Krauthammer today criticized Ted Cruz over his exchange with Dianne Feinstein, saying he overshot and also came across as a little offensive:
Mark Levin says that Krauthammer got it completely wrong and explains why:
Comment Policy: Please read our new comment policy before making a comment. In short, please be respectful of others and do not engage in personal attacks. Otherwise we will revoke your comment privileges.
I thought Senator Cruz was GREAT with regard to his comments toward the Senior Senator from California. She clearly needs a brush up on the Constitution, and her feigned indignation at Senator Cruz challenging her mommy attitude toward the Constitution and the right to bear arms is just ludicrous. She need a lecture, she needs to listen to the lecture, and since she has been around such a long time, perhaps she should leave the Senate as she has clearly been there too long.
I think all the old mossy backs need to be challenged on a daily basis. More please.
That’s the problem Feinstein…you have been in the Senate way too long and you needed to be called out finally. You are a self-serving parasite and you have done nothing, but the suck the life out of my state. This liberal leech doesn’t know the Constitution…she just tries to use it for her own political agendas.
Thank you Ted Cruz for serving Feinstein the same sh*t sandwich she has been handing out to the American people for decades.
chatterbox365 I like this comment 1000 times!
chatterbox365 I’m with ya!
chatterbox365 I appreciate your saying it for me. Liberty becomes you !
It was a classic example of liberal “emoting” with cool logic.
Feinstien came off as the arrogant fool she is.
Another brilliant display of Mark Levin dismantling Krauthammer’s premise on Cruz vs Feinstein..
“It’s not all-star panel, it’s a Bush league panel” – Mark Levin
“the purpose of the Bill of Rights is to protect the individual from the Federal Government; they were concerned about political free speech, they were concerned they were able to criticize the federal government— It had nothing to do with sex” – Mark Levin
Ole Krautie needs to join the Hag Feinstein and go off into retirement in the Middle East.
Once again the RINO establishment have no idea what their base thinks! GO Cruz we need more of this!
Charles is just being fair and balanced (ie giving the Marxists equal support).
The only thing offensive was Feinstein and the others acting as if they lorded over this young “upstart” newbie and as if they gave a rip about the Constitution.
Gee Di, you’ve seen people shot. Maybe because the fools that shot them didn’t know how to hold a weapon properly? http://elizabethemkenussenate2012.files.wordpress.com/2012/05/ak47_5a1-470×382.jpg
Good for Mark. We look for the context exactly. Look at the Founder’s intent, and what they believed in. Thank you Mark Levin. Cruz has nothing to be ashamed of or to apologize for in his questioning.
AmericanborninCanada She is referring to the assassination of Moscone and Milk. She found the bodies.It’s how she became mayor of SF then a senator.
Ole Saurkraut is always “dissing” conservatives.
Krauthammer fell for it. diFi did what she always does, what all good liberals do, ACT OFFENDED to distract from the question and the issue.
As to pornography, we restrict it but we don’t outlaw it so Durbin and Krauthammer misconstrued that. We have been limiting free speech since it’s inception. A child doesn’t disrupt a teacher continually and claim 1st Amendment rights do they?! I could give about a million examples on this. Levin is right. If we aren’t going to be rational then there is no discussion to be had…but isn’t that what the Progressive Liberals want?
Laurel A Right, but crucially it’s a limit on the exercise of rights, not the inherent right, itself.
All rights are limited in their exercise, by the fact that one may not infringe on the rights of others.
We all know this, but the leftists act like they have the right to trample all over anyone’s rights, as long as they claim it’s for “the common good.”
That’s probably because Krauthammer supports gun control.
Krauthammer on guns: “Ultimately, a civilized society must disarm its citizenry if it is to have a modicum of domestic tranquility of the kind enjoyed in sister democracies like Canada and Britain.”
Joe Z “Sister democracies”?!! oy vey.
AmericanborninCanada Joe Z I think he’s mixed up his terms.
Britain is a cistern Democracy.
Fortunately, UKIP had a great outing yesterday. So there’s a chance for greatness to emerge.
Joe Z Ah I see and the ends justify the means!
Joe Z Really? Britain has more domestic tranquility? Someone had better tell Britain that.
Violent crime worse in Britain than in US
poljunke You’re too polite polsis. I thought she came across as something else.
poljunke thatta girl./ Yeah, you’re classier than I am. Good for you!
Yeah lets keep playing footsies with them while they kick your teeth in. Great advice, thanks.
The problem is that Krauthammer, Kristol, et al don’t view the ‘rats as an adversary. We are their adversary.
strngernfiction I get your point but I think they do view liberals as adversaries when they should be viewing them as the enemy. You debate with an adversary you defeat and enemy.
Could Krauthammer be John McCain’s crony? I think so.
marketcomp No, he is one of the “my friends” McCain keeps talking about…the other two are a pink elephant and the ghost of the GOPs future.
Feinstein said that bullets “imploded”. Bullets most often expand, never implode. Liberal gun advocates like to talk about and ban things they know very little if anything about.
SigEliteDark She’s also the same person who made the statement, “we hunt humans!” She’s just too old and so is krauthammer.
SigEliteDark I think she was referring to her brain.
Her brane done deflated, imploded, crumpled up, dried up, and blowed away.
I cannot stand Fox News & Sour Krout can stuff it!
c4pfanyou can always change the channel thanks to our freedom,liberty,and yes capitalism
c4pfan I agree. Someone shoves a camera in one of their faces, and all of a sudden, they are smart? Ugh, they all make me sick. I’ll stick with HGTV, when nto listening to Mark of course.
poljunke When doesn’t she?
I really couldn’t care less about how “nice” a guy Krauthammer’s supposed to be. People say that about Obama, too. He’s a RINO, and a political hack. A leftist in Conservative’s clothing, who not only attacks Cruz, but tried showing how politically egalitarian he was by attacking Sarah Palin, some years back. I don’t listen to this stuffed, yet empty, suit, who does nothing but harm Conservatism, by pretending to be one.
RINOs have the temperament of snakes. You don’t know IF they’ll bite you, but any rational person knows its only a matter of time.
Krauthammer is no match for Mark Levin anymore than a babbling fool like Feinsten is when compared to Ted Cruz. Cruz is so far over her head, she has to look to see down.
Although sex is not immoral nor paper magazines, the exploitation of sex in the form of pornography is immoral and therefore illegal.
Guns are not immoral, but the use of guns in an illegal act such as murder is immoral and therefore illegal.
The argument that Feinstein makes has no merit because she is comparing an immoral act to an AMORAL argument against the nature of guns in general and not the ACT itself that is committed by using a gun.
A gun in the hand of an immoral person is a murderer, but in the hands of a moral person, a protector.
It is the nature of the behavior of the person USING the mechanism that makes her case, not the mechanism itself.
What I find offensive is this constant attack on the Bill of Rights. What would you have him do, Charles? Sit there like a bump on a log? I thought he was brilliant. Gosh, what would Charles have thought of our Founding Fathers?
CHARLES, THIS IS THE BILL OF RIGHTS, NOT THE BILL OF NEEDS. SHE’S NOT A WEAK LITTLE WOMAN WHO NEEDS YOU TO COME TO HER AID. SHE IS ATTACKING THE CONSTITUTION AND OUR FREEDOMS, AND DESERVES TO BE CHALLENGED ON IT. IF SHE CAN’T TAKE THE HEAT, GET OUT OF THE KITCHEN.
Patience the ticket .. nudge the old guard, challenge them, ask questions, demand answers .. thanks Mr. Levin .. can’t wait until 3/16/13 high noon, blank hits the fan .. hope Krauthhammer has his med,s close by, defiantly going to need them.
Hey Feinstein bullets implode?? You are not as smart as you think you are lady.
Aggiemom07 I say send her back to redo 6th grade!
I heard this tonight and was rather stunned at Charles. Ted Cruz was polite and reasonably respectful while Feinstein was a witch… and little dick Durbin chimed in to save her wrinkled behind from Ted’s penetrating questions. Bravo Ted!
And as always, Mark was absolutely correct.
The Sentinel If you’ve listened over time you’ll see that Krauthhammer although on the money sometimes is really a fence straddler when it suits him. As long as he’s doing the criticizing it’s proper but if someone else happens to get in a good shot they’re being disrespectful to the establishment of which he considers himself part.
cabensg The Sentinel He is a former dem. He was a senior advisor to Mondale. He may be bright but in a leftist ‘gaming’ kind of way.
cabensg The Sentinel Agreed.
cabensg The Sentinel I don’t know that he considers himself part of the establishment but, in my opinion, your other points are exactly right.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=coRNJluF2O4 Stop Common core . Obamas education nationalization ,
stang289 lol…or Feinkenstein
stage9 stang289 I call her Debbie ‘Droopy Dog’ Feinstein.
stang289 Very good!
OFF….ensive??? HawkHammer, spitting on her idiotic snout wouldn’t be enough…she’s mentally sick, her IQ is about 70….
I sense a lot of jealousy where Ted Cruz is concerned. Dr. K., you may be smart in your feild, but you lack good judgement.
NJK I’ve been sensing that too….from both sides. I think they know he has a melon sized brain and they have a pea sized brain….they are intimidated by his boldness and intelligence.
Never been a Kraut fan. Frankenfeinstein is – and always was – a left-wing hack. She deals in half-truths and lies. She practices kitman with an Alinsky twist. She’s an old fart who needs to retire, because her head is where it has always been – stuck way up her fatcat a$$.
Yeah, I go up and down with the Krautster. Sometimes, he’s brilliant, and then, other times, I think he’s speaking only to hear himself talk, which is very dangerous no matter what your ideology.
Levin is correct. Kraut is always out there theoretically but never substantively. He plays with words and remember he is a process guy not a principles guy. Like the Bushes, the Rockefellers, the Doles, etc. he does not rest his case on the basis of the Constitution. Listen to what both Cruz and Levin said.
deTocqueville1 Exactly. I created the term “Values Conservative” to include people who seem to be down with the cause, but don’t ever seem to know anything about the foundational structure of classical Liberalism, or modern Conservatism.
Krauthammer is a Values Conservative. He has read the foundational stuff, and decided it’s not modern thinking or something.
Romney is purely a Values Conservative. His values shift over time. He has never articulated a fundamental, Constitutional principle.
Rubio is mostly a Values Conservative. Unfortunately he values “freedom” so much he ignores liberty.
Rand Paul is not a Values Conservative. He’s more Libertarian than classical Liberal, but at least he understands foundational principles, and can articulate them without sounding like he memorized something five minutes before the speech.
Ted Cruz is a 100% Principled Conservative.
(None of these guys are “http://spectator.org/archives/2013/02/05/karl-rove-and-the-cotton-conse” exactly. Although Romney and Rubio are in danger of being Cotton Conservatives because of their lack of solid grounding on principles.)
Charles is a psychologist first and foremost……..I realize Charles is brilliant but at the same time I acknowledge his blind spot.
Both Kraut and Mark missed something very key in Floundersteins response, she said “I have spent X years here on Capital Hill.” Diane, that has absolutely dick to do with knowing the Constitution.
WBCSaint Oh, my Lord…. I am praying for term limits!
1972patriot WBCSaint From your lips to God’s ears, I pray that happens too!
WBCSaint I wondered why so few commentators picked up on that. It’s pretty much a sign of general cluelessness when someone has to refer to their years spent in Congress, instead of referring to time spent doing something like litigating before the Supreme Court, running a business, being in a profession, working at a factory, etc.
I was impressed with Ted Cruz and glad he set Feinstein straight.
Like Levin’s take and agree with him.
im not sure what kraughthammer heard … but im with Mark… i dont think he over reached … just because the libtard didnt answer the question and jump on the defensive….. which they are really good at…
Speech that is regulated: fighting words, defamatory or libelous words, misleading commercial speech, obscenity, speech that infringes on the right to a fair trial, hate speech, treasonous speech, words that tend to incite riots, words that cause public disturbances, loud speech (noise enhancement ordinances), words of a criminal conspiracy, tampering with witnesses speech. Shall I go on? You guys should probably study the law a bit more.
Maybe you should study law a little. The speech you say is regulated is
not speech being regulated, rather it is consequences for harm you have
caused to others. Libel, treason, infringement, inciting a riot, and
false advertisement are the actual crime, not necessarily the speech. No
one is telling you that you may not speak, but that you may not say
things that bring harm, or infringe on the rights of others. In relation
to the 2nd amendment, I should be able to own any weapon I wish as long
as I cause no harm to others or infringe any another persons rights.
It’s tough to see you struggle so much with the understanding of what “rights’ are. Every right is bounded by the fact that others have that same right. Thus, the point where you have overstepped your own rights begins when you step on the rights of others. This is basic logic, and also–surprisingly to the left–a decent guide for human behavior.
So laws have been written that make people aware of those boundaries, and defend the rights of people who have experienced an infringement on their liberties. That is not carte blache to regulate any aspect of the peoples’ rights.
This is foundational to the law, and if you had any understanding of law at all, you would know this. So I think we’ll prefer to ignore you, and continue to follow the logic and reason of people with some actual credibility.
Mark nails it again!
I love Charles 99% of the time, he is way off here. Mark Levin is one in a handful of people telling the truth. Thank God for Radio
PhilipFloydFaustmanV I hope he repeats what he said on Sean Hannity’s show too.
Krauthammer is a DC insider and thrives on the conservative side of the political system. Unfortunately, he is so inside, he defends the etiquette, the pomp and protocol of the DC political machine on both sides. Levine is a bulldog of Conservative policy and doesn’t care who he offends because the Constitution is the thing…the only thing, and nothing but the thing to defend to the last. This country needs more Cruzes, Palins, Levines, Hannitys, Ryans and Rands who speak of what they believe as long as they can read it in the Constitution. Charles and other “polite” politicos need to rear-up more in defense of individual liberty.
Mark, good job of calling out Andrea Tantoros, she has become a special pleader for Christy Cream to speak at CPAC, Andrea nobody cares, Christy is not a Conservative!
Feinstein’s response was remarkably weak, and pathetic. Chuck is an old speechwriter for Walter Mondale, I never understood the fascination our side has with his “genius.”
rocco11 Exactly. When I read that about Krauthhammer, I never trusted him since.
is a stuffed shirt Neo-Con who all too often comments as if he were
nobility and thus superior to the U.S. Constitution.
I would suggest
that he get new reading glasses so that he can clearly see in the 1st
Amendment the words – “Congress shall make no law” and in the 2nd
Amendment – “shall not be infringed.”
Krauthammer needs to realize this is war and he and they need to keep their “manners” comments to himself at this point..He is diluting the whole issue with the critique of BS…He is opening the door for the naysayers …he needs to know its US or THEM!
More important, what Cruz is doing is trying to prevent yet another massive grab for power by the Federal Government. Don’t think it can happen? Well, just look at Obamacare and the government’s takeover of the health care system to see the liberal’s appetite to dictate what power the government can and cannot have. To a liberal like Feinstein, there are NO limits to what the government can do. She openly said that she is not interested in the Constitutionality of a law, that it’s up to the Supreme Court to determine that. All she’s interested is making laws, no matter how overreaching they are. That spells disaster since the Supreme Court now says that it doesn’t want to do Congress’ job in determining if its laws are unconstitutional. The Supreme Court had an opportunity to overturn Obamacare and it did not, stating that it was up to Congress to do that. So if the Supreme Court now says that it’s up to Congress to police itself, all miscreants like Feinstein have to do is pass the law and, in most cases (thanks to the current Supreme Court) it will remain law. So if she gets her law passed, it will only be a matter of time before ALL guns are banned. Count on it.
I thought Feinstein was the offensive person in the room. She could care less about Bills being unconstitutional. She could care less about her oath to uphold the Constitution of the United States.
Feinstein later said Cruz made her feel patronized. Translation: She lost the debate.
Good morning all
I love when these politicians brag about parking their sorry rear ends in Washington for 30+ years, I always want to ask: “What was the national debt when you came on the scene, and what is it now? And you’re proud of your longevity why, exactly?”
Levine is right on target! Feinstein is like all the life long greedy politicians that are drunk on their own power. She is ignorant, illogical, and arrogant. Those are definitely 3 traits a law maker should not have! Law is all about logic, not feelings. Laws written out of emotion will not bring about the safety of anyone, which is what law is intended to to do. Law is a safety net to citizen’s rights. Laws that are written to tie the hands of law abiding citizens and move a detrimental agenda, go completely against that intent. I would have answered Feinstein’s arrogance with a note that bragging about sitting in public office for 30 years and writing unconstitutional drivel proves that she is incompetent and has been violating her constituents’ trust on their tax paying dimes!
notebene MOLON LABE!
Feinstein thinks that because she has been there forever she is above reproach and heaven forbid a young gun would tell her like it is. I laughed when I heard her – she is a joke. I’m surprised she didn’t stomp her feet and cry or scream!!
celestiallady Cruz makes them look like what they really are. He exposes them. The more he’s criticized, the more we know how afraid they are of him.
celestiallady Term limints
Great that The Great One has taken Krautie on his horns, yet again.
It’s becoming obvious that the Washington punditry as well as the dems and RINOs are now starting to peddle the same mem in regard to Sen Cruz: he’s too brash, too young, too inexperienced, doesn’t know his way around Washington, should shut up and learn from his older and betters …
Great that The Great One shows elegantly why they’re wrong.
As far as I’m concerned, I think Cruz makes his points clearly and politely, but will not let those he questions get away with obfuscation and politico-waffle. He knows the Constitution, he knows the law, and I love the way he slips the stiletto quickly into his adversaries without them even noticing, be it when he said to one Senator he’s grateful the Sen recognises that Texas has books, or be it when he schools Sen Durbin about Heller. When Sen Cruz is on, there will be blood on the floor.
That’s why they are deeply scared of him and are trying to cut him down.
Krauthammer was wrong in principle because pornography was not the excuse given by Feinstein, Durban and Schumer. It was Child Pornography. Child Pornography is illegal because it is photographic evidence of Child Abuse. That is a totally different realm than infringing on free speech.
The other example given in committee was the fabled “You can’t holler fire in a crowded theater” meme, which is also false. You can yell fire, but you will be held responsible for any damage or injuries you cause if it is a false alarm. Much as you can be fined for filing a false police report, or calling 911 to make false emergency requests. It has all to do with making a false claim, that results in injury, not in limiting speech.
garryb Good points.
garryb Well said!
I don’t remember all of the details exactly but what I do remember is Milk and Moscone were notorious bullies. Not much has changed in that regard in SF politics to this day.
She’s got the mindset and mentality of …YES … a sixth grader …it is what it is …
Don’t be so hard on CK. He is undeniably and fully wrong here and deserved to be told. Mark Levin got the job done. But don’t kick him while he is down. He is a valuable asset for the conservative cause. Everyone makes mistakes. Let’s not cannibalize our ranks for being human. We did that to Perry, Newt, Paul, Santorum, Huntsman, Bachmann, Akin, Murdock. It wasn’t helpful. They made mistakes. Make some allowance when delivering criticism.
Focus on the real enemy, here: Feinstein and Durbin. CK will come around, I assure you.
Mike55_Mahoney Mike, I beg to differ with your opinion of Dr. Krauthammer. For him to obfuscate Cruz’s point of “is it constitutional?…” down to “…he overshot…” is both petty and absurd. I do not think Krauthammer made a mistake. You don’t see liberals criticizing each other, so why do the moderates in congress and the media need to criticize their own?? When ‘tone’ of a debate trumps the ‘constitutionality’, then we’re in trouble. The only person to overshoot, imo, was Krauthammer.
Mike55_Mahoney CK is just a pundit like the rest, as a conservative ,I reserve the right to disagree with him at the drop of a hat ! Sometimes he sounds like a patriot, other times he’s in line with Dimms. He’s the John McCain of pundits!
I don’t think I have ever been in love with a politician more than Ted Cruz, it’s bordering on Palinista Fever!
Conservative_Hippie Its great when he gets under the liberals’ skin, no??
LibLoather Conservative_Hippie Yes!
Conservative_Hippie I’ll join you in that high praise of a man who looks and sounds like the real deal.
The Sentinel Conservative_Hippie
The Sentinel Conservative_Hippie IS the REAL DEAL!
Conservative_Hippie in the old days it was only a few of us .. train to sanity picking up riders all day everyday, Palin supported Ted, he is fist to thank her publicly, true servants for the people. New wave of GOPers.. we can do this ..
misterlogic0013 Conservative_Hippie Agreed!
Diane Finkstien Cares only that her hag-face is in front of a camera! She has never had an agenda to promote freedom,Ever!
Obama sent a crone, I mean drone to those hearings. Texas sent a Cruz missile.
Cruz was courteous and respectful…and right.
While Mark Levin is an intellectual, he’s also a true conservative political pundit and a constitutional scholar and that’s the difference between him and people like Charles Krauthammer and George Will. The latter lives in a world where they ALONE represent the modern conservatism. In reality, they believe tower above the likes of Mark Levin and Rush Limbaugh.
Thus, it’s no-surprise that they overlook and disregard constitutional conservatives such as Sen. Cruz and Mark Levin – aka RINOS. In fact, it wouldn’t surprise if they voted for Obama twice in-spite of their rhetoric.
Charles Krauthammer of The Washington Post and Weekly Standard’s Bill Kristol to name a few, broke bread with President-elect Obama at George Will’s $1.9 million home. (see article below):
Obama breaks bread with conservatives
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/jan/14/obama-breaks-bread-conservatives/“The lefties are mystified. So are a few of the righties.
President-elect Barack Obama enjoyed an intimate dinner at precisely 6:34 p.m. Tuesday with several scions of conservative journalism at stately Will Manor — the swank, $1.9 million home of conservative columnist George Will…” “…The guests were few; the snub list was lengthy.
Why, no one from this particular paper was there. No girls were allowed. Cable news and talk-radio luminaries were missing — though Rush Limbaugh was across town at a White House soiree. Meanwhile, the Wall Street Journal went unrepresented at this gentlemen’s repast — which may or may not have included typical red-meat Republican fare and a somber merlot…”
Conservator1 Excellent points. So now the opportunity presents itself for a dual list of “moss-covered gargoyles” of the Congress and of the media. Krauthammer, Kristol, and Will to top the latter.
LibLoather Conservator1 and there are far more of these “moss-covered gargoyles” within the GOP.
LibLoather Conservator1 Another member of the human centipede! That’s how you talk sh-t, you’re full of it!
factsobill LibLoather Conservator1 Your ideology is as foul as your vocabulary.
factsobill Conservator1 – I find it amazing that you would go back to a comment I posted on March 15, 2013 – today is May 2nd pal. But what do I care about a leftist fool that is forced to resort to sophomoric offensive language because he/her is to ignorant to post a political rebuttal.
The left twists this “abridging the freedom of speech”, into porn, imagine that.
Love. On my phone I get to hear Krauthammer clip, but Levin won’t play. If no one hears it, it fell in the woods.
You know you are on the right path when John McCain calls you a Whacko Bird. He would never speak that way about a Liberal!
The libs have yet to admit the main purpose of the Second Amendment is to protect the states and the people from the FEDS (not that it will be easy with all the power we have given them with well meaning laws). Admitting that we might need protection from tyranny from our national government would destroy their beautiful utopian world. Got to go, Gun show today, and we have a table for our Tea Party literature that I am manning. Keep up the fight er struggle er Jaha.. na not going there…
WHEN ARE THESE STUPID LIBS GOING TO ADMIT SANDY HOOK WAS A PISTOL MURDER NOT A ASSAULT RIFLE ATTACK?? BIDEN SAID WEPONS OF WAR THIS WEEK AS DID FEINSTEIN..LIARS TO THE CORE!
I just read a comment that liberals are the enemy and need to be defeated. What kind of comment is this? We are all Americans and have different views. All of the Bill of Rights have limitations, right? All speech is not legal. Slanderous or defamatory speech…treasonous speech…speech that tends to cause riots….speech in a criminal conspiracy…misleading commercial speech….obscenity….four letter words on broadcasts…hate speech…etc. The Fourth Amendment has been decimated by mostly Republican judges. All guns should not be legal, but most liberals have no interest in disarming America.
Getaclueconservatives which bit of the law would you have your Fearless Leader Enforce? You’d better be lobbying or he’ll pass you by too! There is no law made that he cannot ignore for political reasons! Now go telll you8r sad story to someone who gives a rat’s butt what you opine! Now, STFU Troll!
My point is the cherished 1st, 4th, 5th and 6th Amendments all have been either legislated or limited by Congress and the Supreme Court. So can the 2nd. Guns mean nothing if the cops can bust down your door for next to no cause and then hold you without a trial. These are going on in this country but you guys aren’t standing up about losing those cherished rights.
Getaclueconservatives You have no idea what you’re even claiming here.
Do you guys want to shoot me for saying that? By the way, most of America today looks at Senator Cruz as a laughingstock. The next Sarah Palin for God’s sake.
We care if you laugh. You can laugh all the way into the dustbin of history. We would laugh at you folks, but you’re so sad that it just doesn’t seem fair.
As for the purported freedom lovers here, look at Justice Thomas’ and Alito’s views on the Fourth Amendment. Two extremely conservative men who seemingly want to make America a police state.
@Conservator1 Bite yourself ! I’d bet you’ll die from your own juice!So get back on your Hot Wheels and pedal back to HuffPoop!
@poljunke You just have such a buildup of good will, that the Internet just assumed you should have one.
Join other followers