So, here we go again. Democrats come up with an accusation, and then new evidence is found to undermine their accusation. From The Blaze:
In this clip, Solomon breaks down the timeline. Starting last year, several Ukraine officials working under Prosecutor General Lutsenko raised alarms concerning Yovanovitch’s conduct, saying not only was she meddling in Ukraine domestic affairs, trying to control who the government there could and couldn’t prosecute, but that former Vice President Joe Biden was also up to something fishy concerning his son, Hunter, and Ukrainian gas company Burisma. But when they tried to bring it to the attention of American politicians, Yovanovitch blocked their visa applications from ever going further than her desk.
“There were three waves of concern expressed by Ukrainian authorities including the prosecutors and other officials. In May of 2018, then-House Rules Committee Chairman Pete Sessions, Republican from Texas and one of the most powerful chairmen in all of Congress at the time, he made a trip over to the Ukraine. He came back and wrote a letter to the brand-new Secretary of State, Mike Pompeo, and he said, ‘I have heard some deeply troubling reports from both Ukrainians and Americans, that our ambassador is bad-mouthing President Trump, and I think you should recall her.’ That was the first time that Ukrainians on the ground raised concerns that they saw the ambassador engaged in inappropriate behavior, interfering investigations, that sort of stuff,” Solomon explained.
“A few months passed and nothing happened. So the Ukrainian prosecutors under Lutsenko … hired an American lawyer. This is in the October-November time frame of 2018,” he continued. “They hired a former U.S. attorney here in the United States and they gave him a packet of information of things that they felt were wrong. One, that the ambassador was interfering in the Ukrainian internal affairs, like telling who he could prosecute and not prosecute. Two, that Joe Biden had fired a prosecutor, who was investigating his son’s company, Burisma. And, three, there is some significant evidence and there is about to be a court ruling in Ukraine … that Ukraine inappropriately interfered in the U.S. election in 2016.”
SO… Dems are claiming that the Trump administration fired Yovanovitch because she got in the way of Giuliani protecting his corrupt clients. John Solomon counters that ACTUALLY, she was meddling in their attempts to look into real corruption!! What’s the truth? Who is being honest? Well, there’s not much actual evidence anywhere, just accusations and recriminations.
I mean look at this response to her testimony:
Participated all day in the depo of former Amb Yovanovitch. Not ONE word uttered over several hrs behind closed doors deep in the Capitol basement couldn't/shouldn't have been asked & answered live in front of YOU. Time for Pelosi/Schiff to invite the public into their clown show— Lee Zeldin (@RepLeeZeldin) October 12, 2019
and the Democrat response:
House Intelligence Committee member Rep. Denny Heck to reporters after leaving the Yovanovitch deposition: "I just sat through eight hours that went like a New York second. It was that amazing that powerful that impactful. And I just feel very fortunate to have been there."— Kyle Griffin (@kylegriffin1) October 11, 2019
UHm. Ok? Then why are the Dems hiding her testimony? Sigh..