CNN is MELTING DOWN over what Trump just said to ABC news

OH boy, CNN and MSNBC is absolutely melting down over what el Trumpo said about maybe possibly probably being open to getting opposition research from China and Russia to help him in 2020.

Watch below:



I mean the thing is, he does say he probably would call the FBI. I think Stephanpoopolous was probably trying to get him to say that he would have called the FBI, so that he could go AHA why didn’t your people do it before? But as we all know, Trump doesn’t go for all that. He just said, eh, yeah I would do it!!

They’re going nuts:

Is it bad? Yeah, kinda. No one cares. Democrats will screech and howl for a few days, Republicans will pretend they never screeched and howled about the threat of Russia in 2012, and we all just move on….

Comment Policy: Please read our comment policy before making a comment. In short, please be respectful of others and do not engage in personal attacks. Otherwise we will revoke your comment privileges.

To our ad-free users: I apologize for the ad below but unfortunately DISQUS requires this ad in order to use their commenting system and I cannot make it go away.

175 thoughts on “CNN is MELTING DOWN over what Trump just said to ABC news

  1. Hilary Clinton paid male prostitutes to urinate on a bed Trump had slept in on a prior visit to Moscow.

    You heard it here first, folks.
    Pass it on.

  2. Uhhhh… Hilary Clinton paid to get Russian dirt on Trump.

    What am i missing here. Besides a slow pitch of a carton of rotten eggs on Democrat faces.

  3. Democrats are shocked, accusing Trump would get dirt on Hilary Clinton in exchange for r a political quid pro quo. (He didn’t.)

    Democrats have no problem with Hilary Clinton getting dirt on Trump the old fashion way – paying for someone else to make up lies about your opponent.

    Yes, we do have a crisis of values in this country. Thank a Democrat (aka public employee union member)

  4. Illegal immigration Trump! Stay on point! And maybe use the same person who writes your speeches to give you your daily talking points…

  5. Thanks for the reminder who really colluded with the Russians in 2016, as reports will soon be made public. No Drama Obama – step aside Biden, you need to retract what you just said today.

    2020 is going to be in the gutter – but that is where the Democrats have existed since 2016 so they have no moving expenses. The rest of us will have to hold our noses and look past the Democrat death rattles.

  6. As if the hypocrite corrupt leftist media/Democraps wouldn’t do the same. In fact they do it all the time and listen to what NK and Russia says about meetings with Trump and run with it!

    1. Considering all the shrieking heads in the Democrat party, it seems a LOT of them broke the law in their attempted coup of Trump and those are the heads that should roll.

  7. So….how is it bad to listen to what a source from another country brings to you, but ok for Hillary to pay to go digging for it from foreign sources?

    They couldn’t get Trump on actual events so now they are trying to set him up and make him guilty on hypotheticals. Pathetic.

  8. He would listen as would any candidate. Hillary and the DNC took it much further and paid for the information in a phony dossier. It was the insurance policy.

  9. The one factor the left never considers is “Is it true?” If the information is true, I say it’s fair game. Notify the FBI, sure. But truth is more important than source.

    1. Yeah, the democrats never got that memo. They wouldn’t know “truth” if it kicked them in the butt.

  10. Now if CNN was given dirt from the Russians on Trump they would broadcast it before the bitcoin payment is complete. The FBI would find out after it was already broadcasted and did its damage.

  11. What’s wrong with taking the information AND contacting the FBI? He can’t be curious? If it’s wrong then pass a law against it. Information is not quite an inkind contribution.

    He’s supposed to scream bloody murderer, plug his ears and cover his eyes and run screaming to the FBI without even a peek unlike Hillary whose campaign ACTIVELY PURSUED foreign dirt on him?!

    The president can’t see what the FBI sees? Information can’t be accumulated and evaluated from wherever it comes from? Shut up with the double standard hypocritical gaslighting BS!

    1. I’m sure you would have a similar reaction if Obama would have said the same thing.

      You MAGAs are so hypocritical it’s funny.

      1. Obama directly offered a quid pro quo to the Russians on a hot mic. Democrats didn’t seem to care.

        The DNC/Clinton/Obama admin blatantly used Russian information to create their oppo research and “Russian collusion” narrative. Democrats couldn’t care less.

        How much are we supposed to worry about a hypothetical case of getting information when Trump includes the caveat that he would possibly call the FBI if he thought it was appropriate?

        This is a classic case of hypocrisy by the left.

  12. Do they have information on Joe Biden and his son (?), because if China/The Ukraine have information on their illegal activities, I’m sure Trump would be happy to contact the FBI. It would certainly be a karmic turn of events.

  13. Considering what we’ve learned about a hostile element within the FBI, if Trump was offered opposition research from China and Russia on a Democrat candidate, I would be suspicious that the FBI was behind it.

  14. The only election meddling I’ve seen so far isnt from anyone other the Democraps in media, FBI, DOJ, State Dept., etc..

  15. Seems to me that he’s trolling them. They’re freaking out, so he was successful. Another day of the same ol’ same ol’.

  16. I do wish if Trump is going to do a lengthy, extended interview, that his people would find an interviewer not working overtime to make Trump look bad, like obviously biased former Clinton lackey, George Stephanopoulos.

  17. As long as Trump keeps pissing off all the right people, I’m not worried about a thing. Makes me smile, in fact.

  18. Why are they saying it’s against the law to get information from a foreign government? Is it? Hillary should be prosecuted then.

    Since when is talking to foreigners illegal? I really don’t get this.

    I think Trump is not on the same page as the interviewer. He’s thinking regular dirt… the left seems to think the government is offering to throw the election? I don’t even know what they are thinking actually.

    I find this troubling that something that has gone on forever is now illegal because people hate Trump.

  19. So… the fact that Hillary bought information from Russia and it was false, not true, and caused chaos for two years over it… but Trump shouldn’t use real information? No one is even saying Hillary buying that information is a crime… although she did launder the money through a law firm so that might be a crime, but getting it seems to be completely legal.

    I wonder if people think the question was that the opponent did something illegal and the FBI should know about it… or if it’s just regular campaign dirt?

    I really don’t get it. Candidates get campaign dirt all the time from all kinds of sources.

    I think they are changing the rules for Trump. Again.

    Is this about reporting a crime? How is actual information from somewhere like say the UK a problem? If it’s true.

    1. Commie-socialist progressive liberal nutjobs are so angry with President Trump that you would think he stole 90% of the Haitian Fund Relief, sold 20% of our Uranium to Russia and let innocent Americans die in Benghazi. No wait, that was HILLARY!

  20. Is it bad? Yeah, kinda. No one cares. Democrats will screech and howl for a few days, Republicans will pretend they never screeched and howled about the threat of Russia in 2012, and we all just move on….

    It would be amusing to play the game “If Obama said it…” and imagine how many people here would be defending such rank idiocy though.

    1. You can’t lie a think Obama says because he’s a big fat liar. Plus, the leftist media would NEVER pose such a question to a leftist! So much for your whataboutism!

    2. You mean how no one hyperventilating over this cares that Hillary paid a foreign intelligence operative to get dirt on Trump?

    3. Obama did do it. So much corruption and CNN is aghast with words but not actions. At this point, I look at what Trump does – not says. (We’ve had 2-plus years of Trump rhetoric so I go by experience.) The point here is that if Obama had said it, it wouldn’t be an issue. These same members would somehow be giggling that Obama said what Trump says. (Oh, and Obama, et al are so sophisticated and ‘presidential’ cuz that’s what the country needs.)

  21. Amusing to see how easily the Left is trolled by someone they think is a dunce.

    Free rent in their heads, all day long.

  22. The media is too stupid to know when they’ve been trolled. Ok for Hillary, Obama and the DNC to do what Trump talks about, but not Trump. No, it is evil and nefarious if the Orange Monster is involved. What a bunch of hypocrites.

    1. Actually, I think he is just playing on a different level. He gives statements that allow the Media to take out of context so easily, but I think he does it on purpose since it always works out for him in the end. Kind of like a game of chess when a player can see more than four moves from players opponent. Its interesting to watch and study.

  23. If the foreign entity got the information illegally then an American has the obligation to contact authorities.

    If the information is legally obtained and not paid for then it comes down to whether or not it’s a campaign contribution.

    We’ve all seen what happens to politicians when they break campaign rules…. absolutely nothing.

  24. Stephanpoopolous was probably trying to get him to say that he would have called the FBI, so that he could go AHA why didn’t your people do it before?

    I think you’re right. This is similar to the reason why Trump refused to admit that the Russians interfered with the 2016 election *at all*. In his mind, he’s avoiding the gotcha.

    Naturally, the Dems are going to go nuts while ignoring their obvious hypocrisy:
    * Obama telling Medvedev that he would have more flexibility after the election, in an obvious attempt to get Russian cooperation during the run-up to his re-election.
    * Hillary/DNC use of Christopher Steele who used Russian disinformation directly as oppo research provided to the media and to the Obama FBI that then used it to fraudulently obtain FISA warrants against the Trump campaign.
    * Adam Schiff was caught red-handed trying to get dirt on Trump from Russian pranksters who published the audio call.
    * Teddy Kennedy tried to work with the Russians to defeat Reagan in 1984.

    And those are just the highlights.

  25. Let me see if I got this straight.

    Hillary does this, and it’s okay dokey. Trump says this, and the world is going to end?

    Hypocrisy is wired into the DNA of Leftists. SMH

  26. Did we forget when a prank caller got Adam Schiff to accept a call from Russia to get dirt on Trump? I’m guessing the media went wild with this? No?

    #FullOfSchiff Prank Call Full- Adam Schiff Falls for Trump Blackmail Russian Prank 2/7/18

    https://youtu.be/c7mzoZvSbAM

  27. Well, it appears that even the author is falling for Trump’s trolling. I have to admit it after watching this guy for the past few years. He is a genius at social media and trolling his political enemies. Think about it. With all of the left wing idiots up in arms about his statement, how are they going to look when Barr definitively proves that is what the demonRats, lead by Hillary and Obama, did in 2016? Am I the only one who picked up on this?

    1. @h2o

      Is it bad? Yeah, kinda. No one cares.

      Doesn’t sound like “the author” fell for it to me.

  28. We already lived it through the dossier last election and the left couldn’t care less that it was Russian sourced.

    1. @plotevil Yeah, the faux outrage at his every utterance is becoming worse than tiresome, although the way Tromp expertly pushes their buttons is rather amusing.

  29. So what? Answering a hypothetical question without any substance is a giant nothing. Suggesting that Trump should be impeached for saying he would not necessarily turn over a conversation with a foreigner to the FBI is ludicrous! He speaks with foreign leaders daily and could not do his job otherwise! There has been no crime committed by listening to someone gossip about someone else, which is a whole lot different than knowingly buying fake “evidence,” lying to the FISA courts to obtain bogus warrants, then spying on and indicting the political opponent who beat your choice for POTUS, as the obama/clinton cabal did! First, the DNC cheated Bernie Sanders out of the Democrat primary, then they tried to overthrow a duly elected sitting President of the United States! Now, THAT IS THE CRIME; why aren’t any real criminals connected to this attempted coup in prison yet?!

  30. Sure, I’d listen too. Not sure if I would do anything with it.
    I was called during my campaign for state Assemblyman by someone stating they had evidence that my opponent was gay. I simply deleted the message.

  31. What he should do is surround himself with the BEST people who could do that opposition research for him. Oh wait…

    The world isn’t going to end after he said this (it was stupid) but it sure seems like he fell into a trap. Why would he say that he would repeat what Hillary did in order to win – especially after rightly criticizing her for it? Trump has more than enough support to win outright. And the democrats are going to ruthlessly chew each other up and expose every nerve.

  32. @ConversationsThatNeverHappened

    {Phone rings}
    Vlad: Hillary, zis is Vlad, how are you today?
    Hillary (or any democrat candidate): I’m feeling a little woozy again, Vlad. How are you?
    Vlad: Veddy good. Hey listen Hillary, I’ve got some great little small bits you can use to help you win your election against Trump. Do you vant to hear dem?
    Hillary: Oh absolutely not Vlad! In fact, I am going to hang up right now and call the FBI. You should be ashamed of yourself. I could never stoop so low as to win by accepting information from a foreign government.
    {Slams phone down}

    1. @toon We all know Hillary was a stickler for all the rules.

      Well, for other people, anyway.

  33. The same parade of people who spent the past three years claiming collusion with Russia.

    What’s really notable about this answer is the honesty of it. Yes, Trump would take such information. So would probably just about any other politician. It’s ugly, but it’s a fact of life. And it only becomes unethical if there’s a quid pro quo of some sort that actually crosses a criminal or unpatriotic line.

    Most politicians asked such a question would simply lie about it. Trump was straightforward.

    I don’t really see how someone who does it but lies about it is morally superior to someone who is straightforward about what he would do.

  34. It’s all a set up so that when it comes out that’s exactly what Hillary Clinton did, the press will have already staked a political position and will look stupid (again) if/when they flip.

  35. Amusing to see how easily the Left is trolled by someone they think is a dunce.

    Free rent in their heads, all day long.

  36. Think Trump doesnt see this? The media is going all out that talking to foreigners is bad. Haha

    Raheem Kassam (@RaheemKassam) Tweeted:
    THREAD:

    All this hand wringing over @DonaldJTrumpJr, and what @realDonaldTrump said about talking to foreigners.

    But hold on.

    Who got the Steele dossier in the first place?

    And why didn’t THEY call the FBI? https://twitter.com/RaheemKassam/status/1139149293082861568?s=17

    Raheem Kassam (@RaheemKassam) Tweeted:
    Why isn’t the establishment media banging down Hillary’s door demanding to know why she didn’t call the FBI?

    Her campaign staff?

    DNC staff?

    The DNC chair at the time?

    No? No one? https://twitter.com/RaheemKassam/status/1139149481956577280?s=17

    1. Exactly. This is all a case of looking for a mote in Trump’s eye while ignoring the whole treasonous forest in their own. If what Trump said rises to impeachment then Hillary and a whole host of those who aided and abetted her should be put under the biggest maximum security prison we have. Of course, I’m wondering if that’s not the whole point in all the Dems screeching and moaning? I wouldn’t be at all surprised to see them trot out a stupid deal that says they won’t impeach Trump if no/few charges are brought against Hillary and the Clinton machine. It’s a way to get around Hillary being prosecuted as one of the worst treasonous politicians ever.

    2. It amuses me how easily they are manipulated into hysterical frothing.

      Like a cat chasing a laser pointer.

    3. they called Dianne Feinstein to let her know her Chinese driver of more than 20 years was a SPY, why the double standard Democrats?

  37. If the foreign entity got the information illegally then an American has the obligation to contact authorities.

    If the information is legally obtained and not paid for then it comes down to whether or not it’s a campaign contribution.

    We’ve all seen what happens to politicians when they break campaign rules…. absolutely nothing.

  38. Is it bad? Yeah, kinda. No one cares. Democrats will screech and howl for a few days, Republicans will pretend they never screeched and howled about the threat of Russia in 2012, and we all just move on….

    It would be amusing to play the game “If Obama said it…” and imagine how many people here would be defending such rank idiocy though.

    1. You mean how no one hyperventilating over this cares that Hillary paid a foreign intelligence operative to get dirt on Trump?

    2. Obama did do it. So much corruption and CNN is aghast with words but not actions. At this point, I look at what Trump does – not says. (We’ve had 2-plus years of Trump rhetoric so I go by experience.) The point here is that if Obama had said it, it wouldn’t be an issue. These same members would somehow be giggling that Obama said what Trump says. (Oh, and Obama, et al are so sophisticated and ‘presidential’ cuz that’s what the country needs.)

    3. You can’t lie a think Obama says because he’s a big fat liar. Plus, the leftist media would NEVER pose such a question to a leftist! So much for your whataboutism!

    1. Actually, I think he is just playing on a different level. He gives statements that allow the Media to take out of context so easily, but I think he does it on purpose since it always works out for him in the end. Kind of like a game of chess when a player can see more than four moves from players opponent. Its interesting to watch and study.

  39. Stephanpoopolous was probably trying to get him to say that he would have called the FBI, so that he could go AHA why didn’t your people do it before?

    I think you’re right. This is similar to the reason why Trump refused to admit that the Russians interfered with the 2016 election *at all*. In his mind, he’s avoiding the gotcha.

    Naturally, the Dems are going to go nuts while ignoring their obvious hypocrisy:
    * Obama telling Medvedev that he would have more flexibility after the election, in an obvious attempt to get Russian cooperation during the run-up to his re-election.
    * Hillary/DNC use of Christopher Steele who used Russian disinformation directly as oppo research provided to the media and to the Obama FBI that then used it to fraudulently obtain FISA warrants against the Trump campaign.
    * Adam Schiff was caught red-handed trying to get dirt on Trump from Russian pranksters who published the audio call.
    * Teddy Kennedy tried to work with the Russians to defeat Reagan in 1984.

    And those are just the highlights.

  40. The media is too stupid to know when they’ve been trolled. Ok for Hillary, Obama and the DNC to do what Trump talks about, but not Trump. No, it is evil and nefarious if the Orange Monster is involved. What a bunch of hypocrites.

  41. The same parade of people who spent the past three years claiming collusion with Russia.

    What’s really notable about this answer is the honesty of it. Yes, Trump would take such information. So would probably just about any other politician. It’s ugly, but it’s a fact of life. And it only becomes unethical if there’s a quid pro quo of some sort that actually crosses a criminal or unpatriotic line.

    Most politicians asked such a question would simply lie about it. Trump was straightforward.

    I don’t really see how someone who does it but lies about it is morally superior to someone who is straightforward about what he would do.

  42. Did we forget when a prank caller got Adam Schiff to accept a call from Russia to get dirt on Trump? I’m guessing the media went wild with this? No?

    #FullOfSchiff Prank Call Full- Adam Schiff Falls for Trump Blackmail Russian Prank 2/7/18

    https://youtu.be/c7mzoZvSbAM

  43. It’s all a set up so that when it comes out that’s exactly what Hillary Clinton did, the press will have already staked a political position and will look stupid (again) if/when they flip.

  44. Let me see if I got this straight.

    Hillary does this, and it’s okay dokey. Trump says this, and the world is going to end?

    Hypocrisy is wired into the DNA of Leftists. SMH

  45. What he should do is surround himself with the BEST people who could do that opposition research for him. Oh wait…

    The world isn’t going to end after he said this (it was stupid) but it sure seems like he fell into a trap. Why would he say that he would repeat what Hillary did in order to win – especially after rightly criticizing her for it? Trump has more than enough support to win outright. And the democrats are going to ruthlessly chew each other up and expose every nerve.

  46. @ConversationsThatNeverHappened

    {Phone rings}
    Vlad: Hillary, zis is Vlad, how are you today?
    Hillary (or any democrat candidate): I’m feeling a little woozy again, Vlad. How are you?
    Vlad: Veddy good. Hey listen Hillary, I’ve got some great little small bits you can use to help you win your election against Trump. Do you vant to hear dem?
    Hillary: Oh absolutely not Vlad! In fact, I am going to hang up right now and call the FBI. You should be ashamed of yourself. I could never stoop so low as to win by accepting information from a foreign government.
    {Slams phone down}

  47. We already lived it through the dossier last election and the left couldn’t care less that it was Russian sourced.

    1. @plotevil Yeah, the faux outrage at his every utterance is becoming worse than tiresome, although the way Tromp expertly pushes their buttons is rather amusing.

  48. Well, it appears that even the author is falling for Trump’s trolling. I have to admit it after watching this guy for the past few years. He is a genius at social media and trolling his political enemies. Think about it. With all of the left wing idiots up in arms about his statement, how are they going to look when Barr definitively proves that is what the demonRats, lead by Hillary and Obama, did in 2016? Am I the only one who picked up on this?

    1. @h2o

      Is it bad? Yeah, kinda. No one cares.

      Doesn’t sound like “the author” fell for it to me.

  49. Think Trump doesnt see this? The media is going all out that talking to foreigners is bad. Haha

    Raheem Kassam (@RaheemKassam) Tweeted:
    THREAD:

    All this hand wringing over @DonaldJTrumpJr, and what @realDonaldTrump said about talking to foreigners.

    But hold on.

    Who got the Steele dossier in the first place?

    And why didn’t THEY call the FBI? https://twitter.com/RaheemKassam/status/1139149293082861568?s=17

    Raheem Kassam (@RaheemKassam) Tweeted:
    Why isn’t the establishment media banging down Hillary’s door demanding to know why she didn’t call the FBI?

    Her campaign staff?

    DNC staff?

    The DNC chair at the time?

    No? No one? https://twitter.com/RaheemKassam/status/1139149481956577280?s=17

    1. It amuses me how easily they are manipulated into hysterical frothing.

      Like a cat chasing a laser pointer.

    2. they called Dianne Feinstein to let her know her Chinese driver of more than 20 years was a SPY, why the double standard Democrats?

    3. Exactly. This is all a case of looking for a mote in Trump’s eye while ignoring the whole treasonous forest in their own. If what Trump said rises to impeachment then Hillary and a whole host of those who aided and abetted her should be put under the biggest maximum security prison we have. Of course, I’m wondering if that’s not the whole point in all the Dems screeching and moaning? I wouldn’t be at all surprised to see them trot out a stupid deal that says they won’t impeach Trump if no/few charges are brought against Hillary and the Clinton machine. It’s a way to get around Hillary being prosecuted as one of the worst treasonous politicians ever.

  50. So what? Answering a hypothetical question without any substance is a giant nothing. Suggesting that Trump should be impeached for saying he would not necessarily turn over a conversation with a foreigner to the FBI is ludicrous! He speaks with foreign leaders daily and could not do his job otherwise! There has been no crime committed by listening to someone gossip about someone else, which is a whole lot different than knowingly buying fake “evidence,” lying to the FISA courts to obtain bogus warrants, then spying on and indicting the political opponent who beat your choice for POTUS, as the obama/clinton cabal did! First, the DNC cheated Bernie Sanders out of the Democrat primary, then they tried to overthrow a duly elected sitting President of the United States! Now, THAT IS THE CRIME; why aren’t any real criminals connected to this attempted coup in prison yet?!

  51. Sure, I’d listen too. Not sure if I would do anything with it.
    I was called during my campaign for state Assemblyman by someone stating they had evidence that my opponent was gay. I simply deleted the message.

  52. I do wish if Trump is going to do a lengthy, extended interview, that his people would find an interviewer not working overtime to make Trump look bad, like obviously biased former Clinton lackey, George Stephanopoulos.

  53. As long as Trump keeps pissing off all the right people, I’m not worried about a thing. Makes me smile, in fact.

  54. Arrrrroooooooo arrrrooooooo
    Is that a wolf howling at the moon…or is it Wolf Blitzer doing his typical newscast…

    1. @pybop Sounded like a WWII submarine going into an emergency dive, but that’s just me.

  55. Trump just cracks me up. Just about the time the MSM stops having heart failure over the last thing he said, he hits with the cattle prod again. To much fun.

  56. Trump haters are melting down about this… lol

    He said he would throw them out of his office. Lmao!

  57. If only the Dems/Media would get half this worked up about the Invasion at our Southern Border…

  58. Seems to me that he’s trolling them. They’re freaking out, so he was successful. Another day of the same ol’ same ol’.

  59. Considering what we’ve learned about a hostile element within the FBI, if Trump was offered opposition research from China and Russia on a Democrat candidate, I would be suspicious that the FBI was behind it.

  60. Why are they saying it’s against the law to get information from a foreign government? Is it? Hillary should be prosecuted then.

    Since when is talking to foreigners illegal? I really don’t get this.

    I think Trump is not on the same page as the interviewer. He’s thinking regular dirt… the left seems to think the government is offering to throw the election? I don’t even know what they are thinking actually.

    I find this troubling that something that has gone on forever is now illegal because people hate Trump.

  61. So… the fact that Hillary bought information from Russia and it was false, not true, and caused chaos for two years over it… but Trump shouldn’t use real information? No one is even saying Hillary buying that information is a crime… although she did launder the money through a law firm so that might be a crime, but getting it seems to be completely legal.

    I wonder if people think the question was that the opponent did something illegal and the FBI should know about it… or if it’s just regular campaign dirt?

    I really don’t get it. Candidates get campaign dirt all the time from all kinds of sources.

    I think they are changing the rules for Trump. Again.

    Is this about reporting a crime? How is actual information from somewhere like say the UK a problem? If it’s true.

    1. Commie-socialist progressive liberal nutjobs are so angry with President Trump that you would think he stole 90% of the Haitian Fund Relief, sold 20% of our Uranium to Russia and let innocent Americans die in Benghazi. No wait, that was HILLARY!

  62. Do they have information on Joe Biden and his son (?), because if China/The Ukraine have information on their illegal activities, I’m sure Trump would be happy to contact the FBI. It would certainly be a karmic turn of events.

  63. The one factor the left never considers is “Is it true?” If the information is true, I say it’s fair game. Notify the FBI, sure. But truth is more important than source.

    1. Yeah, the democrats never got that memo. They wouldn’t know “truth” if it kicked them in the butt.

  64. The only election meddling I’ve seen so far isnt from anyone other the Democraps in media, FBI, DOJ, State Dept., etc..

  65. As if the hypocrite corrupt leftist media/Democraps wouldn’t do the same. In fact they do it all the time and listen to what NK and Russia says about meetings with Trump and run with it!

    1. Considering all the shrieking heads in the Democrat party, it seems a LOT of them broke the law in their attempted coup of Trump and those are the heads that should roll.

  66. He would listen as would any candidate. Hillary and the DNC took it much further and paid for the information in a phony dossier. It was the insurance policy.

  67. So….how is it bad to listen to what a source from another country brings to you, but ok for Hillary to pay to go digging for it from foreign sources?

    They couldn’t get Trump on actual events so now they are trying to set him up and make him guilty on hypotheticals. Pathetic.

  68. Hilary Clinton paid male prostitutes to urinate on a bed Trump had slept in on a prior visit to Moscow.

    You heard it here first, folks.
    Pass it on.

  69. Democrats are shocked, accusing Trump would get dirt on Hilary Clinton in exchange for r a political quid pro quo. (He didn’t.)

    Democrats have no problem with Hilary Clinton getting dirt on Trump the old fashion way – paying for someone else to make up lies about your opponent.

    Yes, we do have a crisis of values in this country. Thank a Democrat (aka public employee union member)

  70. Thanks for the reminder who really colluded with the Russians in 2016, as reports will soon be made public. No Drama Obama – step aside Biden, you need to retract what you just said today.

    2020 is going to be in the gutter – but that is where the Democrats have existed since 2016 so they have no moving expenses. The rest of us will have to hold our noses and look past the Democrat death rattles.

  71. Uhhhh… Hilary Clinton paid to get Russian dirt on Trump.

    What am i missing here. Besides a slow pitch of a carton of rotten eggs on Democrat faces.

  72. Illegal immigration Trump! Stay on point! And maybe use the same person who writes your speeches to give you your daily talking points…

    1. Can’t talk about anything else. It has to be immigration 24/7 or Trump has betrayed us. Do you hear yourself?

  73. Now if CNN was given dirt from the Russians on Trump they would broadcast it before the bitcoin payment is complete. The FBI would find out after it was already broadcasted and did its damage.

  74. What’s wrong with taking the information AND contacting the FBI? He can’t be curious? If it’s wrong then pass a law against it. Information is not quite an inkind contribution.

    He’s supposed to scream bloody murderer, plug his ears and cover his eyes and run screaming to the FBI without even a peek unlike Hillary whose campaign ACTIVELY PURSUED foreign dirt on him?!

    The president can’t see what the FBI sees? Information can’t be accumulated and evaluated from wherever it comes from? Shut up with the double standard hypocritical gaslighting BS!

    1. I’m sure you would have a similar reaction if Obama would have said the same thing.

      You MAGAs are so hypocritical it’s funny.

      1. His backers find the prospect amusing. Yet, they never consider why a foreign state would provide such research: that state would be acting in its interests, which could well clash with American ones and/or it could be seeking to skew America foreign policy via its being “rewarded” afterward. That’s incompatible with the Constitution, including but not limited to the President’s oath of office.

        Finally, Trump did not make certain he would report such a matter to the FBI. The Washington Post reported:

        “It’s not an interference, they have information, I think I’d take it,” Trump said. “If I thought there was something wrong, I’d go maybe to the FBI, if I thought there was something wrong.”

        And then Trump’s radio sycophants go nuts when former VP Biden labels Trump an “existential threat.” Trump just affirmed Biden’s point by indicating he could possibly put his political interests (re-election) ahead of the national interest by accepting such information and not reporting the matter to the FBI.

        1. The bottom line is Trump and his sycophants don’t care who interferes in electiona as long as they benefit.

        2. Having a critical eye regarding the information doesn’t mean you couldn’t look at it, especially as to how exactly would you determine whether if even needed an FBI referral? I’d look at it only as a lead to then follow up on. If it’s criminal the FBI can follow up. If it’s just dirt then my own team would follow up. If I used unverified foreign dirt on a candidate I’d deserve to be criticized heavily for it UNLIKE WHAT HAPPENED TO HILLARY. But if something was there it would be based on my own team’s findings. You can’t get there without information sourced from anywhere. It’s sleazy business for sure but it’s not illegal and it’s especially rich when Democrats whine over Trump merely talking about it when HILLARY ACTUALLY DID IT!

          1. American elections are exclusively an American affair. No foreign intervention of any kind should be acceptable, as any such foreign role dilutes the voice of American citizens and, in doing so, undermines American sovereignty.

            1. Information isn’t that cut and dry. And again there’s a difference between receiving the information versus what you then do with that information. His comment regarding the FBI referral would indicate taking the matter seriously and ethically rather that simply accepting it uncritically.

              1. He said he’d report it if he felt it was wrong. All foreign interference is wrong. Election law expressly prohibits it.

                1. And yet Democrats continue to not care one bit about the interference from Christopher Steele and his Russian disinformation dossier.

                2. And the Democrats not only committed the illegality, but other Democrats have fought the uncovering of that illegality from the beginning.

                  How much are we supposed to care that Trump would listen to information from a foreign source and tell the FBI if it was appropriate?

                  I’m all for following the laws, but I insist that we all follow the same laws. One less-restrictive set of laws for them and a more-restrictive set of laws for us is not something I’ll ever get behind.

            2. Yeah, so what does it mean when Democrats have been trying to flood the country with illegal immigrants from the southern border in order to shift the entire nature of the electorate?

      2. I’ve never been a maga guy and you are a douche for making the tiresomely unoriginal assumption. Why ignore that Hillary ALREADY ACTUALLY DID IT?! Does substantive action mean nothing to you? You’re bothered by Trump’s words but seemingly not by Hillary’s actions. The hypocritical double standard is all on your end. I never jumped on the bandwagons against Obama when they weren’t rooted in substance, but you wouldn’t know that because how could you and it’s much easier to be a self righteous jerk who imagines you’re talking to a caricature so you can feel superior.

        1. If you never met a MAGA guy you must not read this website or look in the mirror. You know nothing about me – yet you are calling me a douche. I’m not the one making excuses for trump or anybody else. Your excuse is yeah but Hilary did something even worse. Makes a lot of sense. If Hilary did something so bad why hasn’t trump done anything – it’s his justice department. Why doesn’t he investigate?

          1. You didn’t even read what I wrote so I won’t extend the same courtesy any longer. I called you that because you ACTED LIKE ONE, whereas you actually have no basis for calling me maga. This site has been over that ground, merely agreeing with something favorable to Trump doesn’t make one his lackey. I hate if simply because Trump agrees with a position I already hold that jerks like you won’t let me have that opinion anymore without disparagingly attributing it to Trump worship. Go away!

            1. I read what you wrote – you just didn’t understand what I wrote, which is not a surprise.

              1. @rjp977 If you think that this is a MAGA site, you are either incredibly stupid, not paying attention, or a complete and utter douchebag. Personally, I’m going with douchebag.

                1. HAHAHA – someone else calling me names. Yeah you are right, this isn’t a MAGA site. I can tell by the comments..

      3. Obama directly offered a quid pro quo to the Russians on a hot mic. Democrats didn’t seem to care.

        The DNC/Clinton/Obama admin blatantly used Russian information to create their oppo research and “Russian collusion” narrative. Democrats couldn’t care less.

        How much are we supposed to worry about a hypothetical case of getting information when Trump includes the caveat that he would possibly call the FBI if he thought it was appropriate?

        This is a classic case of hypocrisy by the left.

          1. There’s no part of life and no person in the world who isn’t hypocritical in some ways. It has to do with the limits of the human brain in dealing with all the information in reality as well as our needs to pursue our own self-interests.

            The real trick is to follow our principles where possible while also understanding the rules being used by the rest of the society. If we bring knives to gunfights every time, we will never win any battles. We will never have the power to set rules for the future battles in which we engage.

            If the Democrats are going to endlessly use foreign support in elections, then why should we crucify Trump for doing the same in a hypothetical? If the Democrats want to work with Republicans in order to eliminate all foreign sources of influences in our elections, great, let’s do it.

  75. Arrrrroooooooo arrrrooooooo
    Is that a wolf howling at the moon…or is it Wolf Blitzer doing his typical newscast…

    1. @pybop Sounded like a WWII submarine going into an emergency dive, but that’s just me.

  76. Trump just cracks me up. Just about the time the MSM stops having heart failure over the last thing he said, he hits with the cattle prod again. To much fun.

  77. Trump haters are melting down about this… lol

    He said he would throw them out of his office. Lmao!

  78. If only the Dems/Media would get half this worked up about the Invasion at our Southern Border…

Comments are closed.