15 year old girl leaves anti-gun politicians speechless

This has gained a tremendous amount of traction in just a few days and once you see it you’ll know why:



Consider this an open thread.

Comment Policy: Please read our comment policy before making a comment. In short, please be respectful of others and do not engage in personal attacks. Otherwise we will revoke your comment privileges.

160 thoughts on “15 year old girl leaves anti-gun politicians speechless

  1. Hannity is going to have this great lady on his show on Tuesday night.  Definitely must watch tv. 
    Maybe we have in her another Margaret Thatcher.  Let’s hope so.
    John Craven – New Orleans

  2. Thank God, there are those among us, who possess Wisdom beyond their years.  It helps balance the fact, that in spite of their years, there are so many among us who have no Wisdom at all.  If you missed the point I was trying to make, it was directed at most of Congress.  That illustrious body of worthless individuals who are supposed to represent us.  That a fifteen year old girl, God Bless her parents, could make a speech like like that, is illustrative of what is wrong with this great nation.  She gets it.  Why don’t our elected Representatives get it?  
    Governing a Constitutional Republic and abiding by The Constitution of our Founders, you would think would be a pretty simple thing, right?  
    Apparently not so.  Does it take a fifteen year old girl to tell us we are headed down the wrong path?  Is that how far we have gone astray of the Principles our Founding Fathers left us?
    Maybe she is just a vision of what is to come.  Let’s hope so.

    1. white531 Very well said, so many of us are disgusted with the political class of public servants, they need to be reminded whom they work for and their employment is conditional!

  3. Gun Control advocates need guns to look like (scary) guns otherwise they will not know when to confiscate peanut butter sandwiches.

  4. I’ve seen this. I don’t think the pols were actually speechless, they were just busy ignoring her articulation of the uncomfortable truth.

  5. This girl’s fantastic.  All of her points are absolutely excellent. She leaves me almost speechless.  There’s nothing to add to anything she’s said.  And she said it all so brilliantly.
    Sadly, we are saddled with Republican Big Whigs like Lindsey Grahamnesty who are more than happy to vote for denying Americans their 2nd Ammendment rights because that will get them on their favorite TV shows ahead of everyone else.
    I hope Lindsey Grahamnesty’s constituents do us all a world of good and kick him out and put in a conservative with a spine.
    John Craven – New Orleans

    1. OneThinDime Thanks OTD!
      Did you catch this in the article, “…she responded with six bullets from her .38 automatic revolver…”. What is an “automatic revolver”, is it anything like a spinning glass disco ball? It’s hard to have a discussion when we cannot speak the same language, by that I mean false language and truth! 
      If those speaking about something don’t know enough about what they are speaking to use the correct language how are we supposed to know what they are actually speaking of?
      I realize this article was simply telling of the crime and the sentence, not openly pushing an agenda. However it is a very good example of how poorly the terms and the lack of knowledge are of those doing the reporting and in some case arguing/agenda pushing…

      1. I did not catch that, thanks for pointing out!  I went right to the sentence and said WTF for trying to murder 3 people?  Did you see he had 6 prior convictions?  He was on the street why?  Rhetorical question my clock friend. Wonder if Holder statement that sentences are too long for blacks influenced this judge…..
        Hey, maybe there’s a new business idea there, an automatic revolver!  It would be on the banned gun list…

        1. OneThinDime It does make one wonder what our legal system is doing.
           This is a career criminal, it seems that at a certain point the legal system becomes culpable. It kind of makes sense if one looks at it from a business stand point, in the case a good repeat customer, but a bad citizen!

    2. OneThinDime  We should pitch in and get that woman a bigger gun just in case there’s a next time.

      1. Dr. Strangelove Great idea!  And a fundraiser to buy her ammo.  Make you wonder if his bros will come after her.

      1. Conservative_Hippie amyshulk  
        love your avi C_H, surfboard is cool, that a long board? nice colour too.

        1. crosshr Conservative_Hippie amyshulk Thanks, yes I think it’s a long board 🙂

    1. John_Frank Outstanding!I would love to shake this mans hand and tell hi m thank you!

  6. As the old saying goes ” out of the mouths of babes” and I mean that with all due respect. Seems like you can’t say anything without it being taken out of context.

  7. Ling- If they are all purchased illegally, then prosecute the ones who are being “straw buyers.” I believe i saw recently that Chicago has one of the lowest federal firearms prosecution rates in the US. Have the lawyers step up here and go after the gangs and the Mexican drug cartels responsible for most of this. Like they wouldn’t bring theirs from Mexico along with their drugs!

  8. She makes some okay points but can finally clear up this whole “none of the guns were registered to the people who used them” canard?
    The reason is because they are bough illegally. The reason they CAN be bought illegally is because gun laws are much more lenient in places OUTSIDE Chicago; many of the guns are purchased LEGALLY elsewhere and then resold on the black market. These people aren’t just making guns for themselves.
    This problem, of course, could be solved by stricter gun control measures in ALL states. Whether or not we want to do that or think it is constitutional is another issue, but the claim that gun controls fail because there are so many guns in places where such laws are strictest is a weak argument. The guns flow in because there are places where laws aren’t nearly as strict.
    Again, I’m not advocating that every state necessarily adopt draconian gun control measures, I just think we need to be honest as to WHY gun control measures are failing in places like Chicago.

    1. linguaphonica  
      Fact: Children died during 9/11/01 attacks, weapons used were box cutters and jet planes (no guns)

      Fact: Children died during the OK City bombing, weapons used were truck and fertilizer (no guns)
      Fact: 909 people died at Jonestown, 303 of which were children, weapon used was kool-aid and cyanide
      Fact:  1927 was worst mass killing at a school, 37 children murdered, weapon used was dynamite
      If you pay attention, the answer to Chicago’s gun problems has been answered by many, ENFORCE the laws!

    2. linguaphonica
      The reason they CAN be bought illegally is because gun laws are much
      more lenient in places OUTSIDE Chicago; many of the guns are purchased
      LEGALLY elsewhere and then resold on the black market.
      More to the point, most of the persons who are buying the guns illegally are criminals. Honest people might buy guns illegally too but they are not going to use them for criminal activities, only self-defense, and even if they use them in self-defense they take the chance of prison time for doing it. If Chicago relaxed the laws and allowed honest people kill in self-defense the crime rate would go down. It doesn’t take a brain surgeon to know that those sorry ass punks are afraid of getting shot themselves when they don’t know if their victim or a person nearby will shoot them.

        1. OneThinDime toongoon linguaphonica Exactly what I was going to say.I’m glad I decided to read the other posts first.

    3. linguaphonica  
      you talking about the fast and furious gun run by the potus & fed ? 
      let’s think about this, you take a gun and wanna intrude and brake in to a house. If you know they have a shot gun and high powered rifle, would their house still be on target ? well except the intruder have a death wish.
      more death from the hand of bad people with gun take place in cities where gun ownership is strictly regulated or completely banned preventing public  from protecting themselves from deadly reckless act of murderous corrupted mindset sleaze population.

    4. Also, the thing about that Chinese mass stabbing (22 kids an adult) that we all seem to be forgetting is that nobody died.    
      Strange… I’ve heard that before. The students who were stabbed didn’t die. 
      Does the left use this argument because it’s OK if children have 6 inches of steel pushed into their chest but it didn’t kill them. I guess they had to die for it have mattered.
      The message is, put down your gun and use a knife, but don’t hit any vital organs, we’re OK with that.
      The problem is and has been mental illness, if they don’t address that, murder rates, or you prefer, violence will go up.

      1. toongoon was going to say the same thing toon.  
        “Hey nobody died! Ok?”  
        “Oh, I didn’t realize.  Well that case stab on.  No issues with it from my end.” 
        I mean really?  “Nobody died” is an argument in that Chinese case??

        1. NCHokie02 toongoon No, but ask any parent whether or not they’d rather have their child get stabbed and live or shot to death and I think they’d all give you the same answer. Saying that there’s other ways to hurt people does little but muddy the issue; of course you can kill people with a knife, if you are good enough you can kill someone with your bare hands. What’s the point?

        2. linguaphonica NCHokie02 toongoon
          ” No, but ask any parent whether or not they’d rather have their child get stabbed and live or shot to death and I think they’d all give you the same answer.”
          This is an example of a false argument, the choice is stabbed and lived or shot and died. 
          Why not ask would a parent rather have their child stabbed and died or shot and lived? You see being shot doesn’t mean death, in fact a minority of shootings result in death. Being stabbed does not mean one will survive either, there are many deaths from stabbings.
          If one wishes to argue based on the merits of their position they must first be honest in the argument being made. Comparing apples to oranges does not support an argument in this case.

        3. linguaphonica “What’s the point”?
          The point is we have a constitution that is suppose to be upheld. The point is more gun control only helps the criminal. Does that not penetrate your thinking process on any level??????
          And while you’re at it, why not ask a parent if they’d rather have their child get diabetes or would they rather they get cancer? Then duck.

        4. clockwindingdown linguaphonica NCHokie02 toongoon 
          The left have their brains wired backwards. It’s like trying to have a discussion with a fence post.

        5. badbadlibs clockwindingdown linguaphonica NCHokie02 toongoon At least a fence post stands its ground and won’t walk away…
          They do lack the ability of critical thinking, which makes them sheep and explains why they fall for the “tricks” of the left.

    5. linguaphonica “The reason is because they are bough illegally. The reason they CAN be bought illegally is because gun laws are much more lenient in places OUTSIDE Chicago; many of the guns are purchased LEGALLY elsewhere and then resold on the black market.These people aren’t just making guns for themselves.”
      There are a lot of assumptions going on there, where is your evidence to support your claims. Outside of Chicago guns can be bought legally. 
      “many of the guns are purchased LEGALLY elsewhere and then resold on the black market.” Where is the evidence that proves or disproves this? Could the guns be stolen?
      “The guns flow in because there are places where laws aren’t nearly as strict.” Why are the guns coming in? You argument fails to address why someone would want a gun, which really is the issue is it not? You also make the assumption that “strict” gun laws are the answer, however doesn’t the fact that Chicago has a gun violence problem and already has “strict” gun laws punch holes in this premiss?
      “Again, I’m not advocating that every state necessarily adopt draconian gun control measures, I just think we need to be honest as to WHY gun control measures are failing in places like Chicago.” If that truly is your intention there are plenty of reasons, mostly based on social and family breakdown. However if decreasing gun violence is a goal then why not look at other places in our country that live under Our Constitution with less gun violence and see what they are doing. 
      With a little work one can find examples of higher gun ownership and legal carry corresponding to lower gun violence. That should make one reconsider stricter laws. Is Chicago enforcing the gun laws it has on the books, if not why, what motives could there be for not enforcing existing laws?

    6. linguaphonica Really?  So in countries where there is no “right” to keep and bear arms there is no violent crime??  So if we banned guns people wouldn’t be getting shot they just be getting stabbed and beaten to death more, which I guess is ok.  Btw, I do believe deaths using a blunt instrument (hammer, bat etc.) occur more than deaths with a firearm. 
      And you are basically saying that gun laws in Chicago fail because gun laws in other places aren’t as strong.  However not only do their gun laws not work, they aren’t enforced.  Chicago also has the lowest rate of prosecuted gun crimes.  So how can the laws work if they aren’t even enforced?  I guess they need more laws, that’s always a favorite fix.

  9. *just posted this on previous story but so angry copied here too!*
    I had to put a comment on here. Just saw Bammy tweeted about Ebert
    passing saying “movies won’t be the same.” When the hell is this POS
    going to tweet about the marine sniper killed, SEALS dying in crashes
    and accidents or any other service man dying in the line of duty?!? This
    man drives me to murder on a daily occurrence!! If anyone should be
    impeached and put before a military tribunal it is this POS traitor!!

    1. bahamianhoosier Right there with you.
      Why is it our “President” hasn’t tweeted any words of reassurance considering lil kim’s tantrum in N. Korea. Does he even have a clue as to the mess he has encouraged in the middle east. Has this man done one iota amount of work since starting his starring role of President. I personally have never been more ashamed of the representation of our country. Thank God for our brave young men and women who serve no matter who leads them. I try to stay positive but it

  10. Amazing, isn’t she? This is exactly the kind of people we need in our government instead of sleazy liars, leeches and thieves. As more and more people realize that the purpose for the ‘gun control’ proposals by the marxist democrat party are not intended to curtail violence, but rather to DISARM THE AMERICAN POPULATION so they can impose their will with impunity, more like this amazing young woman will speak up. Why would anyone want to live in maryland?

    1. harglide I’m dreaming of the day Ted Cruz does a joint interview with this young lady!

  11. As usual, the politicians ignored this young woman because they “knew better” than any pro 2A’er. You can’t have a utopia without breaking a few dozen constitutional amendments.

  12. What is left to say that the posters here haven’t already said?Her words are falling on deaf ears in the legislature.

  13. It is a shame the people she was speaking to have already made up their minds. It is going to take more than talk I am afraid.

    1. brjohnson We elect politicians who become our masters. They write laws, and even it they are thrown out of  office the Law stands and isn’t repealed. The damage they do to our constitution and freedom is , by that time, already done.

  14. Wow, here
    is a young lady who is using her talent to get ahead in life. Scholarships for
    shooting and using that talent to bring to light the lies being told by
    politicians about their attempt to use legislation and laws to turn all
    Americans into sheep. For any who would attack this 15 year old for expressing
    her beliefs, that can’t handle the truth, then please, get off your lazy rear
    end and go to D.C. and show as much respect and intelligence that this young
    lady showed. There are many politicians that were just shamed by an articulate
    and intelligent young lady who seems to have been taught to respect all and
    fear none. Bravo young lady bravo!!!

  15. I know several liberals who own guns, and the anti-gun parade on Capitol Hill is making them conflicted and uneasy. With payroll taxes increasing and health insurance premiums rising, some of them may get enlightenment before 2016. It’s only going to get worse.

    1. applepie101 I would much rather them self terminate and guarantee they never do what they’ve already done three times prior…vote DemonRat.

  16. Pity this would never, ever, be shown in the mainstream media, let alone on a network news program. It is scary how the mainstream media gets a narrative and then will beat the public over the head with it until it is accepted as “fact” by the general public. Global warming was perhaps the biggest example of this, even though now it’s considered to be a lie. Now it’s all about guns. The upcoming “60 Minutes” segment with the parents from the Connecticut school shooting is going to be yet another example of having emotions set public policy. And when you do that, generally somebody’s Constitutional rights go out the window. From what I’ve seen of that upcoming interview, they all talk about gun control, but nobody talked about having better security in schools or making it easier for families to commit insane people who may commit a crime like this. The mainstream media generally always go for the easy answers, like getting rid of guns, and when they do that they are always wrong and never solve anything.

    1. Libertyship46 Democrat = democracy: • control of an organization or group by the majority of its members • the practice or principles of social equality :

  17. When a 15 year old destroys poorly written legislation with facts, it’s time to fire the legislatures writing the garbage.  Gun control is not about the safety of anyone and has never been about safety.  It is completely about taking the right to defend yourself away from you, and making you, the law-abiding citizen, a target for the government to run over.  The idiots pushing this legislation should be put up on charges of treason!  This means you, Odumbo!  Odumbo has lied about keeping his oath of office two times now.  What the zombies who voted for him fail to realize is that he has said all along that he wants to “fundamentally change” the Constitution.  The fundamental change is that he is going after the Bill of Rights.  Funny how libs want to live their lives in complete freedom, but want to destroy the rights of their fellow citizens.  They are so narrow minded and shallow that they fail to see the noose they are creating around their own necks!

  18. Scrolling down I see a couple of new trolls. They never seem to last long here, do they? I believe their heads explode after being exposed to those pesky fact thingies.

    1. Dr. Strangelove No, we get banned for making your heads explode with our intelligent observations. The conservative mind just can’t take it.

      1. mdpop2012 Dr. Strangelove Liberals lack intelligence and fail to observe the obvious.  If you don’t like the Constitution and our Bill of Rights, I hear Mexico is looking for cheap labor.

  19. Well young lady, I think you’re coming to the conclusion that it’s about controlling the populace, not the guns themselves.

  20. What about the drugs being prescribed to our children? Why is nobody questioning the drug makers?

    1. fireme Have you researched political contributions by big pharma? And besides, people aren’t going to give up their chemical babysitters while they’re watching “Dancing With The Stars.”

  21. Americans still don’t understand what has been done to them. It’s not about politicians and votes and elections and common sense and logic and Constitution. Do your own research. America is now an occupied country. Decades ago Marxists began a deliberate infiltration and subversion of all of our key cultural institutions. They currently own all the high ground: the universities, media, government agencies.They created and own the “pop culture” that owns the minds of most of our nations young people. So they own the future. This brave, intelligent young woman is spitting in the wind of a hurricane Stealth Coup D’etat. Her beautifully reasoned argument will be ignored by corrupted, sociopathic politicians with an agenda beyond logic or the Constitution. Their real agenda is not ending violence. If it was they would listen to her. No, their agenda is to disarm and disempower American citizens. Americans must wake up and realize what’s been done to them. It is probably already too late.

    1. RobertJohnson3 “We will bury you without firing a shot.”
      Losing the Cold War was the best thing to ever happen to Marxism.

  22. Brave young lady, she will be demonized by the left. I admire her courage, good job!

    1. StevenValdez If you are being demonized by the Left you are doing the work of Angels.

  23. Well spoken young lady, you give hope for a great country with a young generation degenerated.
     Well parenting, moral spiritual indoctrination ( Biblical teachings) in our school system as well as our faith communities with well clear definition of good and evil will help our youngsters in their personal, social and organizational growth. 
    I’m glad this young lady have the courage to stand toe to toe with these politicians and declare her belief in our constitutional rights with courage and confidence. 
    Most likely our sons and daughters makes good life choice start from what they learn from home

    1. Susanb958 I thought the same thing but wondered if it was (a) nervousness or (b) time limit on comments

    1. Booker I guess you were pretty illiterate back then because all she’s doing is reading off paper.

      1. mdpop2012 Booker And what is wrong with reading your speech?  Duh Bumbler rarely speaks off Teleprompter and when he does he usually puts his dumb ass foot in his mouth.  Not everyone can afford Teleprompter.

        1. hbnolikeee mdpop2012 Booker I thought the Fraudster-in-Chief put his foot up his plumber’s pathway, seems to be his preference.

      2. mdpop2012 Booker illiterates can’t read.  Typical libtard, cannot even make a false argument.

  24. Attending college with a scholarship isn’t a reason for politicians to oppose a gun bill. They should support it on it’s merits of whether or not it’s a good bill.

    1. She mentions China. I live in China. China proves that you can keep guns out of the hands of criminals, and in so doing, decrease the murder rate. The murder rate is lower here, in part because criminals can’t get their hands on guns. (Guns are more lethal than other weapons because of their longer range and greater power.)

        1. Good question.  China and their anti-gun laws has one of the most repressive governments on the planet.  Disarm the populace and you will have them in your control.  Thanks, WaiGouGuizi, for making our point.

      1. WaiGuoGuizi We get your anti gun and trolling. If you are in China then you have no experience with citizens owning guns and know not what you speak of. You also use disingenuous argument, guns are not dangerous, without human interaction a gun is as dangerous as a rock of the same size, a cup, a bowl, etc..
        Being ignorant is one thing, exposing ones ignorance for all to see, priceless!

      2. WaiGuoGuizi Troll for your government! You must’ve missed the part about the chinese mass child murderer? 42 children dead from a edged weapon attack kinda sums up your disingenuous arguement!

        1. factsobill WaiGuoGuizi   WaiGuoGuizi, is that Chinese for “one who is a ward of the state and doesn’t know what liberty is”?  Or does it mean “troll hiding in plain sight but still gets exposed”

      3. WaiGuoGuizi  
        Which statistic are you referring to? Citizen against citizen murder rate or government against citizen murder rate?

      4. WaiGuoGuizi The 2A wasn’t meant to give us protection from criminals but to give us protection from tyrannical government like the oppressive one forcing it’s will on every citizen of China. Thank you, no, but we would rather not have a tyrant ruling over us telling us how to live out our lives. It was working great up until the anti-god socialist came to power and ruined everything. Now we have $16.7 trillion in debt, a product of communist central banking and a worthless fiat currency hat tip to more communists. I could go on forever but I have a life to live thanks to my God.

    2. WaiGuoGuizi Typical leftist logic, or should I say lack of. Any bill that infringes on Our 2nd Amendment has no merit! The subject is not up for discussion, and if you are in China it is no of your affair!

    3. Her losing the opportunity to earn a scholarship because her second amendment rights have been denied her is what we would call an unintended consequence of a foolish law.  The intended consequences of thes law – a reduction in violence – will never materialize.

  25. She’s just a mindless conservative robot regurgitating faulty arguments by other mindless conservative robots like the man in China who stabbed 22 children. All those children survived whereas the children at Sandy Hook…

    1. mdpop2012 Whereas, those children in Sandy Hook would have had a chance if someone on campus had been armed.

        1. mdpop2012 Susanb958 Oh good come back! By switching to Columbine you must agree with Susan958 post, other wise you would have argued your position on Sandy Hook’s merits alone.
          The Subject of Guns combined with Friday night always brings the Trolls out!

        2. mdpop2012 Susanb958 The assault weapons ban was in effect when Colombine took place moron!

        3. 57thunderbird We’re talking about an armed guard at the school not a weapons ban you moron.

    2. mdpop2012 Just a mindless leftist troll robot regurgitating faulty arguments by other mindless leftist troll robots.

    3. mdpop2012 So to use your moronic logic I’m better off with a kitchen knife instead of reaching for my Glock if an intruder enters my home and threatens my family? Why can you morons read the second amendment? It states the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed? I love the China analogies. You on the Left are all a much of Tom Friedman inspired drones who crave opressive, totalitarian state that promote the collective over the individual and has no respect for private property and individual rights. Thanks for ruining my country.

      1. BearNJ Stupid strawmen arguments from a mindless conservative. It’s not about you defending yourself, its about preventing bad people getting theirs hands on guns that kill a mass number of people in as little time as possible.

        1. mdpop2012 BearNJ I quote the Constitution and you call it a straw man? You’re clueless. 

          Of course its about defending
          ourselves. Look at these bill limit rifles (Feinstein bill, NY, CT &
          Colorado) , they look to limit magazine size, they want to create a
          database of law abiding citizens and charge higher fees, the federal
          government is buying up ammo and is making it more difficult to renew
          permits while increasing fees.
          If you chose not to protect yourself
          that your choice. Don’t take my constitutional Right to protect my
          family.

        2. mdpop2012
          You’re wrong. It’s about preventing honest people from defending themselves from government. You are blinded by the hate that is prevalent on the left today. I see it my own family, friends, neighbors and in the arguments the left makes regarding gun control, homosexual marriage, abortion, and in the tolerance of Muslims who kill their own chidren as well other children and women and other innocents worldwide but have complete intolerance of Christians who are not violent in any way.  
          You call the Constitution a straw man argument, completely ignorant that that document has kept more people liberated for over two hundred years. There is never has there been any country that has allowed more people freedom than this one. I challenge you to name one.
          You are incapable of seeing what the liberals and the democrats are doing to this country and yours and your children’s future, if you have any. I will not make any assumptions to your belief in the Bible. The Bible plainly tells us where we are right now. It is written how men will hate goodness and love evil. 
          The gun grabbers, yourself included are going to create a murder epidemic that will take the entire country. But because so much hatred is in people’s hearts they will not see it. The murders will be justified by those who had previously hated death and violence, the taste for blood will be your lips and will not be quenched. Christians, those who oppose liberal cultural ideas, anyone who stands against evil will be targeted.
          You are incapable of making a counter argument, you call people names and repeat the words of those who are trying to change the country. But change the country to what? You should figure that out because I guarantee where they are taking us you aren’t going liike it when you get there.

        3. mdpop2012 You cannot seriously be that ignorant to believe what you wrote? Have you read the 2nd Amendment, are you able to comprehend what it means? Not what someone tells you it means but what the people whom wrote it said it means? 
          Your argument is classic “strawman”, the argument you are attempting to defend is, a false premiss.
          “It’s not about you defending yourself, its about preventing bad people getting theirs hands on guns that kill a mass number of people in as little time as possible.” Seriously, did you reread this, that would be an argument for more people having guns to defend themselves… But we are off topic, 
          This is about infringement of Our 2nd Amendment under disguise, nothing else! To support infringement is to open yourself to exposure of being a victim regardless of the source, criminal or tyrant. 
          On a side note, if you do not value yourself enough to defend yourself don’t expect anyone else to value you enough to defend you.

    4. mdpop2012 STFU,A$$hole! If you had brain, you’d take it  out and play with it! No one wants gun “control” from a trolling T-rd, from that new Communist State of Maryland ! I love it when a little girl gets under your hide with a burr like this one!LOLOLOL!!! Stupid troll! blogs are for People!

        1. mdpop2012 You call conservativism for idiots?

          Only a leftist who supports government
          tyranny who think like you. Conservatives believe in liberty, private
          property rights, individual freedom, the rule of law, a strong national
          defense and the Constitution.

          Your policies have failed whereever its
          changed. Churchill said it best back in 1948.
          Socialism is the philosophy of
          failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy. It’s
          inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery.

        2. mdpop2012 factsobill  
          Dear whoever you are , I can help send a tow truck to assist you, free up your head from  potus & harryR,nancyP chrisM,dianneF your whole libtard idols arse. With that in mind, you have to pick a car wash of your choice to completely wash & rinse your head clean from all crap stain & smell so you can see much clearer as your precious life journey heads forward. Good luck and God Bless !

        1. mdpop2012 57thunderbird Ooh good comeback.Iknow you are but what am I?Did it take you all day with help from you mom to come up with that juvenile response or did you think of it all by yourself?Hahahahaha!!!!

    5. mdpop2012 “Faulty arguments”? Do you mean like actual statistical facts? 
      You see, we “conservative robots” don’t live in the make believe technicolor world of the fanatical liberal parasite — a place where common sense and reason go to die. We live in a place called “reality” where we draw conclusions, not based on irrational and impulsive fears as the radical does, but on whether the situation warrants a reasonable and thoughtful response. Once it’s been determined that the situation warrants a reasonable and thoughtful response, we then offer practical and intelligent solutions that will actually solve the problem and not simply band-aide it over with imbecilic laws and irrational regulations meant to empower the liberal base, aka the common criminal. We don’t believe in arming criminals, though we’re aware that the liberal “god of government” is chock full of them.
      It’s very difficult to convince the gallatically stupid in our culture, namely the liberal parasite, because these imbecilic drains-on-society are both morally bankrupt and intellectually deficient. Expecting them to grasp even the most fundamental notion of “law”and “liberty” is a monumental task even for the most learned of our society. Because as our Southern friends rightly say: “You can’t fix stupid”, and no one is more stupid than a liberal.

    6. mdpop2012 “Faulty arguments”? Do you mean like actual statistical facts? 
      You see, we “conservative robots” don’t live in the make believe technicolor world of the fanatical liberal parasite — a place where common sense and reason go to die. We live in a place called “reality” where we draw conclusions, not based on irrational and impulsive fears as the radical does, but on whether the situation warrants a reasonable and thoughtful response. Once it’s been determined that the situation warrants a reasonable and thoughtful response, we then offer practical and intelligent solutions that will actually solve the problem and not simply band-aide it over with imbecilic laws and irrational regulations meant to empower the liberal base, aka the common criminal. We don’t believe in arming criminals, though we’re aware that the liberal “god of government” is chock full of them.
      It’s very difficult to convince the gallatically stupid in our culture, namely the liberal parasite, because these imbecilic drains-on-society are both morally bankrupt and intellectually deficient. Expecting them to grasp even the most fundamental notion of “law”and “liberty” is a monumental task even for the most learned of our society. Because as our Southern friends rightly say: “You can’t fix stupid”, and no one is more stupid than a liberal.

    7. @MDPOP2012  Yes, that case in China was a bad example – so sorry.  Here’s a better example:
       http://www.foxnews.com/world/2010/04/08/chinese-man-gets-death-murdering-children/
      Perhaps if they had a 2nd amendment in China, some of those parents would have been armed, and able to save their children.  Need some more examples of violence against children in gun free China, check out this video: 
      http://www.planetfury.com/content/weird-child-mass-murders-china

    8. mdpop2012 Could you point out to us her “faulty arguments” and back it up with evidence? If you cannot how can we take you seriously. 
      Was the man in China who stabbed 22 children conservative? There is no evidence of that, can you back it up? See this why you look silly, you are doing what you claim others do, you are creating a strawman argument! 
      You burst on this website firing shots aimlessly, you could to hurt someone! If you look upon yourself and how you act as reason for gun control then it is you that are the problem!

  26. Well, what can I say?  I don’t really like using the word ‘awesome’, but that was awesome.

  27. Great video. What’s going on in Chicago just needs to be brought up again and again. Liberals have these lofty ideals, “someone killed a bunch of people, lets make guns illegal.” They just assume that since they think it’s a good idea, it will actually have results in the real world. They don’t care about facts, just what they want to happen. 
    People are SAFER when they are armed. Violence is LESS when people have the ability to defend themselves.

    1. famouswolf  
      Amen. I’ll always maintain assisting them also with prayers. May the good Lord fill them with wisdom and bless them with thirst for His Holiness

    1. njmom Selfishly I hope she starts her own firearms and ammo manufacturing business rather than swirl in the cesspool of politics.  She has a great career ahead of her if she moves to another state that is 2nd Amendment friendly.  I’m sure with what MD is doing, she will lose her scholarship ability because her firearms will be banned.

      1. OneThinDime njmom  
        The firearm manufacturing business for her? A Gun and a Girl ? She’ll flourish  !

  28. Well presented facts but what we all know here is that these legislators do not care one iota about what the facts are about guns.

      1. Oh, wow. Do I see a young American here? Thanks for this, it does give a little hope. How many are there like these two…if I have to I will die fighting to give them the chance to bring the Republic back.
        Tears in this old man’s eyes.

        1. famouswolf I think the more these young people speak up the more that will have the courage to do so. Think of the young lady in the Romney t-shirt that was bullied by her teacher, another American of that generation.  And then the college student (just a couple years older) that refused to step on the sheet of paper with Jesus written on it. That school, filled with administrators in the DNC backed off in a hurry when the bloggers picked up the story.
          For anyone who thinks bloggers aren’t making the difference in this country, they are fools.  Because of the bloggers we know the truth and the youth have a VERY LOUD VOICE!
          Thanks Scoop for covering these vital stories.

    1. nibblesyble  
      we’ve bless with finding her adding to many we’ve count on and bless with like you nibble. Truly, conservative women are reenforcing backbones, to live without, is likened to an able mind confined to wheelchair .

Comments are closed.