BREAKING: Supreme Court sharply curtails EPA’s power to regulate greenhouse emissions! [UPDATED]

The Supreme Court has just dropped a huge decision on the EPA, sharply curtailing their power to regulate greenhouse gas emissions.

The ruling was 6-3, along ideological lines, with Roberts writing the opinion:

This case is somewhat complicated from a quick reading of the opinion, but all of this began in 2015 under Obama with his EPA overstepping their authority to regulate everything they could to force their clean energy agenda.

I’ll have more on this later, but for now it looks like this is a big win for states, for oil companies and for liberty.

UPDATE: As promised, here’s more on this from The Hill:

The Supreme Court on Thursday curbed the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) ability to regulate climate change, setting limits on how the agency can deal with power plant emissions.

In a 6-3 ruling, the justices determined that Congress did not authorize the EPA to induce a shift toward cleaner energy sources using the approach that an Obama-era regulation sought to.

“Congress did not grant EPA … the authority to devise emissions caps based on the generation shifting approach the Agency took in the Clean Power Plan,” the majority wrote.

The ruling was spurred by an appeal to a decision last year that struck down a Trump-era power plant rule.

In appealing that decision, West Virginia asked the court to consider whether the EPA has the authority to try to push the entire system away from coal and reshape the country’s electric grid.

The Obama administration tried to regulate power plants on a system-wide basis through a combination of both improvements to existing coal plants and a shift away from it toward renewables and natural gas.

But in 2016, the Supreme Court put a temporary halt on that regulation, blocking it from taking effect. It was eventually replaced by a Trump administration rule that only included efficiency improvements for coal plants and no shifts to other energy sources.

The Obama rule was considered to be significantly better at mitigating climate change than the Trump rule, with it expected to cut 415 million short tons of carbon dioxide by 2030 compared to its successor’s ​​11 million short tons.

And legal experts recently told The Hill that preventing the agency from using certain climate tools could result in regulations that allow more planet-warming emissions overall.

The Biden administration is preparing its own power plant regulations, and EPA Administrator Michael Regan has said previously that it was waiting for the Supreme Court’s decision before moving forward.

I’m sure Biden will be bashing the Supreme Court for their ruling on this as well, which puts a serious constraint on what he can do now about the very fossil fuels he hates.

Comment Policy: Please read our comment policy before making a comment. In short, please be respectful of others and do not engage in personal attacks. Otherwise we will revoke your comment privileges.