So here we go. The lawyer for Maria Butina, the Russian woman who was convicted of being a spy, says he can corroborate much of the bombshell claims from Patrick Byrne’s story.
OK, so now I’m confused. He seems to say that Byrne DID have sex with Butina, but he says he didn’t.
He says that Butina was NOT a spy, but he only says that this is in relation to Byrne’s statements. Also Byrne said that Butina was being groomed to the PRESIDENT OF RUSSIA. Nothing about that? OK.
“What he says about Maria is generally accurate…I can verify most of it!” he said.
Well OK then. Ingraham went incredibly soft on this interview, when there are clearly some incredibly important facts that Butina COULD clear up, but doesn’t. She even asks SOMEONE ELSE if it’s POSSIBLE that Comey sent Byrne. Why not ask Butina’s lawyer what he knows?! It’s all implication and hypotheticals and vague general terms. Just like everything else.
And Ingraham admits that Byrne has gone into hiding after his explosive interviews.
Here’s our post about what Byrne said in his other interviews.