Mark Meadows says the media is getting the story WRONG, that Ambassador Sonland is NOT testifying that there was a quid pro quo!

Mark Meadows says the media is not telling the truth about Sondland’s amendment to his testimony and he corrects the record:

This is paragraph 4 that he’s referring to:



Sonland was NOT testifying that there was an actual quid pro quo, only that he presumed there was one given the absence of any proof.

 
Meadows points out that even if you think what Sonland says in paragraph 5 is nefarious, it’s still based on an assumption:

 
For reference, here’s paragraph 5:

I doubt the media will correct their reporting on this, as they are salaciously running the story that the “quid pro quo” has been found.

Comment Policy: Please read our comment policy before making a comment. In short, please be respectful of others and do not engage in personal attacks. Otherwise we will revoke your comment privileges.