Migrants STORM border crossing, BREAK down gate, FORCE their way through

This is straight from the Associated Press, so spare us any attempt to call it paranoia. This is a real thing that happened.

On Friday, “a group of about 350 migrants broke the locks on a gate” and “forced their way” across a border as they made their way here. Hopefully they aren’t headed for a “Sanctuary City” because word is they’re all full up and not interested in new, foreign residents making them, in Cory Booker’s words, “unsafe.”

That border, by the way, is the one between Guatemala and Mexico. Those migrants are in a caravan, and they’re headed here. But if you think it makes a difference as to their intent or intensity that it wasn’t the U.S. border, I urge you to think again.



Here is the most relevant portion of the AP story:

Mexican authorities said a group of about 350 migrants broke the locks on a gate at the Guatemalan border Friday and forced their way into southern Mexico to join a larger group of migrants trying to make their way toward the United States.
The National Immigration Institute did not identify the nationalities of the migrants, but they are usually from Central America.

Remind you of anything?

The liberal line is that fearing a large migrant caravan is somehow racist or evil. What they don’t take into account is that any large group of desperate people facing opposition or obstacles can turn violent really quickly. There’s literally a phrase for it. “Mob Mentality.”

Even if you believe that the best course of action is to remove all obstacles, ie borders, you should STILL recognize that these caravans are a real and dangerous thing, and that danger is growing.

Here’s a little more, from the AP.

The group of 350 pushed past police guarding the bridge and joined a larger group of about 2,000 migrants who are walking toward Tapachula in the latest caravan to enter Mexico.

Claudia Jaqueline Sandoval, 43, from El Progreso, Honduras, was walking toward Tapachula with her 6-year-old daughter. Another son and a daughter are already in the United States.

“I have been HIV positive for 16 years,” said Sandoval, but her reason for going north was not just medical treatment. “It has been two years since I heard from my son” in the United States, and money is scarce, she said.

There are already several groups of migrants in the southern border state of Chiapas who have expressed frustration at Mexico’s policy of slowing or stopping the process of handing out humanitarian and exit visas at the border.

It’s what some might call a “crisis” or “emergency.” You know?

Comment Policy: Please read our comment policy before making a comment. In short, please be respectful of others and do not engage in personal attacks. Otherwise we will revoke your comment privileges.

200 thoughts on “Migrants STORM border crossing, BREAK down gate, FORCE their way through

  1. MIGRANTS my behind! These people display criminal behavior to get what they want. So when they get here, do they break into a store because it’s closed and all they wanted was a soda and a sammich? And by all means, bring us your HIV positive ‘migrants’, cuz we really need some place to dump all that health care funding that’s just lying around, going to waste. 😡 :exclamation:

    1. You got that right Doc, time to rev up the MINUTEMEN and send them on down. We can clearly see it will take the patriotic citizenry to deal with this.

      1. @dr-strangelove I like you, doc, but who appointed you the keeper of the vote? Who knows if this is sarcasm or not?

        Sarcasm should always be posted as “/s” as it can’t be determined definitively, otherwise. Notice that comment didn’t receive any upvotes, either.

        There are many out there who mean their comments, too. Attacks by NT and Democrats come in all forms. Further attacks are not welcome, especially when real people (like me and Lillie) are suffering the real effects in far more ways than you in IL. Thanks. @lillie-belle

        1. So you’re saying that I’m not entitled to my opinion? “Move along, nothing to see here.” is very commonly used to indicate sarcasm. And I don’t live in Illinois.

          1. @dr-strangelove Don’t put words in my mouth. You attacked me for my opinion expressed by my vote on the comment. I’m calling you on it. You want to help that commentor make better posts, then explain the worldwide internet approved method of showing sarcasm: “/s”.

            Don’t attack me for my opinion and right to downvote anyone. You talk about IL all the time, that is why I said that.

  2. Gatling gun the mother f*’s. The mentality that they think they can invade someone else’s land disgusts me to no end.

  3. Wait wait,that is one of our newest fences.No one could ever breach those fences.Tell me it Ain’t so,Shoeless Joe..I would like to Big Sir,but no one would believe me.

    1. Didn’t read the article bs74?
      “That border, by the way, is the one between Guatemala and Mexico.”

    2. @bigsir74
      No, the photo is misleading. it’s one from the US & doesn’t apply to the story at all, not even a gate.

      No photo provided of the broken gate in Guatemala, but if the gates are anything like those on our border, it would be a joke.

  4. Yeah, ‘forced their way’. The Mexican authorities were just helpless! This happened Friday? First I’m hearing about it. WHAT a shock.

  5. Anybody hear Pansy Graham on Fox with Maria this morning!? It was pretty good but hoping he can actually get it done. He wants to get some legislation to deal with immigrants getting to stay here just because they bring a child & asylum issues.

    Here is the youtube video of him:

    1. One thing about Graham,he knows any legislation He proposes can not get through the Congress

      1. And what have you got to say about people like you that have made comments at this site wishing harm on police officers?

      2. No one cares, and you’re not needed to. I’m just glad I didn’t have to serve with too many people like you.

          1. Murder is homicide with no extenuating circumstances.

            You can decide for yourself what rises to an extenuating circumstance. But invasion is not so easily dismissed, armed or otherwise.

            1. Seriously Bob? You too?

              Intentional killing of a human being with malice aforesight. That’s murder. And that’s shamefully, disgustingly what’s being discussed here. Not self-defense. Not by a f*cking longshot.

              1. Not self-defense. ”

                Once again, I’m awfully glad you are not charged with anything having to do with defense.

                You are simply wrong on this.

                I’m not supporting shoot first, but you seem to believe someone else’s life takes precedence over others. That’s bullshit.

      3. @atomicsentinel You (or a carvan of crazed usurpers) break into my home-you’re leaving in a body bag. It’s called protecting your home, whether it be a brick and mortar structure or a country! People like you… EOD

        1. But we’re not talking about breaking into homes. It’s in no way the same thing or in any way relatable.

          1. @AT The United States of America is my home. I completely disagree with you on this. I’m not condoning murder, AT. I do support using the military and force. We protect everyone else around the globe. We should protect ourselves here and honor our laws!

            I’m condoning protecting my way of life. My job. My ability to raise my kids in a country that has a shared common language and rallies around what made this country the most powerful and, at the same time, benevolent nation on earth–the Constitution. It’s not being followed in any respect and certainly, not with this immigration situation. That is not debatable.

            1. We protect everyone else around the globe. We should protect ourselves here and honor our laws!

              Not by gunning down civilians we don’t.

              I’m condoning protecting my way of life.

              If murdering civilians is what you want to turn America into then we damn well deserve to be conquered.

              Is “inalienable rights to life, liberty, and property” a moral principle? Is our Constitution the greatest document ever drafted, and would the world be a better place if it applied to every single man woman and child on the planet? Because if so, then you’re chucking it out the window when you suggest these people should be murdered.

  6. We entered Iraq and Afghanistan in shooting wars based on national security. I’d don’t see why we can’t enter Central America with our military (minus the shooting) based on national security. Shut down the caravans before they have a chance to waltz right into Mexico bound for the US.
    Liberal heads will by such a move but at this point I don’t give a damn and the US needs to show the world that we mean business. Enough is enough.

    1. What we could have been doing for the last 2+ years is choking off any money to organizations and individuals who are organizing the caravans, funding their efforts, and training the future illegals in how to skate immigration law.

      We already have laws, methods, and the intel necessary to go after them. Since 9/11, we’ve become undisputed extra-huge superpower at using the world financial system to attack adversaries. The question to ask is why haven’t we used these tools against the organizations and individuals behind the caravans?

      Without money, logistics, and organization, none of the caravans would have ever started.

  7. How about a photo of the gate at Guatemala & the actual photo of the migrants when this happened? It is available & is NOTHING like the above.

      1. @atomicsentinel
        We’re becoming the left…who knew?

        A reasonable solution of 5-6 secured containment camps along the border with all necessities supplied & have lawyers, judges, etc go there. It’s been done before. Needs a big increase of Temporary Judges to handle the 809,000 backlog.

        Or, just close the damn border for 7-8 months to everyone except commercial traffic.

        I said the other day, very few posters can think for themselves, it’s a pack mentality.

        1. Hey, kinda like we did in Miami back in the 80s. Like, we already have a solution for this problem that works, and we just… don’t do it. For some reason. I don’t know. Let’s start killing everyone instead.

          FFS.

          1. @atomicsentinel
            It’s truly mind boggling. And what’s even more amazing, posters can’t see it, don’t recognize it, & will deny it with every excuse in the book.

            Two years ago I don’t remember comments like this….maybe my memory is going. Lol

            The last 10 years of Leadership has made a huge change in public attitude & unfortunately very little of it good.

    1. That’s sick. You’re talking about opening fire on a group of unarmed human beings. What the hell is wrong with everyone, have you all lost your minds?!

      Yes. This is a problem. It needs a solution. That solution is NOT mass murder. What the f*ck people.

      1. 1. They stopped being migrants when they stormed the fence.
        2. They are not unarmed, have YOU ever been hit in the face with a rock? I still bear a scar from 30 years ago.
        3. They aren’t migrants. These groups are made up of mostly men of fighting age. They want to storm our borders waving their nation’s flags and don’t want to assimilate.
        What the f*ck is wrong with YOU?!?! You have your head so far up your behind you can’t understand what a danger this present to our country in far more ways than your tiny narrow mind can generate answers to. I can clearly see that you have never faced fight or flight. You’ve never faced anything more dangerous than a sink full of bloody dishes. You sound like a blithering buffoon.

        1. I didn’t say migrants. I said unarmed human beings.

          Rocks are not arms that require guns in response.

          I didn’t say migrants. I said unarmed human beings.

          I can understand the problem just fine. MASS MURDER is not the solution to it. What in all the f*cks is going through your skulls?

          1. It’s quite clear that you are just a child flailing around making noise trying to stay relevant. So in your tiny, narrow vision, there is no migrants? There are no gang members in those groups, there are no M.E. men which are actually terrorists in those groups. They’re all just innocent, harmless human beings right? For the love of God you are beyond the realm of pale naive and ignorant.

            1. They’re all just innocent, harmless human beings right?

              Until proven guilty, yes. That’s a bedrock American principle.

              But f that kill ’em all, right?

              1. What part of, “They are storming the border fence” do you not comprehend? That right there makes them guilty of invasion. Try that on many other countries and you DO get shot. Give it a rest, your logic needs well, MORE LOGIC cause there isn’t any there.

                1. Ok, if you’re so intellectually enlightened, enlighten us. What next? Let them invade? Let them infiltrate our country and spend our limited resources on them while our own citizens, many veterans who’ve fought, bled and gave their sanity for freedom die on the streets homeless? Is that your answer?

  8. MIGRANTS my behind! These people display criminal behavior to get what they want. So when they get here, do they break into a store because it’s closed and all they wanted was a soda and a sammich? And by all means, bring us your HIV positive ‘migrants’, cuz we really need some place to dump all that health care funding that’s just lying around, going to waste. 😡 :exclamation:

    1. That’s sick. You’re talking about opening fire on a group of unarmed human beings. What the hell is wrong with everyone, have you all lost your minds?!

      Yes. This is a problem. It needs a solution. That solution is NOT mass murder. What the f*ck people.

    1. You got that right Doc, time to rev up the MINUTEMEN and send them on down. We can clearly see it will take the patriotic citizenry to deal with this.

      1. @dr-strangelove I like you, doc, but who appointed you the keeper of the vote? Who knows if this is sarcasm or not?

        Sarcasm should always be posted as “/s” as it can’t be determined definitively, otherwise. Notice that comment didn’t receive any upvotes, either.

        There are many out there who mean their comments, too. Attacks by NT and Democrats come in all forms. Further attacks are not welcome, especially when real people (like me and Lillie) are suffering the real effects in far more ways than you in IL. Thanks. @lillie-belle

        1. So you’re saying that I’m not entitled to my opinion? “Move along, nothing to see here.” is very commonly used to indicate sarcasm. And I don’t live in Illinois.

          1. @dr-strangelove Don’t put words in my mouth. You attacked me for my opinion expressed by my vote on the comment. I’m calling you on it. You want to help that commentor make better posts, then explain the worldwide internet approved method of showing sarcasm: “/s”.

            Don’t attack me for my opinion and right to downvote anyone. You talk about IL all the time, that is why I said that.

                1. @dr-strangelove Thank you. It’s more polite than what I had in mind to that inane comment about hemorrhoids, which was “how Alinsky of you. Attack with some ad hominem comment when you have lost the argument.” Have a nice day.

              1. Morning Doc, pay these retreads no mind. They’re so full of themselves that they are clueless of the rest of the world. They will find themselves on the short end of the dock that is on the lake of fire soon enough my brother! Have a nice day.

                1. Yep. @golfcartone
                  Doc was just giving a general heads-up on the sarcasm. He didn’t attack you. You guys would probably agree 98% of the time.

                2. @K-Bob

                  To be clear: I said he attacked me for my opinion, in response to his question of expressing his opinion. I pointed out that my up/down vote is an expression of my opinion, which he called out. Then he went on to use his insult. I told him to have a nice day.

                  He has no business calling anyone out on their votes, then questioning whether or not he’s entitled to his opinion.

                  This isn’t the first time Doc has decided he needed to call me out. He did so months ago when this site was on Disqus. I was looking at coming back to this site, shortly after it broke apart. I made a comment about Beto and his DWI. He felt the need to tell me he was a recovering alcoholic. I told him he (doc) wasn’t running for the Senate in Texas. His response: “Bless your pea picking brain.” is what the guy said. My comment was my own stand alone comment. I didn’t even mention Doc. Didn’t even know him. Why was he defending Beto? Never did figure that out. I just thought the guy was a remaining vestage of the NT infestation here (ie quasi Democrat). He also corrected me on something a few weeks ago telling me to remember the 2A. In my comment, the 2A was the first thing I mentioned, being a pro 2A recently retired cop! Pardon the helloutta me if I’m a little sick of his opinion on what I say and do.

                  Meh! I guess I’ll get my verbiage approved by you before I post first. I get it. He can call anyone else out but no one else can make an argument opposing him. Tired of the way the favorites game is played here. Screw it. EOD

      1. And what have you got to say about people like you that have made comments at this site wishing harm on police officers?

      2. @atomicsentinel You (or a carvan of crazed usurpers) break into my home-you’re leaving in a body bag. It’s called protecting your home, whether it be a brick and mortar structure or a country! People like you… EOD

        1. But we’re not talking about breaking into homes. It’s in no way the same thing or in any way relatable.

          1. @AT The United States of America is my home. I completely disagree with you on this. I’m not condoning murder, AT. I do support using the military and force. We protect everyone else around the globe. We should protect ourselves here and honor our laws!

            I’m condoning protecting my way of life. My job. My ability to raise my kids in a country that has a shared common language and rallies around what made this country the most powerful and, at the same time, benevolent nation on earth–the Constitution. It’s not being followed in any respect and certainly, not with this immigration situation. That is not debatable.

            1. We protect everyone else around the globe. We should protect ourselves here and honor our laws!

              Not by gunning down civilians we don’t.

              I’m condoning protecting my way of life.

              If murdering civilians is what you want to turn America into then we damn well deserve to be conquered.

              Is “inalienable rights to life, liberty, and property” a moral principle? Is our Constitution the greatest document ever drafted, and would the world be a better place if it applied to every single man woman and child on the planet? Because if so, then you’re chucking it out the window when you suggest these people should be murdered.

                1. No. We don’t. But let’s tease your idea out even more.

                  Why stop at gunning them down? How about, if they make it to the border, we round them up and put them on trains to take them to a special Camp where they can Concentrate on whether or not they should have tried to illegally enter the nation. We’ll need to keep track of them though, so maybe we can put some kind of tattoo or something on them. And some kind of patch on their vest, so we can identify where they came from. And then… well, let’s keep that part under wraps for now.

                  You’re right. This is a real problem. Given your stance so far, I can’t see why you would disagree with a Solution that’s Final.

      3. No one cares, and you’re not needed to. I’m just glad I didn’t have to serve with too many people like you.

          1. Murder is homicide with no extenuating circumstances.

            You can decide for yourself what rises to an extenuating circumstance. But invasion is not so easily dismissed, armed or otherwise.

              1. “Mexican agents should have fired on them.”

                How is that OK in your head? You said it, psycho. Not me.

            1. Seriously Bob? You too?

              Intentional killing of a human being with malice aforesight. That’s murder. And that’s shamefully, disgustingly what’s being discussed here. Not self-defense. Not by a f*cking longshot.

              1. Not self-defense. ”

                Once again, I’m awfully glad you are not charged with anything having to do with defense.

                You are simply wrong on this.

                I’m not supporting shoot first, but you seem to believe someone else’s life takes precedence over others. That’s bullshit.

                1. I believe nothing of the sort. I will not prioritize lives as if some are somehow more worthy than others, such that we should choose to “defend” one by killing the other. FFS, if that’s your position, then go all-in on abortion. Imminent threat of harm? Fine. But stop pretending that’s what this is. Or make an argument for it.

                  These sadistic SOBs – who I used to respect because I used to believe they were conservatives – are talking about killing swaths of unarmed civilians. If that’s what America is now, then just what the hell are we even defending? Not our values, that’s for damn sure.

                2. But stop pretending that’s what this is

                  You are pretending no harm comes from invasion. It’s exactly how communists justify forcing you to accept people moving in to your house.

                  No dice. You’d never be able to pass a Castle Doctrine test.

                  You need to understand the force continuum, and you need to understand general security. Clue: it ain’t about feelings.

                  talking about killing swaths of unarmed civilians.

                  No. You are the one talking about that. Somehow you confuse “opening fire” with mass slaughter. It’s your go-to tactic: take a proposition that has clear relative meaning, and yank it all the way to a ridiculous absolute.

                3. You are pretending no harm comes from invasion.

                  It’s not a harm that should be responded to with lethal force, that’s for sure.

                  It’s exactly how communists justify forcing you to accept people moving in to your house.

                  That’s a property right violation.

                  No. You are the one talking about that. Somehow you confuse “opening fire” with mass slaughter.

                  How pedantic. OK, so what you’re just going to snipe a few at random? How will you choose who stays alive and who gets put in the dirt? Do we just keep killing them until the rest turn around?

                4. How pedantic

                  Reason is not “pedantic.” It actually means something, unlike your extreme interpretations of intent.

                  Your emotional appeal is just like gun grabbers who portray gun owners as paranoid agressives just itching for a chance to kill someone.

                  It says more about you than it does about the situation or the facts involved. This is why logic is a better tool for analysis here.

    1. No, that’s not true. Donald said.

      When he said he wasn’t going to close the southern border because that’s insane (a position I did not always hold, btw, because minds CAN be changed with reason!), he was all like, Mexico is totally stopping them now. ARE YOU CALLING MY ORANGE GOD A LIAR?! ARE YOU!?

        1. @desireeodey
          My daddy said a beers are OK
          But that wine is just no good
          It’ll make you do things you shouldn’t
          And forget the things you should
          – Siegal-Schwall

          1. No evidence of “totally” in there.

            Do you *ever* knock it off with the moral equivalence and pretending-relative-adjectives-are-absolutes garbage?

            Just curious.

            1. It was slang. Valley girl slang, as evidenced with the prefix of “he was all like,” because I was mocking the notion that Mexico has done jack squat. Feel free to replace it with “hella” or “like a boss.”

  9. We entered Iraq and Afghanistan in shooting wars based on national security. I’d don’t see why we can’t enter Central America with our military (minus the shooting) based on national security. Shut down the caravans before they have a chance to waltz right into Mexico bound for the US.
    Liberal heads will by such a move but at this point I don’t give a damn and the US needs to show the world that we mean business. Enough is enough.

    1. What we could have been doing for the last 2+ years is choking off any money to organizations and individuals who are organizing the caravans, funding their efforts, and training the future illegals in how to skate immigration law.

      We already have laws, methods, and the intel necessary to go after them. Since 9/11, we’ve become undisputed extra-huge superpower at using the world financial system to attack adversaries. The question to ask is why haven’t we used these tools against the organizations and individuals behind the caravans?

      Without money, logistics, and organization, none of the caravans would have ever started.

  10. These caravans or any large groups cannot come without the organized support of interested groups. They need food, water, bathrooms, medical attention, etc. They cannot do it “organically.”

    @golfcartone below mentioned Glenn Beck doing some great work uncovering this. You can see it on his YouTube channel.

    I think Rush also mentioned it too (I only heard a little bit of him). Hopefully others will corroborate this.

    These caravans are part of an organized invasion, taking advantage of the migrants and not caring how much they exploit them for their own evil ends. If only they would put their efforts into cleaning up the corruption into the migrants’ home countries.

      1. @rick Soros @nc-checks-and-balances

        I made this comment the other day on a different thread:

        Soros is an enemy of the State actively attempting to overthrow the laws of this land. He has pledged allegiance to a communist foreign power, the EU, yet retains American citizenship.

        He and his son (co-conspirator) should be arrested. Tried for treason. Citizenship revoked and thrown in solitary confinement for the rest of their life.

        The government should use the Patriot Act to protect this nation from enemies, foreign and domestic. George Soros is Enemy #1.

        1. He is a wanted man in England for breaking the bank of England a long time ago. I believe other countries want him too. I don’ know why we haven’t extradited him.

    1. @nc-checks-and-balances Man, thanks for the mention and the youtube info. It’s hard for me to keep up with Rush, Beck, my local talkers, law school and TRS. So quick links on where to find info is really helpful. Cheers!

  11. Glenn Beck says all these caravans are funded by a communist group in Chicago. I hope DoJ is investigating this claim.

      1. @debw Yep. I didn’t include Soros because he’s behind everything and we all know this. His power base is growing. He is Enemy #1 against America’s survival.

          1. @democratsrfubar A few years back, Soros specifically said “He enjoys dabbling in revolutions around the world.” He enjoys turning countries upside down, inside out. He’s a true Marxist, Fubar.

            1. Yes. He had a great deal to do with breaking the British pound and other dealings in Hungary with the universities as reported in Forbes.. Evil, evil man.

  12. Gatling gun the mother f*’s. The mentality that they think they can invade someone else’s land disgusts me to no end.

  13. Wait wait,that is one of our newest fences.No one could ever breach those fences.Tell me it Ain’t so,Shoeless Joe..I would like to Big Sir,but no one would believe me.

    1. Didn’t read the article bs74?
      “That border, by the way, is the one between Guatemala and Mexico.”

    2. @bigsir74
      No, the photo is misleading. it’s one from the US & doesn’t apply to the story at all, not even a gate.

      No photo provided of the broken gate in Guatemala, but if the gates are anything like those on our border, it would be a joke.

  14. Anybody hear Pansy Graham on Fox with Maria this morning!? It was pretty good but hoping he can actually get it done. He wants to get some legislation to deal with immigrants getting to stay here just because they bring a child & asylum issues.

    Here is the youtube video of him:

    1. One thing about Graham,he knows any legislation He proposes can not get through the Congress

  15. She’s HIV positive?!?!?

    Most countries have strict rules regarding allowing entry to people with communicable diseases. In many cases, visitors are responsible for reporting an illness or answering a questionnaire, but throughout Asia and Africa there are health screening checkpoints in many international airports.

    Walk off the plane in Manila (and scores of other airports), and officials use IR cameras to spot anybody with a fever **before** the immigration checkpoint. If you look sick or your temp is high, health officials pull you aside and you can be denied entry.

    Many countries, even many developing countries, require VISA applicants (if the stay is for more than a tourist trip) to pass a medical exam.

    …but this Honduran will waltz into the US without any health screening, while carrying a deadly communicable disease.

      1. Her disease will likely be the basis for her asylum application. She’ll claim, as a “social group,” HIV positive people are persecuted and discriminated against in Honduras. She’ll probably be successful and then the word will go out, “If you’re HIV positive, free pass into America.”

    1. @txgrunner
      When these migrants enter our country, they should all be isolated in secure long term detention camps located at the border. They could set up 5 or 6 camps with all the necessities they need. All the processors, Judges, etc could go there.

      Feb 15th – Trumps Speech

      $415M will go toward addressing the humanitarian crisis at the border by providing medical care, transportation, processing centers, and consumables

      1. My only quibble with “When these migrants [illegals] enter our country…” is the illegals should never be let in our country in the first place. [I’m sure you agree; you’re just pointing out the best way given they will be coming regardless].

        This whole thing just infuriates me. I know several people — upstanding people with good jobs, a family, and a home — that were denied entry to the US just to visit. I know others who were turned down for student VISAs even though they pre-paid the schools and others who spent 2-3 years trying to navigate the byzantine K VISA process for a fiance/spouse. That doesn’t even include all the folks who apply for the lottery.

        They follow the rules and get the shaft. Meanwhile, the illegals go to the front and get free medical care.

        1. @txgrunner
          Absolutely agree with you, that’s why I put “when” instead of “if”. There is NO doubt they will be welcomed in & Yes, it’s infuriating.

          It’s almost like Government has NO brains whatsoever. They are willingly destroying our country.

          I suggested the camps because it was done before…under Bush I think.

  16. I don’t think Mexico is trying very hard to keep them out…I believe that before Soros and company decided to flood the globe with migrants, you would end up in prison for a very long time if you Illegally crossed into Mexico….
    It’s quite apparent that if this is going to stop, it has to be the people. We need to figure out how to create masses of us. I still believe there are more of us than them. Do we all disagree on different things? Yes but in the end we all want our country back….

  17. Yeah, ‘forced their way’. The Mexican authorities were just helpless! This happened Friday? First I’m hearing about it. WHAT a shock.

  18. Great, coming here to get free treatment for her HIV. Glad we get to pay for that, too. These lowlifes have no business here. Leaches.

    1. No, that’s not true. Donald said.

      When he said he wasn’t going to close the southern border because that’s insane (a position I did not always hold, btw, because minds CAN be changed with reason!), he was all like, Mexico is totally stopping them now. ARE YOU CALLING MY ORANGE GOD A LIAR?! ARE YOU!?

        1. @desireeodey
          My daddy said a beers are OK
          But that wine is just no good
          It’ll make you do things you shouldn’t
          And forget the things you should
          – Siegal-Schwall

  19. These caravans or any large groups cannot come without the organized support of interested groups. They need food, water, bathrooms, medical attention, etc. They cannot do it “organically.”

    @golfcartone below mentioned Glenn Beck doing some great work uncovering this. You can see it on his YouTube channel.

    I think Rush also mentioned it too (I only heard a little bit of him). Hopefully others will corroborate this.

    These caravans are part of an organized invasion, taking advantage of the migrants and not caring how much they exploit them for their own evil ends. If only they would put their efforts into cleaning up the corruption into the migrants’ home countries.

      1. @rick Soros @nc-checks-and-balances

        I made this comment the other day on a different thread:

        Soros is an enemy of the State actively attempting to overthrow the laws of this land. He has pledged allegiance to a communist foreign power, the EU, yet retains American citizenship.

        He and his son (co-conspirator) should be arrested. Tried for treason. Citizenship revoked and thrown in solitary confinement for the rest of their life.

        The government should use the Patriot Act to protect this nation from enemies, foreign and domestic. George Soros is Enemy #1.

        1. He is a wanted man in England for breaking the bank of England a long time ago. I believe other countries want him too. I don’ know why we haven’t extradited him.

    1. @nc-checks-and-balances Man, thanks for the mention and the youtube info. It’s hard for me to keep up with Rush, Beck, my local talkers, law school and TRS. So quick links on where to find info is really helpful. Cheers!

  20. Glenn Beck says all these caravans are funded by a communist group in Chicago. I hope DoJ is investigating this claim.

      1. @debw Yep. I didn’t include Soros because he’s behind everything and we all know this. His power base is growing. He is Enemy #1 against America’s survival.

          1. @democratsrfubar A few years back, Soros specifically said “He enjoys dabbling in revolutions around the world.” He enjoys turning countries upside down, inside out. He’s a true Marxist, Fubar.

            1. Yes. He had a great deal to do with breaking the British pound and other dealings in Hungary with the universities as reported in Forbes.. Evil, evil man.

  21. She’s HIV positive?!?!?

    Most countries have strict rules regarding allowing entry to people with communicable diseases. In many cases, visitors are responsible for reporting an illness or answering a questionnaire, but throughout Asia and Africa there are health screening checkpoints in many international airports.

    Walk off the plane in Manila (and scores of other airports), and officials use IR cameras to spot anybody with a fever **before** the immigration checkpoint. If you look sick or your temp is high, health officials pull you aside and you can be denied entry.

    Many countries, even many developing countries, require VISA applicants (if the stay is for more than a tourist trip) to pass a medical exam.

    …but this Honduran will waltz into the US without any health screening, while carrying a deadly communicable disease.

    1. @txgrunner
      When these migrants enter our country, they should all be isolated in secure long term detention camps located at the border. They could set up 5 or 6 camps with all the necessities they need. All the processors, Judges, etc could go there.

      Feb 15th – Trumps Speech

      $415M will go toward addressing the humanitarian crisis at the border by providing medical care, transportation, processing centers, and consumables

      1. My only quibble with “When these migrants [illegals] enter our country…” is the illegals should never be let in our country in the first place. [I’m sure you agree; you’re just pointing out the best way given they will be coming regardless].

        This whole thing just infuriates me. I know several people — upstanding people with good jobs, a family, and a home — that were denied entry to the US just to visit. I know others who were turned down for student VISAs even though they pre-paid the schools and others who spent 2-3 years trying to navigate the byzantine K VISA process for a fiance/spouse. That doesn’t even include all the folks who apply for the lottery.

        They follow the rules and get the shaft. Meanwhile, the illegals go to the front and get free medical care.

        1. @txgrunner
          Absolutely agree with you, that’s why I put “when” instead of “if”. There is NO doubt they will be welcomed in & Yes, it’s infuriating.

          It’s almost like Government has NO brains whatsoever. They are willingly destroying our country.

          I suggested the camps because it was done before…under Bush I think.

      1. Her disease will likely be the basis for her asylum application. She’ll claim, as a “social group,” HIV positive people are persecuted and discriminated against in Honduras. She’ll probably be successful and then the word will go out, “If you’re HIV positive, free pass into America.”

  22. I don’t think Mexico is trying very hard to keep them out…I believe that before Soros and company decided to flood the globe with migrants, you would end up in prison for a very long time if you Illegally crossed into Mexico….
    It’s quite apparent that if this is going to stop, it has to be the people. We need to figure out how to create masses of us. I still believe there are more of us than them. Do we all disagree on different things? Yes but in the end we all want our country back….

  23. Great, coming here to get free treatment for her HIV. Glad we get to pay for that, too. These lowlifes have no business here. Leaches.

Comments are closed.