WATCH: Andrea Mitchell gets agitated when her reporter uses the term ‘pro-life’

MSNBC host Andrea Mitchell got agitated when her reporter used the term ‘pro-life’ to describe a congresswoman.

Reporter Garrett Haake was describing how Rep. Nancy Mace characterized herself, which was pro-life.

But shortly after he said that Mitchell interrupted him and scolded him for using the term ‘pro-life’, which she claimed was not accurate.

Here’s the video:

 
Here’s more from Fox News:

Things took an awkward turn on MSNBC after host Andrea Mitchell scolded a reporter in the middle of his report because he used the term “pro-life.”

Reporter Garrett Haake was explaining to Mitchell why Rep. Nancy Mace, R-S.C., had voted for two “anti-abortion bills” this week, despite telling MSNBC she wished her party would focus on birth control access as a measure to stop abortions instead.

“She told reporters after the fact that at the end of the day, she was, as she described herself, ‘pro-life,'” Haake said of Mace. “She felt it was important to vote for these measures despite their potentially politically damaging — or politically unappealing appearance, if you will —” he began to say before being cut off by Mitchell.

“Garrett, let me just interrupt and say that ‘pro-life’ is a term that they — an entire group wants to use. But that’s not an accurate description,” she scolded.

“I’m using it because it’s the term she used to describe herself, Andrea,” Haake responded.

“I understand. I understand,” Mitchell said. She filled in the awkward silence with, “Anyway, that was her explanation.”

This tells you everything you need to know about Andrea Mitchell. I’ve never heard anyone claim that ‘pro-life’ is not an accurate description and she’s absolutely wrong.

I am absolutely pro-life and it accurately describes my position. I want a baby to live a full life and not have its life snuffed out before it even has a chance to breathe. To me abortion is murder, plain and simple.

But if we’re talking about inaccuracies let’s talk about the term ‘pro-choice’, because that’s the biggest bunch of garbage I’ve ever heard. Because the baby gets absolutely no choice and no protection when it comes to abortion.

What people like Andrea Mitchell really are is ‘pro-baby murder’. That accurately describes their position in my opinion and I’m pretty sure most of you would agree. The pro-baby murder folks would certainly disagree, because they want to pretend it’s not really a baby. But God knows that creation of His in the womb is a baby from the moment of conception and we know it to, and that’s why we hate abortion so much.

Andrea Mitchell should look in the mirror next time before she speaks on this subject.


Comment Policy: Please read our comment policy before making a comment. In short, please be respectful of others and do not engage in personal attacks. Otherwise we will revoke your comment privileges.