New York Times prints OFFENSIVE image of Pope, IGNORES policy cited when refusing to print Muhammed cartoons

If you look up”hypocrisy” in the dictionary, you might find this example of a ridiculous double standard by the New York Times. In January the venerable and crotchety old gray lady declined to publish the cartoons of Muhammed after the Charlie Hebdo massacre and cited their policy to not offend religious sensibilities:

“Under Times standards, we do not normally publish images or other material deliberately intended to offend religious sensibilities. After careful consideration, Times editors decided that describing the cartoons in question would give readers sufficient information to understand today’s story.”

Right. Sure. And yet just a few short months later, they’re publishing a picture that is offensive to Catholic sensibilities:

Here’s the pic (sorry for the offense, Catholics):

pope benedict condom pic

 

Ahhh the artist says it’s not “hate-filled” and the New York Times takes her word for it. No such tolerance for Pamela Geller on the other hand – I wonder why that is? Actually no I don’t.


Comment Policy: Please read our comment policy before making a comment. In short, please be respectful of others and do not engage in personal attacks. Otherwise we will revoke your comment privileges.