The Right Scoop
I don't want to be the conspiracy theorist type, but color me confused when 7 democrats come out in support of an "evil corporation"? Something smells fishy.
I can't figure out why they are protending to stand against obama, there something more in it for them, OH! Thanks Right, Bain Capital, in the past has been their money dog.
Ignor these democrats, they are obama lap dogs, they need to be defeated when they are up for re-elections come around. Remember if they have a (D) by their names they are oath breakers and subverts of the,
The United States Constitution, The BIll Of Rights, and The Declaration Of Independence.,
they only refer to these documents when their message serves their un-American agendas.
Tea Party Patriot
Impeach obama
Never forget Obamacare: we couldn't know what was in it until it was past.
Never for get they are subverts.
Should we call these people "The Magnificent Seven"? Or using the math of the ever excessively spending liberals, "The Dirty Dozen"?
One thing's for sure. I can't get behind any group that includes California liberals like Feinstein. I've never heard anything come out of her mouth that didn't fall immediately into the category of 'crap'. Hmmm. One wonders if they aren't building for a push to get Hillary on the ticket.
I think their coming out of the closet (so to speak) in support of private equity and Bain in particular has more to do with Bain $$ $upport in their campaign coffers than their ideology.
They are not in as good a position to bash them in public while privately taking in the dough as der 0b0 fuhrer.
Wonderful, now we are heeding the advise of crooks, self-avowed communists, and useful idiots!
Who is John Galt!
"Don't think, we'll think for you."
You have to twist your mind into a pretzel to defend Etch-a-sketch.
Bain made millions for Romney - by using taxpayer money and loans - draining pension funds, running businesses into debt, reducing quality and jobs to make maximum profit (for the investors). Even the Salt Lake City Olympics which was a private enterprise got two billion taxpayer dollars. So, what's not to like about Romney's business tactics?
Or his political strategies/tactics?
Or his liberal policies?
Or his continual lies?
(sarcasm off)
from the inimitable Lee Rodgers
Fact-check. Mitt Romney's career as a Bain Capital executive ended years ago. And while the Obama campaign decries job losses at businesses Bain couldn't save, they ignore the presence of Jonathan Lavine, a long-time Bain executive and member of the board when the losses they decry actually occurred.
Perhaps it's because Mr. Lavine is one of Obama's biggest campaign contributors. He's been with Bain since 1993. Don't learn THAT from the Obama campaign ads and hype, do you?
INTERESTING, NO?
Here's how Bain actually operated - more like date rape than a relationship:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1&feature=endscreen&v=rodifJlis2c
http://articles.businessinsider.com/2011-12-14/politics/30515127_1_mitt-romney-ddi-corp-bain-capital
Excellent video. Capitalism it ain't.
Perhaps though, I'll just pretend I did not see it and jump back on the Mittens Bandwagon. I'll feel better about myself there. ;)
Isn't that what a party "whip" is supposed to do? They must have a really good one because they don't like to step out of line much, lol.
Have you looked at this possible opposition?
http://danhughes2012.org/index.php?5
http://www.flashreport.org/featured-columns-library0b.php?faID=2012030600314518
or this man?
http://catcot.wordpress.com/2012/02/17/introducing-john-boruff-r-candidate-for-us-senate-california/
It is human nature.
For me, this was part of my idealistic hippie thinking, that appearances should not matter, and I still agree and I think human nature when it is wise will agree that substance, the inner person, character are what really matters, but the truth is that in elections a physically presentable candidate often does better than one who is not.
You're welcome! Unfortunately, I think looks can be a big factor in this day and age with many people. Is he handsome, is she pretty? How many really look at/care about substance? A sad state of affairs.
Thank you for your info. I find it interesting that the only real vetting or selecting of a possible candidate against the shoe-in DiFi is occurring right here in my life. I do need to make a selection about whom I will vote for.
As for personal appearance, I could care less, but I think it can be a factor in winning elections.
Why would he need to look more physically imposing when he'd be running against an elderly lady?
He's younger than John, the other candidate who looked positive online and I gave links to... being younger is another reason my sibling voted for him in case he makes it as Senator and might stay in longer.
But if physical appearance is very important to you, does John Boruff look better to you?
http://catcot.wordpress.com/2012/02/17/introducing-john-boruff-r-candidate-for-us-senate-california/
As for Dan Hughes, he evidently made an impression on Chuck DeVore:
http://www.flashreport.org/featured-columns-library0b.php?faID=2012030600314518
I guess the ads you've seen were likely by the lady, Orly, who my sibling says was born in the former Soviet Union and has brought a series of lawsuits against Obama regarding Obama's qualifications for being on the ballot. She doesn't say that he could find anywhere how she stands on the 'social' issues.
I have never heard of Hughes. Have heard ads about Olly somebody who's running against Die Fi. No offense but I think it would help if Hughes were more physically imposing. He looks a bit too nice (is he strong enough to make an impression, let alone win?)
Well, looks like there a couple of positive possibilities there- I have a sibling who voted for Hughes because of message, issues, and feasibility written about by a former Congressman. All things are possible with God! It would surely be a gracious blessing if He provided a conservative Senator for the people of California, my native soil (TN transplant).
For years I have been hopeful and vote for ANYONE ELSE on the ballot, especially one wo may seem feasible.
One time she got whupped (that was by the Republican Huffington, Arianna's ex) but then they found 14,000 uncounted ballots somewhere down in the valley. No kidding. This really happened.
Hussein gets away with the good cop bad cop routine with these bankers. The small fry crooks do not.
I do not know about the rest but Bain was a major contributor to Booker. They called him in on this one. The banksters have a very short leash on their politicos.
"These are the dogs Romney lies with". -- sDee
That's kinda a pun. "Lies" works well in more than one way.
I love this and this is very appropiate for the occasion >>
http://youtu.be/SLY7yI1xV-M?t=15s
I know you will enjoy this !!
You're right, I did enjoy that! No refund needed!
side note: my sister was an extra in that film ;)
I can't help but share this great video.
I hope you all are inspired by it? I think it was put together rather well!!! Many of you have probably seen it. But the message will never be old!!
This is already biting Obama. Romney needs to point out that Obama is a speculator with tax dollars and is jealous that he isn't as good at it as Romney. Solyndra ring any bells?!
I don't know about the rest of these 7 dems but ed spendell is a crook. You'd have a stronger case if you didn't include the likes of him.
They're all crooks, so how can any argument be won - but then again, we have enough of them in our party - in fact, I really want a 3rd party. We're all going to hell.
Hmmmm....maybe it could be said that the administration's position on this subject is so off base that even crooks are against it. :)
That's a much better argument, and you don't have to crawl in bed with the likes of spendell to make it.
Comment Policy: Please read our new comment policy before making a comment. In short, please be respectful of others and do not engage in personal attacks. Otherwise we will revoke your comment privileges.