NYT apologizes for publishing ABSURD anti-Semitic cartoon

I can’t believe that people at the New York Times didn’t realize that this cartoon had anti-semitic tropes in it.



They eventually pulled the cartoon and apologized.

Amazing. It’s hard for me to believe they didn’t see it, they probably just thought it was going to be okay. Pretty despicable, and it shows just how we’re heading into very shaky bigoted territory and people are normalizing it….

Comment Policy: Please read our comment policy before making a comment. In short, please be respectful of others and do not engage in personal attacks. Otherwise we will revoke your comment privileges.

64 thoughts on “NYT apologizes for publishing ABSURD anti-Semitic cartoon

  1. The New York Times Defends Their Hiring a Racist Journalist . . .
    • “#cancelwhitepeople”
    • “White men are bulls—.
    • “Oh man. It’s sick how much joy I get from being cruel to old white men”
    • Dumba— f—ing white people marking up the internet with their opinions like dogs pissing on fire hydrants.”
    • “White people have stopped breeding. you’ll all go extinct soon. that was my plan all along.”
    • “white people are only fit to live underground like groveling goblins

    https://www.nytimes.com/2018/08/09/opinion/sarah-jeong-tweets-opinion-section.html

  2. God almighty and the not so subtle depiction of a German dog a dachshund guess NYT missed that huh ?

  3. Why in the world does anyone accept these phony apologies. They all do it. And listen to Mark about the long history of the anti semites…the NYT…

  4. Translating the statement to English: “We’re sorry we were caught being the antisemites we are.”

  5. The NYT has confused me again. So is Trump a Nazi and an antisemite, or is he a Jew-lover who is controlled by the state of Israel? I don’t think even the NYT readers can reconcile that contradiction in their propaganda-filled minds. Please tell their editors to be more consistent with the way they slander the President.

  6. They don’t care.

    They’ll push any phony concept, in any medium, to keep shoving the culture to the far left. Making an occasional apology, buried on page no-one-cares is a joke to them. It’s a fake apology.

    Just look how they keep on promoting Brie Larson as some actual heroine for being The First Ever woman to blah, blah, blah. It’s all lies. They don’t care.

    All easily disproven. (Magnificently so… Nolte: The Unbearable Ingratitude of Marvel’s Brie Larson )

    They don’t care.

    It’s only going to get better if they experience pain for their fraud.

  7. Looks like the dog is getting ready to pee on Trump’s leg.
    No subtlety there either. Was this image lifted from the Clinton-Russia dossier fantasy?

  8. What was the point of making the “guide dog” a dachshund? Has any dachshund ever been a guide dog? Is it, dare I say, a “dog whistle” to anti-semites?

    How the NYT could ever have approved this in the first place, apologies notwithstanding, is shocking, even for them.

  9. Let’s just put it this way… this cartoon is a lot more blatantly anti-Semitic than was superimposing the “N” from Biden over a picture of him with Obama racist. Is that simple enough for you democrats out there?

  10. Just a mistake! That’s all. Move along. You do a cartoon about illegals, that would be unforgivable.

  11. Translating the statement to English: “We’re sorry we were caught being the antisemites we are.”

  12. The sole explanation for this error in judgement is simple. The NYT suffers from, and is the ring-leader of, a group in the land who have Trump Derangement Syndrome (TDS). POTUS has “broken their brains” to the extent that they cannot see how deeply affected they are.

  13. There is no apology that is good enough to excuse publishing that despicable cartoon. No excuse and a perfect example of the antisemitism that infests this country on the left.

  14. The sole explanation for this error in judgement is simple. The NYT suffers from, and is the ring-leader of, a group in the land who have Trump Derangement Syndrome (TDS). POTUS has “broken their brains” to the extent that they cannot see how deeply affected they are.

  15. The nice part is that on Twitter, even the blue check pussies are calling them out on it. Has anyone seen the cartoon? Time to blame the NYT for their venomous hate that caused the San Diego shooting. Just like they do with MAGA hats.

  16. There is no apology that is good enough to excuse publishing that despicable cartoon. No excuse and a perfect example of the antisemitism that infests this country on the left.

  17. The nice part is that on Twitter, even the blue check pussies are calling them out on it. Has anyone seen the cartoon? Time to blame the NYT for their venomous hate that caused the San Diego shooting. Just like they do with MAGA hats.

  18. it’s very likely that they knew, but their leftie anti-semitic hatred was too great so they published it hoping it would go unnoticed- Testing the waters so to speak to see if they could get away with it- then increase antisemitic memes more and more in the future- hoping people will become desensitized to anti-semetism- Anti-Semitism is rising around the world- I hate to think that even a far left newpaper would do this- but I have my suspicions they knowingly did it-

  19. Funny how suddenly the MSMedia, esp @nytimes is not interested in connecting their anti-Semitic nazi-esque propaganda trope cartoon with the real life Jew hating San Diego Synagogue Shooter relationship dots.

    Where’s the MSMedia’s sanctimonious moral outrage accusation of anti-Semitic Jew hating propaganda incitement leads people to commit violence (eg; San Diego Synagogue Shooting) narrative meme at ?

    Apparently to the NY Times, the real world truth doesn’t fit their political anti-Trump narrative trope meme, so just ignore it.

  20. They would have never made that “mistake” on muslim side. They know exactly what they are doing.

  21. it’s very likely that they knew, but their leftie anti-semitic hatred was too great so they published it hoping it would go unnoticed- Testing the waters so to speak to see if they could get away with it- then increase antisemitic memes more and more in the future- hoping people will become desensitized to anti-semetism- Anti-Semitism is rising around the world- I hate to think that even a far left newpaper would do this- but I have my suspicions they knowingly did it-

  22. Oops.. we’re sorry is not enough, the NY Times must make serious retribution.

    What else is new with the anti-Semitic Jew hating leftist rag, but their so called premier media press paper status means they must be held to a higher punitive standard.

    1. The NYT has been antisemetic since the 1930s, and were early fans of Hitler before his atrocities were revealed. As was Joe Kennedy, by the way.

  23. They don’t care.

    They’ll push any phony concept, in any medium, to keep shoving the culture to the far left. Making an occasional apology, buried on page no-one-cares is a joke to them. It’s a fake apology.

    Just look how they keep on promoting Brie Larson as some actual heroine for being The First Ever woman to blah, blah, blah. It’s all lies. They don’t care.

    All easily disproven. (Magnificently so… Nolte: The Unbearable Ingratitude of Marvel’s Brie Larson )

    They don’t care.

    It’s only going to get better if they experience pain for their fraud.

  24. Funny how suddenly the MSMedia, esp @nytimes is not interested in connecting their anti-Semitic nazi-esque propaganda trope cartoon with the real life Jew hating San Diego Synagogue Shooter relationship dots.

    Where’s the MSMedia’s sanctimonious moral outrage accusation of anti-Semitic Jew hating propaganda incitement leads people to commit violence (eg; San Diego Synagogue Shooting) narrative meme at ?

    Apparently to the NY Times, the real world truth doesn’t fit their political anti-Trump narrative trope meme, so just ignore it.

  25. The NYT has confused me again. So is Trump a Nazi and an antisemite, or is he a Jew-lover who is controlled by the state of Israel? I don’t think even the NYT readers can reconcile that contradiction in their propaganda-filled minds. Please tell their editors to be more consistent with the way they slander the President.

  26. Looks like the dog is getting ready to pee on Trump’s leg.
    No subtlety there either. Was this image lifted from the Clinton-Russia dossier fantasy?

  27. They would have never made that “mistake” on muslim side. They know exactly what they are doing.

  28. Oops.. we’re sorry is not enough, the NY Times must make serious retribution.

    What else is new with the anti-Semitic Jew hating leftist rag, but their so called premier media press paper status means they must be held to a higher punitive standard.

  29. The New York Times Defends Their Hiring a Racist Journalist . . .
    • “#cancelwhitepeople”
    • “White men are bulls—.
    • “Oh man. It’s sick how much joy I get from being cruel to old white men”
    • Dumba— f—ing white people marking up the internet with their opinions like dogs pissing on fire hydrants.”
    • “White people have stopped breeding. you’ll all go extinct soon. that was my plan all along.”
    • “white people are only fit to live underground like groveling goblins

    https://www.nytimes.com/2018/08/09/opinion/sarah-jeong-tweets-opinion-section.html

  30. Why in the world does anyone accept these phony apologies. They all do it. And listen to Mark about the long history of the anti semites…the NYT…

  31. What was the point of making the “guide dog” a dachshund? Has any dachshund ever been a guide dog? Is it, dare I say, a “dog whistle” to anti-semites?

    How the NYT could ever have approved this in the first place, apologies notwithstanding, is shocking, even for them.

  32. Just a mistake! That’s all. Move along. You do a cartoon about illegals, that would be unforgivable.

  33. Let’s just put it this way… this cartoon is a lot more blatantly anti-Semitic than was superimposing the “N” from Biden over a picture of him with Obama racist. Is that simple enough for you democrats out there?

  34. God almighty and the not so subtle depiction of a German dog a dachshund guess NYT missed that huh ?

  35. That’s not just anti-Semitism. That’s outright pure Nazism. Goebbels would have been proud.

    1. The NYT has been antisemetic since the 1930s, and were early fans of Hitler before his atrocities were revealed. As was Joe Kennedy, by the way.

  36. That’s not just anti-Semitism. That’s outright pure Nazism. Goebbels would have been proud.

Comments are closed.