Project Veritas has scored another legal victory over the New York Times after the paper published their privileged legal memos, according to Harmeet Dhillon:
“Yesterday, after Project Veritas filed a discovery motion accusing @nytimes of violating a discovery stay order the paper itself asked for, the court ordered the Times to answer for its publication of PV’s privileged legal memos. NYTimes appealed, and just lost! PV 3, NYT 0.”
🚨🚨Yesterday, after Project Veritas filed a discovery motion accusing @nytimes of violating a discovery stay order the paper itself asked for, the court ordered the Times to answer for its publication of PV's privileged legal memos. NYTimes appealed, and just lost! PV 3, NYT 0. pic.twitter.com/dyl9oeC0sn
— Harmeet K. Dhillon (@pnjaban) November 19, 2021
She continues: “The @nytimes has tried to frame this dispute as something other than it is: discovery misconduct in an ongoing legal case. They’ve told media cronies that they published the legal memos “inadvertently” –right. With social media share & download buttons.Tell it to the judge, guys.”
The @nytimes has tried to frame this dispute as something other than it is: discovery misconduct in an ongoing legal case. They've told media cronies that they published the legal memos "inadvertently"–right. With social media share & download buttons.Tell it to the judge, guys.
— Harmeet K. Dhillon (@pnjaban) November 19, 2021
Dhillon added similar context to a tweet about a Politico article:
Context: @nytimes lost anti-SLAPP motion. NYT appeals, seeks, gets stay of discovery. NYT then gets & publishes privileged legal memos relevant to lawsuit. PV files discovery motion. Court orders NYT to stop it and answer. NYT runs to appeal, loses. Project Veritas 3, NYT 0. OK? https://t.co/D06tTBdz2L
— Harmeet K. Dhillon (@pnjaban) November 19, 2021
I’m liking where this is going. Hopefully it ends with James O’Keefe running the New York Times. 😁