Chuck Krauthammer looks like he flipped on the story that he was saying was nothing. He really rips into Trump Jr. and anyone who defends them.
Watch below:
His main criticism is based on the fact that the denied collusion, said there was no evidence, and then it turns out that they were hiding the evidence. He concludes saying that its no defense to say your collusion is incompetent.
As someone on Twitter pointed, it’s almost as if he’s subtweeting Brit Hume and his defense of Trump.
Martha MacCallum has been a pretty stalwart defender of Trump, but even she had to back down from his logical assessment here…