By The Right Scoop


Mark Levin tells the sad story of Maurice Harris in Miami who was murdered after two intruders busted in his house and killed him while he was trying to keep them from getting to his daughter. The larger point Levin is making is that Maurice didn’t have a gun and there isn’t a single law being discussed as it relates to gun control that would have done anything to keep these criminals from getting guns whether it be the assault weapons ban or background checks. No, everything being tossed around by Democrats would have only applied to Maurice.

Listen:

BONUS: Mark Levin rips Mayor Bloomberg up one side and down the other for calling Americans against gun control ‘extremists':

About 

Blogger extraordinaire since 2009 and the owner and Chief Blogging Officer of the most wonderful and super fantastic blog in the known and unknown universe: The Right Scoop

Trending Now

Comment Policy: Please read our new comment policy before making a comment. In short, please be respectful of others and do not engage in personal attacks. Otherwise we will revoke your comment privileges.


NOTE: If the comments don't load properly or they are difficult to read because they are on the blue background, please use the button below to RELOAD DISQUS.

  • 57thunderbird

    Spot n Mark.The problem is liberals don’t let facts and logic get in the way of their Marxist agenda,especially the Marxists in D.C.

    • OneThinDime

      Saw this yesterday, made me physically ill. Like those 2 black men were holding the wife and going for the daughter for a robbery???? I don’t think so.

      Edit: Here’s the ABC video http://abcnews.go.com/US/video/miami-dad-killed-protecting-daughter-home-invasion-18503751

      • 57thunderbird

        Yeah.They obviously had something other than robbery on their minds.Sick perverted evil doers.The libs think gun control would have stopped these thugs?

        • bongobear

          I don’t think the libs give a damn whether or not these thugs could have been stopped by whatever means. What these people care about, in my opinion, is being able to screw with other people’s lives. It apparently gives them a feeling of superiority to be able to push you and me around.

    • http://profile.yahoo.com/44F4AB4VSCTOCHBMBG4ZWWD5OU Laurel

      Exactly!

  • TexasPGRRider

    Thanks Scoop, and Thank you Mark. Rest in Peace SIR ….

  • OneThinDime

    I truly hope the Admin does not exploit this family and blame the 2nd Amendment for the rabid animals having guns….This is in FL and the Obamas are going to FL on vacation this weekend. What are the chances they stop by for a photo op and some exploitation?

    • http://no-apologies-round2.blogspot.com/ AmericanborninCanada

      UGH! They’re coming to Florida?! I’m going to have to be a hermit again until they leave. I wonder how many guns they will have protecting them?

    • Stehekin912

      Another vacation! Sheesh

  • OneThinDime

    I love that Levin went after the illegals and the open border. Does he realize what the Gang of 8 is proposing with their amnesty? He loves Marco Rubio, but the Daily Caller called his immigration a con job http://dailycaller.com/2013/02/13/rubios-anti-sotu-dissembles-on-amnesty/

  • Stehekin912

    Horatius at the Bridge. Lord, please bless and comfort this family. He IS a hero.

  • notsofastthere

    The real shame is that the only ones hearing this powerful analysis are the ones who know about Mark Levin and TRS.
    How many out there have ears, but do not hear?

  • johnfromjersey

    It’s really starting to get scary out here folks. We Americans have been letting the evil happen before our eyes. We must stop sitting home and letting others handle it. When I found out that over 30% of (republicans) sat out the last election, I nearly had a stroke.
    It was we the people who sat back, (the silent majority), and allowed one woman and nine, unelected, black robed men to throw God from my classroom, and look at the state of education, morals, ethics, and the children’s futures as a result of that decision.
    If America is to survive, we the people are going to have to get off our butts and DO something. Voting is a responsibility that should be taken seriously. We, on the right, moan about voter id, but we can’t be bothered to vote ourselves. What gives?

  • http://no-apologies-round2.blogspot.com/ AmericanborninCanada

    Lord that is heart breaking! These freaking liberals- have people’s blood on their hands for making things so difficult for people to keep their God given rights to protect their families.
    Bloomingidiot is a complete a$$. I’d like to send a photo of every child who has been molested or kidnapped or murdered because their parents or family’s didn’t have a gun to protect themselves with. These *$&#@ &@*! are making me furious.

  • hongryhawg

    When liberals talk about gun control, safety is only the face of their arguments. Safety has nothing to do with it. Socialism cannot succeed with an armed populace. Their push is for disarmament so their ideology can move “forward”. Do not be baited into a discussion over safety. It is their red herring.

  • Shery Hancock

    ON the left, facts just get in the way. That is why they want nothing to do with them. If facts don’t support their ideology, then facts are worthless things that only get in the way of making decisions. And, they don’t want to hear about facts relating to Marxism’s failures, loss of life, etc. You can prove to them that guns held in the average citizen’s hands have never killed anybody other than self-defense, or that it is criminals who will still hold their guns after everybody else’s are taken and they blow it off as if you are a lunatic. THEY WILL NOT HEAR IT. PERIOD! It doesn’t fit their agenda. It’s the same as Obama being shown literally that raising taxes would create less revenue and lowering taxes would create more. He said he totally understood that, but he still felt the rich should pay more. It is the ideology, not the facts. They will NOT change their ideology.

  • wodiej

    It is a sad story. Even though the intruders were heavily armed, having a personal gun in the home could have either scared them away or injured/killed one or both of them. It would be better than being completely defenseless.

    Having a dog is an excellent deterrent too. Several years ago several houses in my neighborhood were burglarized on the same day in broad daylight. My back door was not that great and they could have easily broken in but they didn’t. The cops asked if my home was Ok and I said yes. He said those two dogs probably kept the burglars away. Every house that was robbed had no dog. People laugh about little dogs not being able to help protect you. But get a little Schauzer riled up and they are fierce. I have Shih Tzu who is as sweet as he can be but get too close to my house or me and he will come after ya.

    On Bloomberg, he’s not even worthy of a comment. “Nuff said.

  • bobemakk

    Gun control should be thrown out of the House and Senate. This is a prime example of what gun control does to the public. I feel for this family. When the hell will the liberals wake up and abandon gun control? Mark Levin is always right.

  • http://www.facebook.com/paul.leslie.3998 Paul Leslie

    I’m tired of the “good old boys club” in Washinton where they want to “play nice” with each other to the point that no one will stand up and speak the truth. Obama lies through his teeth every day, yet no one in D.C. will call him a liar. Similarly, Fienstein and her progressive party are seeking to undercut the Constitution and restrict our liberty. As one of my senators sickenly said of her, she is “well-intentioned.” Nonsense – she is well aware of what she is doing and it is evil. Those who assault the Constitution and our unalienable rights have bad intentions. She is disavowing the oath she took to support and defend the Constitution.

  • http://twitter.com/stlytdwck Stanly Tedwick

    ..

  • http://twitter.com/jimmytravisband Jimmy Travis

    PRAVDA & GUN RIGHTS
    The English version of Pravda (yeah it’s still around) thought it necessary to remind us of the historical fact that in 1917 the first move the Red Army made was to take away all privately held guns. This well armed population was what allowed the various White factions to rise up, no matter how disorganized politically and militarily they were in 1918 and wage a savage civil war against the Reds. It should be noted that many of these armies were armed peasants, villagers, farmers and merchants, protecting their own. If it had not been for Washington’s clandestine support of and for the Reds, history would have gone quite differently. . Governments will use the excuse of trying to protect the people from maniacs and crime, but are in reality, it is the bureaucrats protecting their power and position. In all cases where guns are banned, gun crime continues and often increases. As for maniacs, be it nuts with cars (NYC, Chapel Hill NC), swords (Japan), knives (China) or home made bombs (everywhere), insane people strike. They throw acid (Pakistan, UK), they throw fire bombs (France), they attack. What is worse, is, that the best way to stop a maniac is not psychology or jail or “talking to them”, it is a bullet in the head, that is why they are a maniac, because they are incapable of living in reality or stopping themselves.

  • 12grace

    This is a tragic story. All the more reason why we should all be armed.