WATCH: Tom Cotton DEFENDS Trump’s national emergency in great Senate speech!

Tom Cotton took to the floor of the Senate today to defend Trump’s national emergency declaration from the three phony arguments being leveled against it.

First, he presents the facts at the border demonstrating that there is absolutely a crisis that must be dealt with:

 
He also hammers the Democrats for calling Trump’s declaration an lawless act:

Here’s the full segment on that which is worth hearing, which stops at 7:15:



 
He doesn’t stop there.

He also responds, respectfully I might add, to the claims of his colleagues that Democrats will use the national emergency statute to push their own agenda. He admits that it isn’t hard to imagine such abuses, but says they would be exactly that, abuses, which is not what Trump is doing at all:

If you continue watching that video, Cotton also hammers Democrats who call this a ‘fake emergency’, explaining why it’s more of an emergency that other national emergencies they had no issue with.

All in all, it’s pretty clear that Cotton will be one of the many Republican Senators who support Trump’s declaration. Sadly, it likely won’t be enough to keep it off Trump’s desk. But it’s still good to hear such a strong defense of the declaration from Cotton.

As I was about to post this, he just tweeted the following:

Great point!

Comment Policy: Please read our comment policy before making a comment. In short, please be respectful of others and do not engage in personal attacks. Otherwise we will revoke your comment privileges.

58
Leave a Reply

Please Login to comment
20 Comment threads
38 Thread replies
24 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
newest oldest most voted
Michael Thomas
Member
Member
Michael Thomas

Cotton is an American hero. The betraying 12 will be remembered for taking down Trump if he loses. They had better start speaking libturd lingo.

MST3K
Member
Trusted Member
MST3K

Cotton comes through again for conservatives, just like he did last December when he voted against the ‘Criminal Leniency Bill’…

nc checks and balances
Member
Noble Member
nc checks and balances

I heart ❤️ Tom Cotton!

PVG
Member
Active Member
PVG

Bravo Sen Cotton!!

KMichael
Member
Member
KMichael

GOP Senators need to focus on the main thing. They are frequently distracted by secondary issues. This diminishes their strength. McConnell needs to get the administration’s vacancies filled. He needs to get the judiciary up to a full complement. The GOP Senate needs to work some overtime hours and weekends. Stop wasting time.

CheetoBuster
Member
Active Member
CheetoBuster

If Trump had the name Obama and was a democrat…..his National Emergency would have passed with no controversy. Period.

MST3K
Member
Trusted Member
MST3K

Tom Cotton, the real conservative leader in the Senate.

kong1967
Member
Noble Member
kong1967

Using facts and common sense doesn’t hold water with Congressmen. More times than not they are driven by party power and self interest than they are by the interest of the American people.

New West
Member
Active Member
New West

He speaks rarely, but when he does, he’s spot on.

msliberty
Member
Noble Member
msliberty

Tillis just changed his mind!

nc checks and balances
Member
Noble Member
nc checks and balances

What? Wow!!!

msliberty
Member
Noble Member
msliberty

He said that he received so many calls from his constituents wanting him to support Trump, so he listened to them instead.

nc checks and balances
Member
Noble Member
nc checks and balances

Nice!

sjmom
Member
Noble Member
sjmom

Good speech by Cotton. At least some people realize there’s a crisis at the border.

msliberty
Member
Noble Member
msliberty

Tom Cotton is always great & to the point. clapping clapping clapping Now can he convince his fellow R’s!

Tracy
Member
Trusted Member
Tracy

Cruz voted against resolution.

Tracy
Member
Trusted Member
Tracy

And Sasse!

nc checks and balances
Member
Noble Member
nc checks and balances

He didn’t either.

nc checks and balances
Member
Noble Member
nc checks and balances

TracyTracy No he didn’t, thank God.

Tracy
Member
Trusted Member
Tracy

Yes he did, he voted against the resolution, and stood with Trump and the voters who want a wall.

nc checks and balances
Member
Noble Member
nc checks and balances

Sorry, Tracy, I’ve been out all day, I got confused. You are right. I only knew that Cruz and Sasse voted the “right” way with Trump. facepalmg

Tracy
Member
Trusted Member
Tracy

Yeah it’s confusing that to be for Trump you vote against this smile

nc checks and balances
Member
Noble Member
nc checks and balances

It’s the DC Way!!!

EWizzyEJDSon
Member
Active Member
EWizzyEJDSon

Trump is totally right about the National Emergency at the border. It’s nice to see Cotton is on board with the issue, and sees things for what they are. Partisan Politics aside, I see Trump taking this act as the next step towards restoring our country to greatness. I would like to see policies in place to discourage illegals for invading here, and thereby increasing American Citizens’ prosperity.

Ciceroni Excogitatoris
Member
Trusted Member
Ciceroni Excogitatoris

I was expecting Cruz and Lee to give this kind of speech defending US borders and using the National Emergency Statute to protect US sovereignty but the Koch brothers gave them a call…

COTTON for POTUS 2024!

Michelle Lee
Member
Active Member
Michelle Lee

Cotton is good on immigration. He introduced the RAISE Act with Senator Perdue back in 2017 that would have cut legal immigration in half. Unfortunately it went nowhere.

CalvinCool
Member
Member
CalvinCool

Cruz is firmly opposed to illegal immigration and a solid Constitutionalist. His voting record isn’t perfect (at 82% conservative lately) but it’s better than Tom Cotton’s (74%). And no one can beat his steel sharp mind and incredible debating skills. Sticking with Cruz in 2024. You’ve been pissing on Cruz for years anyway.

Ciceroni Excogitatoris
Member
Trusted Member
Ciceroni Excogitatoris

Well, where’s his speech defending the protection of US sovereignty and its borders? It took him veeeeeeeeeery long to come out and say something on this matter. Immigration is the issue we’re dealing with right now and Cotton, with his RAISE Act and speech, tells me he’s not afraid of the Koch Brothers.

Chow Yun Fatty
Member
Active Member
Chow Yun Fatty

It’s AIPAC they’re afraid of. Not the Kochs.

SkeeterN
Member
Member
SkeeterN

We have never secured the border for decades while talking a great deal about doing so. The reason is that it is not just the democrats who are for open borders but the chamber of commerce wing of the republican party who wants the cheap labor.

Abe Lincoln
Member
Active Member
Abe Lincoln

Yep! money over security and that’s the cancer within the right that is destroying us from within.

AT
Member
Active Member
AT

I truly believe that there would be a lot less room for debate or disagreement on this subject had Donald not gone down this road after his failure to win over Congress.

That’s what taints it with the stink of impropriety. Not the action itself, but that it’s tied to his failures as a President.

I don’t disagree with any of Cotton’s points. I personally feel, like many of you, that we’ve had an undeclared emergency at the border for a long time. But the fact that it was undeclared is the problem. And the fact that it was only declared in direct response to Trump negotiation failures is what makes it problematic.

Abe Lincoln
Member
Active Member
Abe Lincoln

And if he didn’t wait and acted right away, a greater number will complain that he is bypassing Congress–the people’s representatives. There is no winning with Democrats/RINOs. He just needs to do what is legally right and ignore the static coming from the left (including right-left)

AT
Member
Active Member
AT

Doesn’t that mean that there’s no winning with Americans? I mean, they’re the ones who voted Democrat/RINO. The American people said they want it. They said, “I want that person to represent me in Congress.” Congress saying, “We don’t want a wall,” is in fact Americans saying, “WE don’t want a wall.”

That’s on us, Abe. That’s on our failure to vote for what we actually want, rather than vote against what we don’t want. It’s just like Obamacare. We (claimed to have) said no. Congress did it anyway. And then we rewarded them with re-election. What kind of message does that send?

There’s no winning with Democrats/RINOs, but we keep electing them. Trump “ignoring the static” is in fact Trump ignoring the People. Maybe he’s going to do that because the People are too dumb/cowardly to do what’s best for themselves.

But then that’s a leftist mentality, isn’t it.

Tracy
Member
Trusted Member
Tracy

So the problem isnt the spiteful display of Dems, denying money for a wall even tho any reasonable person could see the border is a humanitarian crisis.

Its Trump.

Covfefe
Member
Active Member
Covfefe

That’s a problem. But Trump is a problem too. He had two years where the GOP controlled the entire Congress. The spiteful Dems were powerless to stop him, yet he did nothing. That’s his fault. He’s had three years of constant attacks from the Democrats to teach him that they can not be negotiated with. He should never have bothered and went straight for the National Emergency. He didn’t. That’s his fault. When he tried to play hard ball with the Dems over the shutdown, he claimed that he would “be proud” to shut down the government, and that it could go on for “months” or “years”. To his credit, he had one of the longest shutdowns in history. But he caved to the pressure, and signed a bill that not only gave him less money for the wall than was initially offered, but even had backdoor amnesty. That is… Read more »

Ciceroni Excogitatoris
Member
Trusted Member
Ciceroni Excogitatoris

False. You needed 60 votes to get anything done on immigration. Btw, the checkered-pant Republicans don’t want to do anything about immigration because the Koch brothers say so…

Tracy
Member
Trusted Member
Tracy

CovfefeCovfefe I agree Trump missed his chance. He surrounded himself with people who are not serious about our border and let Paul Ryan string him along for two years that the wall fight will be “next time”

He sure was an idiot.

But that doesnt change the fact that the border is a crisis. Even if Trump is the only person in DC that wants to fix it.

And they call him a dictator and tyrant. Sheesh, he is stopped at every turn, and meanwhile the chaos continues at the border

Sonofagip
Member
Active Member
Sonofagip

This is true. The biggest problem with this presidency is Trump is as slow as a snail in molasses. It took him 2 years to finally veto a spending bill that didn’t have border wall funding because he was afraid to stand up to the Republican Congress the previous two years. Even his national emergency is moving slowly. Instead of just building the wall a month ago using the military, he is waiting for the Senate to do something. And after the Senate is finished, is he going to wait another 6 months for the courts to weigh in?

AT
Member
Active Member
AT

Congress is just representing the will of their Constituents who voted for them. The reason we divide the legislature into a House and Senate is so that individual communities/states can have more of a voice than the national one that determines the President.

The President is the general interest. The Legislature is the more specific interests. Generally, we want border security. Specifically, we don’t want a wall.

At least, that’s how Americans voted insofar as choosing their Representatives. Trump failed to convince Congress, and the People, to build a wall. Yea, that’s on him.

Back to the drawing board, Donald. Come up with a new idea to pitch to Congress/the People.

Covfefe
Member
Active Member
Covfefe

If this goes to court the fact that he didn’t feel the need to declare the emergency earlier, paired with the fact that he literally admitted he only did this to get around Congress, will not help him.

AT
Member
Active Member
AT

Yes, I agree. I agree so much that I suspect it’ll be the basis for a holding against the emergency, which ultimately distinguishes it from all the other declared emergencies.

Ciceroni Excogitatoris
Member
Trusted Member
Ciceroni Excogitatoris

False. If you believe Schumer, Durbin and the RINOs could be “won over” on this immigration issue, you’re living in the Land of Oz. I’m glad Trump used the National Emergency statute to protect US sovereignty and its borders, as opposed to using it to protect Rwanda.

AT
Member
Active Member
AT

Then maybe Donald needs to take his case to the people who voted for Schumer, Durbin, and the RINOs. Get them to make better choices at the poll.

That’s the way it’s supposed to work, Cic. He’s not King of America. Neither was Barack. Much as they both seem to think otherwise.

Ciceroni Excogitatoris
Member
Trusted Member
Ciceroni Excogitatoris

Yeah, he should go tell the people of Illinois and New York to vote for a conservative!!

Maybe threatening to withhold Federal funds to those states may work? Who knows!?

AT
Member
Active Member
AT

Flipping New York and Illinois would be pretty impressive. I’m told he’s a great negotiator.

But he doesn’t necessarily have to do that. Simply convincing them that they’re too extreme in the face of the issues we’re dealing with, to pull back on the progressivism and push more for the classical liberalism, would work too.

Ciceroni Excogitatoris
Member
Trusted Member
Ciceroni Excogitatoris

You would negotiate with folks like AOC, Ilhan Omar, and Rashad Tlaib? LOL

If the Left needs convincing about the issues at the border; human smuggling, drug trafficking, child prostitution rings, etc., you’re living once again in the Land of Oz. The Left cares more about future voters… it’s that simple to them.

AT
Member
Active Member
AT

No no no, negotiate with their voters. Try to help their voters see why these folks are crazy people, and to turn to classical leftists over socialists.

I saw a youtube video a while back of college students changing their mind on the GND once someone explained exactly what it was. If some guy with a microphone can do that, surely the President can make the effort too.

Tracy
Member
Trusted Member
Tracy

Hm. I like him more and more. Excellent points!

Sentinel
Member
Noble Member
Sentinel

I’m still wondering why some senators are voting with and some are voting against Trump’s solution. I realize there’s a LOT of misinformation floating around (I’ve been a victim to it myself)… but it should be CRYSTAL clear if what Trump wants to do is legal and constitutional or not. People who I have trusted before, claim it isn’t and some claim it is. And when some republicans vote with democrats, that’s almost always a very bad thing (red flag)! Why aren’t republicans united and in line with Trump is it’s all good? Other than they obviously want porous borders. This is crap that some support it and some don’t for their own perceived “right” reasons. There’s only one truth here and yet republicans are fragmented?

For the record, I don’t consider Collins or Murkowski to be republicans.

SheerPolitics
Member
Active Member
SheerPolitics

You need to follow the money. Who’s funding these guys? That will tell you why they suddenly vote contrary to their normal record.

SkeeterN
Member
Member
SkeeterN

You nailed it!

Ronbo
Member
Active Member
Ronbo

The crisis is that the Democrats would lose illegal votes so they can’t let it happen. They no longer care about blacks, Jews, or the union worker.
Opportunistic filth all of them.

SheerPolitics
Member
Active Member
SheerPolitics

And republicans want cheap labor.

Back to Top of Comments