[VIDEO FIXED] – Kamala Harris is all over the place defending her position on decriminalizing the border…

Kamala Harris seems all over the place in this short video from The View today where she’s asked how she’d deal with border crossers since she wants to decriminalize the border:

After McCain points out that Harris that she’s in favor of decriminalizing border crossings because she raised her hand in the debate, Harris says that’s not accurate.



She then claims she’s for a secure border and doesn’t want to decriminalize it. BUT she doesn’t want to treat illegal border crossers as criminals.

It sounds to me like she’s trying to have it both ways. She doesn’t want to change the law but she also doesn’t want to enforce it. How very Obama.

Watch the video for more…

Comment Policy: Please read our comment policy before making a comment. In short, please be respectful of others and do not engage in personal attacks. Otherwise we will revoke your comment privileges.

58 thoughts on “[VIDEO FIXED] – Kamala Harris is all over the place defending her position on decriminalizing the border…

  1. Allegations of fraud tainted Kamala Harris U.S. Senate bid.

    Her bid raised eyebrows in the law enforcement community when she ALLOWED the statute of limitations to expire for prosecuting alleged crimes committed by the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) and top managers at Southern California Edison (SCE) involving the ratepayer-funded bailout of SCE’s failed SONGS nuclear facility.

    Governor Brown’s office was implicated as a participant in the unlawful bailout of Southern California Edison at ratepayer expense.

    All of the emails involve details behind a secretly negotiated bailout of SONGS nuclear facility, which resulted in a deal that:

    *****FORCED Southern California utility CUSTOMERS to PAY an average of $1,600.00 EACH for the cost of the FAILED SONGS nuclear power plant.

    https://publicwatchdogs.org/allegations-fraud-at-cpuc-taint-californias-attorney-general/

  2. Kamala Harris is a secret Muslim-lover. She took the oath of office on the Koran for District Attorney in San Francisco. Very, very few people know that.

    Which is why she later “shut down” the Muslim women AGAINST Sharia.

    When Kamala Harris took the oath for Senator, the book her husband held, had a leather book cover over it, so you couldn’t see that it was a Koran.

    Kamala and her divorced Muslim mother, Shyamala Gopalan, from Chennai, INDIA, moved to CANADA and lived THERE from age 7 until 17. Kamala came to the United States to attend Howard, a black party school.

  3. U.S. Senator Kamala Harris is NOT a ‘natural born Citizen‘ of USA – NOT Eligible to be President and Commander-in-Chief of Our Military per U.S. Constitution.

    ***Both of Senator Kamala Harris’s parents were NOT U.S. Citizens when Kamala was born.

    Kamala Harris was born to a “Jamaican Citizen” father and to a “Citizen of India” mother. Senator Kamala Harris’s staff has refused to answer any questions regarding the citizenship status of her parents when she was born.

    The normal path to becoming a naturalized U.S. Citizen *****takes five years.

    Kamala Harris was born in 1964. Her father emigrated from Jamaica to the USA in 1961. Her mother emigrated from India to the USA in 1960. Thus there was NOT sufficient time for either of Kamala’s parents to become naturalized U.S. Citizens.

    https://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com/2018/08/10/u-s-senator-kamala-harris-is-not-a-natural-born-citizen-of-usa-not-eligible-to-be-president-and-cinc/

  4. Muslim-loving Sen. Kamala Harris to Census:

    Count Transgenders, Don’t Count Citizens. U.S.

    Census officials must not count the number of citizens, legal immigrants or illegal migrants in the United States, but must categorize and count everyone’s sexual preferences and their sense of masculinity or feminity, says Democratic Sen. Kamala Harris.
    https://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2018/08/06/kamala-harris-census-count-transgenders-do-not-count-citizens/

  5. I have a question for kamletoe? How many children did she separate from their families when she was AG of California? How many children did she put if foster care when she convicted their parents for committing crimes???

  6. This is what happens when you have no principals and pander to the polls. Like jello any bright person can turn her into any shape they like.

    Trump will destroy this lame brain.

  7. Kamala Harris says we can’t treat people (who are criminals) like criminals. Sounds just like something a democrat would say……oh that’s right, she is a democrat.

  8. Kamala Harris is a dullard and a wh*re who advanced on her back and through affirmative action, an utterly ludicrous program that only enables mediocrity, shoves failure down the throats of good Americans and creates an embarrassment of too many who used it. She had most of her convictions overturned because she was a horrible and ineffective prosecutor who slept her way to where she is now, but that does not change who she is or the fact that she would continue the democrat tradition of recruiting the worst presidents in American history. So there.

  9. More information on asylum for your reading pleasure.

    Obtaining Asylum in the United States
    https://www.uscis.gov/humanitarian/refugees-asylum/asylum/obtaining-asylum-united-states

    8 U.S. Code § 1158. Asylum
    https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8/1158

    If someone could lead me to the requirement that refugees apply to the first available country they enter I would appreciate this. I know it is the case but just can’t seem to locate it. I may have a blind spot and keep reading right over it.

  10. Seems Democrat candidates will say anything to be elected depending on the audience; in this case she faced brainless department store dummies [in The View] who know nothing and check nothing.

  11. Even Trump with his limited vocabulary and juvenile descriptions would have no problem destroying “heels up” Harris in a debate. Even the dense as a fence post, Meggie McCain figured her out, bless her little heart.

  12. We can’t treat people like criminals…when they break the law? Do we need to clarify to K. Harris what the definition of criminals is? Seriously.

  13. she slept her way to get a damn job enough said about this so called brilliant woman
    she is scum

  14. Look, I don’t care what any one of these fools running on the Democrat side say. The fact that they have advocated for these totally destructive and anti-American policies at all should scare the hell out of everyone. We all know what they really believe, even if they want to soften their position to con people into voting for them. Trump needs to hit them everyday with their anti-American rhetoric. Make them own it. I don’t care what comes out of their mouth today, because yesterday they were willing to sell us all down the river to appease their nut job constituency.

    1. In the Border Patrol we dealt with criminal violations and administrative violations.
      Being found guilty of a criminal violation could result in a fine and/or jail time.
      Being found in violation of an Administrative law could result in removal from the US.

      Its confusing for sure. If an alien is found guilty of rape he would be sentenced to state prison. That same alien is now identified by the Immigration and Nationality act as an aggravated felon and would be removable from the US.

      So a crime sends him to prison.
      The conviction of that crime makes him deportable/removable.
      The removal would not take place until he is released from prison.

      Keep in mind that not all criminal convictions would make an alien deportable/removable.
      Example: Conviction of fishing without a license.

    2. A civil crime results in a fine or judgement. A criminal crime results in imprisonment. In this case, the illegals would be allowed to pay a fine and apply for citizenship or granted citizenship through some kind of amnesty. If we treated it as a crime, they would be confined, and then deported and barred from eligibility for citizenship.

        1. I don’t think he was ever jailed for murder. He was jailed for robbery to steal back some of his sports memorabilia. He did lose in a civil case to the Goldman family regarding the killing of Ron Goldman. There was a judgement rendered against him, but he somehow shielded his assets from collection, so there is a perpetual judgement the Goldman’s have against him they were never able to collect on yet.

    3. In the Border Patrol we dealt with criminal violations and administrative violations.
      Being found guilty of a criminal violation could result in a fine and/or jail time.
      Being found in violation of an Administrative law could result in removal from the US.

      Its confusing for sure. If an alien is found guilty of rape he would be sentenced to state prison. That same alien is now identified by the Immigration and Nationality act as an aggravated felon and would be removable from the US.

      So a crime sends him to prison.
      The conviction of that crime makes him deportable/removable.
      The removal would not take place until he is released from prison.

      Keep in mind that not all criminal convictions would make an alien deportable/removable.
      Example: Conviction of fishing without a license.

      1. Yes, but they shouldn’t be here in the first place creating a drain on the American taxpayer and destruction of our laws….what is the point of laws at all if these people are allowed to stay here, whether in our jails or wandering throughout the country, fined but free?

        And don’t get me wrong; I realize that the CBP is only doing its job in adhering to the so-called laws that politicians create. Therefore, Americans need to get rid of the legislators who refuse to uphold their own laws and who do all they can to subvert the jobs of those tasked with carrying out laws!

        1. The magnet is so strong. Thats why we need a massive wall, E-Verify, and extremely harsh punishments to companies who knowingly hire illegals. I mean harsh like seize their company and the property and put it up for auction harsh.

          1. So true, but we can actually blame ourselves for the corruption of our system of government, which requires the people to be in agreement about our laws and to speak boldly, and vote accordingly. At this time, the democrats and RINOs, funded largely by satan-soros and steyer (and hollyweirdos) are being paid to destroy what is a great system.

            All systems that promote freedom also require honesty, a code of honor and a sense of personal responsibility, which also requires people to correct whatever harm they may commit….and that a values code that is emboldened by faith in God, which democrats and RINOs have worked hard to toss out of our nation.

            Therefore, it is incumbent upon the people of this nation to fix the problem ourselves by tossing away all of the dirt and garbage in our government.

      2. thanks… so this “Being found in violation of an Administrative law could result in a fine or removal from the US.” is a non-deportable “civil” crime that is “punishable” with a fne of a few hunded bucks and release into the general population?

        1. Some one found in the US by entering illegally would be in violation of both a criminal law and an administrative law. We generally did not prosecute the alien criminally. We simply set them up for an administrative removal/deportation. Meaning they would be processed for an immigration hearing with an immigration judge. We could do this because the administrative law allowed for their removal in these cases.

          There are some administrative violations for aliens that are already here legally that may not have removal as an option but instead a fine. For example an alien approved for lawful residence who is 18 years or older and fails to carry their proof of alien registration with them. We would not set someone up for removal who simply left their immigration documents at home. The law doesn’t allow it and it would be harsh to do so. How many times have I forgot or left my wallet at the house and gone to work. That being said I very rarely caught an adult alien without their LPR documents (Green Card) on them. There are some minor administrative paperwork violations or requirements that would not result in a removal of the alien who is otherwise present legally. US immigration law is compassionate and reasonable regardless of what the left will say.

          For some one who entered or was admitted legally we apply INA removal charges in order to effect the deportation.

          For someone who entered illegally we would apply INA inadmissibility charges to effect the deportation.

          Removal charges for those who were admitted legally: But perhaps because of a crime they committed or convicted of after entry puts them in a class of removable aliens. Also removal charges would apply to those who entered legally but over stayed their visas. Such as foreign students who remain in the US after their schooling and expiration of their student visas.

          http://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid%3AUSC-prelim-title8-section1227&num=0&edition=prelim

          Inadmissibility Charges are for those were not admitted legally:

          http://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title8-section1182&num=0&edition=prelim

          Here is the inadmissibility charge we would use to deport someone who entered the US illegally out in the middle of nowhere:

          6) Illegal entrants and immigration violators
          (A) Aliens present without admission or parole
          (i) In general

          An alien present in the United States without being admitted or paroled, or who arrives in the United States at any time or place other than as designated by the Attorney General, is inadmissible.

          If the alien fell into a class of aliens that are inadmissible or removable we would set them up for their immigration hearing. Keeping in mind in the case of long term resident aliens their are a some discretionary waivers they can apply for to avoid removal. They would would apply for discretionary waiver in immigration court. The immigration judge would determine if the alien was eligible and decide ultimately to grant the waiver. And as always it ain’t over until it is over. There is an appeals process.

          I am going a lot on memory. I have been out of immigration work for almost a decade now. There may have been some slight changes since my retirement. The biggest change, not slight by any means whatsoever but slight of hand, being Obama’s unconstitutional EO on DACA. What a mess he created. Purposely no doubt.

  15. Obviously to get control of our borders, we need to decrease the penalties for violating them… ugh.

  16. Kamala has been all over the place on many issues. She pre-planned an attack on Biden at the first debate to accuse Biden of being a racist because he didn’t support school busing many years ago at the federal level. Then she supported school districts deciding on busing. Then she switched back and supported federal reules on school busing. Yes Scoop, she is trying to have it both ways, or all ways.

    Last Friday I was listening to talk radio in the early morning, and the 2 hosts had a guest on to interview. One of the hosts said that she believed if Kamala got the Dem. nomination that she started out with 2 things going in her favor-one being she was black, and the second one she was a female. Unfortunately the guest agreed with her that it would make it pretty hard for Trump to campaign against her for those reasons. Yes the lefty media would attack him for being a racist and a misogynist, but they have already been doing that long before any Dem. threw their hat in the ring for the presidency.

    Yes she’s a woman of color, but Obama was already the first black president, and we know how that turned out. Obama divided the country very badly on the race issue, and now Cortez is even calling Pelosi a racist who is going after the 4 newbies that are all women of color. I, and I know I’m not alone am sick and disgusted with everything being about race, rather than policies.

    Secondly, didn’t Hillary already claim that progressive women have already broken the glass ceiling, they are just as smart, just as powerful, and just as qualified to compete with men on a level playing field? Sure Hillary was, and will always be a cackling corrupt to the core witch, but Kamala is proving to be a mini-Hillary.

    Kamala got a bump after the debate when she attacked old Joe, but that bump was just that, and she is going down in the polls again, as Pocohontas is going up. I know the debate was at the end of the 2nd quarter, but she wasn’t a star in the fundraising field.

    I think I’m going to go and have me a beer.

  17. It’s possible she believes those who illegally cross the border should be treated as committing civil offenses rather than criminal acts.

    1. That’s what she said, but I doubt that’s what she believes. She believes that the more illegals allowed in the country, the better chances she has of re-election, so the more the merrier.

  18. Lets not treat criminals as criminals is what I think she is trying to say. My question is How should we treat criminals?

  19. Great job by McCain immediately forcing her off balanced and defensive of her hand raising.She was as nervous as she could get after getting knocked off balance.

    1. kind of wished I had not view the Video.Truly described what is really happening at the Border and probably a bunch of lies about how many Military personnel are at the Border.Thanks Lillie Belle,nice post.

  20. They’ll tell you a Dem doesn’t change positions; they “evolve.” Horizontal Harris fits right in with the rest of the phonies on their side, no principles, all pander for votes.

    1. A pretty rickety weather vane that kind of wobbles all over the place so you can’t even tell quite where it’s pointing,.

      1. You are making me feel better about myself because I constantly err. Just to let you know my Disqus is working great. I saw some comments somewhere people saying they were having some issues. Thinking it must be their computers or browsers.

    1. If she is the democratic nominee they will have to feed her the questions and answers at the debates,or a representative from Wikipedia sitting at her side.

Comments are closed.