Google CEO admits that are trying to censor ‘hate speech’

In an interview on HBO, Google CEO Sundar Pichai admits his company, and especially YouTube, is working hard to censor what they deem as ‘hate speech’:



In short, what Pichai is explaining here is exactly what they are doing to Steven Crowder.

None of us want harmful content on our platforms. I think last quarter alone we removed nine million videos from the platform. More recently we have introduced – just like today we do this in search. We rank content based on quality. And so we’re bringing that same notion and approach to YouTube so that we can rank higher quality stuff better and really prevent borderline content. Content which doesn’t exactly violate policies which need to be removed but which can still cause harm, and so we are working hard. It’s a hard computer science problem; it’s also a hard societal problem because we need better frameworks on what is safe speech, what’s not, and how do we as a company make those decisions. Let’s scale and get it right without making mistakes.

Crowder didn’t violate their policies and they admitted as much. Yet he was censored anyway from making money on his videos because Google and YouTube have become big brother.

This isn’t about ‘safe speech’ at all. This is a war on speech they disagree with and want to suppress.

It’s one thing to take down videos of a terrorist organization that is killing people, or videos that support those organizations. It’s wholly another thing to suppress videos because of political correctness in some kind of utopian effort to make the world a ‘safe space’ devoid of offenses. Sadly it appears that’s exactly where this world is headed.

Comment Policy: Please read our comment policy before making a comment. In short, please be respectful of others and do not engage in personal attacks. Otherwise we will revoke your comment privileges.

54
Leave a Reply

Please Login to comment
24 Comment threads
30 Thread replies
20 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
newest oldest most voted
Rednca
Member
Active Member
Rednca

What effing species is the interviewer?

SheerPolitics
Member
Noble Member
SheerPolitics

Today, “hate speech” can be interpreted as “speech WE hate.”

PlotEvil
Member
Noble Member
PlotEvil

Watch the dark web grow bigger now.

desireeodey
Member
Trusted Member
desireeodey

When these platforms act like a publisher deciding who is silenced, what speech is not permitted, they lose all protection of a platform. They can’t claim to be something they are not. Yes, these entities have a right to do whatever they with their product but they don’t have a right to have it both ways. They act as a publisher, they are a publisher.

D Guest
Member
Trusted Member
D Guest

Long past time for conservatives to build their own platforms.

pybop
Member
Noble Member
pybop

I will delete your comments because:
-They are false
-they are offensive
-I don’t agree with them

This is called CENSORSHIP

KMichael
Member
Member
KMichael

Let’s keep it simple. Google CEO admits that Google is against free speech, and opposes open discussion. Google supports Muslim terrorists, but suppresses American Conservatives.

T_ump
Member
T_ump

Here is a link to YouTube’s “Harassment and Cyberbullyiing Policy.”

https://support.google.com/youtube/answer/2802268?hl=en

I believe YouTube indicated that Crowder was not in violation, but based on the policy as written it seems that YOuTube just as easily could have determined that he was. But I guess what constitutes “bullying” and “harassment” is open to interpretation.

Ush
Member
Active Member
Ush

Note to self: Never play poker with Sundar Pichai.

sjmom
Member
Noble Member
sjmom

Who decides what is hateful and harmful and where did they get the authority to judge? That’s rhetorical BTW.

AT
Member
Noble Member
AT

Let me do it. I’ll volunteer.

T_ump
Member
T_ump

On YouTube? YouTube has that authority. It is their company.

Agesilaos
Member
Trusted Member
Agesilaos

Hate speech is for f*gs.

Warren Z
Member
Active Member
Warren Z

Google Just Lost A Major Battle In Conservative Bias Lawsuit
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XwCK2GkR2ew

kong1967
Member
Noble Member
kong1967

I don’t have a problem with them weeding out extreme speech. I don’t want to give an example but we are all aware that some of it is so bad it could cause people to get killed. If someone talks like that around here the comment will be removed as well.

The problem is they don’t base their judgement on that. They base it on PC and what the left disagrees with. They are turning themselves into corporate brownshirts for the left.

Surely there has to be a way to restrict their ability to ban perfectly accepted points of view.

AT
Member
Noble Member
AT

Or…. stay with me here…. don’t.

Unless the speech breaks some kind of established law (eg. child pornography, inciting riots, etc), then just let people speak it regardless of who it offends. And if someone can prove demonstrable harm as a result of someone’s speech, file action against the guy.

We don’t need flags and panels and control control control. Just let people exercise harmless freedom, and accept the fact that sometimes they’ll exercise freedoms you don’t like.

That’s called life in a free society. No harm, no foul, so leave me alone.

kong1967
Member
Noble Member
kong1967

ATAT I agree with your first point about letting comments go as long as they don’t violate any laws or incite riots or violence. That’s what I was talking about with filtering out the extremes. You’d still need flags to get a review because moderators can’t catch everything.

The problem is that’s not what we’re getting. They’re banning content on the basis of political views and PC guidelines. I’m saying there needs to be a way to restrict their interference to only what you yourself said needs to be chopped off.

AT
Member
Noble Member
AT

Well, there’s no solution to that. Because freedom also means I don’t have to put up with anyone’s crap under my own roof. So, to your second point, which is what I’ve said from the beginning – we need to quit grovelling to youtube to give us a fair shake, and use the market to build some competition.

kong1967
Member
Noble Member
kong1967

ATAT The only way that’s going to happen is if there’s a mass exodus of conservatives that create a new market for the competition to cater to.

AT
Member
Noble Member
AT

Yes, and like leftists in Walmart, it’ll never happen. They don’t have the will. They want to have their cake and eat it too.

Which is why I can’t take anyone seriously as they try to rationalize their stupid positions on this one.

kong1967
Member
Noble Member
kong1967

ATAT Maybe mass banning of conservatives could be a blessing in disguise. It could possibly lead to a competing social network that doesn’t ban based on leftist whims.

Sentinel
Member
Noble Member
Sentinel

That interviewer has really ruined God’s creation imo. What an abomination.

Watchman
Member
Noble Member
Watchman

He/She/It is a freak of nature. The fact they even used this person sends a message which side they are on.

Sentinel
Member
Noble Member
Sentinel

I don’t EVER use Google, Facebook, Pinterest, Snapchat, Twitter, etc. – all of that is trash. However, I have used YouTube due to the abundance and variety of content – wish I didn’t. And I participate with this excellent site (and The Resurgent). But too much of what’s out there is dangerous and addictive. Even the current POTUS isn’t immune (unfortunately).

Tracy
Member
Noble Member
Tracy

I can do without all the social media, but I use YouTube everyday.

Sad.

Sentinel
Member
Noble Member
Sentinel

Right there with you… Wish I didn’t like it.

Watchman
Member
Noble Member
Watchman

Censoring speech is anti-freedom and anti-American. Our Founding Fathers knew this, which is why they gave us the First Amendment.

Sentinel
Member
Noble Member
Sentinel

“This isn’t about ‘safe speech’ at all. This is a war on speech they disagree with and want to suppress.”

That solidly sums it up. Leftist devils have taken over social media and most public/ cable media in one way or another. They have been increasingly censoring media and content to their own tastes and as a result, have poisoned the minds of the gullible and ignorant – useful idiots.

To me, this is evil. And until people with more benevolent or honest intentions start up a viable alternative, the world is screwed. Humanity will be warped – because the tools contain funny, entertaining and distracting content that’s compelling to the passive consumer. My daughter (unfortunately) and most people of her generation are already hopelessly addicted to this crap. So we need wholesome alternatives.

Warren Z
Member
Active Member
Warren Z

What’s interesting is how they assume authority as to what “hate speech” is. Based upon their own disgusting pig ideology.

kong1967
Member
Noble Member
kong1967

What the….???!!! That lady doing the interview threw me for a loop when “she” began to talk. Holy crap it’s a freaking dude!

Abe Lincoln
Member
Noble Member
Abe Lincoln

Please use proper pronouns–it’s they.

kong1967
Member
Noble Member
kong1967

@Abe-Lincoln They ugly!

Dayenu
Member
Member
Dayenu

At least…. couldn’t…. the interviewer … at least try speaking in an upper range? I don’t get it. You want to be a girl. You put on the dress and the hair and all that…. but you won’t adjust how you speak? Dude….. yeah, I said it, dude…. clear give away.

kong1967
Member
Noble Member
kong1967

AvatarDayenu I have more respect for cross dressers that only do it at night. How this man got a job as a journalist and is allowed to interview people is beyond me. I wouldn’t be able to take the interview seriously.

CheetoBuster
Member
Noble Member
CheetoBuster

Conservatives just need to start living without using these platforms. You don’t need google, you don’t need youtube, you don’t need twitter, facebook or pinterest. Go enjoy life and screw these leftist fascists.

Warren Z
Member
Active Member
Warren Z

That would be nice except that the disgusting left won’t leave us alone.

CheetoBuster
Member
Noble Member
CheetoBuster

I’ll stay on twitter until everyone has moved over to Parler. Right now there is too much good information there. Once Trump moves to Parler it will be game over for twitter.

Warren Z
Member
Active Member
Warren Z

Or gab.

Tracy
Member
Noble Member
Tracy

Gab has been fighting the tech monopolies for awhile and has been very innovative.

Gab.com (@getongab) Tweeted:
“Just build your own”

A comprehensive list of services that Gab has been banned from for defending the fundamental human right to speak freely on the internet and having a TOS that is identical to Twitter’s circa 2007-2015. https://t.co/hJ8p6B3kXN https://twitter.com/getongab/status/1124892644813885440?s=17

Watchman
Member
Noble Member
Watchman

You don’t need google, you don’t need youtube, you don’t need twitter, facebook or pinterest.

The average individual doesn’t need them, but the caveat is in this day and age if you own a business advertising on social media is a must. These platforms have become interwoven into the way we conduct business that it’s very difficult to divorce them completely, and they know this.

CheetoBuster
Member
Noble Member
CheetoBuster

I understand the business side. Dishing out more money to these leftists for advertising isn’t going to help conservative causes either. People will have to pick either fight against these leftists now or lose everything if they get full control.

Sentinel
Member
Noble Member
Sentinel

Unfortunately.

AT
Member
Noble Member
AT

Not true. I need it. I can’t exercise freedom of speech without it. Also I’m entitled.

And other leftist arguments.

AT
Member
Noble Member
AT

but which can still cause harm

If they’re not going to define that, I’m not going to take them seriously when they say it.

what is safe speech, what’s not

Or that.

It’s all just a recipe for arbitrary and capriciousness.

Which I guess is their right. We all have a right to be a jerk to people we don’t like. But hiding behind that kind of weak sister garbage is lame.

Agesilaos
Member
Trusted Member
Agesilaos

Words and sentences, heck, whole paragraphs can’t harm people. The left are such pussies.

AT
Member
Noble Member
AT

“Sticks and stones just break my bones, but names will cause lasting, searing emotional trauma.”
-Treacher

trytothink
Member
Noble Member
trytothink

Dan Bongino keeps talking about working on a “Plan B” for his Youtube content. I assume that it’s another video hosting platform.

BlazeTV already has a decent Internet footprint and infrastructure. It would seem like a good business idea for them to start to get into hosting independent content that may have trouble finding a home on Youtube.

Abe Lincoln
Member
Noble Member
Abe Lincoln

He may be working on contract with Blaze–probably best bet for a plan B

Tracy
Member
Noble Member
Tracy

Good luck to any Google product alternative.

Tracy
Member
Noble Member
Tracy

Look – big tech is investing a lot of money in politicians and has to work to keep them in office. No one can disrupt the status quo.

Google is tech’s top spender on lobbying — Facebook and Amazon are also at record levels

PUBLISHED SUN, JUN 9 2019 12:40 PM

https://www.cnbc.com/2019/06/09/google-is-techs-top-spender-on-lobbying-but-facebook-amazon-also-up.html

Agesilaos
Member
Trusted Member
Agesilaos

“Hate speech” = “the speech we hate”

Sentinel
Member
Noble Member
Sentinel

Too true!

Back to Top of Comments