul has to say if you are his representive?

          • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100000924130996 Fara Wheld

            You don’t seem to get.. that the reason we’re all so boistrously supportive of Ron Paul is BECAUSE we’ve checked him out. We’ve watched the past Presidential administrations continue what has already failed us. We watched them promise us what this country needed, only for them to pay it lipservice when the get into office.

            After GWB.. there had to be someone who was a *REAL* conservative. One who wouldn’t let us lose our liberties. One who understood the framers of our constitution and what THEY had gone through and WHY they build the United States. I found that person in Chuck Baldwin. Who eventually led me to Ron Paul. Even though I didn’t like Ron Paul… I took the honest route and studied what he’s about and WHY Chuck Baldwin would support him.

            • Anonymous

              Yes, But they did fight a war to win this freedom. They wrote a document to King George that said, take a hike, it wasn’t an entreaty to him to say pretty please. It said then fought a war for 7 years. They didn’t negotiate with him or we would still be British.

              That these united Colonies are, and of Right ought to be Free and Independent States, that they are Absolved from all Allegiance to the British Crown, and that all political connection between them and the State of Great Britain, is and ought to be totally dissolved; and that as Free and Independent States, they have full Power to levy War, conclude Peace, contract Alliances, establish Commerce, and to do all other Acts and Things which Independent States may of right do. — And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of Divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes, and our sacred Honor.

              That is my difference with Paul.

              • http://www.facebook.com/djkapitalkev Kapital Kev

                mikey123 i am still unclear on your differences with Paul I only ask to better understand

                • Anonymous

                  Kapital,

                  My difference with him is that I believe in strength in international issues. It goes from there.

                • http://www.facebook.com/djkapitalkev Kapital Kev

                  International issues such as? He does support free trade and discussions internationally.

              • Josh Mulder

                It sounds like there’s some misinformation that made it’s way into your opinion of Ron Paul. Ron Paul is for a strong national defense. Ronald Reagan said this about him: “Ron Paul is one of the outstanding leaders fighting for a stronger national defense. As a former Air Force officer, he knows well the needs of our armed forces, and he always puts them first. We need to keep him fighting for our country.”
                He is not against all war. He is against unnecessary, undeclared wars of aggression. All administrations in recent memory have endorsed or condoned military strikes on nations that have not directly attacked our nation. This is the definition of a ‘war of aggression’. The reason he calls them undeclared is because congress has not declared war since WW2. Ron Paul has stated, “Declare war, fight it, and win it.” These wars, with no clear objective to measure victory, linger on and on; sucking trillions of dollars from our treasury. (Money that is either borrowed or printed out of thin air.) Ron Paul wants a strong defense, with an unparalelled military force within our borders. A military that can respond to any attack, and win any war that comes to us. What he does not want is a foreign policy that encourages wars like we have been involved in time and time again. Too many of us forget that what politicians call ‘no fly zones’ and ‘surgical strikes’ equates to bombing of nations. Those nations are being attacked, and see it that way. Long story short; we are way too involved with the internal affairs of sovereign nations around the world. We need to focus on our own problems here in the United States.

              • Josh Mulder

                It sounds like there’s some misinformation that made it’s way into your opinion of Ron Paul. Ron Paul is for a strong national defense. Ronald Reagan said this about him: “Ron Paul is one of the outstanding leaders fighting for a stronger national defense. As a former Air Force officer, he knows well the needs of our armed forces, and he always puts them first. We need to keep him fighting for our country.”
                He is not against all war. He is against unnecessary, undeclared wars of aggression. All administrations in recent memory have endorsed or condoned military strikes on nations that have not directly attacked our nation. This is the definition of a ‘war of aggression’. The reason he calls them undeclared is because congress has not declared war since WW2. Ron Paul has stated, “Declare war, fight it, and win it.” These wars, with no clear objective to measure victory, linger on and on; sucking trillions of dollars from our treasury. (Money that is either borrowed or printed out of thin air.) Ron Paul wants a strong defense, with an unparalelled military force within our borders. A military that can respond to any attack, and win any war that comes to us. What he does not want is a foreign policy that encourages wars like we have been involved in time and time again. Too many of us forget that what politicians call ‘no fly zones’ and ‘surgical strikes’ equates to bombing of nations. Those nations are being attacked, and see it that way. Long story short; we are way too involved with the internal affairs of sovereign nations around the world. We need to focus on our own problems here in the United States.

  • Anonymous

    Did you read the update? That makes sense. If you want your guy to win, it would be done honestly or you are only emulating Obama.

    Flooding a poll is dishonest and I don’t think that it represents your candidate well. You want to diminish him?

    • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100000924130996 Fara Wheld

      It’s not poll flooding. It’s support. Passionate, dedicated support. B/c Ron Paul has earned it. He’s flat-honest with everything he says. SO when he says he’s Pro-life. People believe him. When he put a bill out for Fetal Personhood (and protection under the Declaration/Constitution — thus making abortion IMPOSSIBLE and ILLEGAL as it would go against “LIFE, liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness”) people believe he’s genuine. Reality is a lot more complicated than a 30 second soundbite or even a 5 minute soundbyte. I trust Ron Paul.. and I don’t trust anyone.

      • Anonymous

        Well fine Fara,

        I am happy for you. If you trust him, then vote for him. But don’t threaten to shoot people who don’t have your passion. It makes you sound like a thug.

        • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100000924130996 Fara Wheld

          You’re a lying, story spinning moron. You know I never said ANYTHING about shooting you. You took my comment regarding the oppression of China and made yourself a victim. You are pathetic if you have to resort to such tactics because you can’t debate on the merits of the topic.

        • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100000924130996 Fara Wheld

          You’re a lying, story spinning moron. You know I never said ANYTHING about shooting you. You took my comment regarding the oppression of China and made yourself a victim. You are pathetic if you have to resort to such tactics because you can’t debate on the merits of the topic.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100001640529977 Allison Birch

    WHERE IS RON PAUL???????????????????!?!?!??!!!!! YOUR POLL SUCKS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    • Anonymous

      Please read the update.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100001640529977 Allison Birch

    “right scoop” = WRONG scoop

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_RB3FNOYBWKFIUH6K5DVCI7LAX4 mr who

    Why did you remove Ron Paul from the choices to vote for?

    are you scare or have you been bought out?

    • Anonymous

      Please read the update.

      • herman munster

        mikey you talk about all the rude comments by RP supporters that make you cry, but you never mention or even respond to level headed correct and polite pro RP comments such as: “Paulbots? I would understand if there were automated scripts running trying to boost Paul’s numbers. But no, these are actually people voting for their candidate. Why fault the people for being far more organized and passionate about their candidate then all others? That is censoring free speech and it should not be tolerated.”

        and i know why because you dont have a good reason yourself you just want to validate in your mind that were crazy and uncivilized thats y we dont deserve a vote well, go ahead answer the man tell him why he cant vote because his candidate already won and it wouldnt matter anyway. sorry if i just PWNED you but explain.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_RB3FNOYBWKFIUH6K5DVCI7LAX4 mr who

    This site should be listed as the wrong scoop , please return Ron Paul to the list of People bieng voted , why are you censoring him , your as corrupt as all the other news stations sellout (guess no independent thought here)

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=546582610 Alberto Morel

    Paulbots? I would understand if there were automated scripts running trying to boost Paul’s numbers. But no, these are actually people voting for their candidate. Why fault the people for being far more organized and passionate about their candidate then all others? That is censoring free speech and it should not be tolerated.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Michael-Schuster/595492540 Michael Schuster

    Last time I checked… Ron Paul won the debate, excluding him from your poll cannot change this.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Lillian-Bradley/1344384531 Lillian Bradley

    This is worthless. Do you really this this juvenile tactic will stop Dr.Paul, quiet the roaring voice of the people or change lies into truth? I won’t sully Dr. Paul’s reputation with this bogus poll. COWARDS!!!!!!!

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Lillian-Bradley/1344384531 Lillian Bradley

    Censorship reflects a society’s lack of confidence in itself.
    Potter Stewart
    You censor him only because you know beforehand that Dr. Paul will prevail and all others will fail.

  • http://www.facebook.com/djkapitalkev Kapital Kev

    wow i voted for Ron Paul and you removed his name! How can you poll who won then delete a candidate? BS move you just showed your cards and we the people are sick of this type of media nonsense and the nonsense in Washington.

  • http://www.facebook.com/joe.brutschy Joe Brutschy

    So Ron paul obviously won?

  • Anonymous

    This yelling a cursing is really a poor showing for Paul’s followers. It was explained to you why his name was taken off and then you flood this site , just as you would flood the poll.

    Is that what your candidate is all about?

    We get enough of this tactic from the left, why would anyone want to vote for a person represented by this hysterical crowd. You sound no different than those fools t HuffHO and DailyKOS.

    Do you think that Paul would support how you are behaving? He becomes less and less attractive to me, as an independent because of his representatives.

    We already have crazy, loud-mouth, hysterics running this country. Why would we want more drama queens?

    • http://www.facebook.com/dannyboy1980 Daniel Salazar

      shouting? all I see are letters. why are you pretending to be a moderator, you’re probably not even old enough to vote

      • Anonymous

        Hey that’s the marginalize the messenger technique. Are you a liberal in training? Did you read the explanation? Do you know how to read?

        • http://www.facebook.com/dannyboy1980 Daniel Salazar

          he is saying we flood the poll and now the site. I came to vote for who I thought won the debate, if there are more of us than supporters of other candidates, it doesnt make it right to remove him off the ballot. If we dont find our man on the poll, we have every right to leave a message asking why. Im not a liberal in training, are you? Isnt this how guys like Putin and Hussein stay in power? He’s called a fringe candidate, yet they cant even handle his large amount of supporters on the poll. And we’re supposed to just shut up about it. Whos the liberal again? cause it isn’t me.

      • Anonymous

        Daniel,

        If you think that not answering insipid, childish comments with the like is moderating, then I have nothing more to say to you.

        As to my age. You are funny and thank you. :)

    • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100000924130996 Fara Wheld

      If what you want is submissive and mousey citizens surrounding you, go to China. They keep their mouth shut or get it shot off their face. Being passionate doesn’t make one crazed. That’s a lie from the governmental propaganda machine who have openly debated the (future) use of lithium in water supplies to reduce stress and anxiety in the populace. Yeah… anxiety and stress. That’s what it’s for.

      • Anonymous

        Wow you’re not submissive and mousey. Go vote for Obama, you’ll get the same results voting for Paul.

        • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100000924130996 Fara Wheld

          I’ll have to check the last 30 years of my life to find out when I ever said I was mousey. I don’t think a woman has to be nasty to be bold.. but I don’t think a woman has to be mousey to be a lady.

      • Anonymous

        Passionate is not what you project. Passionate also implies reason, not personal attack when you are losing an argument.

        Being “mousey” is what Paul wants to be with the Iranians and everyone else. He wants to live and let live, like the dems in the Civil War and the appeasers before WW2. See what that did.

        If you see reasonable conversation as mousey, then you are just as radical as the far left and are no different from them as you would bully once you gor power. That is why you will never attract the main stream.

        Ranign and raving is a poor recruiting tool.

        • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100000924130996 Fara Wheld

          No one attacked personally. Except TRS. You are grasping at straws and it’s pitiful to see.

          Want to shoot you? This is exactly what a propagandist does. This is what media gossip magazines do. This is what *mainstream* media does.

          They take a comment completely out of context to make themselves looked like victims. They play the ‘abused housewife’ syndrome to garner pity and support. You’re so disgusting. I can’t believe you stooped to that level.

          No one has attacked anyone here. I don’t attack anyone. I debate, discuss, and argue. But I don’t attack anyone. I don’t go after people and try to tear them apart. Everyone has the ability to manipulate others. Especially vicious women. If I didn’t know any better I’d think you were one. I don’t get along with women b/c they do what you just did.

          The twisted lies in order to gain sympathy. I’m so disgusted right now with your tactics. I expected a retort or a debate.. but not that.

  • http://www.facebook.com/joe.brutschy Joe Brutschy

    So Ron Paul won the debate but you have removed him from the pole. This poll is invalid.

    • Anonymous

      Learn to read.

  • http://twitter.com/conservative__ conservative

    I believe it’s fairly obvious that, among the candidates there, Mitt Romney was the winner.

  • http://twitter.com/conservative__ conservative

    Ron Paul’s compassion for Iran is perhaps the most dangerous thing I’ve ever heard.

  • Anonymous

    you seriously ask who won the poll and leave the name of someone who had over 20 minutes of talk time in the debate off the list of choices? What the hell is this, communist china or russia or something? How do people like you even get a website?

    • Anonymous

      Did you read the explanation or are you part of the problem?

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_HRBUCEBMQHEFZ636S433TX2JJE Kcrystale

    THIS POLL IS A SHAM! ALL CANDIDATES SHOULD BE PRESENTED, YOU SHOULD BE ABLE TO VOTE ONLY ONCE TOO. MY CHOICE IS RON PAUL!

    • Anonymous

      And that sadly is a vote for Obama.

      • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100000924130996 Fara Wheld

        *eyeroll*

  • http://twitter.com/BLoafX Sean CoROCKin’!

    So, I don’t get it, did people at Daily Paul created a bot that was sent to this poll that voted multiple times, or did they just simply post the link to this site so people could come vote for Ron Paul? Definitely the creation of bots would be dirty play, but simply posting a link so people could vote for him doesn’t call for him being removed from the poll.

    • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100000924130996 Fara Wheld

      There were no bots. We’re organized supporters of Ron Paul.. other candidates don’t have such support, so therightscoop.com decided to silence the overwhelming Ron Paul voters and created controversy.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_YRV7CAQGLNTCD3TIL6ZHU2K66U Bryan Hurley

    Ron Paul 2012!!!

    • Anonymous

      You really are such a zealot, you’d vote for Paul (again probably) and help Obama win. You need to keep your eyes in the prize, the White House.

      • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_YRV7CAQGLNTCD3TIL6ZHU2K66U Bryan Hurley

        And you sir, really are blind. One day you will wake up like the rest of us.

        • Anonymous

          Wake up like the rest of us? You’re in some zealot land with your own Koolaide. He has tried and lost in the past. You want Obama to win? Keep pushing the unelectable.

          • http://twitter.com/DC4Teggy Ryne

            I’m not going to just bow down and vote for the lesser of two evils. I will vote for Ron Paul and ONLY Ron Paul. I’m not some RepubliCON who just wants to beat the Democrats. I want to vote for the man who will bring America back to it’s glory days. That man is and only is, Ron Paul.

            • http://twitter.com/DC4Teggy Ryne

              By the way, a vote for Romney, Perry, Bachmann IS a vote for Obama. As in, they are all the same. No differences what-so-ever.

              A vote for Ron Paul is a vote for Freedom and Peace.

              • Anonymous

                Unfortunately, a vote for Paul is a vote for Obama. He won’t win so your helping Obama get re-elected. How many times will you need to vote for Paul to get the message?

                • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100000924130996 Fara Wheld

                  Then stop whining and vote for Ron Paul :-D Because we refuse to vote the lesser of two evils. I will write him in if need be. And if this country votes in what they see is the lesser of two evils.. then we’ll either get Obama or a Neo-con. Either way.. America sees it as the Lesser of two evils. Whereas *we* (some of whom believe in a higher power to answer to) will *not* be bowing down to the power of “evil” and will instead stand on principles and vote for the only honest, intellectually and otherwise, candidate in the running.

                • Anonymous

                  First do you always speak for yourself in the third person? I’m not whining, just trying to get zombies to wake up. So you’re High Priest is Ron Paul and he connects you to your higher power? Wow!

                  The power of evil… turn off the sci fi channel dude, there really isn’t a Darth Vaader.

              • Anonymous

                By the way, I did not specify which of the other candidates can win. But I did state that Paul cannot.

                • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_YRV7CAQGLNTCD3TIL6ZHU2K66U Bryan Hurley

                  Well said Fara and Ryne. Well said my friends. Ron Paul 2012!!!

                • Anonymous

                  I guess we have here an example the insane leading the blind. Wake up.

  • barbaragol

    “Beware the leader who bangs the drums of war in order to whip the
    citizenry into a patriotic fervor, for patriotism is indeed a double-edged
    sword. It both emboldens the blood, just it narrows the mind. And when the
    drums of war have reached a fever pitch and the blood boils with hate and
    the mind has closed, the leader will have no need in seizing the rights of
    the citizenry. Rather, the citizenry, infused with fear and blinded by
    partiotism, will offer up all of their rights unto the leader and gladly so.
    How do I know? For this is what I have done. And I am Caesar.”–Julius
    Caesar.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_YRV7CAQGLNTCD3TIL6ZHU2K66U Bryan Hurley

    The Admin removed my comment. RON PAUL 2012!!!

  • Anonymous

    Can’t you read? We see you can curse.

  • http://twitter.com/DC4Teggy Ryne

    They can leave him off this poll. This website is trash anyway.

    Here is my write in vote for your silly poll.

    RON PAUL.

  • David Robertson

    I’m not surprised Newt is leading this poll. He won the debate intellectually…but he is not my pick from a primary standpoint. I wouldn’t have a problem supporting him post-primary if he won it–regardless of all the BS conspiracy theories out there.
    What is surprising to me is that Huntsman is doing well in the above poll. I thought Huntsman did absolutely nothing to win that debate last night. As a matter of fact, I would have put him in last or tied for last with Ron Paul. (I’ll get swift rebuttals to this comment for that).–let me explain. I like Ron Paul’s vigor on the Fed and fiscal policy. I part with him on moral and foreign policy grounds. No amount of further argument and debate could change my mind on that.

    Now, with that said, one of the policies that Presidents have most control over is foreign policy. So it is mind-boggling to me fathom why anyone would agree with him on his isolationist views. Folks, I’m a good conservative freedom loving guy, but I refuse to put my head in the sand and act like world matters don’t come home to roost on us. Anybody remember Pearl Harbor?

    • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_MZHNGQNVDNLIVWKKDQQNXMEFCU kaied

      People voted Huntsman because we’re not allowed to vote for ron paul

    • David Robertson

      replying to my own post here…could it be that the “Ron bots” are sabotaging the poll now? Is that why Huntsman of all people is running #2?

      • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100000924130996 Fara Wheld

        Yep.. I haven’t voted. But such is ‘blowback’ eh? If you listen to Glenn Beck.. Ron Paul supporters are dangerous terrorists. No joke. He said RP supporters are scary, dangerous terrorists. All b/c a moneybomb was held on Guy Fawkes day.

        So glad Glenn is leaving TV.

        • Anonymous

          Spoken like a true lib in the closet. Don’t let someone that doesn’t agree with you have the floor to speak. Just right. Look in the mirror there and see what looks back at you. Geesh.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_MZHNGQNVDNLIVWKKDQQNXMEFCU kaied

    I voted Huntsman AKA Ron Paul

    Problem faggots?

    • Anonymous

      How does your insipid comment further the debate?

    • Anonymous

      How does your insipid comment further the debate?

      • Anonymous

        Perhaps he is stating that he is a problem faggot?

  • Anonymous

    Palin won the debate without even being there.

  • Anonymous

    Palin won the debate without even being there.

  • http://twitter.com/craigymeboy craig miller

    when will america wake up and wonder why r.p doesnt get any govt owned media attention , is it because he is not funded by the bankers like everyone else of the status quo

    • Anonymous

      no, it’s because he’s not a particularly compelling candidate.

      • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100000924130996 Fara Wheld

        You clearly haven’t changed the channel from FoxNews in the last 4 years…

        • Anonymous

          How is that when I don’t even own a tv?

          • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100000924130996 Fara Wheld

            Foxnews.com – Word.

      • http://www.facebook.com/djkapitalkev Kapital Kev

        Isnt compelling? what do you mean? he speaks the truth and has a wealth of knowledge on why things are the way they are and how to resolve those issues. I am sorry I forgot the truth and stance for what this country was founded on is no longer compelling to the people. I for one am very compelled and believe most Americans are fed up with what is going on and realize he is the only one that will change things.

      • http://www.facebook.com/djkapitalkev Kapital Kev

        Isnt compelling? what do you mean? he speaks the truth and has a wealth of knowledge on why things are the way they are and how to resolve those issues. I am sorry I forgot the truth and stance for what this country was founded on is no longer compelling to the people. I for one am very compelled and believe most Americans are fed up with what is going on and realize he is the only one that will change things.

    • Anonymous

      no, it’s because he’s not a particularly compelling candidate.

  • http://twitter.com/craigymeboy craig miller

    when will america wake up and wonder why r.p doesnt get any govt owned media attention , is it because he is not funded by the bankers like everyone else of the status quo

  • Anonymous

    So, let me get this straight. Daily Paul sent a *ton* of unique traffic to your site, and you … denied them?

    Wow. Brilliance.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_KYM46CXILK6IOUUBQUYBL27UTA JohnBlaze

    If you ignore him he’ll just go away LOL! Actually it’s having the opposite effect and drawing people closer, you’re clearly scared to death of Ron Paul and the public sees right through you! You are pathetic and you have been exposed!

  • StopCensorship

    I believe some legal action is in order here. This would be a great case that any lawyer would want to take on. You don’t know what you have just committed here. Internet law and censorship laws will stop you right in your tracks and you will be used as a guinea pig. I suggest you look into that and reconsider your stance on this because you can get into legal trouble if enough people recognize the illegality of your decision to censor. I will be the first to sign and I am sure countless others as well.

  • http://thereactionariesspeak.com/ reactionaries

    I thought the Hermanator was spot on with his answers, he is showing a learning curve, and admits it. His chances? not good I fear, which is entirely too bad.

  • Han Solo

    Paul/Gingrich 2012 is starting to have a nice ring to it. Clearly the two most intelligent candidates.

  • Han Solo

    Paul/Gingrich 2012 is starting to have a nice ring to it. Clearly the two most intelligent candidates.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=514791674 Tim Barnhill

    What a stooge the owner of the site is. I guess it’s commonplace in the world of free Ideas and Liberty to completely ignore the results of a poll when they don’t work out to your favor. I digress. We’ll just have to wait till the Straw Poll tomorrow to see how much of a deuche this guy really is when he has to suck it up and realize with the rest of the MSM that Dr. Ron Paul is the only candidate for Americans that love Liberty and defend the constitution of this country.

  • http://www.facebook.com/djkapitalkev Kapital Kev

    “Newt Gingrich is winning this poll. The Paulbots put up a post at Daily Paul to run up the votes for their messiah, so I disabled him in the poll. Sorry Daily Paul, but that won’t be tolerated here. And just remember that next time that Ron Paul is left off a poll. You only have yourselves to blame.” So we are Paulbots we are not voters we dont count? This statement alone shows why the people are tired of both the Government and the Media. You might can dismiss us from your online poll but you cant dismiss us from the voters box or the message we spread…..

  • http://twitter.com/craigymeboy craig miller

    easter bunny would win in this poll against all these clowns

  • Anonymous

    So… this is how you do your polls in america? Quite surprising. I think it’s unfair to remove a candidate from the list just because you suspect that his supporters “cheated”.

    Anyway, good luck Ron Paul! You seem to be the least overzealot warmongering biblekissing candidate of them republicans! The world needs America to have a president with common sense, now when Obama has failed, and who do acknowledge that FED is a bad busyness… as was the deal with FannyMae and FreddieMac, I mean… really?! Who got that stupid idea to regulate your banking sector in the first place?

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_V6JBRTA47I36ZLAHWDFLLWA3YA traveler

    What a bunch of BS, where is Ron Paul. it’s obvious your a shill.

    • Anonymous

      You dingbats are confusing activity with accomplishment.

  • http://twitter.com/craigymeboy craig miller

    vote for any of the above and there will be more war and eventually bankruptcy

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Jeff-Tree-Hugger-Powell/632634967 Jeff Tree Hugger Powell

    They took RP off. . . that figures! What neo-con hack runs this poll?!?!

  • Anonymous

    lol, “if people want to vote for Ron Paul, I’ll just take him down” loser

  • Tom2020

    If you took Ron Paul off why even have the poll? So you can say the respected Gingrich won? lame

  • http://twitter.com/PatriotRoxy Roxy Judd

    RON PAUL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    • Anonymous

      I think Ron Paul is a sincere man that loves America. And I agree with Paul that our money should be based on the gold-standard, we should be getting out of ALL of the wars and we must end the Fed. And the health care mandate must be nullified. And the 2nd amendment is vital to our freedom.

      However, his foreign policy is unrealistic and scary. You cannot sit down with Iran or other countries that support and endorse terrorism and negotiate with them.

      Also, I have heard Paul say that illegals should be able to come here to work and then go home when they are done. Quite frankly with so many Americans out of work that angers me.

      And according to Atlas Shrugs, Paul is an anti-Semitic.

      • http://www.facebook.com/djkapitalkev Kapital Kev

        12grace the problem is most of us dont even realize why Iran dislikes us. We are fed they hate us because we are free. The reason Iran and some people do not like our Government is because we interfere within there country. Iran had a democracy in the 50’s and we used the CIA to overthrow there government. We supplied Saddam Hussein weapons and missiles to bomb Iran. Just imagine how you would feel towards another country that did this to America? Would you not like them or think about fighting for your country? Alot of the reason these other countries do not like America is because of what we are doing in their region not because we are Free.

  • Josh Mulder

    Then I guess you should take Mitt Romey off too. The ‘Romneybots’ posted a link at mittromneycentral.com. Either take Willard off, or put Paul back on. Either way it shows your personal bias and unprofessionalism.
    http://mittromneycentral.com/2011/08/11/who-won-the-fox-news-ames-iowa-debate/

  • Anonymous

    I agree with Newt winning, but Huntsman coming in second? Must be some libtards skewing this poll!

    • Anonymous

      Newt is a smart man and he called the media on their stuff- that was great. I was surprised at how well Newt did in this debate. I thought Huntsman was a disaster, he talked out of both sides of his mouth at the same time in almost every response. Remember his response about immigration? We have to build a fence, and he then described the fence, and reiterated how we needed the fence and concluded by saying that until we have the fence we can’t talk about anything else. That’s the kind of double-talk rhetoric that the American people have heard from obama and his minions ever since the leftist got illegallly installed into the highest office in our land….the American people are tired of being scammed.

      • Anonymous

        Well said!

        Hunstman made my teeth ache.

  • Dick Butt

    You removed Ron Paul because one of his supporting parties is trying to get people to vote for him? It’s very clear that Ron Pal is the favored candidate in this poll, and you can’t handle reality.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_HWFNYMOHNFQO63ZYTBBHL37J5M VictoriaL

    If you’re not going to have Ron Paul on there then it’s not any accurate poll by any means. There are alot of other people voting for Ron Paul besides just his usual base. I’m one of them. Your actions are very disappointing, you should be a shamed of yourself for discluding anyone.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_BPIFJYIKAC7TGLOTY6UZ6MCTAA Brock S.

    Holy crap – wrath of the Paulians.

    • Anonymous

      I love debating passionate people. It is fun. As long as you remain calm, it is fun to read their comments.

      Dr. Paul has no chance of winning in November, but that doesn’t mean that his followers should give up on him. If he makes people wake up and get involved, then he has done a good thing.

      It is passivity that allows tyrants to win.

      • http://www.facebook.com/djkapitalkev Kapital Kev

        While I will agree with most of your statement “If he makes people wake up and get involved, then he has done a good thing. It is passivity that allows tyrants to win. ” I have to disagree that he has no chance. The only people with no chance are those not running the race. He has alot of odds stacked up against him yes but the knowledge and truth he speaks is being heard. Americans are tired of the lies and misinformation we are waking up and opening our ears to the truth that Ron Paul speaks.

        • Anonymous

          Well if I am wrong and he wins in November it will be due to the hard work that you and your fellows do.

          I am hedging my bets that he won’t win.

          • http://www.facebook.com/djkapitalkev Kapital Kev

            I appreciate your respect man and I respect your thoughts as well.

  • Shannon Duran

    So, you removed Ron Paul because there is a PRO-PAUL website? Are you that naive? Really? Maybe you should watch the part of the debate that Newt talks about the shock and awe that we had when we found out terrorists LIED… WHOA… CRAZY concept, huh? I never supported Ron before, but after last nights debate, I’m sold. Put him back up if you really want the results of your poll. What’s the point of putting it up if you don’t want to know the answer…

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=646851376 Judith A Bradley

    Where is Ron Pauls name

    • http://www.facebook.com/djkapitalkev Kapital Kev

      they posted an Update saying they are removing his name because he was winning lol at least they admitted it. Romney has the same post on his support page with the link to the poll but its ok for him.

    • Anonymous

      Yea, I think they should include Ron Paul even though he is not my candidate of choice. It’s not respectful to not give Ron Paul a fair chance.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=646851376 Judith A Bradley

    so where is Ron Paul you can’tcontinue to ignore him he will not go away .

  • Audrey Snitko

    I am a 57 year old grandmother of 20, mother of 6, homeschool mother, and Christian. I really resent being called a Paulbot. Do Ron Paul supporters not count anymore?????

    • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100000924130996 Fara Wheld

      ♥ Also a homeschool mother.. of a 7 year old. As of today. Happy B-day, E! I am a Ron Paul Supporter.

      • Anonymous

        I think home schooling is the wave of the future. As the schools turn into little propaganda mills, we lose more and more control over what our kids learn.

        I would want my kids to learn to read, and do math and learn about the Constitution and that our founding fathers were giants.

        Not the slush they learn in school.

        Oh and by the way I am a teacher. I teach physics. Many of my colleagues in the hard sciences are conservatives. We are not all stark raving liberals.

    • Anonymous

      AUdrey,

      In the world of politics there is mud slung all over the place. Ignore it. You are the only one who knows who you are.

    • Anonymous

      I don’t think we need to call each other names like “Paulbots” or ‘Romneybots’ just because we have different takes on the debate last night. Ron Paul is not my candidate of choice but I defend people’s right to express their support of him. And I expect the same courtesy.

      • Josh Mulder

        I used the term ‘Romneybots’, in single quotes, in my statement as a response to the statement by the creator of this poll. It was sarcasm. It was not name calling on my part. The only namecalling was by the unprofessional pollster who’s running the show here.

  • http://www.facebook.com/Leatherneck4Liberty Gary C. Huggins

    I’ve been a member of the GOP since 1972 the day I turned 18 and registered to vote as a Republican in 1972 (more than 38 years ago). I’ve been an activist for conservatism since Reagan announced his third candidacy for president in 1979. I am a US Marine Corps veteran of 14 years. I do not use, or condone the use, of any type of drug. I am gainfully employed in the biotech industry and fall into the upper tax bracket. I am a mainstream conservative. I believe in individual liberty, constitutional government, sound monetary policy, free markets, and a foreign policy of nonintervention. I support Ron Paul for President in 2012.

    • Anonymous

      Semper Fi and thank you for your service. I don’t think, however, that mainstrean comservatives share your viewpoint in non-intervention.

    • Anonymous

      Semper Fi and thank you for your service. I don’t think, however, that mainstrean comservatives share your viewpoint in non-intervention.

      • http://www.facebook.com/djkapitalkev Kapital Kev

        I think what you and Washington fail to realize mikey123 is that we Americans are fed up with “mainstream”. I think the “mainstream” doesn’t realize how many people do not hold their views no matter how much they have tried to push them on us. We are all questioning our government and the agendas they try to push on us and we are educating ourselves.

  • Anonymous

    UPDATE: Newt Gingrich is winning this poll. The Newtbots put up a post at DailyNewt to run up the votes for their messiah, but so what? He deserves to win.

    OK, I know you didn’t (and they didn’t) do this but what if they had? What if all of them are trying to skew your poll results? Why wouldn’t they? Maybe it’s a matter one one camp being better organized than the others.

  • http://www.facebook.com/djkapitalkev Kapital Kev

    http://mittromneycentral.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=214 here is Romney supporters doing the same thing Ron Paul’s are doing! Are you going to take Romney’s name off the poll? can we get another UPDATE

  • Anonymous

    LOL, this is BS. Newt’s supporters can flood the poll, but not Ron Paul’s? Dang, if it weren’t for all those Ron Paul supporters, Newt would win!

    Goofy. The good news is this kind of nonsense will only help to increase Dr. Paul’s appeal.

    Thanks boys!

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_TWEJXYJCPRRJU4A336CUN2LML4 d

    LOL you hypocritical TOOLS! Ron Paul was getting too many votes, so you disabled him and if he gets too many votes – you will disable him in the future?! Go home and cry to yo momma cus everybody knows Ron Paul is WINNING!!! YOU CAN NOT STOP AN IDEA WHOSE TIME HAS COME!!

  • Douglas DeWane

    So because we support Ron Paul, Ron Paul has been removed from the poll? What if I put up a poll of favorite soda, but because I don’t like Coke, I exclude Coke? What kind of poll is that?

    Why even bother running an actual poll? Just put up a post that says, “I ran a poll and Newt Grigrich won.” The mindless readers of your site won’t even look for a poll and you’ll still get to support your loud, inane candidate.

    Get your head out of your ass.

    RON PAUL 2012

  • http://www.facebook.com/scluck Shawnetta Cluck

    Way to go… You sure aren’t going to win the people over if you keep Ron Paul off the polls. OH well… His people will make his own media for him then!

  • Douglas DeWane

    ALSO: Since you obviously have no clue about how to run a poll, use this for reference. You’ll notice that ALL EIGHT of the debating candidates are included. You’ll also notice that the candidate you excluded is BLOWING AWAY all others.

    http://www.topix.com/issue/fox/gop-debate-aug11

  • Anonymous

    Must be Newt’s massive Twitter army voting.

    lol

  • Anonymous

    Must be Newt’s massive Twitter army voting.

    lol

  • Anonymous

    I have heard this assertion of poll rigging by Ron Paul supporters on more than one occasion. From a moral standpoint, I was loathe to test it but I really found it difficult to believe so, finally, in several polls I tried to vote twice. But I could not. After reading the comments of the admin of this site I tried to vote twice (for Hunstman) but could not – “Thank you – we have already counted your vote”. The logical conclusion can only be that this poll is rigged to suit the desired outcome of the admin. Morally dishonest and a mirror image of what’s wrong with our country. Disingenous, much???

  • Anonymous

    I think Ron Paul is a good man and I believe he loves America. Many people like the fact that he thinks outside of the box. He is a rebel, of sorts. However, he has some major flaws and I’m not sure that he would win the poll. But, I do think he should be on the poll. Also, I don’t think it is kind, fair or intelligent for any of us to call each other names because we have different takes on the debate.

    Newt is a very well-educated and experienced man. He had the answers last night. I was surprised at how well Newt did in the debate.

  • martinlakewylie

    This is not a legitimate pole without all the candidates. It’s like playing poker with a cheater. Why are neoconservatives so afraid of the US Constitution?

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1550597528 Tom Voss Jr

    As long as the poll has been set up to eliminate multiple voting there is no reason to remove Ron Paul. Just because he has loyal followers that are active doesn’t give you the right to silence thousands imo. Locking out Dr. Paul is an open admission of his popularity with the people. So he almost wins by default.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_XVW3HOOY3ROO2RSMDGN3ZNA55Q john

    How do I vote for Ron Paul? He won the debate, yet I do not see him on the list. Not surprising.

  • http://www.facebook.com/jasonleecochran Jason Cochran
  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Ross-Mauri/100002721144561 Ross Mauri

    HANGING DUAL CITIZEN ZIONIST JEW TRAITORS AND THE COWARD GOYIM SCUM THAT STAMD WITH THEM IS NOT ANTI-SEMITIC ! GOT ROPE ?
    http://WWW.911MISSINGLINKS.COM

  • Anonymous

    ALERT!!! The Romney camp has posted this poll on their website to encourage supporters to come vote for Mitt. OMG!!! In a Herculean effort to be fair, Mitt’s name will be also be removed. This poll is now meaningless, and rightfully so, it seems.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Ross-Mauri/100002721144561 Ross Mauri

    hanging dual citizen zionist jew traitors and the coward goyim scum that stsnd with them is not anti-semitic ! got rope ?

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_XVW3HOOY3ROO2RSMDGN3ZNA55Q john

    How do I vote for Ron Paul considering he won the debate, and yet he is not on the list. The philosophy of liberty is under attack, and, I, as an American, will not allow that to happen without a fight.

    Vote liberty 2012! Vote Ron Paul!

    “Liberty, when it begins to take root, is a plant of rapid growth.” -George Washington

  • Craig Scott

    I am sorry you are afraid of Ron Paul, can’t handle liberty?

  • http://profiles.google.com/cfenn615 Corey Fenn

    Ron Paul was winning so you removed him? Shame on you!

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Winston-Smith/100002666532498 Winston Smith

    Censorship is the first step on the road to fascism…

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Eric-Pierce/750698316 Eric Pierce

    So much for unbiased reporting. This site and it’s disingenuous “journalists” have just distinguished themselves as no different from the talking heads on main-stream-media. Who is it that you like? Why not just put that one name up there for the poll. That way you can be sure your choice has the advantage. Crap is what the “Rightscoop” is holding.

  • Anonymous

    Fara,

    Where did our comments go? I had responded to it and it disappeared?

    I scrolled down but couldn’t find it.

  • Anonymous

    You forgot the best candidate you assholes!!!

  • Craig Scott

    So you don’t like the results. Why place the poll? Afraid of liberty? Scared of our constitution?

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Bailoutapalooza-Nomo/1279397415 Bailoutapalooza Nomo

    Why the hell have a poll if your eliminating choices. Oh that’s real scientific. What are you afraid of? Liberty?

    Ron Paul 2012

  • ELROCOCCO

    I find it interesting that those who support a contestant in this debate cannot communicate between themselves to vote for their choice without you fearing their organizational acumen. Sore losers always stand out and your actions to disable votes for Ron Paul show your inherent fear of the people’s choice against the corporate salesmen on the stage beside him. Above and beyond that I’m sure it hurts your pride (moderator) that you have been caught towing the “company” line – and by that I mean attempting to silence the voice of Liberty. I’ll leave you with a little advice from Confucius:

    A superior man thinks of what is right,
    a small man thinks of what is profitable.
    A superior man demands much of himself,
    a small man demands much of others.
    A superior man accepts his lot calmly,
    a small man is full of complaints.

    Your actions in removing Ron Paul from votes because his supporters have organized amongst themselves to speak in a mighty united voice indicate to me that you are like the “small man” which Confucius describes. Reread your history, Liberty is the path to freedom, not supplication to tyrants.

  • Iysander

    In other words, Paul won the poll but Fox News wanted Gingrich to win…so they romove Paul and pretend that Gingrich won. Wow…Fox News continues to expose itself as unfair, unbalanced and increasingly irrelevant. Good job guys.

  • Dodoforever Canspell

    Boring and will remain so until Sarah Palin comes on.

    • Anonymous

      I am interested to see how things shake out when Perry enters the race. I am not sure whether Palin will enter or not. She is in the cat bird seat right now and could throw her support behind any candidate she chooses.

      Al I care about is getting rid of Obama.

      • http://www.facebook.com/djkapitalkev Kapital Kev

        “Al I care about is getting rid of Obama.” mikey123 as much as I agree Obama isnt the solution just getting rid of him and replacing him with just anyone isnt a solution. So we get rid of Obama and throw in Romeny are things going to really get any better? They all have similar mindsets as the past presidents we have had and see where it has gotten us. We need someone with real knowledge and truth and knows the solutions nothing less. Ron Paul brings all this and no other candidate comes close.

    • Anonymous

      I am interested to see how things shake out when Perry enters the race. I am not sure whether Palin will enter or not. She is in the cat bird seat right now and could throw her support behind any candidate she chooses.

      Al I care about is getting rid of Obama.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Mark-Atkins/782809442 Mark Atkins

    Ron Paul won it but you are not listing him? Shame on you!

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Mark-Atkins/782809442 Mark Atkins

    Ron Paul won it but you are not listing him? Shame on you!

  • Anonymous

    Does Erik Erickson (sp?) live here, too?

    And Paul supporters, please conduct yourselves and your language in a manner befitting our “messiah.” There is no valid reason to stoop to the level of this site’s admin. Thank you.

    • http://www.facebook.com/bobby.eskenberry Bobby Eskenberry

      So you want us to play “nice” in your little world. Keep putting your head deeper in the sand. “Thank You”

  • Anonymous

    Does Erik Erickson (sp?) live here, too?

    And Paul supporters, please conduct yourselves and your language in a manner befitting our “messiah.” There is no valid reason to stoop to the level of this site’s admin. Thank you.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_Q3SZDPRC2LYH7PPVLM2I5V7P6I Nathan

    HAHA whiner’s didn’t like Ron Paul winning so they took his name off…this is amusing…you can’t stop an Idea whose time has come!!!!!

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_Q3SZDPRC2LYH7PPVLM2I5V7P6I Nathan

    HAHA whiner’s didn’t like Ron Paul winning so they took his name off…this is amusing…you can’t stop an Idea whose time has come!!!!!

  • ELROCOCCO

    It saddens me that you have removed Ron Paul from the voting list because I cannot vote for him now. However, I see another larger, looming problem with your actions – namely how you respond to fear. If the supporters of Ron Paul can organize themselves to vote for their man on your poll and you respond by shutting them down, it indicates to me that you are just another rope towing corporatist shill. Sorry for the name, but you’ve earned it. Removing Paul and retaining the others shows your favoritism and your fear to the real voices out there. If you don’t want to know how the populace feels, then do not have a poll. It seems such a spiteful thing to try and silence the voice of Liberty, but tyrants have tried this throughout recorded history. Your small contribution to this kind of oppression, through omission, shows your prejudice and your lack of scruples. I’d advise you to get some guts, read some truth, find your gumption and wake up to your slavery.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Ryan-McAvity/100000157475672 Ryan McAvity

    Ron Paul 2012!!! You can tell Ron won just by the message board. Americans are not as dumb as u try to brain wash us to be.

    • Anonymous

      America won, Ryan, because we are here talking to each other.

    • http://www.facebook.com/mcvay.will Will McVay

      This website loses though for failing so hard.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Ryan-McAvity/100000157475672 Ryan McAvity

    Ron Paul 2012!!! You can tell Ron won just by the message board. Americans are not as dumb as u try to brain wash us to be.

  • Anonymous

    What? So because Ron Paul was winning, you removed him from the poll?
    Well, your poll is not a poll.

    Guess you just don’t realize that this country wants a POTUS who is a Champion of the Constitution, wants peace, freedom and sound money. I guess that’s just too awful for you!

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=733620176 Harry McGuire Jr

    You cannot silence Liberty.. All the candidates are doing poll links on their support sites.. The fact that Ron Paul has many supporters should not be penalized, so this site has earned a fail rating..

  • Kori Anders

    So because Ron Paul was winning then you automatically assume that it was because ‘Paulbots’ were driving up the vote.. The same could be said for any candidate who is winning any poll.

    Maybe the reason why he was winning is because Americans are finally opening their eyes and realizing that out of all of the candidates, he is the only one who isn’t a puppet and who actually answers the questions honestly.

    By removing him from the poll, you are acknowledging that he has become a threat. Bring it on. The media can’t hide Ron Paul for much longer, Americans will know the truth.

  • Kori Anders

    So because Ron Paul was winning then you automatically assume that it was because ‘Paulbots’ were driving up the vote.. The same could be said for any candidate who is winning any poll.

    Maybe the reason why he was winning is because Americans are finally opening their eyes and realizing that out of all of the candidates, he is the only one who isn’t a puppet and who actually answers the questions honestly.

    By removing him from the poll, you are acknowledging that he has become a threat. Bring it on. The media can’t hide Ron Paul for much longer, Americans will know the truth.

  • David Taylor

    So will Paul be taken off the ballot of the Republican primary because The Daily Paul tried to get people to vote for him?

  • http://www.facebook.com/bobby.eskenberry Bobby Eskenberry

    DONT VOTE ON THIS POLL! Shameful cowards who FEAR Ron Paul by ignoring his front runner position.

  • http://www.facebook.com/djkapitalkev Kapital Kev

    If you click on Sort By and choose Best Rating look at some of the comments by the names with a Star at the end. They are moderators and blatantly make comments about Ron Paul which just shows how biased this poll is. Why even have a poll if you dont like the results?

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1272000050 Naomi Prettyman

    lmao, that is pathetic. You took RP off because he was winning? You should work in government, you’d fit right in.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1037199134 Jan Bledsoe DeLaval

    Call me a Pauler, Paulbot or whatever you like. Ron Paul is not listed, he was there and won almost every MAJOR polling that was taken after the debate. You may not like that fact, but it is true.

    For a poll to be considered legitimate, you must include all the persons in question, and this poll did not. It only proves that certain groups of people are worried about the fact that Dr. Paul is a deciding factor in the upcoming election. He is the only person running who has the halo of truth on his side. He is constitutionally correct and should not be feared. He has the American people’s best interest at heart.

    I hope that your future polling will present themselves as legitimate in the future and give a true representation of how the American people feel about ALL the candidates.

    Thank you for the opportunity to post my feelings.

    RON PAUL 2012

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100001048065818 Heather Newman

    Well If I was going to vote it would have been for RON PAUL. I cant believe the media is going to do this again!

  • http://www.facebook.com/kylee.darwin Kylee Jo Raymor Darwin

    You cannot have a true poll without all of the candidates on it. Perhaps Ron Paul really was the best. I know it goes against every GOP establishment bone in your body, but he is right on a lot of issues and because he’s a straight shooter, people like him. What you’ve done is promoted dishonesty. Any result from this poll isn’t valid, it’s a lie that you’re pushing.

  • Alf Alien

    UPDATE: We removed Ron Paul because he was winning. Having a devoted and organized voter-base is not allowed. We do not want our results skewed by honesty.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Larry-Cumiskey/658152231 Larry Cumiskey

    Where the F is Ron Paul you asshole??

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Nathan-Angus/1638725922 Nathan Angus

    We all know who won. Ron Paul 2012!!!

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Larry-Cumiskey/658152231 Larry Cumiskey

    They removed Ron Paul because he was winning!! This site is as crooked as the Bush Admin!!

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Larry-Cumiskey/658152231 Larry Cumiskey

    Anonymolus needs to hack this BS website!!

  • http://www.facebook.com/mcvay.will Will McVay

    So, because another website points out the existence of your poll, you remove the guy who’s winning it? Yeah, ok. Allow me to WRITE IN my vote then. RON PAUL!

  • Anonymous

    I understand, unwelcome results are unwelcome.

  • Anonymous

    Not only that, there is some evidence that the Fox News poll is deleting Paul votes. My zip code shows a Gingrich vote but no Paul vote.

  • http://www.facebook.com/AdamKoropsakSavage Adam Savage

    It was cool that Newt confronted Fox on the “gotcha” questions, but I think he came across as a cry baby. I like the way Bachmann handled the submission question with a sarcastic “thanks for that question”. All politics and drama aside, there was only one candidate who answered all questions with honest answers and not just a bunch of mumbo jumbo, and that was Ron Paul!

  • Anonymous

    do a 1 vote per email and you won’t have that problem… having a poll without all the candidates is pointless.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_AKNFBE4DX2HKE3CMLBGVYM7NMM Lori

    So now it’s “We don’t like who’s winning, so we’ll remove him from the poll?” Is this poll being controlled by a second grader?

  • Anonymous

    The reason your site is and will continue to be shunned by ‘real’ people is this kind of stupidity. What? Well, the reason you decided to leave out the actual winner (yes, Dr, Paul) is because supporters sought to help him out using (an)other site(s). Well golly-gee morons…so are all the other candidates!…but that’s okay with you. Dr. Paul just has more support willing to get active…isn’t that what polls are supposed to be looking for?

    Leaving him off only hurts your credibility for having a “half-poll”—what possible good is that?

    Your Momma musta been really bad to you to think you could ‘punish’ the winner for being too popular.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_H7KNNBGPTEN2JZCSSCCTL25VIU Chris

    Removing the most popular entry…. that’s awfully democratic…..

  • http://www.facebook.com/rcaston Rodney Caston

    Wow, Ron Paul wins every online poll, so you remove him from yours.

    classy.

  • http://www.facebook.com/rcaston Rodney Caston

    Wow, Ron Paul wins every online poll, so you remove him from yours.

    classy.

  • Anonymous

    The reason your site is and will continue to be shunned by ‘real’ people is this kind of stupidity. What? Well, the reason you decided to leave out the actual winner (yes, Dr, Paul) is because supporters sought to help him out using (an)other site(s). Well golly-gee morons…so are all the other candidates!…but that’s okay with you. Dr. Paul just has more support willing to get active…isn’t that what polls are supposed to be looking for?

    Leaving him off only hurts your credibility for having a “half-poll”—what possible good is that?

    Your Momma musta been really bad to you to think you could ‘punish’ the winner for being too popular.

  • Anonymous

    How could you not include Ron Paul in this poll. I live in Southern California and never heard of “daily paul” so you are just a fake and fraud. I, my family and my friends are all voting for Ron Paul.

  • Anonymous

    NOTE* If you keep taking my comment down, I’ll keep putting it up–you can’t simply ‘remove’ those (true things you don’t want to hear..you’ll learn if I have to get a few hundred friends to put this same message up about a million time! You posted the half-poll, try to defend your ignorance.

    The reason your site is and will continue to be shunned by ‘real’ people is this kind of stupidity. What? Well, the reason you decided to leave out the actual winner (yes, Dr, Paul) is because supporters sought to help him out using (an)other site(s). Well golly-gee morons…so are all the other candidates!…but that’s okay with you. Dr. Paul just has more support willing to get active…isn’t that what polls are supposed to be looking for?

    Leaving him off only hurts your credibility for having a “half-poll”—what possible good is that?

    Your Momma musta been really bad to you to think you could ‘punish’ the winner for being too popular.

  • John Snyder

    Mitt Romney has fake corporations donating money, so why don’t you take him off too?

  • Anonymous

    How could you not include Ron Paul in this poll??? I live in Southern California and never heard of a “daily paul” so I think you are a fake and fraud. Myself, family and friends are all voting for the only honest politician in Washington, Ron Paul.

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Larry-Cumiskey/658152231 Larry Cumiskey

      The SOB did include Ron Paul until RP was winning and the crooked bastard removed him!!

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_CGU2QFKL4II4I7ST6YHUC5OJWU Joseph E

    assholes

  • http://twitter.com/RyanSwagger Ryan Schweighardt

    What kind of censorship is this?

    lol so because Ron Paul fans mostly have computers and are passionate, that upsets you?

    I guess he’s doing his job at upsetting the establishment if stuff like this happens haha

  • http://twitter.com/RyanSwagger Ryan Schweighardt

    What kind of censorship is this?

    lol so because Ron Paul fans mostly have computers and are passionate, that upsets you?

    I guess he’s doing his job at upsetting the establishment if stuff like this happens haha

  • Orlando Machado, Jr.

    Removing Ron Paul only makes you come off like petulant children.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Joe-Dumas/56705642 Joe Dumas

    No, we only have idiots like you to blame. Since when is it bad for a candidate to have lots of dedicated supporters? Any of the other candidates’ supporters could have put up links to direct like-minded voters to the poll. If they are too lazy to do that, how is that Ron Paul’s fault?

  • http://twitter.com/inscamerated Gary Fowler

    I never vote in any poll that purposely excludes Ron Paul for any reason. Anyone else is worthless and will not help this country.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_JE2AEWGX6Y3FY6KJ5WXSGFKGN4 SonsOfLiberty86

    It’s not a very fair poll if you remove only 1 person.

    This poll is biased.

    Consider that the other candidates most likely have poll bots as well, and your argument is invalid.

  • Anonymous

    Re: “Update” — Typical neocon response: the majority of voters want one thing, but it’s not what the appointed arbiters of good taste will accept, so they ban the choice. That’s a very queer definition of democracy you have there, more in line with the “democracies” they had in the Soviet Union, and Iraq under Saddam, and in China, and so forth…

  • http://www.facebook.com/frederic.steinfels Frederic Steinfels

    where is ron paul?

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Larry-Cumiskey/658152231 Larry Cumiskey

      Go here if you want to see a real poll where RP is winning too, but they have not removed his name like the nazi that runs this site!! http://politics.newsvine.com/_

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Larry-Cumiskey/658152231 Larry Cumiskey

      Go here if you want to see a real poll where RP is winning too, but they have not removed his name like the nazi that runs this site!! http://politics.newsvine.com/_

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Larry-Cumiskey/658152231 Larry Cumiskey

      Go here if you want to see a real poll where RP is winning too, but they have not removed his name like the nazi that runs this site!! http://politics.newsvine.com/_

  • http://twitter.com/DavidSherret David Sherret

    Why don’t any other candidates have the enthusiastic support RP does? Thought of that??

  • Anonymous

    You took Ron Paul off an online poll because you think the results might become skewed on an ONLINE POLL? You dumb ass. This is fucked up. You and the media like you are what is wrong with this country. So much for openness and freedom.

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Larry-Cumiskey/658152231 Larry Cumiskey

      Go here if you want to see a real poll where RP is winning too, but they have not removed his name like the nazi that runs this site!! http://politics.newsvine.com/_

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Larry-Cumiskey/658152231 Larry Cumiskey

      Go here if you want to see a real poll where RP is winning too, but they have not removed his name like the nazi that runs this site!! http://politics.newsvine.com/_

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Larry-Cumiskey/658152231 Larry Cumiskey

      Go here if you want to see a real poll where RP is winning too, but they have not removed his name like the nazi that runs this site!! http://politics.newsvine.com/_

  • Andrew Bolger

    Where is Ron Paul?

  • Bill Mitchell

    This is the dumbest fucking pole. How do your purposely remove someone from it and expect anyone to take it seriously. You are an idiot, and I will always resort to name calling when faced with this kind of garbage.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_DVHT6FUMHPQ6FMYIUJFSKJZSRQ Matthew

    Where is Ron Paul? Didn’t you people watch the debate? Amateurs. Time to get a professional to run your poll.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Larry-Cumiskey/658152231 Larry Cumiskey

    Go here if you want to see a real poll where RP is winning too, but they have not removed his name like the nazi that runs this site!! http://politics.newsvine.com/_news/2011/08/11/7350500-who-do-you-think-won-the-gop-presidential-candidates-debate

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_DVHT6FUMHPQ6FMYIUJFSKJZSRQ Matthew

    Where’s Ron Paul? Didn’t you people watch the debate? Amateurs. Time to hire a professional to run your poll.

  • Josh Patrick

    Ron Paul does not want to go to war with Iran. Ron Paul never voted for the Patriot Act. He never worked for the IRS. He has never supported RomneyCare. He was never a chairperson to the Federal Reserve. Ron Paul is the only candidate with sound economic viewpoints. Ron Paul 2012!

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1542113381 David Robins

    Newt (“She turned me into a newt!”) isn’t winning squat, he’s coming in a distant second to Dr. Paul and we all know it.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1542113381 David Robins

    Newt (“She turned me into a newt!”) isn’t winning squat, he’s coming in a distant second to Dr. Paul and we all know it.

  • Anonymous

    What’s the point of a poll if you remove your leading candidate? If Bachmann supporters flood the poll next, will you remove her?

  • Anonymous

    On http://mittromneycentral.com/2011/08/11/who-won-the-fox-news-ames-iowa-debate/ it says, “if you’re looking for the new polls to vote for Mitt in, click here.” with a link to this poll, but something tells me you won’t take Romney off this poll.

  • Anonymous

    Webmaster is being blatantly unprofessional. This blog’s credibility has been completed flushed, and not just the Paulbots think so.

  • http://www.facebook.com/rallocca1 Rob Locke

    Their were no bots! Put Paul back on the poll, he was winning because people know his message is pure and true, and that’s his only problem in today’s politics

  • http://www.facebook.com/creazy Jake McCrea

    Does he really think there’s an online army of Ron Paul robots out to ruin every poll? Sounds like a special kind of moron.

  • http://www.facebook.com/melodic.invention Mike Rudolph

    Everyone vote for Rick Santorum that supports Ron Paul just for laughs. This website is a joke, may as well make the poll a joke too.

  • http://punditpawn.wordpress.com PunditPawn

    Gingrich did himself a lot of good… smoked the Fox stupid questions and enunciated a clear and credible plan to revoke Obama.

  • http://www.facebook.com/creazy Jake McCrea

    It’s a shame your site doesn’t have enough pull to rig polls the way you’d like.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_MGKWWILTJFNYAGLZFXMPRBSZ4U Dan

    I would like to place my vote for Ron Paul, but I don’t see him on the list.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Larry-Cumiskey/658152231 Larry Cumiskey
  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Larry-Cumiskey/658152231 Larry Cumiskey
  • http://voteronpaul.tumblr.com/ voteronpaul

    why is RON PAUL not on this… put him back so to get accurate results! STOP THE BS!!!!!!!!!!!