In the New York Times’ write-up on slimeball Avenatti’s new client, they add an interesting and revealing paragraph on Julie Swetnick’s gang-rape accusations against Kavanaugh:
None of Ms. Swetnick’s claims could be independently corroborated by The New York Times, and her lawyer, Michael Avenatti, declined to make her available for an interview.
The Times is used to going the extra-mile to try and corroborate claims like these. For instance, they interviewed ‘dozens’ of people from Yale trying to corroborate Ramirez’s claims, yet were unable to do so. So if they say they couldn’t independently corroborate her story, I would assume it’s not for a lack of trying.
And remember, there would have been other girls and other guys participating in these gang rape parties. It should be easy to corroborate a story like this, yet nothing.
It’s also interesting that Avenatti won’t make his client available for interviews or questioning. Could it be because her story is crap and she’s liable to say something that would make that evident to those questioning her?
To make such horrendous allegations like these, you think she’d at least be willing to testify about such atrocities.
But I guess we’ll just have to take the word of her slimeball attorney and the affidavit she released…NOPE!