BREAKING: AG Barr will NOT recuse himself from Epstein case

It’s being reported this morning by CNN reporter Erica Orden that AG Barr will not recuse himself from the current Jeffrey Epstein case:



It was reported last night that Barr said yesterday was going to recuse himself:

Attorney General William Barr revealed Monday he recused himself from the Justice Department’s prosecution of alleged child sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein, who was arrested over the weekend and formally charged that morning.

“I’m recused from that matter because one of the law firms that represented Epstein long ago was a firm that I subsequently joined for a period of time,” Barr told reporters in Southern Carolina.

It’s good to know that ‘recusal’ was Barr’s default position since he knew had this affiliation. It tells us how honest a man he is, despite how Democrats have tried to smear him.

Thankfully he won’t have to sit this one out. We know how Trump feels about recusals…

Comment Policy: Please read our comment policy before making a comment. In short, please be respectful of others and do not engage in personal attacks. Otherwise we will revoke your comment privileges.

33 thoughts on “BREAKING: AG Barr will NOT recuse himself from Epstein case

  1. The left is so desperate to find something on Trump that it appears they’re willing to take down the Clintons to do it.

    1. That’s because the Clintons no longer wield the power and clout that they used to. Now the evil left are free to turn on them as a “sacrifice for the greater good”—getting Trump!!

      1. I agree. The Clintons have outlived their usefulness. Bill is in fact a liability in the #MeToo community.

    2. @kenoshamarge Tromp kicked Epstein out of Mara Lago. I don’t think that they have anything here.

      1. Since when did the truth bother the media or the libs? They’ve used unfounded accusations, hyperbole and innuendo to great advantage thus far. You have to remember that they’re posturing for their folks who seldom bother to read beyond a headline and who call anyone that disagrees with them liars and Nazis.

  2. Recusals should be rare and would only be proper if Barr himself had been involved prior cases against the pervert. As usual, the nutbag media gets it wrong.

  3. Will Jeff Sessions have to recuse himself?? Had he ever had a vile thought about an under age girl? (/sarc)

  4. Just thinking if any of the pervs are the ones We paid hush money to. You know the useless idiot Marxists we have in DC. Would pay to see the list and kind of surprised why it hasn’t been leaked…never mind…we know why…Cause both sides are on it…

  5. The left is so desperate to find something on Trump that it appears they’re willing to take down the Clintons to do it.

    1. @kenoshamarge Tromp kicked Epstein out of Mara Lago. I don’t think that they have anything here.

      1. Since when did the truth bother the media or the libs? They’ve used unfounded accusations, hyperbole and innuendo to great advantage thus far. You have to remember that they’re posturing for their folks who seldom bother to read beyond a headline and who call anyone that disagrees with them liars and Nazis.

    2. That’s because the Clintons no longer wield the power and clout that they used to. Now the evil left are free to turn on them as a “sacrifice for the greater good”—getting Trump!!

      1. I agree. The Clintons have outlived their usefulness. Bill is in fact a liability in the #MeToo community.

  6. Recusals should be rare and would only be proper if Barr himself had been involved prior cases against the pervert. As usual, the nutbag media gets it wrong.

  7. Call me Alex Jones, but the sudden need to prosecute Jeffrey Epstein feels like a set up to go after Trump, or maybe it’s just the media’s desperate attempt to tie a known rapist/pedophile to the President (instead of Bill Clinton) that makes this feel like a frantic sequel to the fictional blockbuster, RUSSIAN COLLUSION.

  8. We know how Trump feels about recusals…

    To be fair that’s really only when it comes to protecting him. I doubt he’d care about a recusal on Epstein outside of a Democrat fever dream that he’s actually connected to this.

    1. “To be fair”

      I don’t think that phrase means what you think it means.

      “outside of a Democrat fever dream”

      Dino… we spent the last couple of years dealing with the “Russian Collusion” Democrat fever dream.

  9. Will Jeff Sessions have to recuse himself?? Had he ever had a vile thought about an under age girl? (/sarc)

  10. Just thinking if any of the pervs are the ones We paid hush money to. You know the useless idiot Marxists we have in DC. Would pay to see the list and kind of surprised why it hasn’t been leaked…never mind…we know why…Cause both sides are on it…

  11. Call me Alex Jones, but the sudden need to prosecute Jeffrey Epstein feels like a set up to go after Trump, or maybe it’s just the media’s desperate attempt to tie a known rapist/pedophile to the President (instead of Bill Clinton) that makes this feel like a frantic sequel to the fictional blockbuster, RUSSIAN COLLUSION.

  12. We know how Trump feels about recusals…

    To be fair that’s really only when it comes to protecting him. I doubt he’d care about a recusal on Epstein outside of a Democrat fever dream that he’s actually connected to this.

    1. “To be fair”

      I don’t think that phrase means what you think it means.

      “outside of a Democrat fever dream”

      Dino… we spent the last couple of years dealing with the “Russian Collusion” Democrat fever dream.

Comments are closed.