Trey Gowdy BLASTS NY Times Benghazi report and in one question DESTROYS video narrative

Trey Gowdy blasted the Benghazi report by the NY Times, saying that it took them 15 months to learn how to spell Benghazi. And when asked about the video being the cause of the attack, as suggested by the article, Gowdy responds with a question that simply destroys any notion that the video was the cause of the attack:

The video was translated into Arabic in early September of 2012… What in the world explains the violence in Benghazi prior to the video being translated and released? Our consulate was attacked way before the video was released. The British Ambassador was almost assassinated way before the video was released. The International Red Cross was attacked twice in Benghazi, well before this video was ever released.

So if the video is really the impetus for the violence, what in the world explains the violence prior to the release of the video?

BOOM! That’s what you call an argument based on facts and logic, not on political motivations.

But there’s more, including Gowdy asking if you’d know who the Secretary of State was after reading the NY Times article.

Watch:

Comment Policy: Please read our new comment policy before making a comment. In short, please be respectful of others and do not engage in personal attacks. Otherwise we will revoke your comment privileges.
  • TreadNotHere

    Trey Gowdy is the guy we need to turn loose on barry’s sorry ass. Then let him go full throttle after hillary and the rest. This fella needs to replace holder right now.

    • Steve Angell

      True.

      But I trust the GOP will find someone who hates the Tea Party and will make sure we lose in 2014 and Hillary wins in 2016.

      Seems the GOP if far more anti Tea Party than anti Democrat in fact seems to me they are very much pro everything Democrat.

      • They can damn well try, but we the people won’t put up with their crap this time will we!

        • Steve Angell

          I have seen no real evidence of that.

          It does not help when Ted Cruz goes to South Africa and gets along so splendidly with an ardent Democrat. Will not explain why he went.

          When a huge number of GOP Reps vote for Obama spending for two solid years.

          • Valid points Steve, but there are a lot of good people running this time. Constitutionally strong. We have to make sure they are voted in over the rinos. Rove and the rest of the GOP can stuff it.

            • Steve Angell

              Totally agree. We just really need to watch them and point out when they do something that makes it clear they are a RINO in Tea Party clothing.

      • aposematic

        Seems ?????? 100’s of $Millions already designated by GOPe/Rove/sycophants to defeat TP candidates.

      • Joe McCarthy’s Daughter

        Yep and this time when they swear Hillary in as POTUS we can all thank the useless scumbag Karl Rove. I am so sick of progressive Republicans I could puke!

    • sno_warrior

      Yea man, lets get ahold of Obamma and tell him that!

  • MiBones

    “What difference does it make?” Love it. Reminds me of “I did not have sexual relations…..”.Do you think the Clintons have been spending too much time together?

  • aposematic

    I’ll admit that sometimes I got my beefs with Gowdy…but a lot of times I just love him, this is one of those love him moments…

  • d1comment

    NYT claims they had a reporter talking to the attackers as the attack was takng place…so, if they know who the attackers were, did they report that to the FBI?…. Because they are all over this investigation.

  • John Queue

    I long to see this man as AG of the U.S.A…truly, I do.

  • Nukeman60

    Barack Obama or Hillary Clinton as President — What difference does it really make? They are both disastrous for this country. Time to put a stop to them both, in the same fell swoop.

  • Okay, this is really about Hillary.

    One thing that would be nice would be if the folks on the right started treating the NYT the way one would treat True Detective Stories and Workers World.

    Just roll your eyes when they get mentioned, like someone at an auto workers union meeting suggesting people buy Japanese.

    • Message To Nancy

      See a NYT’s story and say in your head…

      “Once upon a time in a land far far away…”

      • Sentinel

        🙂

      • How about, “I have some fish that need wrapping! Throw that paper here newsboy! Ouch!”

        • I wouldn’t contaminate perfectly good fish with that rag. 🙂

          • Valid point 🙂

          • PVG

            Better on the bottom of a bird cage!

            • I think the NYT is just Super!

              Look, up in the sky, it’s a turd, it’s a crane, no, it’s Meghan McCain!

            • tinlizzieowner

              Cat pan liner. 😉

    • Patriot077

      I would trust the Enquirer over the NYT and I never read that rag.
      It is all about Hillary and Gowdy did a bang up job making all salient points.

  • sallyjohanna

    The stalwart..our first defense against a rogue government…the unfettered press…what a joke…they are traitors to the country and cannot be trusted. Protecting politicians not the American people.

    Thank God and protect Trey Gowdy…a loud honest voice in the traitorous wilderness!

  • Sentinel

    LOVE. THIS. GUY.
    Imagine him replacing Holder during the next administration. Holder is a stooge… and Trey is a leader. Awesome!!!

    • PVG

      PERIOD!!!

    • That’d be my dream come true.

    • Joe McCarthy’s Daughter

      After he replaces the stooge, Holder, then hopefully he can charge him, Obammy and Jarrett for all their crimes and lock them up for a long time.
      Now that’s my dream come true!

      • Sentinel

        Throw Shrillary in there too (for Benghazi) and the dream would become that much more satisfying.

  • sallyjohanna

    It does your heart good to hear someone blast these traitors and their subversive actions out of the water! Yes it does…hmm..hmm GOOD!

  • Haywoodjbl

    My God…I get so sick of the spin….Anyone that has followed this knows that Gowdy is correct and our Ambassador died and the SPIN has begun for Hillary……………F Her

    • Message To Nancy

      They are savages, aren’t they? Desecrating the dead?

    • sallyjohanna

      I love how Hillary gets to dismiss why our Ambassador and Americans were killed…like the reason does not matter. When an atrocity of this level happens to Americans…we ALWAYS care and absolutely demand to know what and why it happened…it is one of the values that make America great. But not Hillary…what difference does it make? She is a communist…just like Otyrant!

  • I love him for this. God Bless Trey Gowdy for his work on #Benghazi. Hitlary will not get away with this, nor will dear leader. Some how, some way, truth will come out. I am so sick of the messed up hearts and minds of these people and their supporters. Only in a freaking messed up progressive world do people responsible for the deaths of 4 good men, 2 absolute heroes, be promoted and elevated the way dear leader and hitlary have been. Only in a freaking messed up ignorant world does the government of the United States ARM the very ba$tards who did this, but who committed the first 9/11 attack, same terrorist ba$tards our troops have been fighting in Iraq and Afghanistan and now having to TRAIN them in Libya, the same terrorist ba$tards that murdered Stevens, Smith, Doherty and Woods.
    Thank you Trey for this.

  • Sentinel

    The NYT is Peter Pan… because they reside in ‘Never Never Land’ when it comes to Hillary and they never grow up.

    • sallyjohanna

      Sentinel check your dashboard. I did reply to you. I have always respected your opinion from way back in the day. I still do..always will.

      • Sentinel

        Thank you – no harm or worries. Something didn’t send right or something odd happened… technology… heh. You’re very kind and I enjoy your posts too.

  • What’s not to love about this guy Gowdy? I say, nothing at all, except, you never know what his hair’s gonna do…kinda like Rand Paul’s 🙂

    • sallyjohanna

      I would love to get my hands on Rand Paul’s hair. He has a lot of great things to say…but his hair is killing it for the millenniums…they will not vote for him just for that reason…of course they have no reasoning…but it would help the cause if we could fix his hairdo!

      • I thought you were gonna say you wanted to run your fingers through it. I was sorely disappointed 🙂

        I’d like to tease it a little, with some fancy, off the cuff comments.

        • sallyjohanna

          Oh. he would love if I ran my fingers through it…I am an expert. No, I want to tame it…your hair should never be talked about more than your platform…haha. I see a candidate under the mop…(laughing) and a very handsome man!

          • Downright dreamy sister.

            I think he’s a pretty darn good candidate, but his hair needs a psychiatrist specializing in schizophrenia.

            I am not making light of this serious thread, only the current actors, and find it ridiculously ludicrous what the NYT did with their Benghazi piece. What the writer did was blatant balderdash brought to bear by a bilious buffoon.

            Which rhymes with Sassoon 🙂

            • sallyjohanna

              My son wants his political junkie parents to lighten up..SOMETIMES..and I do, but rarely. I hope we do not nit pick and disenfranchise our young politicians that are making sense and speaking from the Constitution…I like a lot of them and sometimes they put their feet in it, but it is exciting to see and hear new born Constitutionalism!

              • I prescribed lightening up to myself this evening, based on some words I’ve often read.

                “A merry heart doeth good like a medicine: but a broken spirit drieth the bones.” (Proverbs 17:22 KJV)

                Have a great night. Thanks 🙂
                .

                • sallyjohanna

                  Very true..I have two, brand new twin grandsons…that have captured me…and made me “merry” with their bewitching medicine….have a great evening and a blessed New Year!

      • PNWShan

        Can you fix Trey Gowdy’s? I guess he’s too busy being the best prosecutor in the House to get a decent haircut.

  • timerunnersc

    Thank you Mr Gowdy;

  • 3boojums

    to Mrs Bill Clinton: Benghazi is not a stained blue dress. don’t waste your time and other people’s money. people died because of you. we will not forget

    • sallyjohanna

      So true..thank you. I will tell my grandchildren the true story of Benghazi…if we are allowed to by then.

    • hbnolikeee

      “What difference does it make?!”

    • Stormy Weathers

      Well said. And this, alot of us will make sure doesn’t die down.
      She shouldn’t even be allowed to run. Many of us will make sure it’s no pleasure cruise all along the way. She doesn’t care.

  • nibblesyble

    Love this man!!

  • disqus_E4Vdp7qC06

    Prepping the darling liar for 2016…. Bill made the call!!!! If anyone thinks this conniving lying witch is going to be any better than what we have now, dream on!!!!

  • hbnolikeee

    Big surprise the NY Slimes is shilling for Cankles.

  • Mary M.B.

    Trey Gowdy for President! He’s one smart guy compared to Obozo.

    • I’d rather have Cruz/West and Gowdy for AG 🙂

      • tinlizzieowner

        I want Col. West for Sec. of Defense. 😉 😉

        • storykeeper

          Dr. Ben Carson for Director of HHS

          • DHardy

            I don’t like Carson’s Gun Control Ideology.

          • Marridge

            John Bolton for Sec of State.

          • Stormy Weathers

            Don’t know which roll but completely agree, he needs to be in some high office.

          • Galatiansch2vs20

            He turned down surgeon general from what it looked like in something I read when Obama was interested- didn’t offer enough money. I think education is something near and dear to his heart- of course that federal department should be abolished.

      • Mary M.B.

        I think Ben Carson has a better chance than Allen West and I like Allen West! I know Ben Carson lacks political muscle but has other winning attributes!

      • Mary M.B.

        Mike Lee and Ben Carson should fit in there somewhere, along with some other Conservatives

        • I do love Mike Lee too, and Ben Carson for surgeon general.

    • joyfulgiver

      there is NO comparison! Trey Gowdy wins hands down.

  • CalCoolidge

    The Slimes? Hasn’t announced they are endorsing the Democrat? I think the last Republican the Times endorsed was Ulysses S Grant.

  • Johnny Right

    The NYT is synonymous with servile.

    • storykeeper

      I prefer ‘obsequious’

  • Message To Nancy

    I think it is a SUPER safe bet that Bill Clinton won’t be sending Trey any cigars.

  • tinlizzieowner

    It took the NY Times 15 months to bring this to light. So far, that’s less time than it’s taken the Obama administration to bring anybody ‘to justice’ over this.;-) 😉

  • willynilly

    and now Kerry says he won’t let anyone testify, we need to tear this administration and Clinton to shreds. Gowdy gets my vote to lead the way.

  • DHardy

    We need to start focusing on Issa He is most certainly running roughshod for Obama and these congressional hearings provided only to appease Conservatives. As long as they put the dog and pony show on they can say. We are trying to Bust them for their wrong doings. Yet people like Kerry and Holder and Hillary and the IRS and Obama have done nothing but disrespect this effort and NOTHING is being done about the stone walling and lying. No contempt of Congress at all? NOTHING! just a bunch of wind.

    • Betsey_Ross

      Issa can only go so far. It requires a higher authority to prosecute. Boehner is in the way and of course Holder is and will continue to stonewall to protect is buddy, Obama. It’s up to us to make sure we elect more people such as Trey Gowdy to push out Boehner, McConnell and Reid. Congress has abdicated their power and it’s time to take it back.

  • It’s almost worth it to move to South Carolina to help this man’s campaign for President.

    • Stormy Weathers

      Wayne: I agree. I’d love to see him in the White House.

      • He does NOT take shit from anyone. At all. I like that.

        • Conservator1

          My 2016 presidential dream ticket is Sen. Cruz and Rep. Gowdy.

          • dave3200

            Cruz isn’t eligible to serve as President or Vice President of the U.S.

            • Conservator1

              Grow up and stop the nonsense; of course he’s eligible to run for president. His mother was an American citizen.

              I know people who believe this will have to wait until Cruz actually runs for president and then for the courts to rule he’s an American who’s eligible to be President of the United states.

              • dave3200

                I don’t doubt that he’s a “U.S. citizen”. However, he is not a “natural born citizen” of the U.S. which he must be to be eligible. You need to do a little studying. Wish I had the time to spend with you on it. But, I don’t.
                Start with Article 2, section 1, clause 5 of the Constitution of the United States of America. Follow that with page 100 of Vattels “Law of Nations” which was the prevailing law at the time the Constitution was written.

                • Conservator1

                  Son, you have no clue of what you’re speaking about. And I certainly don’t need you to teach me anything on the Constitution. The SCOTUS has never ruled in any case in our history where they determined what a “natural born citizen” truly means.

                  So I’m glad you have already determine what the SCOTUS would rule if such a case is ever on the docket again.

                • dave3200

                  As I said, you need to spend a little time studying and learning the subject. You also would do well to know with whom you are speaking before getting snotty over something you obviously know so little about.

                  Since you are already a self-professed expert on the Constitution, and I presume you have read Vattel’s, you should move on to a piece of case law you must have missed when you disputed how the Supreme Court would rule on the question. Try studying:
                  Minor v. Happersett, 88 U.S. 21 Wall. 162 162 (1874)
                  Have a good day, young feller.

                • Conservator1

                  Sure sonny; relying on a case from the 19th century which isn’t applicable to what or who is a “natural born citizen” is a great reference of proving your idiocy.

                  You keep posting Vattel as a source. As I recall he was a Swiss philosopher in the 18th Century who died before our Constitution was ratified.

                  So sonny, I believe I’m well informed to know most constitutional scholars agree with me on this issue. In fact, the only people I know who would attempt to make such a ludicrous case as you have are Paulbots.

                • Rick Cleveland

                  Conservator – It’s time to grow up and stop the name calling – your acting like a democrat.

                • Conservator1

                  I’m so sorry that I annoyed you. But I can’t tolerate a low information commenter posting gibberish about Ted Cruz’s eligibility to run for president. This is especially true when that person uses references such as “Minor v. Happersett” and “Vattel.”

                  Yet you’re not alone; somehow Larry Johnston discovered my comment from 3 hours ago and has come to the rescue – you people are funny.

                  I called him sonny and he called me a ‘young feller.’ To me, that’s playful banter. Yet, you accuse me of acting like a Democrat while telling me to grow-up. Is that a great sign of maturity?

                • Larry Johnstone

                  Not only wrong, you’re rude

                • Conservator1

                  Oh Larry, I’m rude yet you, Dave and Rick tell me I need to study because I don’t have any knowledge of the constitution – give me a break on rudeness.

                  I’ll repeat, the majority of constitutional scholars who have written about this topic, agree with me – live with it.

                • Larry Johnstone

                  Never told you to study and I do not care who agrees with you, you are wrong anyway

                • Larry Johnstone

                  I would not have felt the need to post what I did if I had read your comments first.

                • Larry Johnstone

                  Wrong.

                  The Venus, 12 U.S. 8 Cranch 253 253 (1814)

                  Shanks v. Dupont, 28 U.S. 3 Pet. 242 242 (1830)

                  Minor v. Happersett , 88 U.S. 162 (1875)

                  United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649 (1898)

                • Conservator1

                  Going back to 18th century is a ludicrous attempt to prove your point. I’ve definitely got the Paulbots into an uproar. Let’s examine your first court ruling:

                  “If a citizen of the United States establishes his domicile in a foreign country between which and the United States hostilities afterwards break out, any property shipped by such citizen before knowledge of the war and captured by an American cruiser after the declaration of war must be condemned as lawful prize.

                  Upon a shipment of goods to be sold on joint account of the consignee and shipper or of the latter alone, at the option of the consignee, the right of property does not vest in the consignee until he has made his election under the option given him.

                  If two partners own jointly a commercial house in, New York, and one of them obtains an American register for a ship by swearing that he, together with his partner, of the City of New York, merchant, are the only owners of the vessel for which the register is obtained, when in fact his partner is domiciled in England, the vessel is liable to forfeiture under the Act of Congress of December 31, 1792…”
                  http://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/12/253/case.html

                  Yeah, that proves your point.

                • Larry Johnstone

                  Just one of the four cases speaking and defining natural born citizen.

                  Minor v. Happersett , 88 U.S. 162 (1875)

                  This case concerned Mrs. Happersett, an original suffragette, who in virtue of the 14th Amendment attempted to register to vote in the State of Missouri, and was refused because she was not a man. The Chief Justice of the Supreme Court in that year, wrote the majority opinion, in which he stated:

                  The Constitution does not in words say who shall be natural-born citizens. Resort must be had elsewhere to ascertain that. At common law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners. Some authorities go further and include as citizens children born within the jurisdiction without reference to the citizenship of their parents

            • He’s eligible. Get used to it.

      • olddog

        Or DOJ..put with-HOLDER on trial for Hate Crimes..then RICO charges.

    • mizlindajean

      seriously thinking same thing Wayne

    • Vonnie Wilford

      What do you mean “almost worth it”….you’d be darn lucky to live in South Carolina. If you don’t love it, we don’t want you!!

      • Calm down, Francis. I live in North Carolina now. And what I mean by that is that after 20 years in the Navy, you get sick and tired of moving.

  • LIBERTYUSA

    … Why was the U.S. There to retrieve WEAPONS !”

    • HCTUB

      I believe you are right , Fox did a story on a ship with weapons that was going to the Palestinians , and the White House sent the ambassador their to investergate , but the story got no traction .

    • Look_A_Squirrel

      The US was funneling weapons to Syria through Turkey (which is why Stephen’s last appointment was with the Turkish rep in Benghazi and not Tripoli where the Turkish Embassy is also located). When Gahdaffi fell his and the US weapons we supplied to his opposition were flooding Benghazi for shipment to the highest bidder.

  • iaintlyin

    Two hidden gems in the R party, This guy and Louie Gohmet. Gotta love ’em both for their candor, honesty and ability to speak WITHOUT reading from notes. Whether speaking to the press, from the congressinal floor, from a seat on a committee, these two guys know their stuff and know the ins and outs of which they speak without READING talking points. Mincing words and playing semantics is not their forte.

  • Conniption Fitz

    MoBro hood (aka Al Queda) shows its true colors:
    Nazi salutes from Muslim Brotherhood protestors

    Of course, we know There has been a Nazi/Islam alliance since WWII.

    Islam is an evil system with evil friends and evil fruit.

  • justapatriot

    I see great things for Trey Gowdy. I appreciate his candor and his tenacity.

  • Harold T. Walters

    Trey Gowdy for POTUS in 2016

  • nick

    Man why didn’t this guy run against Lindsey Graham?

    • Galatiansch2vs20

      Maybe he’s concerned about keep his influence in the house and Graham’s unfortunately pretty popular in SC.

  • Retired_CSI

    The NYT does what the Obama Regime tells it to do, period!

  • wtram46

    We need this man in DC!!!

  • kwagner

    Gowdy’s constituents should be pleased to have him. I speak as someone represented by Debbie Wasserman-Schultz. 🙁

    • iaintlyin

      Yeah dude, Wassermans-Shultz is as bad as the creep representing my state, some crook named Shumer. Getting back to Gowdy, very humble guy from what I’ve seen and read of him. On more than one occasion I’ve seen him speak to the fact that he’s only around until he’s re-elected, showing me he takes nothing for granted including his office and his voters.

  • Carol Marie

    once again, rep gowdy is on point

  • Steve Graves

    NYT printing more lies to try to cover up criminal negligence by Clinton & Obama.

  • Exodus2011

    I believe the fascinating but Kallous, Killary Klinton will not be able to escape JUSTICE this time, like she did back during the ‘Whitewater’ caper

    The wheels of Justice turn deliberately and slowly, Killary, as The Founders wisely ensured ….

    but Killary? … they DO.TURN.

    May the FULL and TREASONOUS TRUTH be REVEALED.

    • UnCL3

      We on the conservative right know the truth…but the REVEALING part? HAH! That’s in the hands of the commie left media, so, I’m not holding my breath.

      • Bruce wayne

        GOD WAS THERE THAT NIGHT AND HE KNOWS THE TRUTH

        • Ernest Murphy

          Yeah, and water boarding will bring more truth.
          Next up Hillary Rodham Clinton

  • John Andrews

    The reason why there was so many American CIA and military personel on the ground.. Obama was Illegally arming the Muslim Brotherhood. High crimes at a minimum.

  • Jim Roberts

    So the NYT has invented a new fallacy. Pre hoc ergo propter hoc

  • gregzotta

    The New York Slime is another Propaganda Arm of
    the Obama Regime

  • gregzotta

    We just need to
    keep reminding the people that Killary Clinton failed to provide adequate
    security for Ambassador Stevens in
    Benghazi, resulting in 4 Americans being slaughtered and she was complicit in
    the cover-up blaming a video, in which the movie producer was jailed. And that
    Barack Hussein Obama was MIA.

    • Ernest Murphy

      B. Hussain Oboma was not MIA he was taking a nap for his fundraiser in Reno the next day. Oboma had already created the avenue for arms shipments to muslims through the bogus Gaddafi attack that used up, 100 million$ of our cruise missiles, in order to arm Alqueda in Libya. Those armed terrorists are the same ones who were in Benghazi to prevent those arms from going anywhere else, but to them. Ambassador Stevens was not in an embassy that is protected,and usually with beefed up security near the date 9-11. Ambassador Stevens was negotiating an arms transfer from Benghazi. Hillary did not provide protection because this activity was not supposed to show up as an incident Her chief of staff Huma Abdin and Vallerie Jarrett failed in their muslim brothers support for this action. As long as we know and keep saying it Like Trey Gowdy it simply removes more trust from the media sources.

  • practical

    Regardless of who is in power the media and government only allow certain facts to filter to the public. There is evidence that the ruling party was aware of a possible attack on Pearl Harbor but did not act. Why? Because we as a people were not ready for war. Similar rumors abound regarding other conflicts. I vaguely remember Nixon saying that the settlement regarding Viet Nam Coukld have been negotiated and achieved years earlier but wasn’t. Why? Because the American People weren’t ready for it. I am simply saying we are manipulated by Media and gov’t constantly Be it Fox, CNN OR NBC We bend the way and when they want us to and then give us the shaft

  • don76550

    Why would anyone in their right mind believe anything they read in the left wing propaganda rag New York Times.

  • lrjrj

    NYTs is trying their best for Hillary, and this muddling of the events of 9/11 will be useful in predictable, revisionist “he said, she said” later on, and the hope has to be that the partisan country will take sides, and this will be like any other political debate, meaningless. And with the millions of Americans Dem strive to get to the polls (immigrants, young people, single women) it won’t matter a bit that Hillary is nothing but a political climber, like Obama, not up to the very important job of leading this country. And it will work.

    • anotherworriedmom

      The he said / she said that you refer to is spot on. Look for it in the 2016 debates when HRC uses the NYT article as “proof” that she was right about Benghazi.

      • lrjrj

        The TV ad against Obama, “who’s going to answer that 3am phone call” is priceless – who would have thought to answer, “None of the above” or “not the next day either” ? What a joke. Why don’t Americans think the Democrats are strong on national security? Obama and Hillary, all politics, 24 x 7 – nothing can come before their political careers. Hillary in charge of Americans in a very dangerous part of the world, but not going to risk her 2016 political viability by taking any risks, explaining her positions, or telling the American people what happened to their Ambassador and the men protecting them, with no assistance from the greatest military in the world? Great ad, could not have been more Saturday Night Live -esque, now that we know what Obama and Hillary are made of!

  • dan9el

    If Mr Gowdy has the drive, courage and stomach (and so far it seems he has) to start articles of impeachment,….then this is going to take place soon;…
    We have;…..NSA, IRS, APA, Benghazi, Fast And Furious, Obamacare project,…no to mention horrendous economy, poor national security, ,illegal immigration,..massive illegal practices and fraud surfacing at virtually daily basis..etc,…etc.

    Don’t we have (we, the people),…don’t we have enough material to expose, accuse, convict, arrest, remove from power, and ultimately sent to jail the members, associates and affiliates inside and related to this un-American, unconstitutional , corrupted and fraud-base current administration?…..Yes?….or….No?

    WE KNOW THEY ARE THERE …WE CAN FIND THEM,… AND WE CAN HIRE THEM ,… AND THE TIME IS NOW!

    The already legal ensemble should and must team-up with Rep Trey Gowdy to launch the massive impeachment – way expected for log time and well deserved – against the un-American, corrupted, insidious and fraud-base current administration that for long time has been conducted the ongoing brutal attack – in so many ways,…at so many levels – against the good people of this great nation.

    The action is way overdue,…no more talking no more waiting.

    Doing this now, will serve to create a much better scenario for cleaner 2014 and 2016 incoming elections.

    What we should, could, and must do is….MASSIVE MEGA-IMPEACHMENT against the entire current administration for their ongoing insidious assault in so many ways and at so many levels – to the good people of our great country.

    And on this, since the congress does not have any teeth , much less stomach for it, (for they are bribed and intimidated and so in fear) we, the people have, should , must hire external powerful legal array (and we all know they are there) to get the job done.

    Input anyone? Opinions welcome.

    • dan9el

      In addition, we all can help in the quest to recover our country;…

      Although the Tea Party Movement is heavy on the topic , here are some of the places where to go;

      http://rowanteapartypatriots.wordpress.com/2013/09/01/movement-to-impeach-obama-snowballing/

      National Organizations Supporting Impeachment

      While the “Committee to Impeach the President” and its parent organization, the Citizen’s Investigative Commission, have been instrumental in facilitating a grass-roots impeachment movement across America, there are more than a dozen national non-profit organizations which have been pushing impeachment as well. The following is a partial informational list of these groups.

      Conservative Caucus 450 Maple Av. Vienna, VA 22180 (703) 938-9626www.conservativeusa.org –Howard Phillips, Chairman

      Carol Moore’s Button Distribution Center IMPEACH CLINTON AGAIN RESIGN RAPIST Red and Blue on white. 2 1/4 inches $2.00 each; 5 or more $1.25 each. Checks to: Carol Mores BDC Box 6551 Washington DC 20035 202-635-3739

      Citizens United 11094-D Lee Hwy., Suite #200 Fairfax, VA 22030www.citizensunited.org –Floyd Brown, Chairman

      Christian Action Network
      Forest, VA (800) 835-5795 –Mark Mawyer, Chairman –Gil Davis

      Citizens for Honest Government P.O. Box 220 Winchester, CA 92506 Phone: (909) 925-2434 Fax: (909) 652-5848www.CHG.org –Pat Mastrisciana, Chairman

      Forecast Foundation 2400 Carolina Rd. Chesapeake, VA 23322-1428 –Dr. Herb Titus, Chairman

      Coalition of Politically Active Christians 611 Pennsylvania Av. SE Suite #1165 Washington, DC 20003-4303 Phone: (970) 872-4000 Fax: (970) 872-2408 –Charles Phillips, Chairman

      American Criminal Justice Center P.O. Box 97187 Washington, DC 20090-7187

      Judicial Watch
      P.O. Box 44444 Washington, DC 20026 (202) 646-5199www.judicialwatch.org –Larry Klayman, President

      Landmark Legal Foundation 457-B Carlisle Drive Herndon, VA 20170 Phone: (703) 689-2370www.landmarklegal.org –President, Mark Levin

      http://www.conservativeaction.org/resources.php3?article=impeach/organizations

      So, contact the nearest one and good luck.

  • poorhardworker

    I will admit up front that I do not live in his state or know if he is in favor there or not…but I absolutely LOVE the succinct way he expresses his logic and. tonight, his sardonic side. He is almost as incisive as Ted Cruz.

    • frisco8112

      I live in his state of South Carolina, and we do love him.

  • lrjrj

    Isn’t the NYT whitewashing political corruption, hiding the truth from the American people, and deliberately deflecting blame and accountability from public officials, the complete opposite of the role they are supposed to play? How close is this piece, in muddling and revisionism of political accountability and reporting, to treason?

  • scottytreid

    The question is why did the US govt side with Islamist terrorist to overthrow the secular govt of Ghaddafi? Why did Western Media promote lies that people were being slaughtered in Benghazi. The CIA and the State Dept had a presence in Libya because Ghaddafi sided with the US govt in the war on terror and Ghaddafi told you that it was Al Qeada in Benghazi causing all the problems. But no one is asking the central question of why did the US govt side with terrorists over an ally?

    • anotherworriedmom

      HRC’s assistant Huma Abedin has been with her for more than 20 years. Ms. Abedin’s mother is the founding member of the Muslim Sisterhood. Barack Obama’s “favorite sound” is the muslim call to prayer. The ties to the Muslim Brotherhood within this administration are too numerous to list (google them). The idea was to install the MB in Egypt so that they could bring about the Caliphate. It’s not working out that way but the MB is deeply entrenched in O’s administration.

  • Marty Holden

    how about they can speak english dumbass, so much for logic