RUSH LIMBAUGH: Let me assure you, the NY Times is not dumping on the Clintons

Posted by The Right Scoop on Aug 15, 2013 at 1:18 PM in Politics | 12 Comments

By The Right Scoop

Rush doesn’t believe for a minute that the intent of the NY Times yesterday, when they ran their devastating piece on the Clinton Foundation, was to dump on the Clintons. No, he believes they ran the piece to get it out now so that it has little to no effect on Hillary come 2016.

Listen:

Comment Policy: Please read our new comment policy before making a comment. In short, please be respectful of others and do not engage in personal attacks. Otherwise we will revoke your comment privileges.

NOTE: If the comments don't load properly or they are difficult to read because they are on the blue background, please use the button below to RELOAD DISQUS.

Laurel A

He is right. This is the fault of Republicans. We have known that the Clinton Global Initiative was nothing more than a self aggrandizement scheme and we said nothing and did nothing. No one is surprised by the news story. Heck a lot of Republicans participated in foundation as well…including the Bush family.
Desjardins

Laurel A Hell, they all live in glass houses, they can’t throw rocks.
PressWatchusa

Totally in agreement with RUSH – The Clintons know EXACTLY what they are doing!
Bac Si68

Taking out the trash now, so if it is brought up again you can shoot the messenger.(Seems they have done that before)
Laurel A

Desjardins Laurel A True! Ya know Rush first pegged the Clinton Global Initiative as being what it is…a self aggrandizement scheme when Clinton left office and started it back in 2000. I think it fell on deaf ears due to the election tumult and it being more of a prediction at the time than a reality.
However anyone who knows how these guys operate could of seen this coming. This is exactly how the rich stay rich. This is how they redistribute wealth, YOUR WEALTH, under the guise of ‘do gooder-ism’. If you notice Hollywood does this too with all of their ‘relief’ concerts etc. This is precisely why I am conservative and against 99% of the alphabet agencies, entitlements, and programs. And yes that 99% number is correct because most of those agencies are redundant as well. I’m not against government…I’m just against it in it’s current form.

And now you know precisely why our FF’s said our Republic was only suited for a moral society.
stage9

“the NY Times is not dumping on the Clintons.”
I do…every time I visit a bathroom stall.
volgeek

I’m not sure I agree with Rush on this one. The NY Times has never really loved the Clintons, Bill was never liberal enough for them. Remember it was the NY Times that was investigating Whitewater. Clinton finally asked for an Independent Counsel to be appointed to look into the matter only after the NYT started calling for one. On the other hand, the NYT has shifted even further to the left since than and Hillary is more of a leftist than Bill was.
No matter what, we know that in the end, the NYT will support whoever the DNC nominates.
12grace

I think Rush is right about this as the NY Times seems to favor everything and anyone that leans far left. This is why their readership has declined drastically.
jiaqian

tinyurl.com/lr69xbu
clubgitmo

Rush does have an uncanny ability to be correct.
fireme

He is absolutely right Where did the money go? The NYT will not take the time to investigate further.
TIMERUNNERSC

One of many great things I like about Mr Limbaugh the knows the mainstream media very, and when the fix is in he calls them on it.
By the way Rush, we enjoy coffee and tea , your “Two If By Tea”, tea taste is rich in flavor, very good, its the best tea we’ve ever had. Now what we want to know is wheres the coffee? you know! the “Two If By Ship” Coffee”?

RUSH LIMBAUGH: Let me assure you, the NY Times is not dumping on the Clintons

Follow Us

Places of Interest

RUSH LIMBAUGH: Let me assure you, the NY Times is not dumping on the Clintons

Follow Us

Places of Interest

Follow "The Right Scoop"