Olbermann: Scott Brown is a homophobic racist

I’ve listened to Ed Shultz and Keith Olbermann do their best to get people to vote for ‘Marica’ Coakley. With Ed Shultz it was a blatant plea to voters, questioning their loyalty along the way. With Olbermann, it’s more of what he does best – tearing down Scott Brown while insulting the very people he is hoping will vote for Coakley. In case you miss it, the insult is accusing ‘the commonwealth of Massachusetts’ of potentially sending a bad joke to the U.S. Senate. This reminds me of David Shuster questioning whether the state of Massachusetts ‘has lost it’s mind‘.

“In short in Scott Brown we have an irresponsible homophobic racist reactionary ex-nude-model tea-bagging supporter of violence against women and against politicians with whom he disagrees. In any other time in our history this man would have been laughed off the stage as an unqualified and disaster in the making by the most conservative of conservatives. Instead the commonwealth of Massachusetts is close to sending this bad joke to the Senate of the United States.”

Comment Policy: Please read our comment policy before making a comment. In short, please be respectful of others and do not engage in personal attacks. Otherwise we will revoke your comment privileges.

To our ad-free users: I apologize for the ad below but unfortunately DISQUS requires this ad in order to use their commenting system and I cannot make it go away.

33 thoughts on “Olbermann: Scott Brown is a homophobic racist

  1. This is why he is rated so low. He makes Michael Moore look like a saint.He is the reason that I quit watching MSNBC

  2. Kieth Oberman = LOSER! WAKE UP LIBERAL Left Wing Biased (so called) Press.

    How on earth can you or any of your kind criticize conservative politicians, when YOU are the devisive, hate-mongers?

    Hear US! We don't want socialism, IN ANY FORM.

  3. Oblabbermann, pretty much meaningless. A spiteful little man whom does not receive the adulation and recognition he thinks he should….Because all he does is attack and ridicule others.
    TIT 3:10 Warn a divisive person once, and then warn him a second time.
    After that, have nothing to do with him.11 You may be sure that such a man is warped and sinful; he is self-

  4. Bring in the Clowns…The only thing funnier then watching Keith Olbermann on TV, is watching the Three stooges on TV. Pelosi, Reid and Franken!
    So put your feet up, pass the pop corn and Coke Cola. Get ready for a belly shaking laugh…..

  5. Olbermann has to go. This is slander and MSNBC can't leave him on the air. Imagine if Bill O'Reilly said something like this?

  6. Keith Olbermann is without a doubt the worst demagogue I've seen in my lifetime. He also uses the word “progressive” in every other sentence, without ever informing his viewers that the “progressives” are the communists who were kicked out of the Democratic Party by Truman, and slowly worked their way back in and took over.

  7. So who is defending Brown? Nobody, because Olbermann is right. What a shame to have something like that running for the Senate

  8. Dude, you're a sicophant. Go and kiss the altar you have erected to Obama, the Facists, its prayer time or go take your meds that you obviously forgot to take today.


  10. The problem with Olbermann is not Olbermann, but the company that employs him. MSNBC considers itself a news agency but they are really a variety show staffed with a bunch of angry liberals (hmmm, kind of like the View). Olbermann himself does not actually believe most of what spews out of his mouth, no one could be that idiotic; he is doing what he does best, making a living being as “out there” as he possibly can. He is like watching Monty Python but with less farting and shots of naked backsides. It wasn't that long ago that he was a news anchor for, among other organizations, ESPN. Olberman's problem is now, and has always been, his total inability to draw ratings. If you fear his message, take heart, only a miniscule percentage of the TV audience is actually watching him, or Shultz, Maddow, Shuster, and pantload Matthews. Rejoice in the fact that we will be taking back our country starting today in Massachusetts, and by the end of 2010, this drunken foray into Euro-socialism will be over and the rebuilding of our country can begin.

  11. You are joking, right? “Unpatriotic”?
    It is so typical of a Progressive to shout “racist”, etc. when you have no valid argument.
    No one disagrees with freedom for all. However, when you start asking for special rights and privileges, or decide that YOUR group is correct, so you can destroy anyone who gets in the way…NO, freedom for all is NOT what you're about.

  12. Ugh, the man makes my blood boil. What a rude, egotistical and vicious man. I guess when your ratings are THAT low, you can say whatever you want!

  13. So everyone you disagree with is a homophobic racist, eh? I disagree with gay marriage, so does that make me homophobic? And how do you get the racist part? I'd really like to know that.

    The great thing is that Americans know who Scott Brown is, and they know he is neither a homophobe nor a racist. You are certainly welcome to disagree with his policies, but to paint him as evil incarnate is simply hyperbole and people will see you for who you are.

  14. Scott Brown is a sexist homophobic racist. I have been following that disgusting moron's career for a few years now and I would be disgusted with my fellow massholes if we really elected such a ridiculous bigot to the senate to represent us.

    Voting for Brown is unpatriotic, his idea of change is going backwards in a way that defies logic and the ideal of what our country was founded on, freedom for all. If people like Scott Brown, Sarah Palin, and other sorts of un-american radicalists like them get elected (or even taken seriously) by the majority of americans then we should take George Washington and Ben Franklin off of our money because that is not the America they led into a war for freedom. Perhaps we could just replace their faces with that of Rush Limbaugh or Adolf Hitler.

  15. Oh, sorry Keith, as I read your summary at the bottom there it was a wonderfully accurate description of Barack Obama until I got to the “Massachussetts” part. My bad.

  16. You suck worse as a commentator than you did as a sportscaster. Who the H$ll are you to judge anyone you stuffed shirt windbag. You have the forum you have due only to some small success at the gift of Bullshirt. I predict that you will be pissed off for an awful long time to come. Scott Brown is only the first. We're taking our country back from hateful namecalling slobs like you. Get bent.

  17. This Alinskyite toady would call Mother Theresa a “hoochie mama” if it got Dear Leader a half-dozen votes- appalling.

    I love how they paint their opponents as “not discussing the issues” right before they launch into the character assasination- John Kerry did the same thing yesterday. At least they're disciplined- if you don't mind glaring hypocrisy.

    Of course hacks like Olberman had their wagons not just hooked, but welded to the Hopenchange pony… now lame. And lots of people get nasty and lash-out when it becomes clear they've blown a reckless all-or-nothing bet…

    ha ha ha ha ha ha ha


  18. I cannot belive that this stupid one sided idiot, Olbermann, has a job when so many good people are out of work. To stoop so low with his absurd comments about Scott Brown and then get air time is just beyond comprehension.
    I wonder if he is so in the dark that he has not heard the ridicolous comments and behavior from Coakley. Make a real diference Mass – Vote for Brown!

  19. Olbermann is right he just go the names and positions wrong….strike Brown out and plus in Al Franken and or Barack Hussein Obama, Jr., and his underlying arguments make complete sense from the delusional warped mind of a coward who is scared of driving cars.

Comments are closed.