Obama Admin leaking CIA documents to give Obama cover in foreign policy debate on Benghazi

This White House is unbelievable. According to Fox News reporter Catherine Herridge, she’s been informed by House Intelligence Committee Chair Mike Rodgers that there is “a concerted campaign by people within the administration with specific leaks to the media to try and bolster the statements of people like Ambassador Susan Rice.” Herridge goes on to say that it’s a very one-sided leaking, that they aren’t going to leak documents that undercut this idea that it was a protest.

In other words the Obama administration is leaking documents to give Obama cover in the foreign policy debate on Monday. It’s that simple. They know Romney is going to attack the president for misinforming Americans about what went on and they want to make it appear that Susan Rice’s story was legitimate so the president can be ‘offended’ again like he was at the last debate at the suggestion he misled the American people.

Even now, the Washington Post has already released an article entitled “CIA documents supported Susan Rice’s description of Benghazi attacks” and it begins by saying that Romney “misfired” in suggesting that Rice’s “Sunday Show” version of events wasn’t backed up by CIA intelligence.

Watch Herridge’s report below:

Comment Policy: Please read our new comment policy before making a comment. In short, please be respectful of others and do not engage in personal attacks. Otherwise we will revoke your comment privileges.
  • TJinNJ

    TREASON…Step up Petraeus or you’ll be Betrayus for real…Not sure why you’re CIA to begin with and hoping you’re not one of them…

    • BlueGood

      HOLY SHIT…it not only emboldens further attacks….what is much more worrisome it this emboldens the LIARS in the White House!…

      And what’s this crap about U.N. Election MONITORS coming to AMERICA to VETT YOUR ELECTION????



      • tvlgds

        There was talk of this in 2004, as well. To my knowledge, it never happened.

      • tshtsh

        Let’s add to the left’s outrage. The UN can only vet those that “brung them to the dance” it will capture the imagination to see all those blue- fingered dems live up to the one person one vote rule like the rest of us.

      • orthodoxyordeath

        Blame Bush for that one actually. It started back in 2002 which means he must have agreed to it.

        • Hoos1

          If you are talking about ‘Fast and Furious’, it was not started under the Bush administration. Under Bush there was a program called ‘Gun Runner’, which was a standard police method for tracking guns not a wholesale gun giveaway without tracking as was done with Fast and Furious.

  • Sandra123456

    Obama and Holder get away with what they do because they are black.

    After Romney wins impeach Obama anyway.

    • Sober_Thinking

      Sadly, that statement may hold water… After a Romney win, arrest and jail the traitors for life.

      • Orangeone

        Arrests, trials, executions for treason.

      • librtifirst

        I think that Romney likes Obama too much for that. Most people here know what I am talking about.

        • Sober_Thinking

          Ouch! 🙂

        • old_crank

          Please elucidate.

          • Michelle is referring to the multiple times that Romney has said things like “I like Obama personally”, or “Obama is a good person”.

            • old_crank

              Thank you good sir.

    • kong1967

      Correction. They get away with everything because they are black liberals.

      • marketcomp

        No words truer spoken, my friend!

        • pajamakat

          Exactly true and so sad for the country. Their complexions are their protection. And guess what, if this sounds racists, that’s just too bad. Truth hurts doesn’t it libs

      • colliemum

        It really annoys me when Bathhouse Barry is described as ‘liberal’, because it seems to put him on the same level as the great, true Liberal British PMs, like Gladstone, Palmerston, Asquith, Lloyd George.

        Bathhouse Barry is a puny commie, as are his friends like Holder, and he even fails when compared to proper commies of recent memory.

        • kong1967

          There are some great liberals?

          • colliemum

            Not ‘are’ – were.
            That was before the left ideologues highjacked that expression to make themselves sound nice and soft to those who wouldn’t even look at them if they called themselves what they really are: socialists always, and commies at worst.
            But ‘liberal’, and ‘progressive’ for that matter, sound unthreatening.
            Presidents Wilson and FDR knew full well what they were doing when they used those labels to describe their policies. At their times, communism just started, wading in blood, and Stalin, at FRDs time, was into his killing spree.
            And even then, the good old NYT preferred to publish lies while people died. You’ve heard of Walter Duranty …

            • kong1967

              “You’ve heard of Walter Duranty…” — colliemum

              Until now….no. But I glanced a bit at his biography. It appears that the NYT said he had “some of the worst reporting to appear in this newspaper”.

              • colliemum

                He sent reports from Stalin’s Russia in the early 1930s, praising communism and praising Stalin, and lying to his back teeth about the starvation in the Ukraine, where peasants were taken off their lands in their millions, and sent to Siberia to die – those, that is, who hadn’t died of starvation before.
                That was the famous drive to turn the land into kolchozes (sp), remove all private ownership of land, farm animals, farm machinery, and kill all peasants deemed to be ‘rich’.
                Walter Dunranty ‘saw’ none of that. Must have taken a tremendous effort on his part.
                I haven’t words to describe what I think of that scumbag, even after all these decades.
                Good old liberal socialist NYT!

                • kong1967

                  We have journalists now that basically do the same thing. Nothing close to that level, but they ignore facts and events in order to project their own propaganda.

                • colliemum


                  The old, corrupt media are full of generations of liars, bred in liberal socialist colleges and universities, happy to please their commie superiors and friends, while giving the finger to truth, honesty, and their country.

                • kong1967

                  So true.

                • librtifirst

                  I think that millions are dying due to our media. It is just a different process of killing.


                • kong1967

                  Ok, I fail to see the connection to the media.

                • Ignorance kills, and the media is the medium in which ignorance is perpetuated. (along with our schools)

                  Recently, the media went on a national campaign to tell people that organic food is no better than the rest. They reported on a government study that was total hogwash, and they did it from the national level on down to the local level, and with no investigative reporting whatsoever.

                  They did the same with vitamin D3, saying that it had no health benefits in helping the immune system.

                  They do the same with vaccines, fluoride in the water, GMOs, establishment medical advice, etc. The result is a massive increases in chronic disease that kills millions each year around the world, and destroys the lives of many more.

                  The media does the same with the foreign wars, and situations on the ground. They are literally controlled by government as to what they can report. They are fear mongers who drive up the fear level in the populous to help gain support for foreign wars, such as Libya which resulted in the wholesale deaths of 40k blacks by Al Qaeda after Gaddafi fell. Then, no word about it in the western media.

                  They regurgitate the crap that leads to the wholesale deaths of millions of babies, and do nothing to show the other side of the issue.

                  They are the betrayers of our republic. They are the scourge of our constitution. They are corporate sellouts. They ignore the core issues that are leading to the collapse of our society, where many people will die due to starvation and riots. They are the purveyors of lies and disinformation that guides the public into the proverbial gas chambers.

                  Ok. I’m done.

                • kong1967

                  No matter how you spin it or what the media reports, they do not make policy, manage wars, or control vaccines.

                  If the media is controlled by the governent on what they can report, why is Fox able to report so many anti-Obama stories? The media reports whatever it wants to report, and most of the MSM is staffed by liberals so they have a liberal bias. No one is forcing them to put government propaganda on the air. Go to Venezuela where Chavez shut down any media outlet that didn’t support his agendas or make him look good. That is government control over the media.

                • The only government control that I was referring to was overseas, and in war zones. I am not saying that the corporations that run the media (a handful) have to take orders, but they do receive government money through corporate bailouts of companies like GE and its media subsidiaries such as MSNBC. When money is accepted, it carries influence with it.

                  I was linking the flow of information from supposed “trusted” news organizations to having a deadly effect on society. When you see ABC, NBC, Fox, MSNBC, CNN, and others reporting the same things in the same ways at the same time, it become all too obvious that there is a consorted effort to push the same flow of information, and the information often originates from a government study or press release.

                  Take this video for instance. Notice that all the networks used the same terminology, on the same day, about the same subject.

                  If we had a free press, there would have been differing coverage of, possibly, the same issues or subject matter. This happens across the board on many different subjects and issues. The MSM follows the same agenda, and it comes from corporate headquarters, not investigative reporters who’s stories are vetted by independent editors.

                • kong1967

                  I can’t remember what they call it, but you know they all have to share their stories with each other, right (in the MSM)? It’s like putting it all in a big box and each station chooses which of those stories they are going to pull out and report on. Some MSM channels ignore stories altogether, but they have the same stories Fox does…even when Fox is the only one that puts it on air. The commentary is not controlled. The fact that several reporters all said “top tier” is your proof that they have a concerted effort to manipulate the public, including Fox?

                  The left does, that’s for sure. They even had a website for liberal reporters to go to so they could all get in sync with each other to further their agenda. The site shut down because of the ensuing controversy over ethics in journalism. They still do it.

                  Fox is the one channel that goes against the grain. They show the news from a different angle…..one that doesn’t put a very good light on government. If your accusation is true, Fox would have to be included in the “control” of the media. The reason the other channels are in sync is because they are all liberal and in order to manipulate the public they have to be in sync with each other. However, government does not control them, either. They willingly allow the Democrat party to control them.

                • In those clips, fox didn’t just use the words “top tier” the same as the rest, but they used the same three names in their top tier list. The problem that is presented is exacerbated by the fact that Ron Paul was left out of the “top tier”, when he was doing better than some of those listed, and all three networks were quoting each other verbatim. I agree that the use of the term “top tier” in and of itself, is not enough to conclude what I have.

                  I think that Fox News is the conservative answer to the liberal media, but it is by design that it exists for that purpose. There has to be an outlet for conservatives to maintain their partisan divisions, and Fox News fills the void. They have done well to put people like Beck and Nepalitano on, but you know what happens when they go too far. There are limits to their ability to expose the corruption. I watched the progression of their careers at Fox, and as they got close to hitting the nail on the head, they got shut down, and kicked out. Nepalitano is still there, but in a limited capacity.

                  I see the establishment in D.C. as being non partisan. Both controlling party power brokers move the same agendas. The party members generally fall in line. If there isn’t really any substantial difference in the two parties, and both parties pass the bailouts that go to corporations and their subsidiaries that run the media, then why wouldn’t I consider that there is a consorted effort to carry the same dialogue from day to day? Fox News is not exempt from these connections.

                  The left wing media shows its true colors more so when a republican is in office. They report more corruption. The right wing media reports more corruption when a democrat is in office, but all networks ignore the same things, and report on the same things, and there is very little difference in the reporting, except for the twist that is put on it. (left/right)

                  That’s how I see it Kong. I’ve been studying it for a while now, and I just keep getting confirmation that it is true. That doesn’t mean that I don’t appreciate the Fox difference, I just keep in mind that they are really serving the same failed system, just on the other side of the political spectrum from the rest of them.

                • kong1967

                  Lol, you’re just pissed because Ron Paul lost and you feel he got cheated. He only did well in the straw polls, and that was because he paid for more tickets to get his followers to attend. Straw polls are a joke, and that’s putting it lightly. Everyone that would vote for Ron Paul was already in his camp, while the rest of the votes were split among multiple candidates. Ron Paul had zero chance of picking up any of those votes. Those other votes consolidated to the other candidates as some of them dropped out. Ron Paul didn’t get any of them.

                  Those three candidates were mentioned across multiple networks because they were in the running, in the “top tier”. Ron Paul was not. You’re going to claim he was, but that’s bullsh**. .

                  Not everything is a conspiracy, including Ron Paul not getting the nomination.

                • I never expected RP to get the nomination. I have said that since day one. Those three networks were reporting on the results of a straw poll, which was the first one to take place in the primary. What counts in Iowa is the caucus results, which the media refused to mention at this time. They were reporting the top tier people based solely on that one vote. There was no other voting to consider in the equation. Paul took second, and all three networks only reported 1st, 3rd, and 4th. “All three networks”.

                  They could have left Santorum out, and it would still be a valid point. For the sake of this conversation, I wish it had been Santorum.

                  This is what the three networks were reporting on:

                  The only reason that I used this example is because John Stewart put the clips together and showed it. If I had a non-RP example, I would rather have used it, because I often get the same reaction as you have given me.

                  Since you mentioned the straw poll being pointless, what about the caucus?

                  On the spot caucus results:

                  Official reporting:

                • moonchowsan

                  It is called Holodomor.

                  WARNING: Watch the links only if you can handle images of forced starvation genocide. YOU HAVE BEEN WARNED.

                  Holodomor – Parts 1 to 4:



                  Holodomor (Radio Quebec, 1983):

                  Holodomor, Ukraine, XX century (Parts 1 to 12):
                  To watch Part-1, you need to sign in to your YouTube account because it was flagged, but you can start Part-2 from here and use the video list on the right side to watch the whole series (from 2 to 12):

                  Holodomor Ukraine 1933 (the real holocaust) (54 mins, 46 secs):
                  You need to sign in to watch this video.

                • colliemum

                  Thanks for the links, moonchowsan.
                  People should watch these, because the commies still do not accept the blame for the millions and millions of people their ideology killed. That ideology was Marxism, was class warfare.

                  I’m not of the youtube generation, and got my information from books.
                  I think the one book anybody ought to read is “The GULAG archipelago”by Aleksandr Soltshenitzyn. There are many others, also some stunning autobiographies, but this one book shows the horror from the beginning.

                • moonchowsan

                  “The GULAG archipelago” is a classic. It seems like we came into beings several decades before the birth of personal puters.

                  His dedication:

                  “I dedicate this
                  to all those who did not live
                  to tell it.
                  And may they please forgive me
                  for not having seen it all
                  nor remembered it all,
                  for not having divined all of it.”

                  The GULAG Archipelago, Volumes 1 – 3:

                  The Black Book of Communism (Stéphane Courtois, Jean-Louis Panné, et al, 1999) is a catalog of the kills by the communists. By 1999, 85 to 100 millions were murdered already. Add several more millions to get the up-to-date numbers to 2012 and beyond:

                  “The Sword And The Shield: The Mitrokhin Archive And The Secret History Of The KGB” and “The World Was Going Our Way: The KGB and the Battle for The Third World” (Christopher Andrew and Vasili Mitrokhin) showed the sneaky and deathly ways that the communists have been using to build a one world government.

                  The following two books stand out in the Department of Deception:
                  New Lies For Old – The Communist Strategy Of Deception And Disinformation (Anatoliy Golitsyn) 1.5 MB:
                  The Perestroika Deception (Anatoliy Golitsyn) 1.5 MB:

                  The new kid on the block from the same department is: Agenda 21
                  Since the mass murders are too obvious (duh!) and the early deception techniques have been noticed by people who have been following their moves closely, they changed their code words and are using (over twenty years old) neologisms such as sustainability, sustainable environment and world, etc. I have posted links regarding Agenda 21 elsewhere in therightscoop. (if you are interested, I will repost them, let me know) Agenda 21 in communism on steroids in sheep clothing. The general understanding is that Agenda 21 is the most ambitious, lethal, and successful stealth communism infiltration ever perpetrated. I have been following this for the past two decades, and it is getting worse day by day. Some local communities have been implementing the Agenda for the past several years, and the pace is getting astonishingly fast lately. Once Agenda 21 is fully executed (yes, executed), there is no turning back (totally unlike the rise and fall of O. The suffering under O and his minions will feel like playing in a squeaky clean sand-box). Everybody WILL lose their Life, Liberty, and Pursuit of Happiness. There is no other way around on this one.

                • Excellent post. Glad to see others who are on to it.

      • aposematic

        More like black Marxists/Islamists…but I get your point.

        • kong1967

          Yes, you are correct. All part of the Democrat party.

    • Bettye Jo Martin

      Can he be impeached after he leaves office? I do not know, maybe someone can answer this.

      • librtifirst

        From what I understand, impeachment is to remove an individual from power, and criminal charges would have to be brought separately. The establishment doesn’t charge their own unless they need a fall guy.

  • Where are the dead lybians? How many did the rescue team kill? how many did the guards kill?

    Did our soldiers have a do not shoot order?

    • kong1967

      Kinda hard to kill anyone with rubber bullets.

    • Orangeone

      Maybe it’s just me being me, but I find it interesting with these bloody and unruly attacks that the bodies of the 4 Americans were air lifted out. How the heck did that happen?

      • aposematic

        Verrrryyy Interrrrressssting????

        • Orangeone

          Perhaps everything was already in place for the October surprise – rescue of a kidnapped Ambassador but the mooslims didn’t follow the plan?
          Also very interesting that one American survived and not a peep from him….Inquiring minds want to know.

      • keats5

        Yeah. That’s a real good question.

    • Bettye Jo Martin

      What rescue team? I am not aware any was sent in. Anyway, I read that between 7 and 10 Libyans were killed. I do not know which side they were on, probably some of each. But, you are right, Libyans were killed and we have heard nothing about that from the WH. Guess they are afraid of offending the Muslims. I can’t help but wonder if Obama’s spiking the ball about OBL’s death and Gadhafi Death contributed to the attack on our embassy. I think I read somewhere that the terriorists were Gadhafi supporters.

      Judge Jeanine had a GREAT show on FOX last night. They may repeat it Sunday night. She sure called it like it is.

      • librtifirst

        The attackers were carrying the Al Qaeda flag. Why is everyone missing this?

  • Medaton

    We have been betrayed all the way around. I no longer know who to trust.

    • Sober_Thinking

      Seriously. Obama has sold America’s soul to be pResident.

      • StrangernFiction

        America sold its soul and President Obama is the result.

        • Sober_Thinking

          Wow… I like your twist much better. Well-said.

      • Landscaper

        The way you spell pResident is killer Sober….. I mean the guy is sure as h*ll no President, but is indeed a Resident in The White House.

        • Sober_Thinking

          Thanks. I saw another bright poster write it that way and thought it was brilliant… so I borrowed it in an attempt to seem brilliant myself. 😉

          Feel free to borrow it and pass it on. 🙂

  • 911Infidel

    Leaks…That would be Thomas Donilan…He is the traitor. The guy is a political hack from the word “go”. When this administration goes into the shitecan of history, Donilon should be brought up on charges of leaking classified information and be introduced to the DOD equivalent of “Bubba”.

  • Sober_Thinking

    Seriously… why is he still allowed to sit in that office? Has there EVER been a Presidential campaign riddled with more scandal, cover-ups and treasonous, lawless acts? I hope and pray that those who are involved get burned bad. Furthermore, I hope this all gets exposed so Obama’s adoring fans can see what this devil looks like with the mask off.

    These criminals can’t win a fair fight can they? Once again, I’m steaming mad… I’m so unbelievably sick and tired of all of this. I pray God intervenes and exposes this evil.

  • wales777

    What the HELL is wrong with Petraeus!? Seriously….What the HELL is the wrong with our military Generals?

    Is there no one with real courage anymore?! My GOD!!

    • StrangernFiction

      Betrayus sounds about right to me.

      • Orangeone

        Best post of the day!

    • tshtsh

      Military leaders in Washington DC are politicians first that’s how they get there, unfortunately.

      • librtifirst

        I’m glad that I read your post before I hit the “reply” button.

  • MaxineCA

    The media manipulation has gotten is over the top ridiculous, actually it’s been spinning for O from the time he first ran for office.

    Of course, the “people” outside were loud and screaming before they invaded and murdered. That doesn’t mean they were protesting a video. WTH……. do people actually think these terrorist were silent as they attacked?

    For those that missed Judge Pirro’s monologue…… she out and out called the spin lies. If you missed the show, it replays again in less than a hour on Fox. Set your DVR’s if it’s too late. Later in the show she had on 3 retired intel folks who spelled out how this works, proving the lies that they didn’t know.

  • detectivedick

    There were others on FOX tonight about what really happened as far as the lack of action within the LIARs Administration. The October Surprise should for real men and women to stand up and expose the LIAR. Petraeus and Paneta are not men of honor they are part of the problem, SHAME on you two gutless butt kissing TRADERS for serving for and hiding under the desk for a pension. Petraeus you are a SHAME to West Point and Paneta you are vile!

    • Landscaper

      Treason; traitors. just helping. Either way, it’s a crime punishable of prison time.

  • Stephanie T

    This administration makes Slick Willie look like an amateur. My sense is that their hope is to ambush Mr. Romney at the final debate, knowing that the President can rebut any statements made by Mr.Romney with lies because it doesn’t matter if they speak the truth. The media, and possibly the moderator, will carry their water, no matter how dirty it is. Listening to Ms. Herridge’s statements after reading the post about the UN election day monitors is truly horrifying. This is a must-win election for this machine of corruption.

    • Orangeone

      Schieffer will carry O’s water for sure. He’ll give a preview on the Sunday show this morning.

    • aposematic

      Very well said Stephanie T!

    • librtifirst

      The machine is in place, no matter who wins.

  • kong1967

    Obama is leaking information? What a shock!! It’s appalling that we have a President that will leak anything in order to help his campaign for re-election, even if it gets people killed.

    Time to plug the leak. Mr. Obama, you can leak all you want in the street sewers in Kenya starting January 20th.

    • tshtsh

      Maybe the outgoing “pResident” (sober…) and guests shouldn’t be at the inaugural ceremonies to avoid an allahu akbar moment.

      • kong1967

        Lol, I love how you typed pResident.

        • tshtsh

          Yes, quoting one of our many brilliant right scooper’s–Soper-Thinking

    • librtifirst

      “street sewers in Kenya” ……………good one.

  • Joe

    John Boehner MUST wake up ASAP!

    This coverup is beyond treason and must be exposed

    Drop everything and have hearing after hearing until someone breaks

    Why are these things getting away with everything?

    It shows they are all in the same bed

    • detectivedick

      Boehner, who is that?

      • librtifirst

        He is the guy that I thought Obama might replace Biden with. Didn’t happen though.

    • marketcomp

      Probably somewhere having a glass of merlot and a cigarette! Man I wish we could get rid of that drunk!

    • BOPOS

      Let’s cross our fingers and hope they are holding onto an October surprise for BO and it’s ready to hit the fan

      • An interesting thought, but I do wonder when there was an October surprised that actually helped the republican candidate…

      • Orangeone

        Gloria Allred has the October surprise to launch on Romney and we know how vile that b!tch is. Maybe now we know where the truck of missing new $100 bills went, payoff to the whores she will march out.

        • kong1967

          Any hint of what the surprise might be?

          • Orangeone

            If she holds to her slimy pattern, she’ll drag wh0res out to slander Romney.

            • kong1967

              That is her tactic, but I think it will backfire. No one will believe it. His character does not support the possibility.

    • tvlgds

      Boehner has GOT to go! He’s a spineless wimp and he needs to be gone!

    • Orangeone

      Boehner is part and parcel of the treason. The October surprise needs to be the American public marching on these “officials” offices and demanding the articles of impeachment be filed immedately.

      • librtifirst

        The congress could have had zero out a long time ago. We should have had continual congressional hearings against corruption from Zero for the last four years. That would be in a congress that wasn’t just as guilty as Zero.

    • aposematic

      The old time establishment career R’s have been the Democrat’s bellboys for a long time now.

  • detectivedick

    It was a great show. Then came Obama butt kissing Jerry Rivers to try to smooth it out. I tell you we are on the edge in these United States

  • deeme

    Since when did talk shows become a place to discuss our intelligence in the first place, this is such a sham..He needs to be made to come out and tell the truth..why didn’t they give Chris security after he more or less begged for it..and who gave the order to blame it on a movie??? I just heard Obama earned 181 million in September his best month ever, at least we know what is priorities were…

  • wales777

    Did Stevens know to much? Did O betray him to ensure he’d never talk? Fast and Furious – Middel East version.

    • marketcomp

      You are probably more right than you know.

  • marketcomp

    Romney MUST absolutely make clear that this President needs to go. He is responsible for removing our allies like; Kaddafi, Mubourick of Egypt, and perhaps next the Presidents of Syria, Jordan, Turkey, and Saudi Arabia later. This is a clear pattern to me and Romney needs to highlight this in the debate on Monday. These actions are leaving this country vulnerable and our allies defenseless and they will not help us with intelligence or give any help and that’s not to mention the vulnerability of allies like Poland and Israel. I remember when Obama was candidate Obama and he sided with Russia during a conflict over the oil pipelines belonging to Poland and that’s not to mention that he gave British codes, which only the US knew as an ally, to Russia. This President is on a path to making us weak and powerless and this election is our only chance to get him the hell out of there before we are all staring down the barrel of a gun in the form of a nuclear weapon due to his efforts to cut America down to size.

    • aposematic

      As we are plainly seeing the reaping of what Carter (D) sowed 30+ years ago in Iran, what Obuma (D) has sowed in the Middle East will be haunting US for Centuries.

  • Well, the administration is going to look kind of stupid if they now are going to go back to their old story about the video, when their own State Department said under oath that it knew THAT EVENING that there was no protest over a video. Seems like the White House conveniently finds facts to support its “case” whenever new evidence comes out that proves that they lied about the whole event. And there still is the whole problem of why security was actually reduced in Benghazi when all these reports stated that the security problem in Benghazi was getting worse on a daily basis. Somebody messed up, and the way this is looking that lady from the State Department, Charlene Lamb, is going to take the fall for this. I wonder if she knows what’s about to hit her? The Clinton and Obama machines are going to let her hang out to dry and her only hope may be for her to say under oath who she told about this and how high up the food chain it went.

    • mike3e4r7

      Right! Wasn’t Obama’s “shining moment” in the last debate when he falsely claimed and Candy Crowley “confirmed” that he called Benghazi a terrorist attack during his Rose Garden speech? That was his big gotcha moment. How does he plan to reconcile that with these new lies that his administration is leaking? Let’s see him try to explain that during the upcoming debate.

  • sjmom

    There is no evil more treacherous than they that deceive themselves and Obama is now in over his head. IMO someone will come forward and blow this thing sky high because there is always someone whose conscience will not allow them to continue to live with the lies. I pray it is before the election; however, I don’t think these leaks will fly because of the docs released to Congress on Fri. Even if the intel does talk about the movie the fact is there was no security at the compound. That they cannot deny.

    In Bret Baier’s report last night it was said there were CIA in Benghazi and they left because it got too hot, but they kept the ambassador there. Hmmmm.

  • Betsey_Ross

    I guess the good news is that we all actually know the whole story. Obama’s leaking of parsed information is quite silly because it does not really stop the narrative that it was known all along that it was a terror attack. So sending Dr Rice out there on the Sunday shows is not the problem. The problem has been the innaction by the entire admnistration from State, to Defense, to Obama that all of them failed to act. The blood of 4 Americans is on their hands. They made no effort to help them. No amount of friendly leaking will help any of them.

    Romney will be on top of this. He gets intel reports and I am sure that he reads them. He has stepped up on both of the debates quite well. He’s got a plan. He can fix this. As Dennis Miller said a few days ago. Mitt likes to fix things. He’s good at it. He’s probably already got his trap laid out in his mind for Obama’s demise.

  • chatterbox365

    What a dirty and corrupt Administration, but it proves Romney is surging. These people have no shame and it is an embarrassment that they are representatives of our country.

  • Tim Unes

    We need to post this article on every blog, facebook, and news article you can get to before Monday night.

  • Yazz55

    The regime’s truth panels strike again!

  • The zero and his henchwench Hillary both have blood on their hands. This whole thing makes me so angry. I say drop them both in the middle of downtown Tehran and let the the wolves at them. What irks me the most is they went about their little parties while our people were fighting for their lives, “OUR PEOPLE” they left twisting in the wind. Just so the flippin POS could look good with “his” war in Libya. I hope and pray after this piece of garbage is sent packing they find something they can put him on trial for, like treason, anything but something that puts him in a dark dungeon cell for the rest of his rotten life. And they can take that leech of a wife with him.

    • aposematic

      Lets see, Obuma has Valerie Jarrett (Iranian family ties) advising him and Hillarious has Abedin (Huma Mahmood Abedin–Muslim Brotherhood personal and family ties) advising her. What could possibly go wrong on foreign policy…

  • tshtsh

    Any document from this administration will need to be certified by an outside party as to the date of creation and if it was altered.

    • SoLongSong

      Ah, yes! But just like the constant “late Friday afternoon document dumps” this administration has mastered, I bet they try a do something November 4th or 5th.

      Unfortunately for them, it will be a BLATANTLY OBVIOUS attempt. America’s already suspicious and thankfully we have other outlets to pre-empt that kind of attempt.

  • Orangeone

    I love Judge Pirro. I would LOVE to see her be our first true Hispanic member of the SCOTUS

    • kong1967

      Me too.

  • Orangeone

    But wouldn’t this tactic, although we all know it to be a lie, say that Obama lied during Debate #2 when he called it terrorism in the Rose Garden speech? Does he think Americans are that stupid and won’t put that together? Oh wait, demorats are that stupid. He could say we live on the planet Mars and they would nod in agreement.

    • colliemum

      Bathhouse Barry doesn’t lie!
      He’s only not very well acquainted with the truth, and anyway, it’s the fault of his minions and underlings: they are the liars because they want him to fail, yeah, and they’re waacists as well, and it’s all just a huge conspiracy to hold da man down …


      • Orangeone

        It’s soooo funny, Chris Wallace brought up the very same thing on his show this morning….I wonder if he’s following the brillant Scoop and his posters 🙂

    • kong1967

      I think Obama is just trying to secure the vote from his base, maybe rile them up. He has probably already given up on anyone with a brain.

      • SoLongSong

        Those are his constituents: Those without brains, those that like free phones and money, those that don’t pay attention….

        You can judge this president not only by the cabinet he chooses, but by the constituents he woos.

        • kong1967

          Exactly, and it’s not the America I want to be part of.

  • anneinarkansas

    This will backfire on the administration. No one believes them anymore. All credibility is shattered.

  • Paul C.

    If this lying basta** get in again he will build a wall around the WH and we will never know what goes on behind those closed doors because we all learn from our mistakes. Where was all the transparency in the last 4 years, thats right there was none.

  • That is TREASON…Obama will sell USA in order to get elected.

  • aposematic

    The corruption of this Democrat Obuma Administration is unceasingly horrendous.

  • Michelle Malkin was right! This administration is the most corrupt in the history of America. They will stoop at nothing to blame, distort, misinform, re-direct, cajole, and fabricate to protect and shield themselves from taking any blame on this, and all issues of controversy. And the main street media has been complicit since Obama’s election 4yrs ago.

    And to all news media….and that includes print, television and computer. Here’s a quote from my favorite founding father and 3rd president of the United States-Thomas Jefferson. Who believed so strongly in the first amendment to the Constitution. He used himself as a pawn by releasing newspaper editors and writers who were imprisoned by President John Adams by violating the.. Alien & Sedition Act.

    ” No government ought to be without censors; and where the press is free no one ever will.”-T. Jefferson

  • I saw a story in my local paper this week of all these people on the street in Lybia saying the attack was not coordinated, amateur and some people did not even have guns they just jumped in when they saw the action. And, oh yeah, it was about the video because they heard people in Egypt were rioting about it. A total cover story for the failed Obama-foreign policy! Disgusting.

    • SoLongSong

      BREATHTAKING. Omission by the MSM is one thing, but LYING?

      If it weren’t for them not doing their job, Obama would never have been president in the first place.

    • Galatiansch2vs20

      Secretary Clinton in this early video statement on 9/12/2012 said: ‘Heavily armed militants assaulted the compound and set fire to our buildings.”

  • Spartan4Palin

    Catherine and Lara Logan. Two of the best reporters I have seen in a long time. Doesn’t get clouded by political BS!

    • Orangeone

      Sharyl Atkkinson is great as well!

  • AAG617

    Total manipulation of facts reminiscent of the old USSR .

  • Chiefparker

    In the debate the President glaringly neglected to offer condolences to the families filling his time with a defensive and clinical answer.
    To make things a little more interesting, I would like to see Pat Smith sitting in the front row…

  • dk_in_tn

    U N B E L I E V A B L E

  • anyonebutbarry2012

    people should not be depending on the last debate to help them make their decision. afterall we have had 3 1/2 years of this horrendous administrations policies. fast and furious, his treatment of Israel and so on. benghazi just the final nail. notice how thru this all never hear a word from boehner? ! he needs to go, what a useless speaker .

  • ebola131

    If the SHTF, the Bill Clinton “Bosnia Rules of Engagement” take effect.
    He targeted government officials, bureaucrats, the indoctrination complex (teachers), AND THE MEDIA.
    They are unaware that they are contributing to their doom.
    As they say in “clingerland”, there ain’t no cure for stupid.

  • The CIA put out a “talking-points” memo the day before Rice’s five-network tour claiming, as Rice claimed, that a demonstration over the youtube video escalated into a riot that led to the deaths of the ambassador and 3 others. This provides Rice with very little cover since WE KNOW the state department had – in real time video – proof there was no demonstration. These CIA leaks only serve to prove that the CIA is now actively engaged in the cover-up to protect Obama and the White House ahead of the election.

    • Ford Prefect

      The good old I am and idiot because they are idiot’s argument. The problem is there is to much information coming from foreign news agencies for this to work.

      There internal polling must be in the toilet for them to try something this lamb.

    • Galatiansch2vs20

      Secretary Clinton in this early video statement on 9/12/2012 said: ‘Heavily armed militants assaulted the compound and set fire to our buildings.”
      I wonder if this statement was prepared prior to the spontaneous demonstration narrative?

  • snowshooze

    It occurs to me that Obama killed Bin Laden, then he got Qaddafi killed, ( Liberating Libya…) and then worked with Libyan revolutionaries to secure the weapons stockpiles and move them to Syria to overthrow Assad. Trying for a home run.
    But he had no idea who he was really dealing with.

  • kajunredbull

    There hypocrisy knows no bounds!

  • TexasEnforcer

    No surprise there. Hope Romneys nails obama’s a#& to a tree during the last debate. obama and biden have been terrible for our country. R&R2012.

  • Hard to believe the CIA would leak documents that make the CIA look stupid and inept. if the CIA wants the world to think the CIA believed this was a spontaneous protest over a movie, when any average citizen with half a brain that saw what was going on knew better, and was able to put 2 and 2 together on 9-11, then the CIA is politicized, useless, has lost all semblance of pride and probably should be shut down in favor of a competent intelligence agency.

    • tshtsh

      We should look at the political appointees. The rank and file cannot be incompetent boobs from one administration to competent the next administration.

    • CIA is NOT leaking documents…..liars are. Read the title again 🙂

  • NJK

    Dear God. They need to be prosecuted for treason. I watched the video this morning, Dreams from My Real Father about Obama. I believe Frank Marshall Davis may be his real father, and Obama is really dangerous. This isn’t going to work for him and the media.
    This media needs to be tried for treason also. Freedom of the Press doesn’t mean freedom to commit anti American activites. Frank Marshall Davis was on the FBI watch list for years. They have to know the truth about him, within this govt. There is no way they don’t know.

  • NJK

    My hope is that the media are sitting at ground zero when there is another attack. There is no group more deserving.

  • 12grace
    • Galatiansch2vs20

      So Mali is a hotbed for terrorism as well! Thanks for sharing, Grace.

      • 12grace

        I’m really glad you found it helpful, g2vs.

        I love Allen Klein, he has uncovered things we would never hear about from the regular media.

        • Galatiansch2vs20

          I may have heard the name before, but don’t think I’d ever heard him before. Definitely hadn’t heard others discussing Mali!

  • BrokenGlasses01

    Treason occurs when you fail to defend and uphold the Constitution against all enemies….foreign and domestic.
    This is a lying outrage beyond the disgraceful lying cheating sleazy foreign supported campaign.
    He is a freakin liar.
    Impeach the …
    Never reelect!

  • SKL53

    Nothing is going to help this evil, lying sack of turd!!! While our ambassador was dragged through the streets, this president flew light-heartedly to Nevada for a fundraiser! Then went on to be Mr Moviestar himself telling lies on the Letterman show! What’s with this guy??? Does he think Americans have guzzled the kool-aide again? People are now awake and ready to kick his a#$ out of the WH!!! He is the worst lying, lacking in integrity, self-absorbed, leader America has ever known! This will be his legacy to his children!!!

  • BrokenGlasses01

    No one is in the WH to care and protect America!

  • aZjimbo

    These people are simply the lowest form of life in everything they do. Their day is coming very soon.

  • suzy000

    Catherine nailed it….as long as Obama spins the word terrorism, the terrorists are going free and becoming”emboldened” as Catherine puts it. I hope Romney attacks this President on his failure to provide adequate security, his failure at an attempt to launch a rescue and his failure to capture and or kill the ones responsible. I hope Romney plasters him to the wall on these Benghazi issues. Obama is pitiful and should have NEVER been elected President. He has done nothing but cause chaos in this country and abroad…what a mess he has made of everything.

  • hongryhawg

    Spin as they will; the truth is out. To continue to spin in an effort to erase the truth just makes for a deeper hole. It’s like as if a super assertion of the spin will remove the heat. Reminds me of Bill Clinton with that ‘look you in the eye” and expect sheer power of personality to erase the facts. I’d like to say, ” Good try, pretender”, but it wasn’t even a mediocre try. The pretender can no longer pretend. It’s over.

  • PapaLouie

    No matter how they spin it, they still have a problem because the President has told two contradicting stories about the attack. He claimed in the debate that he called the Benghazi attacks an act of terrorism the very next day. But on Sept 24th he went on “The View” and refused to label the attacks terrorism. When asked specifically if it was terrorism, he said “We’re still doing an investigation. … We don’t have all the information yet, so we’re still gathering it.” That’s not a consistent message. How can you claim to have called it terrorism from day one if you refused to call it terrorism on day 13?

  • The article mentioned is a “Opinion” piece. There is no proof. Just more desperate spin by Obama.

  • Romney, DO NOT LET the liars
    to cram their lies down our throats AGAIN!!!
    If not permitted to talk your side of the story, LEAVE the debate!!!

  • ObamaPelosi

    Romney shouldn’t fall for this bs. We need to be smarter than this. Obama campaign will definitely cover up this lie. Romney needs to go beyond Benghazi and attack Obama on his overall foreign policy and drive it home that Obama has been a failure at all points. This debate is war, and Romney needs to look at it that way. Obama will bring up more of his feigned ‘offense’ at whatever Romney has to day. Romney needs to hit back saying that the American people are offended on how Barack Obama characterized the death of 4 Americans. Romney needs to expose Obama for the failure that he is on all counts and hammer these facts in the next debate.

  • bobemakk

    I weep for the future if Obama wins this election. We will become a third world country ruled by socialism/total government control. God Help US!!

  • orthodoxyordeath

    Nope. Talking about the UN monitors. Happened under Bush.