The Fifth Circuit has extended its block on the new Texas law allowing for the arrest and deportation of illegals crossing the southern border.
The Supreme Court ruled last week that the Texas law could be enforced while it was being heard by the lower courts. However that night the Fifth Circuit put the law on hold again.
Here’s the latest:
A federal appeals court issued a ruling that extends the block on a Texas immigration law that authorizes local law enforcement to arrest those suspected of entering the country illegally. https://t.co/9Eq17Sa5UP
— The Hill (@thehill) March 27, 2024
A federal appeals court issued a ruling late Tuesday that extends the block on a Texas immigration law that authorizes local law enforcement to arrest those suspected of entering the country illegally.
The 5th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals’ panel of three justices voted 2-1 to issue the pause on Senate Bill 4. The appeals court’s decision continues the months-long legal saga surrounding the legislation, which made it all the way all the Supreme Court before the appeals court halted its enforcement last week.
“Texas does not demonstrate why it would be entitled to vacatur of the preliminary injunction,” the court said in its opinion. “Constitutional text, structure, and history provide strong evidence that federal statutes addressing matters such as noncitizen entry and removal are still supreme even when the State War Clause has been triggered.”
The statute criminalizes the entry into the Lone Star State outside of a port of entry, making it punishable by up to six months in jail, or with subsequent crossings, a maximum of 20 years.
Judge Andrew Oldham, the lone dissenter in the overnight ruling, argued Texas is “is supposed to retain at least some of its sovereignty” in the federal system.
“And its people are supposed to be able to use that sovereignty to elect representatives and send them to Austin to debate and enact laws that respond to the exigencies that Texans experience and that Texans want addressed,” Oldham stated in his dissent.
Last week, the law went into effect for a short period of time following a Supreme Court decision.
I really don’t understand how any lower court decision could overrule the Supreme Court decision like this. I would think the Supreme Court vacating the earlier block would extend to future blocks as well and I would hope they would take issue with the Fifth Circuit doing this.