***UPDATED – Palin: Rage against the machine, vote for Newt!

***UPDATED WITH FULL INTERVIEW***

Sarah Palin says that it tells you something that both party establishments and the media are trying to crucify Newt right now, and thus she is once again encouraging voters to keep the vetting process going by voting for Newt in Florida:

How can he say he’s not a part of the establishment? Well, look at the players in the establishment who are fighting so hard against him. They want to crucify him because he has tapped into that average, every day American Tea Party grassroots movement that has said enough is enough of the establishment, that tries to run the show and tweak rules and laws and regulations for their own good and not for our nation’s own good. Well, when both party machines and many in the media are trying to crucify Newt Gingrich for bucking the tide and bucking the establishment that tells you something.

And I say, you know, you got to rage against the machine at this point in order to defend our republic and save what is good and secure and prosperous about our nation. We need somebody who is engaged in sudden and relentless reform and isn’t afraid to shake it up, shake up that establishment. So, if for no other reason, rage against the machine, vote for Newt. Annoy a liberal, vote Newt! Keep this vetting process going. Keep the debate going.

She also answers the question as to who would be best suited to defeat Obama in the fall. She says it’s the candidate that most articulates conservatism, and they will articulate that conservatism in debates. Therefore, Newt!



Here’s a clip from the interview:

I’ll post the whole thing when it becomes available.

***

UPDATE: Here is Sarah Palin’s full interview from last night:

Comment Policy: Please read our comment policy before making a comment. In short, please be respectful of others and do not engage in personal attacks. Otherwise we will revoke your comment privileges.
newest oldest most voted
Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous
Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous

newt and sarah???? i think that would work!!!!

David Scott Masiwchuk
Guest
David Scott Masiwchuk

Damn That woman knows how to keep it plain and keep it true…..

ApplePie101
Guest
ApplePie101

Thanks for posting the entire interview. Sarah’s annoyed, tight lipped smile at the end speaks volumes.

sDee
Member
sDee

What is the “establishment”? Alan Caruba has a post, in part reviewing a book by Charles Murray: Saturday, January 28, 2012 The New American Elite ” The culture that Americans shared uniquely and in contrast to much of the world, warns Murray “is unraveling” as “America is coming apart at the seams—not the seams of race or ethnicity, but of class.” Murray defines the new upper class “as the most successful five percent of adults ages 25 and older who are working in managerial positions, in the professions (medicine, the law, engineering and architecture, the sciences, and university faculty)…” As of 2010, about 23 percent of all employed persons aged 25 or older were in these occupations, which means that about 1,427,000 persons constituted the top 5 percent. They are not the “millionaires and billionaires” that President Obama is always blathering about. They are the new “establishment” that determine much… Read more »

Max Twain
Guest
Max Twain

Poor Sarah. So little influence and no power to speak of. She should just be happy it’s not her out there about to suffer a crushing loss in Florida.

I mean with Romney beating Newt in debates, imagine the how badly he would have destroyed her. She’s no where close to Newt’s IQ.

Jaynie59
Member
Jaynie59

Rick Santorum must be genius level because he smacked Mitt down pretty good in the last debate, don’t you think?

If that had gone on much longer Mitt would have been reduced to a sniveling pile of Jello before he collapsed into a weeping mess on the floor. Did you see his face? Whoa. Nobody programmed him to respond to truthful statements about his record. I almost felt sorry for the poor guy.

PunditPawn
Guest
PunditPawn

Yea? Well, read the Fog of War and see how far intelligence gets you vs. leadership and common sense.

sDee
Member
sDee

Do you cheer willingly a man who will enslave you to more government, or are you trying to convince us to give up the fight?

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous

do you have any idea of gov. Palin’s background and achievements? She is a principled conservative with more backbone, charisma and moxie than Romney will ever have. He is totally wrong for a resurgent conservative movement.

Cheryl Fallon
Guest
Cheryl Fallon

Sarah Palin knows how to do just like Newt, Romney and many other conservatives including John McCain whom she thought so much of politically that she accepted the role of VP running mate! Please don’t talk to me about backbone and moxie when she is incapable of staying the course. Those are not conservative values!

And if you are going to list the things she did in AK that were positive-and there were indeed those be ready to list the things that she did that brought herself down within the state as well. Charisma and beauty yes she has,(which is the ONLY reason she remains somewhat relevant).

She took her devoted fans for a ride this summer but no worries she got a great bus trip out of it and taught us all a little American history along the way according to Sarah!

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous

Who are you a devoted fan of? Or are you going to tell me you’re an independent? You seemed very mis-informed.

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous

this one may well be a mole, cudaforever

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous

I think so. She’s just here to divide and conquer.

Good call!

Cheryl Fallon
Guest
Cheryl Fallon

Why am I misinformed because I don’t agree with what you say? I just think that I would rather gamble on any of the current candidates rather than RISK 4 more years with Barack and Michelle. I honestly see good things with all of them and negative things with all of them. And IF SP had run and had been the Presidential nominee I would have supported her as well. I just am not sold out on any of them to blindly follow them without questioning what they say and do. Campaiging and governing are two different things-living life and getting to the age I am at has taught me that things never quite work out the way you want or plan-this won’t be any different! But I am still hoping for good things with any of these candidates more so than if we get another 4 more years of… Read more »

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous

I recommend the Movie “The Undefeated” — Check it out with an open mind and it will inform you on the Real record of Sarah’s service to Alaska. I wish you well !!

Amy
Guest
Amy

Sarah isn’t sold out to any of them either… She actually is on record as saying she wants to hear more from all of them and the primary shouldn’t end in Florida. If Romney takes Florida, it’s pretty much the end of the primary.

And I’m tired of hearing people gripe that Sarah or Allen West or Rubio should be running. SP is perfectly capable of governing, but like a couple other notable conservatives has decided this isn’t her time to run. We need people in the trenches just as much as we need them in the leadership positions. People like SP, Allen West, Rubio, Ryan, etc. If we don’t have strong roots (governor’s & congress) then a ‘perfect’ candidate doesn’t get us much.

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous

you have no idea what conservatism means if you equate palin to romney or mccain…they are RINOs. Do you actually know what she was up against in ALaska…I sense a mole.

Cheryl Fallon
Guest
Cheryl Fallon

No need to call names! I do understand your desire for someone to take up the sword and to charge into battle-but for now it isn’t Sarah Palin-I listen to her words and weigh them but she says the same thing all the time-and this time (at least in the first clip) if you listen closely she said what Rush said and did not confirm Newt as a staunch conservative-just that he was able to articulate the cause but that he needed to answer any future charges that might come his way about not being conservative-very smart move on her part! as with Rush!

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous

You don’t have a clue…..

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous

I think you’re jealous of Sarah. Either that, you’re a fake here to divide and conquer. Which is it?

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous

I believe SP’s strategy is to at least gain a brokered convention with Newt, Santorum and Paul gaining enough delegates to deny Romney a majority and possibly the nomination. Santorum is a great retail politician as he proved in IA. His message will resonate well in the midwest (MO, KS, NE, ND and SD. I’m changing my mind that Paul is a liability in the race as his supporters will never go to Newt or Romney. Paul is concentrating on the caucus states which is smart given his campaign budget. I’m still predicting Newt will sweep the south including TX, regardless of the Bushies. I’m hoping that this will be enough to stop Romney. I believe that is why SP is encouraging the candidates to go through the process and not give up.

Trust1TG
Guest
Trust1TG

Judge Janine was smirking and contemptuous of every Tea Party conservative from Cain to Newt…she used exaggeration “he wants to turn the moon into the 51st state?”

What a four-plus jerk that woman is.

Reminds me of when Beck interviewed Newt all the while using snide facial expressions and then went on to interview Bachmann and take him apart.

I’m disgusted with the pundits… very few of them are worth giving any attention.

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous

Not sure she could actually smirk as her face is pulled so tight.

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous

thanks! I need a good laugh…

Nukeman60
Member
Nukeman60

They shall reap what they sew. And it shows up eventually where it hurts them the most, in their pocketbooks. That is how we will eventually get the media we want.

Al Capone was not jailed for murder, but for tax evasion. It’s the little things that bring them down.

NJK
Member
NJK

Fellow Tea Party soldiers in Florida, you must show up and politically beat the crap out of Mittens on Tuesday. Let’s really make them hate us, just like the British hated the Patriots who came before us. They’ll be with us in spirit.

sDee
Member
sDee

Make The Call.

http://newtsnetwork.com/activism/pb/default.aspx

We do not have to be in Florida to call Floridians!

NJK
Member
NJK

Mitt Romney=Socialized Medicine
Mitt Romney=Cars with AAA memberships to welfare recipients. Even allowing them to keep them if the went off of welfare.

http://bostonherald.com/news/us_politics/view/2011_1018mitt_defends_his_welfare_wheels_from_gop_outrage

Mitt Romney worked with John Holdren who now works for Zero’s EPA. John Holdren thinks it’s alright to put something in the water to sterilize people.

http://www.redstate.com/repair_man_jack/2011/10/18/mitt-romney-and-the-advice-of-evil-men/

Mitt Romney is endorsed by George H.W. Bush and Jeb Bush. I saw a photo yesterday of these two in the Oval Office meeting with the man who’s trying to turn our country into a communist nation. My question is, why would they associate themselves with someone as evil as Zero, and endorse someone who couldn’t even bring himself to call Zero a socialist?

These people are up to no good. They can’t be trusted.

NJK
Member
NJK

That’s what we plan to do Sarah. Watch them get enraged when Romney loses Tuesday. First the voters are hicks who like cock fights, what will they be in Florida? Any guesses? They’ll be foaming at the mouth.

F. Chuck Todd said Romney has to wrap this up. He said a poll taken by NBC shows Zero at 51%, Romney at %47, and Gingrich at 27%. Yea, sure. They want Romney. Don’t fall for it.

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous

“What we saw with this ridiculous opposition dump on Newt was nothing short of Stalin-esque rewriting of history. It was Alinsky tactics at their worst.” – Sarah Palin

The Reagan contemporaries, who actually worked for Reagan and helped defeat the Soviet behemoth, cut taxes, etc. are now being labeled Stalinist by Sarah Palin, because they support a non-Newt candidate. Sorry Sarah, no matter how much you guys bully, we still get to vote, and your guy is losing and will lose. This is your last go around. You lost in Alaska with Joe Miller and this will be your final and conclusive defeat.

Jaynie59
Member
Jaynie59

Huh?

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous

Do you need a translator?

Jaynie59
Member
Jaynie59

Yeah. Explain to me the mentality of someone who supports Mitt Romney so much that they’re willing to lower themselves to call Sarah Palin and Newt Gingrich “Stalinists”.

Seriously. Are you that easily bought?

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous

You misread Palin’s quote. You have it completely backwards. Try again.

Jaynie59
Member
Jaynie59

I read your comment. You are the one who needs to try again. You racist bigot.

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous

Palin compared Reagan white house allies like Abrams to Stalin. Stalin murdered more people than Hitler. Please read it again or go back to high school.

K-Bob
Editor
K-Bob

Godwin Threshold has been met. This sub-thread is done. Deletions come next, so don’t go there.

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous

Right, because I cannot answer someone who calls me a racist bigot for no reason whatsoever. Okay I’m done with that thread as well.

NJK
Member
NJK

dougx,
You know nothing about Reagan. Go crawl back under your rock.

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous

Reagan was a party builder, not destroyer. That’s the difference between a winner and a loser. The Newt/Palin ticket is a loser and it will be proven on Tuesday.

sDee
Member
sDee

Reagan had many inside his administration fighting him as does any President. The Rockefeller big government elephants and the media destroyed Goldwater with a fervor that would have made Stalin and Alinsky blush. They tried with Reagan too and planted many seeds of destruction in his administration, Bush-1 being the most prominent.

Palin is referring to Romney, his henchmen, and the complicit media. Just because they wear elephant suits does not mean they are not Progressives, and well versed in the politics of destruction.

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous

It is a real leap you are trying to make. It is not their choice that is in question, it is their methods to achieve their ends. It sounds to me like you have the Alinsky model well embedded in your thinking.

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous

What’s the leap? She is comparing Reagan era people like Abrams, of whom even Rush said had “impeccable integrity” to Stalin and Alinsky. This shallow woman doesn’t know Stalin or Alinsky from a hole in the wall. Cannot believe intelligent people fall for this rubbish.

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous

Re-read your own quote. I never saw her label anyone. She referred to the tactics that were being used. Alinsky tactics. Let me re-direct you attention to the Drudge report. You last post spoken like a true liberal. If we cannot talk about the issues, we will attack the person, “this shallow women “. Sounds like you have another problem.

Jaynie59
Member
Jaynie59

I heard Rush say that about Abrams and I was shocked. Anyone who watched him during the Iran Contra hearings and still says he has integrity is blind. I revere Rush Limbaugh but he is dead wrong about Abrams.

Elliott Abrams picture should be in the dictionary next to the word weasel.

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous

How does Mitt win, when everyone he runs against, winds up hating him? Can he buy or intimidate every member of the base? Shouldn’t you be more concerned about your candidate than you are an independent lady from Wasilla Alaska, who has successfully annoyed another liberal?

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous

The people Romney fought against the last time are for him. That shows me he brings people together. But if a dead ender like Palin thinks it’s in their best interest for Obama to win, it will be hard to bring those types together for the common purpose.

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous

Willard has not won the nomination. Lots of states yet to vote. Fyi Governor Palin did not lose john McCain lost the election. His campaign manager said if it wasn’t for Governor Palin john McCain would had lost by a larger number.
Governor Palin is not finished she has only begun.

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous

I am done with this site I have been on this site and I have advertised for this site, which I will no longer do. I have spent time and effort supporting and helping this site grow for the time I have been here. After the way I have been treated on this site. TRS has not kept to their high standard of being Neutral. Most on this site don’t want to hear another point of view. I will leave you to all boast together in your greatness. K-Bob you should go back and read. I am the one who gets called names. I am the one who has been getting attacked personally. I have kept to Ideas and stories. It is other people who attack me because I point out a different point of view. I don’t want to be associated with people like that. If you only want… Read more »

PunditPawn
Guest
PunditPawn

OK bye, whoever you are.

Jaynie59
Member
Jaynie59

“I have been treated with higher respect on left leaning blogs. I am ashamed of this site and its people.”

You must be a real lowlife if what you wrote there is true.

NJK
Member
NJK

Bye, Bye.

Jaynie59
Member
Jaynie59

Woosh. Way over my head.

Cheryl Fallon
Guest
Cheryl Fallon

Not really, most left blogs don’t like Palin and allow any comments that aren’t praise! This site doesn’t!

NJK
Member
NJK

Bye, Bye.

Mike Florey
Guest
Mike Florey

“I will take my talents, my time and my research capability ells ware.”

Take your misspelling, syntax errors and Kleenex with you.

Nukeman60
Member
Nukeman60

I’m afraid the fault is mine. Last night, I offered him a free online dictionary site so that he might be better able to communicate with us (communication is the key to success). I even went as far as to offer the proper spelling of the word ‘else’, but alas, to no avail it seems.

For my efforts, I got flagged by him. I suppose I wasn’t as congenial as I should have been for his liking. My apologies, first to TRS, as this site is a well run, well moderated site, and second, to the posters here, who try so very hard to bring forth honest, straightforward debate.

Jaynie59
Member
Jaynie59

What do you mean you got flagged? I saw some edited comments on that other thread and if that’s going to be the norm around here then this place will die pretty quickly.

Nukeman60
Member
Nukeman60

The moderator handled it properly. This guy likes to flag people when he believes he’s been personally attacked, which is just about everytime some one strongly disagreed with him. Granted, I have a tendency sometimes to be a bit sarcastic, so I have to watch that as well.

Jaynie59
Member
Jaynie59

How do you flag somebody? All I see is Like and Reply.

Hell, if sarcasm and rudeness is all it takes to get a moderator on your ass they may as well ban me right now.

Nukeman60
Member
Nukeman60

Little red flag in bottom left corner of any post. Please don’t click on mine to test it out, tho.

Nukeman60
Member
Nukeman60

Moderators on this site are very good. Getting flagged doesn’t get you in trouble. It just brings things to the attention of the moderator and they decide what’s best. So far, I have absolutely no complaints about what they do.

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous

Your post sounds like one of Obama’s speeches. I, I, I, I, I, I & good bye.

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous

Please don’t flip-flop like a halibut on the deck waiting for the mallet!

Cheryl Fallon
Guest
Cheryl Fallon

Your mistake is being critical of Sarah-and I guess now Newt-it isn’t tolerated well here…mostly the commenters here reaffirmin what they believe, think or feel about all things political, there is little “discussion” mostly agreement…that is just the way it is!

I like RS because he puts forth current political information out there rather quickly. I don’t necessarily agree with all of his interpretations though much of it seems accurate and I do see the bias at times but I do appreciate all the hard work.

Blogs are whatever the owner wants them to be!

K-Bob
Editor
K-Bob

Have people been banned for criticism? No. Only for being rude about it. Just because your arguments in support of someone get refuted, often testily (Scoop isn’t running Robert’s Rules of Order here), doesn’t mean you have to denigrate the site or the people who come here to discuss things. Scoop has been quite open about how his decision-making has gone. Obviously he didn’t just settle on one person at the outset. Your comment reminds me of how some folks mistake “compromise” to mean “you must agree with me.” I know you don’t mean that, but it’s the same logic error. For criticism to be meaningful, it needs to have a strong component of fact, coupled with reasoning about the facts. If it’s just complaining, boasting, accusation, or snark, it isn’t “criticism.” As to all of that “agreement” you mention, that’s only because many folks have been here a while,… Read more »

Cheryl Fallon
Guest
Cheryl Fallon

Actually I have been banned once before, but I appealed to RS.

Oh I think this is a pro Palin site and criticism of her even in the slightest is not tolerated very well and unfortunately those that criticize her respectfully sometimes are taken aback at the backlash and then fight back, then THIS happens (moderator intervenes)

I hope that if nothing else my comments are seen as respectful to both the person I am commenting to and about whom I am commenting. I just don’t happen to agree with the many on here about SP! And it seems as if the same is happening when one disagrees about supporting Newt! But I certainly don’t see this site as neutral!

K-Bob
Editor
K-Bob

As long as folks resist the urge to make bizarre accusations and leave out the namecalling, everything is well, and will be well, in the garden.

We can’t catch them all, though.

Steven Valdez
Guest
Steven Valdez

fine take your dead horse and go beat it somewhere else then…

K-Bob
Editor
K-Bob

Soapbox Time! Anyone ever think that “neutral” applies to therightscoop? I sure didn’t expect to find “neutrality” in a place with that label. As for that last paragraph, I’m guessing there’s a reason why you were treated with higher respect by the left, but I’ll let that go. Let’s talk about “treatment.” I spent a lot of years–decades, in fact–trying to argue with leftists at several fora, newsgroups, and politics-related websites. Despite strict adherence to the following several rules I developed for myself over the years, I assure you I was never treated as well as you have been here. Not even in the last decade, where I decided to live by them permanently. (Before I developed them, I made all the usual dumb mistakes.) Here are the rules I live by in contentious debate: 1) Never use snarky nicknames for people when arguing. (Fooling around, it’s fine, as long… Read more »

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous

All you guys are bigots. Please provide EVIDENCE of me ever saying “Forcing anyone to ever agree with me or ells)? there is none because I have done none. This is an allegation by Nuke. Who started in last time on me. Whenever I write a thread I put research time in to it and logically think it out. That is why my thread I usually write pretty long threads. Because, I try to back up what I say. You guys are the ones that don’t listen to compromise. You guys are the ones who push people off that don’t agree with what you are saying. That is what I meant when I said. “YOU CAN ALL BOAST IN YOUR OWN GREATNESS”. I have been treated with much higher respect on left leaning blogs. But when you have a moderator, agreeing with other people on this site saying that I… Read more »

K-Bob
Editor
K-Bob

Why take this stuff personally? I sure don’t.

KenInMontana
Editor
KenInMontana

You have been treated in a fashion befitting the treatment you have given others. You have received from the moderators here, a considerably larger amount of respect and restraint than you have shown them or, have shown others. As for you getting attacked personally, as I explained to you on a previous thread, you took other posters challenging your stance as personal affront and called them liars (an actual personal attack), then when moderators stepped in and asked all parties involved to take a step back, you essentially accused them of bias against you, which was not the case. As to the site and it being “neutral”. Well if you haven’t picked up on it by now, you likely won’t, so I’ll spell it out for you, blogs are essentially opinion based. The content posted reflects the opinions and position of the sites publisher, their politics, their opinions. Do my… Read more »

PunditPawn
Guest
PunditPawn

Now John Ziegler had just unleashed an anti-Palin hit piece:
http://www.johnziegler.com/editorials_details.asp?editorial=211

If Romney beats Obama she is immediately irrelevant. Her entire purpose at this point is to throw bombs at a liberal President with whom she is obviously linked through her 2008 VP run. Not only would there be no one left in power for her to be the brunette Ann Coulter against, but her chapter of American history also becomes instantly ancient.

Even worse than that, unless she decides to go completely rogue and humiliate herself by being Romney’s primary opponent in 2016, she would have no, even theoretical, next political act until 2020 at the very earliest. That will not be nearly enough to sustain her career as a commentator/speaker/author at anything near its current levels.

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous

This is proof that the 1st amendment is still in place. LOL

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous

Well, Rush will also suffer too. Rush is scared to the core of his being that the so-called “moderate” (conservative in 2008) Romney will do a bang up job, get the economy going, and then all the dead-enders will have egg on their face.

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous

He doesn’t know how to be anything but awful.

Cheryl Fallon
Guest
Cheryl Fallon

I do think Sarah will support whoever the nominee is! And I don’t think she will ever run for president-it just isn’t her-remember she doesn’t like to be confined! At least she knows herself!

puma_for_life
Guest
puma_for_life

As far as I am concerned Sarah Palin is a sell-out or else she follows her husband’s directions. To claim Gingrich has anything to do with the teaparty is a joke. He is a Washington insider and a big government hypocrite and immoral. He is the machine!She has really jumped the shark.

RefudiateObama2012
Member
RefudiateObama2012

Talking about jumping the shark, you’ve launched yourself into the deep end when you did it. Even Fonzie had enough sense to land on firm ground. Why is it you can’t understand that she sees Newt as the only way to stop Mitt’s coronation? Why is it that a coalition of Tea Party chapters are backing Newt? Do you believe that a sinner can receive redemption? Can a sinner repent?

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous

Redemption is only for the Beck’s and Obama’s of the world. Those nasty conservative sinners are lost forever. (satire)

puma_for_life
Guest
puma_for_life

So, if Bill Clinton repents, will you support him?

Cindy08
Member
Cindy08

Has he?
We know Newt has.

puma_for_life
Guest
puma_for_life

How do you know? Newt will agree with and say anything that will get him votes. That’s his problem, he has no ethics.

KenInMontana
Editor
KenInMontana

How do you know? You don’t have any more knowledge of what is in his heart than any one else does. I think that is between Newt and God, as it is with anyone else, don’t you?

In addition, whether Slick Willy repented or not, just what makes you believe that anyone here would support him for anything, much less political office?

NJK
Member
NJK

Newt Gingrich was one of the first to appear at Tea Parties. You don’t know what you’re saying. He’s embraced the Tea Party from the beginning. Go away.

puma_for_life
Guest
puma_for_life

Newt Gingrich will embrace anything that will get him votes.

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous

Did you ever think about using facts instead of talking points in your post. You sound like an NBC BACK BENCHER .

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous

I think Saran Palin and Herman Cain understand the following:

Willard Romney = The empty bucket candidate. Bob Dole never understood the joke. A man trying to win the Presidency without a motivated base is like a man standing in the bucket trying to pick himself up by the handle.

Now we hear one of Romney’s advisers tried to redistrict West out of his job and what comes to mind is the following Reagan quote:

“We had rabbits when we needed tigers” -President Reagan

Newt/West 2012!

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous

Great post. I loved it. The same people that put Obama in office will also put Romney in office if we do not fight them tooth & nail. Love the Reagan quote.

wodiej
Guest
wodiej

Gov. Palin is right as usual. She has said she is not outright endorsing because wherever she goes controversy follows which inevitably would hurt the candidate. I think when her husband endorsed that was a back door seal of approval for her. She knew they wouldn’t go after him and they didn’t. You can only take so much crap being thrown at you before you say screw it. I think that was a good part of why she didn’t run.

Cindy08
Member
Cindy08

The Tea Party Patriots are coming!!!
The Tea Party Patriots are coming!!!

Alas, no British in this age and time but the end result will be the same: the Tea Party will win!

sjmom
Member
sjmom

If that is not an endorsement of Newt Gingrich without coming out like Rick Perry did and use the word “endorse” I don’t know what is. I agree with Sarah because in order to defeat Obama, the liberals and the establisment we must first defeat them in the Republican party. It’s time to rid ourselves of the good ol’ boys in the GOP who have compromised our values to keep their status quo. We must work together and right now Newt is the answer given to us by voters. Florida: vote Newt!

Joe
Guest
Joe

Sarah is a sharp young lady and tells the truth As Jack Nicholson said: : (The Country) “You can’t handle the truth” That’s why the MSM is the main problem – They don’t like facts I believe she is waiting for the cycle of 2016 Assuming the Republicans don’t screw this up and actually get elected and do a good job She will be ready – will run and should win – By 2016 – The MSM will have had the snot kicked out of them – and she will be ready to do a great job as POTUS She is smart not to get in now – I can’t imagine any sane person wanting to tackle this mess Obama created Sarah is too smart to be sucked into vortex of insanity and will serve us better from the outside where she can scream and yell and lift our spirits… Read more »

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous

Just what we have been waiting for, Sarah Palin in attack mode vs the establishment rinos and leadership!
They have been waiting with bated breath hoping against hope that this moment would never come. I for one am glad to see her back on the attack. The establishment was MIA for the most part as Palin was being trashed along with her family.
To borrow a quote,” I didn’t walk away from the republican party, the republican party walked away from me!” May I also mention that they’ve walked away from the very principles Reagan espoused, not to mention upholding the Constitution they vowed to serve.
There is little to no difference between the repubs and the dems anymore. Both are the party of a massive government, and the concept of government rule over the citizen, master rather than servant.

tencole
Member
tencole

Take a look at the latest Allen West speech here at Right Scoop, and then tell me what a Palin/West ticket would not only do to the liberals in this country, but what it would do to the gope as well. ♥♥♥

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous

Now Mom, you already know that would be my ideal ticket! Two hard core Warriors for the Constitution leading the nation! Can we say,” Sudden and Relentless Reform”, personified!!!
Of course, things will get messy as liberal and gope heads explode! VG

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous

I,too, dumped Drudge after writing him a nasty email. I wonder what graft he got from the Romney campaign.

Hot Air is also in the tank for Romney even though their parent company is evangelical. Dumped them, too.

Almost seems there is a Republican journolist developing all promoting Romney at any cost.

I was hoping Palin would mobilize the Tea Party before Romney got too much of a lead.

I’m counting on Mama Grizzly to come in with guns blazing for Newt!

Trust1TG
Guest
Trust1TG

Romney’s financial empire spreads further than you can imagine…he even owns FTD.

He has close/deep ties with the establishment in China… which may prove to be another scandal exposed very soon.

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous

Me too, she needs to charter a flight outta gorgeous Alaska and get her butt to Florida and stump for Newt. The machine is grinding away, and people need to see her in person fighting against it! We only have till Tuesday. Giuliani need to get out her as well to rally the former New Yorkers!

Guy Who Talks Polytx
Guest
Guy Who Talks Polytx

Newt is a machine politician, through and through, from his days as an erratic Speaker of the House, to his days with an office on K Street taking money from Fannie Mae.

Trust1TG
Guest
Trust1TG

Today’s talking points brought to you by the Obama/Romney liberal machine.

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous

Good for Gov Palin

I am not sure why I am commenting but John Zeigler is someone that needs to go away – his hatred of the Governor is so sad – he needs to get a life.

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous

Zeigler is a sad little man that tried to hitch his wagon to Sarah’s and when that didn’t work he is now coming out against her to make his living.

Is_Sense_Common
Member
Is_Sense_Common

And the Political Class’s heads Explode ! Sarah took her ba77s out of her purse today and threw down the gauntlet! She’s been somewhat tolerated by the Establishment to date because of their fear of her ardent supporters, however, after this, I would look for a re-living of the most vile and wretched kind of dirty politics against her that we’ve ever seen. God be with you Sarah! Long live “We the People!”

Jaynie59
Member
Jaynie59

They’ve already started. Ace’s has a vile post up by Gabriel Malor that trashes Palin, the Tea Party, and Newt for being hypocrites for complaining about Alinsky tactics when they have embraced Alinsky tactics.

Is_Sense_Common
Member
Is_Sense_Common

Problem is – Sarah & her supporters are immune. She’s been thru hell & came out unscathed & stronger than before – vindicated, in fact. She’s fearless & I respect the heck out of her.

Trust1TG
Guest
Trust1TG

The old ‘The Tea Party are terrorists’ line.

As if a balanced budget and stopping spending ourselves into oblivion was a subversive terrorist scheme.

They are projecting their own inner dung on others. Their paid OWS crowd pooping on police cars, their diseases, rapes, vermin, disrespect for property and costing cities millions (of taxpayer dollars), shows the liberals for exactly what they are – it reveals their contempt for the laws, society and economy of our nation.

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous

Ace has gone from supporting Perry to Romney…how can he jump from a true conservative to wishy-washy snake-man Romney? He lost credibilty with me as well as Huckabee, and anyone else that espouses conservative principals and then supports Romney who has done nothing for the conservative cause.

Jaynie59
Member
Jaynie59

That’s what kills me about Ace and Allah and the other so-called “conservative” blogs. It’s one thing to support Romney because you don’t think anyone else can win, I have those moments myself, but to go out of your way to trash Sarah and Newt is just too much. No matter what you think of them, they are true conservatives.

You want to support Romney, fine. But what motivates someone to trash someone else in defense of Romney? You know what I think it is? It’s a knee jerk need to take down anything a lot of other people show a passion for. The bashers don’t really believe in anything passionately themselves, so they ridicule anyone who does. It makes them feel bigger.

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous

Annoy a liberal? Nuff’ said! Let’s roll!

Is_Sense_Common
Member
Is_Sense_Common

Annoy a RINO? Yup – them too! Sarah P goin rogue – again!

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous

Loooove it!

Jaynie59
Member
Jaynie59

Newt is not part of the Republican Establishment for the same reason the founders of The Weather Channel and Greenpeace are no longer connected with those organizations.

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous

It should be her.

Sentinel
Member
Sentinel

Palin is the beauty, Romney is the beast.

Spot on Sarah… you betcha.

Constance
Guest
Constance

I like this approach by Palin. Straight to the point, right between the eyes. smile

semby24
Guest
semby24

Sarah you are SO pathetic. Who says you get to say what we should do. You left your governship only after 2 years in office.
It’s all about you. If Romney wins you will sidelined because he will have none of what you offer as it is pathetic. Be quiet, no is listening. You don’t know what you’re talking about either.

RefudiateObama2012
Member
RefudiateObama2012

I say Palin gets to say what she thinks we should do. None of what you write is worth reading.

TxGold
Member
TxGold

No one is listening? Have you been under a rock for the last 3 yrs. or just had your head up your but.t?

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous

Both, Txgold!

Nukeman60
Member
Nukeman60

You are entitled to your opinion as is Gov. Palin. The difference is that your opinion doesn’t hold squat while Sarah’s voice resonates across this great nation.

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous

Nice smile

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous

it appears no one is listening to you as indicated by all the posts in favor of what she says, espouses, and believes. Please go over to the Daily Caller and post..they hate Sarah over there, and I think you will find yourself in good company.

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous

Go Jump in the Lake, Loser !!

Sentinel
Member
Sentinel

Nice comments and you’re right (literally): If the establishment and media is for one of our candidates, then that is the candidate to eliminate from the running (Romney). If our GOP nominee scares Maobama, Reid, Pelosi, DWS, Axelrod, etc. AND Boehner and McConnell, then we’re doing something right (literally)

Rage against the demoncratic and repubican machine.

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous

Everyone is ignoring the third guy in this race…Ron Paul. While Palin and Cain back Newt, and Coulter and Christie and Dole back Mitt, and the nasty million dollar TV ads fly in Florida, Ron Paul is quietly campaigning in states where he could actually win, such as Maine and Nevada. Before you laugh, realize that those two states combined carry more delegates (52) than Florida (50). The GOP Establishment has chosen Romney as their candidate. He will go into the convention with the most delegates, but there will be one man with enough delegates to stop him from getting the nomination on the first ballot…that man is Ron Paul. There are four caucuses in the first week of February. If Newt beats Mitt in Florida and takes those 50 delegates, Ron Paul could actually be the leader in the delegate count by the middle of February. Of course, the… Read more »

sDee
Member
sDee

All manner of Progressives, Socialist, Communists, Marxists and Labor aligned under the Democratic Party. After Truman they all ran as Democrats and aligned under a common ideology.

We have to do the same. Our strength is that our common ideology is the core principles of the Constitution, Limited Government and Individual Liberty upon which the nation was founded.

Their scheme lives in the shadows and depends upon deceiving Americans. Ours thrives in the light of day and depends on the truth. This will not be easy.

Mary
Guest
Mary

Bless her. Sounds like she’s getting fired up!

ApplePie101
Guest
ApplePie101

Santorum 1st, Newt 2nd, Romney never. I was disgusted with Pirro’s shilling for Romney throughout the program, and how she cut Palin off at the end (you don’t show that part of the clip) when Palin was starting to allude to Romney’s liberal tendencies. Forget annoying a liberal, I want to annoy an establishment Republican!

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous

Exactly! Liberals will always be the enemy, but the Establishment need to be put on notice!

Johann Streit
Guest
Johann Streit

Newt being in Washington doesn’t necessarily mean he is of Washington.

StNikao
Guest
StNikao

The left/establishment attack on Gingrich was orchestrated by Bush I and was found baseless. Gingrich paid the cost of the ‘investigation’ was exonerated by the IRS and yet the media reported the investigation on the front page and the exoneration/findings of the investigation on the back page. The conservative electorate/voters are not fooled so easily – they do their homework. Why just this week, Reuters had to recant five charges against Rubio… probably on their back page in fine print…after suspicion had been cast. Yet they do not expose Romney’s lies (3 in the last debate alone). They do not expose Obama’s many lies and crimes. They did not catch that Pam Bondi has been bought, neutralized as her state’s agent against Obamacare yesterday by Romney’s promise to give her a big role in his administration (God forbid!) fine-tuning and implementing Obamacare (socialized mandatory nationalized health care). The media are… Read more »

sDee
Member
sDee

America and our Constitution are the final obstacle to the globalists. All the power and money is aligned against us. We know who will fight back. We need to use our vote and remove the few hundred traitors we call the three branches of government.

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous

One reason Washingtonians are so scared of Newt is because he knows the system and the dirty tricks they pull behind closed doors. It is like an ex-mob joining the force.

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous

I Voted fr McCain because of Sarah Palin… Now I will Vote For Newt Because I Support Sarah

Anonymous
Guest
Anonymous

I agree royroyo. That is about my logic too !!

Allen Poe
Guest
Allen Poe

Ougch! Mustn’t attack mama bear. Interagator must still be bleeding. Trying to feed mama bear words, gets you too close to teeth. Delightful Sarah turned it around so fast, the rep must have head spinning. DNC has learned well, they fight dirty, and use anything, to stop the conservative movement. They are trying to cut Newts roots, and seem to be doing that well. Even here on RS, you see the DNC news believers.All polls MUST show Newt losing. Ve shall see!

Preston Krueger
Guest
Preston Krueger

Shes supporting Gingrich but described Ron Paul pretty well as her ideal candidate…Im confused.

K-Bob
Editor
K-Bob

Hmmm. Another reason to rage against the machine?

James O’Keefe explores how easy it is for the dead to vote in New Hampshire.

Apparently no zombies were harmed in this investigation.

ApplePie101
Guest
ApplePie101

Very good investigation. Thank you.

Back to Top of Comments