CNBC SUCKS: ‘Journalist’ John Harwood rants about ‘Trump fanatics’ and ‘right-wing media’ in UNHINGED tirades

by Fred T

It’s amazing that the media doesn’t know why people hate them. Take CNBC’s John Harwood, for example. He is treated like a legitimate journalist and respected member of the media, and is CNBC’s Chief Washington Correspondent. People know he’s biased, but he’s not treated like an opinion host by his colleagues. Instead he’s held out as a journalist and correspondent.

Except he’s the guy who emailed John Podesta to ask him for juicy debate questions to attack Jeb with. He also blew it moderating those debates in one of the most partisan performances in debate history. Harwood blamed “white fear” for midterm losses under Obama, and has questioned the mental health state of Trump more than once.

And he’s been raving on Twitter all week. But the media can’t understand why people don’t like them. It’s darn near inconceivable.

But it would take a week to post all his leftwing nutjob hack tweets from the week. So let’s just have a sample.

and here’s a real doozy:

Y’all, that’s just the last six hours or so.

And he retweeted two of his own tweets from yesterday:


Dude he REALLY can’t stop trying to deify Pelosi.

And I’ll top y’all off with this one. Don’t want to gag you with too much bile.

And if you think that’s something, check out all his retweets. And he’s still going.

This is not someone other journalists treat like an opinion host, like Sean Hannity (who Harwood trashes all the time) or Tucker Carlson (who Harwood trashes all the time) but is instead a Chief Correspondent and regularly sought for his insights and news input.

And they wonder why they are called fake news?

Next rally I suggest chanting CNBC sucks. It does. It’s just a factual statement. You might call that chant simply news.


Comment Policy: Please read our comment policy before making a comment. In short, please be respectful of others and do not engage in personal attacks. Otherwise we will revoke your comment privileges.