An Indiana public school district has just lost their last hope of an appeal to block a lower court ruling that allows transgenders to use the bathroom of their choice after the Supreme Court refused to take up the case.
The AP writes that the Supreme Court rejected the appeal from the Metropolitan School District of Martinsville in Indianapolis.
Here’s more:
The Supreme Court on Tuesday passed up a chance to intervene in the debate over bathrooms for transgender students, rejecting an appeal from an Indiana public school district.
Federal appeals courts are divided over whether school policies enforcing restrictions on which bathrooms transgender students can use violate federal law or the Constitution.
In the case the court rejected without comment, the Chicago-based 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals upheld an order granting transgender boys access to the boys’ bathroom. The appeal came from the Metropolitan School District of Martinsville, about 30 miles (48 kilometers) southwest of Indianapolis.
The federal appeals court in Richmond, Virginia, also has ruled in favor of transgender students, while the appeals court based in Atlanta came out the other way.
Legal battles over transgender rights are ongoing across the country, and at least nine states are restricting transgender students to bathrooms that match the sex they were assigned at birth.
In her opinion for the 7th Circuit, Judge Diane Wood wrote that the high court’s involvement seems inevitable.
“Litigation over transgender rights is occurring all over the country, and we assume that at some point the Supreme Court will step in with more guidance than it has furnished so far,” Wood wrote.
Judge Diane Wood is a Bill Clinton appointee – big shocker there. But I don’t know why the Supreme Court refuses to weigh in on this issue because this isn’t the first time they’ve refused to hear a case like this. Last year they refused to lift a stay on a law in West Virginia banning transgender bathrooms. Now they refuse to intervene again. Will they ever settle this issue, one way or the other? Because the left is winning on this issue in the courts and it’s a travesty.