John Bolton: Obama is not qualified to be Commander in Chief!

A new book called “Obama’s Wars” has come out that has a few revelations in it that the White House has apparently not denied. The major one being these words from Obama’s lips:

“We can absorb a terrorist attack. We’ll do everything we can to prevent it, but even a 9/11 we absorbed and we are stronger.”

And one more:

“I have two years with the public on this (Afghanistan war)…I want an exit strategy…I can’t let this be a war without end…I can’t lose the whole Democratic Party.”



John Bolton rips into Obama from the start, suggesting this is more evidence that Obama is not qualified to be Commander in Chief. He goes on to point out that if Obama really felt this way about getting out of Afghanistan, that he didn’t want to be there, then why put our troops in harms way for 2 years for nothing?”

But it’s at the end when I realized my mancrush for Bolton. Just watch to the end and enjoy!

Comment Policy: Please read our comment policy before making a comment. In short, please be respectful of others and do not engage in personal attacks. Otherwise we will revoke your comment privileges.

32 thoughts on “John Bolton: Obama is not qualified to be Commander in Chief!

  1. Obama isn’t fighting anyone,I seriously doubt the man could fight his way out of a wet paper bag and as to letting the troops fight, you might want to re-evaluate that statement, Petraeus is continuing with the same COIN strategy and the same ROE’s that have been in place and he previously approved. For quite some time the left has been screaming about Afghanistan being a new Vietnam, now they are going to make it into one. http://townhall.com/columnists/DianaWest/2010/07/01/petraeus_continues_coin_nightmare/page/1

  2. Honestly, I’m unsurprised. If any of the stories are true, I am not surprised. If it’s a lie, the really bad part is not the fact that he would tell such scurrilous lies about the president, but the fact that Obama’s character and actions are as such that it makes the lies believable. For a man to say something like ‘we can absorb another attack’ shows just how little he cares about anybody but himself (if the deaths of the oil rig workers weren’t enough to show that). I said it, before, I’ll say it, again: he’s not qualified to be CINC and Chief of State, for many reasons, chiefly that he is not a leader. He has no leadership ability, much less any leadership qualities. There is nothing about him that says “leader”.

    The fact that he crafted his own ‘strategy’, though, galls me in the extreme. Fall guy Dave Petraeus is even getting sick of him. The man (quote-unquote) probably wasn’t even a CUB SCOUT, and yet he fancies himself some sort of military strategist. The guy believes he’s some sort of polymath, when he’s really not all that intelligent, from what I’ve seen of him, from what I’ve heard of him, and from his own [ghost] writings.

    You’d have to be pretty stupid to think he’s pretty smart.

    Obama writes an ‘exit strategy’ (which was probably just a paper with RUN! RUN! RUN! scribbled all over it in crayon), and yet isn’t he the same idiot that couldn’t even wrap his narrow head around sending reinforcements into Afghanistan, once things started to badly heat up (http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/54807), during which Obama played golf, threw parties and hung more pictures of himself in the White House. During wartime in the armed forces, such criminal negligence could get you the firing squad.

    Worrying about pleasing people, as opposed to allowing his generals and admirals to craft a winning war strategy is clearly negligent and criminal. Bush could very well have done this; he got an overwhelming vote against Hanoi Kerry, but as opposed to doing that, he concentrated on getting the job (i.e.: winning against terrorist forces like AQI). Playing politics at the cost of lives is truly criminal, and for a guy to defend this niggling BS shows how much of a low-life he truly is, as well as how much of a low-life he’s defending. If Obama’s so sure we can absorb another terrorist strike killing thousands, maybe this time the plane SHOULD hit the White House. They keep saying we should have “…skin in the game…”. Maybe Obama and Biden should lose their pound of flesh, as opposed to us, and certainly as opposed to Obama’s betters (military personnel and Veterans) losing theirs. Obama has clearly abdicated his responsibility to defend the United States. He couldn’t even bring himself to call the murderer at Fort Hood a terrorist, choosing to slam the cavalry forces for their history with Indian nations, at the remembrance ceremony. As opposed to returning command of the national guard forces to the state governors, he’s made it clear he will leave the borders (and I live in a border state — Michigan, right down the street from Dearbornistan) and worry more about his Party of Slavery and union thugs, seeing how much of our money he can funnel into their pockets.

    1. Why be wary of St.Crispan’s Day? Are the Anarchists and the Left planning to rise up or something? I know they typically mark the day with demonstrations along with effigy burning,but it rarely goes beyond that.

    2. Why be wary of St.Crispan’s Day? Are the Anarchists and the Left planning to rise up or something? I know they typically mark the day with demonstrations along with effigy burning,but it rarely goes beyond that.

    3. Why be wary of St.Crispan’s Day? Are the Anarchists and the Left planning to rise up or something? I know they typically mark the day with demonstrations along with effigy burning,but it rarely goes beyond that.

    4. Why be wary of St.Crispan’s Day? Are the Anarchists and the Left planning to rise up or something? I know they typically mark the day with demonstrations along with effigy burning,but it rarely goes beyond that.

    5. Why be wary of St.Crispan’s Day? Are the Anarchists and the Left planning to rise up or something? I know they typically mark the day with demonstrations along with effigy burning,but it rarely goes beyond that.

  3. This Simon character, is in serious denial. He is not president. He is an impostor. Just because everyone continues to cover for him does not make him legitimate. John Bolton said it best at the end. I hope John Bolton runs for President, and fires everyone down to the last paper pusher. Barack Hussein Obama has probably already given away all of our secrets to his guests at the White House which included, Wm Ayers, Malik Shabazz, Angela Davis(from the Black Panthers,)George Soros, Jeremiah Wright. We’re living a nightmare. Arrest him!

  4. This man is a psychopath, it shouldn’t shock anyone. Where has Woodward been for the past two years? This man is a foreigner. Every member of Congress received by certified mail at the end of August, beginning of September a copy of his Kenyan birth certificate, with his footprint. A footprint, like a fingerprint does not change. He needs to be confronted, and now. He is raping the people of this country. He is stealing everything we have, and he is putting people in danger.
    He is just like Bundy, Hitler, Stalin, Van Der Sloot. He has no conscience. He has ice water running through his veins. Psychopath’s lie, and he does it continuously. He has lied about his birthplace, faith, policies. How many will have to die before he is stopped?

    1. Will we get the chance to vote? I am concerned that somehow they are going to thwart this because too many people are awake now and they can’t afford to lose the strides (or the machinery )they have set in place according to Beck!

    2. I think David Limbaugh (not sure if that’s his name) had an interview on the Medved show about his most recent book. I believe he discusses the pitfalls of what will be perceived as ‘vengeful’ tactics by the right. I agree with him. Put yourself in the shoes of the opposing party (the ones that still believe Obama loves this country or that Dems are just granters of rights and money) and you should realize how something like that could backfire and hand the keys back over to the progressives so they can run us off the cliff.

      1. Ozzie, I beg to differ. These are not vengeful tactics, it is human survival. We want to make sure we are safe. I think most normal people understand that. Everything in life is not politics. This man must be stopped.

        1. It may not be vengeful, but it will be perceived that way- It looks childish and you have to remember that not everyone agrees with you, or with conservatives in general- We are lucky to have a swell in support for conservative ideals, but do not mistake the current mood with deep ideological agreement.

        2. It may not be vengeful, but it will be perceived that way- It looks childish and you have to remember that not everyone agrees with you, or with conservatives in general- We are lucky to have a swell in support for conservative ideals, but do not mistake the current mood with deep ideological agreement.

  5. The GOP can easily absorb a terrorist attack. We got attacked on 9/11, and we just got attacked recently at Ft. Hood.

    But Obama is fighting the terrorists–its not like he’s just letting us not fight. He’s bombing in Af-Pak and doing rendition n shit (which he said that Bush was wrong for doing).

Comments are closed.