See, MSM reporters, THIS is what doxxing is. Not publishing a warrant the people have a right to see.

by Fred T

When Breitbart News published an unredacted copy of the Mar-a-Lago warrant every virtue signaler in the country got on a soapbox about doxxing and putting people in danger and blah blah blabbety blabbety blab.

Of course, that warrant was in the public interest, and the agents who were on the warrant filed their names with the court in information to which the public has a literal RIGHT. We don’t have a secret police force for a reason. It leads bad places, historically speaking.

But as you know, the media’s gasping is always reserved only for things that aren’t actually doxxing. They couldn’t have cared less about the actual doxxing done by Taylor Lorenz or a million other examples of fellow media doing it.

And they CERTAINLY don’t have any objection to the IRS and Politico doxxing anonymous donors.

Look at this:

“71 donors who anonymously gave” — anonymous no more, though they had every right to be.

Now unlike the warrant, this isn’t being done for some public interest, even though that’s what Politico is thinly claiming. It’s purely partisan. This is a political hit job and they are pretending it’s journalism. That’s the daily media grind from our fake press already. But what’s the public interest here? How does it outweigh privacy? What about the method of obtaining this info, does that matter?

From the article:

Like other nonprofits, Stand For America files an annual tax return with the IRS. While the agency and the nonprofit must make those filings available to the public, including the amounts of contributions to the group, such nonprofits do not have to disclose the identities of their donors.

However, the organization Documented, which describes itself as a nonpartisan government watchdog that investigates money in politics, obtained an unredacted copy of Stand For America’s 2019 filings, which it then shared with POLITICO. The group did not share the original source of the filing, but it bears a stamp from the charity office of the New York state attorney general.

Remember how big tech silenced the New York Post for the supposed shady origin of Hunter Biden laptop data? THIS shady sourcing won’t be a blip on big tech’s radar. They’re toasting each other over it.

Nikki Haley and her team rightly weren’t sitting on their hands over this.

They were CORRECT, Alex Isenstadt of Politico.

Say I wonder, Alex, if you can tell us whether labeling people fascists and then naming their donors is somehow a danger to those donors? Are you trying to chill speech, Alex Isenstadt of Politico? Those are the things that people say when Democrats are asked direct questions, challenged on their record, or described by apt descriptions like socialist or groomer. Right, Alex?

Oh and Alex here’s another question: Has there been any recent news that might give you pause about potential dangers?

The hypocrisy and double standards are so blatant it’s hard to believe they think they can convince us otherwise.

Here’s a REALLY sobering thought from Dana Loesch.

It’s not even remotely under wraps anymore. The press is out front acting as political operatives for one party, for one ideology, and they aren’t at all ashamed. From CNN to MSNBC to the Nightly News they claim this is their ROLE as journalists. To take the side of one party over the other.

They have embraced propaganda and tell each other it makes them heroes.

Alex Isenstadt doxxed these donors as part of his long record as an out and out shill, which is unblemished by anything that could be called journalism or even reporting.

Despicable. Fake news. Propagandists. Alex Isenstadt is not a journalist. He’s a hired thug.

 


Comment Policy: Please read our comment policy before making a comment. In short, please be respectful of others and do not engage in personal attacks. Otherwise we will revoke your comment privileges.