Here’s the one jury instruction that people say is ‘outrageous’ and ‘illegal’

As most of you know the jury is currently deliberating Trump’s fate after the corrupt judge spent the better part of an hour issuing jury instructions.

However there was one instruction that has outraged many on social media and beyond, and it was Merchan telling the jury they do not need unanimity to convict Trump:

It’s like Merchan is going out of his way to ensure that Trump convicted, but I don’t know how this is legal. Unanimity has always been needed in the past to convict someone, and when at least one person doesn’t agree the jury is considered ‘hung’.

Here’s some of the responses from X:

UPDATE: Here’s how one lib legal beagle explains it:

Comment Policy: Please read our comment policy before making a comment. In short, please be respectful of others and do not engage in personal attacks. Otherwise we will revoke your comment privileges.