I smell a lawsuit coming:
1 of 2: For a week paparazzi has been lurking outside my home day & nite. Finally today I took my kids to school. I went out alone 1st, offered them donuts & begged them to just take their pic of me & to leave my kids alone when they emerged. All were nice. Except the Dailymail…
2 of 2: The DailyMail 1st published photos of my husb IN OUR HOME & then *did* photog my kids, trailed us to my daughter’s school, & secretly videotaped my 7-yr-old child (her classmates too) & posted it. THIS IS NOT RIGHT.
1 of 2: For a week paparazzi has been lurking outside my home day & nite. Finally today I took my kids to school. I went out alone 1st, offered them donuts &begged them to just take their pic of me & to leave my kids alone when they emerged. All were nice. Except the Dailymail...
— Megyn Kelly (@megynkelly) October 31, 2018
2 of 2: The DailyMail 1st published photos of my husb IN OUR HOME & then *did* photog my kids, trailed us to my daughter’s school, & secretly videotaped my 7-yr-old child (her classmates too) & posted it. THIS IS NOT RIGHT.
— Megyn Kelly (@megynkelly) October 31, 2018
There are lines that you just don’t cross and it appears that the Daily Mail has indeed crossed them. Now I checked out the post and I didn’t see photos or video of anyone but her and her husband. So apparently they didn’t post the children. The Hill says they only posted photos of her husband.
Even so, videotaping and photographing her children should be off limits for any reporter, especially at their school! I guess all the other reporters backed off except for the Daily Mail.