"Saturday Night Live": Obama's Bootlicker
Question: What’s the difference between members of the Democrat National Committee and the cast of “Saturday Night Live?”
Answer: Not much, except that the people on the DNC get paid a lot less than the comedians on ”SNL.”
I used to enjoy watching ”Saturday Night Live.” I mostly liked the bride’s eye-rolling and feigned shock at some of the sketches.
When it debuted on NBC in 1975 featuring ”not ready for prime time players” such as John Belushi, Jane Curtin, Chevy Chase, Gilda Radner, et al., the show was usually funny if occasionally off-color and edgey. ”SNL” was always politically correct back then yet it poked caustic fun in almost every direction.
No more. The show has repeatedly demonstrated it has the same goals as the DNC, re-electing President Barack Hussein Obama. It simply employs one-sided, partisan humor to advance that aim as opposed to directly funding Democrats.
Times and “SNL” have radically changed, especially since the appearance on the political scene of Barack Hussein Obama.
Aside from regularly ridiculing the presumptive GOP nominee for president, Mitt Romney, just as their cadre of late night comedians like Letterman, Leno, Fallon, Stewart, et al. incessantly do, “SNL” has now apparently upped the ante by allowing Obama and Company to censor its content.
In deference to complaints by arch-racial agitator Rev. Jesse Jackson and in conformity with a concerted effort to compensate for alleged discrimination toward African-Americans in the entertainment industry, Hollywood and television producers caved and today blacks are more than well-represented on the silver and TV screens.
They bent over backwards, upside-down and every whichway to assure blacks that the entertainment industry was not only not racist but that they would slander conservatives in the process in order to prove their how liberal they were.
DailyCaller.com revealed that “SNL” has caved again, this time to advance the Obama 2012 re-election campaign.
Last Saturday, Lorne Michael scrapped the show’s planned and written opening skit mocking the president’s shameless efforts to suggest he was primarily responsible for killing mastermind 9/11 terrorist Osama bin Laden last May in Pakistan.
In Obama’s historical revisioning, SEAL Team 6, then-CIA director Leon Panetta, Admiral William McRaven, and a host of other advisors became secondary to his incredible courage in ordering the assault on bin Laden’s Abbotabad compound–after months of indecision.
Truth is usually less humorous than fantasy so “SNL” opted to . . .
(Read more at http://www.genelalor.com/blog1/?p=23331.)
Barry has a problem, Youtube Larry Sinclair and Obama.
Yeah obama riding the fence post, Okay i'm done with that.
While the public is talking about things like gay marriage.
Celente America Is A Full Blown Police State!.
Teaching the Book of Revelation with Frank DiMora part 12
It must be tough to pander to two different audiences. African Americans are usually very anti-gay marriage (anti gay anything). White liberals are usually pro gay marriage, pro "things that upset regular Americans".
Having to appeal to both contradictory elements must be tough. Can't lose the black vote! Can't lose the gay vote! Oh no! Make a stand Baraka. You can't have your cake and eat it too.
As of now, people who support gay marriage have no candidate. All things being equal they might as well vote for Romney because even though like Obama he doesn't support gay marriage, he at least doesn't want to make them poorer. Pay attention West Hollywood.
Was it here that I read earlier VP Biden said Will and Grace best represented the gay lifestyle and thats why he liked it so much…..?
Yes, he's on the crazy train!!!
I wasnt a big fan of the show- I never cared for Will or Grace.
But Jack and Karen were pretty funny. And Rosie, Karens "maid" got in a few good ones too.
'And after all these years he says he’s still ‘evolving’ on the issue'
The only way Obama can 'evolve' on any issue is through the polls. No matter what the decision, the policy, or the actual thought is that he is forced to elicit, it must come from what the polls say.
God help us if we are ever attacked again and he has to make a '3 am call'. The time it would take for him to poll it, we could all be a mushroom cloud.
What to do when one has no morals, no conscience, one who makes his own rules, who is his own god, and who has spent so much time being all things to the elite few and pleasing none?
Libel Case Against Obama's Gay Lover Dismissed
And I think he firmly believes in advancing his political career.
A big problem with hiring such a young man for your President is that their life experiences and belief system aren't fully fleshed out. But he's a cool President, so I guess it's OK that he's a novice.
I don't think this is a winning issue for Republicans because of the pro-gay agenda of Massachuetts. So, I don't think Obama wants to touch this and I don't this Romney wants to touch this.
With the elections, Obama will be to all as long as they pull the lever. I have seen people trying to have it both ways, but I must say that Obama takes the cake having his VP saying "Yes" while he states, "evolving".
Talk about being the squishes election ever!!!!
Here is how the question should have been answered:
FYI, it's not "anti-gay marriage" and "pro gay marriage", it's "marriage" and "anti-marriage".
Obama will go with whatever gets him votes. He may have had no political background before his "vote present" Senate term but he's figured out that if people will vote for you if you make them promises, then by all means make all the "promises" you possibly can. Oh, and if you are not going to get enough votes on a split issue, don't go either way...
I think the only reason he hesitates on the issue is because he's concerned if he came out in favor of gay marriage that some African-American men wouldn't show up to vote for him in November. And he needs each and everyone one of them to be there.
Otherwise, I think Obama is a typical Lefty, and if he's reelected he'll finish his "evolution" and support gay marriage. It'd be another significant achievement that Progressives will remember him for. The MSM would love it; they'd consider it his civil rights issue.
I don't think Obama is a religious person of faith (so he has no religious objections). I also don't think he has any personal objections to homosexuality that would prevent him from supporting gay marriage.
Here is the scoop on Barack Hussein Obama, Larry Sinclair made allegations in a Press Conference and proceeded to sign an affidavit stating that all he said was true and filed it with the Chicago police. He said he performed some plumbing on the Man/Child's private part while the Man/Child was smoking crack cocaine, a substance he told us in his book Dreams From My Father was his substance of choice. Not long ago the media, both liberal and conservative hounded Herman Cain right out of the Republican primary leaving us to believe Cain was a sexual pervert. So based upon allegations we can assume that American elected our first Bi-Sexual Crack Head for POTUS. Now ain't that so sweet. Hope and Change on steroids.